HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
Andrew, Trainor, ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield
1325 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
asygo 29
Rick H 26
kland 16
November
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Member Spotlight
dedication
dedication
Canada
Posts: 6,705
Joined: April 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
9 registered members (TheophilusOne, dedication, daylily, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible), 2,513 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 56 of 71 1 2 54 55 56 57 58 70 71
Re: The Covenants [Re: kland] #107584
01/16/09 02:48 PM
01/16/09 02:48 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Kland, yes, I see Jesus doing things in the OT that He didn't do while He was here in the flesh. For example, in the OT He created a planet inhabited with plants, animals and people. He also employed the forces of nature and caused a wolrd-wide flood. He commanded Moses to stone people to death. Etc, etc, etc. Jesus did none of these things while here in the flesh.

Re: The Covenants [Re: Tom] #107585
01/16/09 03:38 PM
01/16/09 03:38 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: Tom
M: Can I assume, then, that you agree with my summarization of what you think about the angels? That is, they "incorrectly" expected God to wipe out the sinners instead of correctly expecting Him to send Jesus as a babe, and that they got this wrong idea from watching God employ the "withdraw and permit" method of causing death and destruction?

T: The angels had a misunderstanding here. They expected one thing but another happened. My point is that if even the angels were not understanding things correctly until the cross, because of Satan's sophistry, why should we think that men can do better?

What is it exactly about my summary of your view do you disagree with? I based it on things you posted here and elsewhere. Also, what about it do you agree with?

Quote:
M: Why not quote what she said? Why leave out key words? "All that man needs to know or can know of God has been revealed in the life and character of His Son." The phrase "needs to know or can know" to me means Jesus revealed only those traits and attributes of God that 1) we are capable of comprehending and that 2) we need to know to experience salvation.

T: Your idea limits she said significantly, to a very small subset of what her statement actually says.

On this we disagree. Please, in the future, do not quote this passage as if your view is right and mine is wrong and then try to prove something based on it. It is obvious Jesus did not reveal everything there is to know about God. He said so Himself.

Quote:
M: So, you believe the "withdraw and permit" method of causing death and destruction is God's "will and purpose", right?

T: Not necessarily, but possibly.

M:Please explain your answer.

T: Your question is pretty vague. I think what I had in mind is that in certain cases, such as in the 3SG passage, God could have a specific purpose or purposes in mind, such as those she pointed out, and other times not have such a specific purpose or purposes.

Are you suggesting we must look at each case individually to determine what God's "will and purpose" is, that one-size-fits-all does not apply?

Quote:
M: Is this what you think God's "will and purpose" is as described in 3SG 80, namely, to motivate sinners to choose life and not death?

T: Sure, this was a part of God's purpose. Wouldn't you agree? He could have some other purpose as well, but don't you think God would have wanted sinners to choose life and not death as a response to what He did?

M: I assume you are referring to the ones who watched them die. But what about the ones who died? What was God's "will and purpose" concerning them?

T: I think God had the same will for them, that they repent and be saved.

Can full-cup sinners repent and be saved after God employs the "withdraw and permit" method of killing them?

Quote:
M: Do you think we can substitute the word "God" for the word "justice" in the following sentence? "Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed.” If not, why not?

T: No, because I think it would convey a meaning which could be better expressed differently (Specifically, the quotes I've repeatedly presented of Fifield's in regards to what I understand this quote to mean conveys the thought well).
Is "justice" in this quote a sentient being? If not, what does it represent? Does it represent God or Satan or someone else?

[quote]T: The simplistic idea is that God has nothing to do with sustaining life, apart from providing a tree to eat from. MH 417 makes that clear.

M:On this point we disagree.

T: I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with here. Are you disagreeing that MH 417 says that God is not active in sustaining the life of man?

Please include everything I said about it.

Quote:
T: By "employ," I assume you mean manipulate or manage. In this case, God was using force.

M:I didn't use the word "manipulate".

T: You have in the past. "Micromanage" you've used as well.
"Employed" I understand to be synonymous with "made use of." This could be either active or passive.

God employs His enemies and the forces of nature to punish full-cup sinners. He manages the outcome of their choices to ensure a favorable end of the GC. Nothing is left to chance or Satan or sinners.

Re: The Covenants [Re: Tom] #107586
01/16/09 04:39 PM
01/16/09 04:39 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: Tom
T: No. Your reasoning here is bewildering to me. Can you explain it? That I'm not aware of any Scriptures explaining something doesn't mean anything in regards to my believing or not believing something. Why would you think it should?

M:Since you don’t know of any inspired passages that explain why God commanded Moses to kill the Sabbath-breaker and the blasphemer I assumed you disagreed with the view I posted above. My bad.

T: No, I don't disagree with your view because of some specific inspired text dealing with this specific instance, but on the basis of general principles that inspiration teaches.

M: Let me ask instead – Do you believe, as some do, that God was forced to commanded Moses to kill the Sabbath-breaker and the blasphemer to accommodate the ignorance and hardened hearts of Moses and the Jews, that He had to do it to retain their respect and attention long enough to show them the "right way"?

T: No. Who did you have in mind?

You have yet to explain why. Will you ever?

Quote:
T:I think your idea here is what is counter-intuitive. Everyday experience teaches us that there are decisions we make where one choice is as good as another. For example, which pair of socks you pick to wear.

M:But we’re not talking about shapes and socks. We’re talking about God.

T: No on both accounts. We're talking about choices. There's no reason to believe that God is always constrained to one choice. He could have more than one viable choice available to Him. There's no reason to suggest otherwise. The fact that God is perfect in no way implies that *choices* He might make must be limited. There could be more than one valid choice available. We can rightly assert that there is no *better* choice that God could make than what makes in a given circumstance, but not that there is no choice which is as good.

On this we disagree.

Quote:
M: Did you also miss the note? The apology was in the box you omitted.

T: What box did I omit? Could you repost it please?

That's the problem with leaving out aspects of the discussion.

Quote:
M: The quote in 3SG 80 is the focus on the question. I cannot omit it. You have not answered the new and improved question. Here it is again: Do you agree with me that God does indeed do these kinds of things [in the quote you omitted]?

T: He obviously did the things mentioned in 3SG 80 in the circumstances that quote referenced.

Thank you for answering my question.

Quote:
M: But you didn’t answer my question. Here it is again: Do you agree that everything God causes or permits is the result of His absolute perfect “will and purpose”? If not, does it mean you believe sometimes things get out of hand, that things happen that exceed His established limits and boundaries? If not, please explain what you do believe. Thank you.

T: No to both questions. Your question is based on an Augustinian paradigm, which is itself inspired by Hellenistic thought. The concept of "absolute perfection" that you referenced is Platonic. This would take quite a bit of time to explain adequately, which I cannot do right now. Basically you're assuming that everything that happens has a specific purpose on the part of God. But many things happen which are not God's will, nor something God permits for some specific purpose. They are just evil things which happen because evil beings choose to do these evil things. They do not occur because of some will or purpose of God.

However, that being said, in spite of these evil things which God permits to happen, against His will, God is able to accomplish His will and purpose. Thus God can make evil to accomplish His will and purpose even though the evil itself was not God's will or purpose.

I don't care one iota about the old timers you named above. Mentioning their names mean nothing to me. Nor do I believe God causes people to make evil choices or to evil things. What I do believe is that God manages the outcome of the choices they make to ensure the GC ends favorably. He establishes and enforces limits beyond which His enemies cannot pass.

Quote:
M: Does this mean you believe God sins every time He manifests jealousy?

T: Since God never sins, obviously the answer to this question is no, even without considering the assumption upon which it is based.

M:Are you implying, then, that sometimes the word “jealousy” doesn’t mean something sinful, that the immediate context determines whether acting or feeling jealous is sinful or not? Can sinners act or feel “jealous” without sinning?

T: No. The phrase "even without considering the assumption upon which it is based" makes clear this is not being implied.

I don't understand your answer. Do you believe the word "jealous" means something different in the case of God?

Quote:
M: So, you agree with me that Satan cannot exceed the limits enforced by God.

T: Obviously. How could this not be the case?

Thank you for answering my question.

Quote:
M: How does He enforce the limits? And, why? What does He do to prevent it and what does He do to permit it?

T: Regarding how, I know of no communication from God where He informs us how He does this. We know that force is not a principle of His government, so we can rule that out.

Regarding why, if He didn't, as I've stated a number of times, Satan would destroy everybody. As to preventing it, this looks to mean the same thing as "enforcing the limits." If so, I addressed these questions immediately above. If it means something else, you'd have to explain what.

Thank you for answering my question.

Quote:
M: Regarding the second part above. So, you do not believe it was God’s “will and purpose” for Peter, Paul, John, and Jesus to suffer and die the way they did?

T: No. It was Satan's will that they suffer and die the way they did.

Interesting.

Quote:
M: Why, then, did they suffer and die the way they did?

T: Because evil beings inspired and committed evil deeds.

Interesting.

Quote:
M: Did Satan exceed the limits established by God?

T: How would this be possible?

You tell me.

Quote:
M: If not, then please explain why they died the way they did.

T: Because evil beings did evil things.

Interesting.

Quote:
M: Why didn’t God intervene and prevent it from playing out the way it did?

T: This could be answered in respect to any bad thing that happens. When a child dies, this is a natural question. Why did God permit this to happen? On a case by case basis, I don't think we can know these types of questions until the judgment when we have access to all the information that God had access to when He made the decisions He made.

I agree.

Quote:
M: What were God’s limits in each of their cases?

T: What?

God establishes and enforces limits beyond which His enemies cannot go. Did the way they die exceed those limits?

Quote:
M: How did God envision them dying?

T: Not sure what you're asking here?

Everyone dies. Did they die in a way that exceeded His limits?

Quote:
M: Why didn’t He ensure it played out according to His “will and purpose”?

T: This gets back to the question I asked you above, which you didn't address. How can God force people to repent?

Why didn't God ensure that they (the people named above) died according to His "will and purpose"? Or, did He? Did He intend for them to die some other way? He intend for them to die of natural causes?

Re: The Covenants [Re: Mountain Man] #107589
01/16/09 05:42 PM
01/16/09 05:42 PM
K
kland  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2024

5500+ Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,512
Midland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, yes, I see Jesus doing things in the OT that He didn't do while He was here in the flesh. For example, in the OT He created a planet inhabited with plants, animals and people. He also employed the forces of nature and caused a wolrd-wide flood. He commanded Moses to stone people to death. Etc, etc, etc. Jesus did none of these things while here in the flesh.
Why?

Why, when He had good reason and was urged by others, did He not maim, kill, and torture men, women, and children?

You keep bringing up creation. He finished and rested. Why would you bring that up that He didn't create more -- that doesn't make sense to bring that up.

The world had already been flooded by removing His protection. Since the water had already reached its lowest point (the ocean), it would not flood again -- just like He promised. I don't know why you would you bring that up, either.

I mean, He didn't talk to Adam and Eve, either. But wouldn't you think that is non relevant to the topic being discussed?


But, why do you not think there was good reason for Him to stone people? In fact, He quite contradicted that idea.


WHY?


We're not talking about specific instances any more than all specific instances need be explicitly detailed in order to apply similar instances to His character. If Jesus was to represent His character, why do you see the apparent contradiction (contradiction based upon your responses)?

Re: The Covenants [Re: kland] #107591
01/16/09 08:32 PM
01/16/09 08:32 PM
Tom  Offline OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Quote:
M: Can I assume, then, that you agree with my summarization of what you think about the angels? That is, they "incorrectly" expected God to wipe out the sinners instead of correctly expecting Him to send Jesus as a babe, and that they got this wrong idea from watching God employ the "withdraw and permit" method of causing death and destruction?

T: The angels had a misunderstanding here. They expected one thing but another happened. My point is that if even the angels were not understanding things correctly until the cross, because of Satan's sophistry, why should we think that men can do better?

M:What is it exactly about my summary of your view do you disagree with?


Your mindset. You view God as destroying and doing destructive things. I read in the SOP that Satan is the destroyer and the Lord is the restorer. I would not say something like, "God employs the 'withdraw and permit' method of causing death and destruction." I would say that others cause God to withdraw His protection, and then calamity follows. For example:

Quote:
By stubborn rejection of divine love and mercy, the Jews had caused the protection of God to be withdrawn from them, and Satan was permitted to rule them according to his will. (GC 35)


Instead of "Satan was permitted to rule them according to his will" other unfortunate results could be included.

Quote:
I based it on things you posted here and elsewhere. Also, what about it do you agree with?


I agree that the angels misunderstood God's intentions, and were not expecting Christ to come.

Quote:
M: Why not quote what she said? Why leave out key words? "All that man needs to know or can know of God has been revealed in the life and character of His Son." The phrase "needs to know or can know" to me means Jesus revealed only those traits and attributes of God that 1) we are capable of comprehending and that 2) we need to know to experience salvation.

T: Your idea limits she said significantly, to a very small subset of what her statement actually says.

On this we disagree. Please, in the future, do not quote this passage as if your view is right and mine is wrong and then try to prove something based on it. It is obvious Jesus did not reveal everything there is to know about God. He said so Himself.


I'll agree with this request if you'll agree not to quote the following passage as if your view were right:

Quote:
A single angel destroyed all the first-born of the Egyptians and filled the land with mourning. When David offended against God by numbering the people, one angel caused that terrible destruction by which his sin was punished. The same destructive power exercised by holy angels when God commands, will be exercised by evil angels when He permits. There are forces now ready, and only waiting the divine permission, to spread desolation everywhere.(GC 612)


Quote:
Are you suggesting we must look at each case individually to determine what God's "will and purpose" is, that one-size-fits-all does not apply?


No, I'm not suggesting this. To even address this, one would need to address what God's "will and purpose" is. In a general sense, God's will and purpose is that all repent and be saved. Also in a general sense, God's purpose is to bring an end to sin. If one accepts this latter principle for what God's "will and purpose" is, I would agree that a one-size-fits-all approach would work. That is, God works in such a way as to bring sin to an end as quickly as possible.

Quote:
T: The simplistic idea is that God has nothing to do with sustaining life, apart from providing a tree to eat from. MH 417 makes that clear.

M:On this point we disagree.

T: I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with here. Are you disagreeing that MH 417 says that God is not active in sustaining the life of man?

M:Please include everything I said about it.


I'm asking you're disagreeing with. You shouldn't need to see everything you've written on this to know what you disagree with, I wouldn't think. If you think this is necessary, you can do this task.

Quote:
God employs His enemies and the forces of nature to punish full-cup sinners. He manages the outcome of their choices to ensure a favorable end of the GC. Nothing is left to chance or Satan or sinners.


You seem to have an Augustinian perspective. Let me ask a simple question to clarify this. Do you believe that whenever anything happens, it happens because it is God's will that the given thing should happen? (By "God's will" here, I do not mean "God's permissive will").

To clarify, I would agree that God permits certain things to happen. But I believe there are things which happen which are contrary to God's will, meaning that He would prefer that something else happened than what He permits to happen.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: The Covenants [Re: Tom] #107592
01/16/09 09:07 PM
01/16/09 09:07 PM
Tom  Offline OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Quote:
M: Let me ask instead – Do you believe, as some do, that God was forced to commanded Moses to kill the Sabbath-breaker and the blasphemer to accommodate the ignorance and hardened hearts of Moses and the Jews, that He had to do it to retain their respect and attention long enough to show them the "right way"?

T: No. Who did you have in mind?

M:You have yet to explain why. Will you ever?


I'm sent you many pages in reference to this question. You don't agree with the explanation, which is your prerogative, but you needn't suggest no explanation has been suggested.

Quote:
M: Did you also miss the note? The apology was in the box you omitted.

T: What box did I omit? Could you repost it please?

M:That's the problem with leaving out aspects of the discussion.


MM, I don't recall any apology. If you've made an apology, I'd like to hear it. You can repeat it from memory; that would be fine.

Quote:
I don't care one iota about the old timers you named above. Mentioning their names mean nothing to me. Nor do I believe God causes people to make evil choices or to evil things. What I do believe is that God manages the outcome of the choices they make to ensure the GC ends favorably. He establishes and enforces limits beyond which His enemies cannot pass.


A famous quote says:

Quote:
Those ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it (paraphrase of George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1)


Regarding what you say you believe, the last two sentences, I don't know anybody (i.e. any believer) who doesn't believe these things.

Quote:
M: Does this mean you believe God sins every time He manifests jealousy?

T: Since God never sins, obviously the answer to this question is no, even without considering the assumption upon which it is based.

M:Are you implying, then, that sometimes the word “jealousy” doesn’t mean something sinful, that the immediate context determines whether acting or feeling jealous is sinful or not? Can sinners act or feel “jealous” without sinning?

T: No. The phrase "even without considering the assumption upon which it is based" makes clear this is not being implied.

I don't understand your answer. Do you believe the word "jealous" means something different in the case of God?


You asked, "Does this mean you believe God sins every time He manifests jealousy?" Since God never sins, the conclusion is moot. This is a fundamental principle of logic.

"Jealous" has different meanings. For example, I can say I jealously guard my time. This has a similar meaning to what we see in Scripture where it says God is jealous.

Quote:
M: So, you agree with me that Satan cannot exceed the limits enforced by God.

T: Obviously. How could this not be the case?

M:Thank you for answering my question.


Please return the favor. How could this not be the case?

Quote:
M: Did Satan exceed the limits established by God?

T: How would this be possible?

M:You tell me.


You asked the question, MM! Why did you ask it? Do you think it's possible Satan could exceed the limits established by God? (not that you think this does happen, but that it could happen)

Quote:
M: Why didn’t He ensure it played out according to His “will and purpose”?

T: This gets back to the question I asked you above, which you didn't address. How can God force people to repent?

M:Why didn't God ensure that they (the people named above) died according to His "will and purpose"? Or, did He? Did He intend for them to die some other way? He intend for them to die of natural causes?


He intended that they repent and live. God is not willing that any should perish but come to a knowledge of the truth.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: The Covenants [Re: kland] #107616
01/17/09 03:41 PM
01/17/09 03:41 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, yes, I see Jesus doing things in the OT that He didn't do while He was here in the flesh. For example, in the OT He created a planet inhabited with plants, animals and people. He also employed the forces of nature and caused a wolrd-wide flood. He commanded Moses to stone people to death. Etc, etc, etc. Jesus did none of these things while here in the flesh.
Why?

Why, when He had good reason and was urged by others, did He not maim, kill, and torture men, women, and children?

You keep bringing up creation. He finished and rested. Why would you bring that up that He didn't create more -- that doesn't make sense to bring that up.

The world had already been flooded by removing His protection. Since the water had already reached its lowest point (the ocean), it would not flood again -- just like He promised. I don't know why you would you bring that up, either.

I mean, He didn't talk to Adam and Eve, either. But wouldn't you think that is non relevant to the topic being discussed?


But, why do you not think there was good reason for Him to stone people? In fact, He quite contradicted that idea.


WHY?


We're not talking about specific instances any more than all specific instances need be explicitly detailed in order to apply similar instances to His character. If Jesus was to represent His character, why do you see the apparent contradiction (contradiction based upon your responses)?


I don't see how we can talk about it without naming and comparing specific instances. Either Jesus demonstrated every aspect of God's kingdom and character there is to know or He didn't. What do you believe? Did He or didn't He? I believe it is obvious He didn't.

Jesus did indeed give the order for someone without sin to cast the first stone at the women caught in the act of adultery. He did not do it Himself because the law of Moses specified that the person who caught them was supposed to be the first one to cast a stone. However, I do not believe it was in His heart to do so in this specific case. He understood the situation perfectly, and the circumstances did not lend themselves to capital punishment. Besides, Roman law disallowed it.

Re: The Covenants [Re: Mountain Man] #107617
01/17/09 03:47 PM
01/17/09 03:47 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: Tom
M: God employs His enemies and the forces of nature to punish full-cup sinners. He manages the outcome of their choices to ensure a favorable end of the GC. Nothing is left to chance or Satan or sinners.

T: You seem to have an Augustinian perspective. Let me ask a simple question to clarify this. Do you believe that whenever anything happens, it happens because it is God's will that the given thing should happen? (By "God's will" here, I do not mean "God's permissive will").

To clarify, I would agree that God permits certain things to happen. But I believe there are things which happen which are contrary to God's will, meaning that He would prefer that something else happened than what He permits to happen.

God does not want sinners to make sinful choices. Nor does He sit around hoping they do so that He can punish them. He does not delight in punishing sinners.

Re: The Covenants [Re: Mountain Man] #107618
01/17/09 03:54 PM
01/17/09 03:54 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
In reference to 107592

Tom, you have never explained why God commanded Moses to kill sinners. Never!

I apologized for assuming you think 3SG 80 describes Satan, instead of God, using the forces of nature to cause death and destruction.

The last question was in reference to Peter, Paul, John, and Jesus. Your answer seems off topic.

Re: The Covenants [Re: Mountain Man] #107629
01/17/09 09:22 PM
01/17/09 09:22 PM
Tom  Offline OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
1.Regarding God's commanding Moses to kill sinners, I sent many pages dealing with the father/hunter, and stated I could not present the concept more clearly than the author did there.

2.Thank you for 3SG 80 explanation.

3.Regarding last question, it is not God's will that people be killed. The people you listed were killed because evil being inspired (e.g. angels) or evil beings killed them(men). God would have preferred that the evil men repented in response to the preaching if His messengers as opposed to killing them.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Page 56 of 71 1 2 54 55 56 57 58 70 71

Moderator  dedication, Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
by Rick H. 11/23/24 07:31 AM
No mail in Canada?
by Rick H. 11/22/24 06:45 PM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 11/21/24 11:03 AM
Fourth quarter, 2024, The Gospel of John
by asygo. 11/20/24 02:31 AM
The 2024 Election, the Hegelian Dialectic
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 08:26 PM
"The Lord's Day" and Ignatius
by dedication. 11/15/24 02:19 AM
The Doctrine of the Nicolaitans
by dedication. 11/14/24 04:00 PM
Will Trump be able to lead..
by dedication. 11/13/24 07:13 PM
Is Lying Ever Permitted?
by kland. 11/13/24 05:04 PM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 11/13/24 04:06 PM
Profiles Of Jesus In Zecharia
by dedication. 11/13/24 02:23 AM
Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study
by dedication. 11/12/24 07:31 PM
The Great White Throne
by dedication. 11/12/24 06:39 PM
A god whom his fathers knew not..
by TruthinTypes. 11/05/24 12:19 AM
Understanding the Battle of Armageddon
by Rick H. 10/25/24 07:25 PM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Dr Ben Carson: Church and State
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:12 PM
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by dedication. 11/22/24 04:02 PM
Will Trump Pass The Sunday Law?
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:51 PM
Understanding the 1,260-year Prophecy
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:35 PM
Private Schools
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:54 AM
The Church is Suing the State of Maryland
by Rick H. 11/16/24 04:43 PM
Has the Catholic Church Changed?
by TheophilusOne. 11/16/24 08:53 AM
Dr Conrad Vine Banned
by Rick H. 11/15/24 06:11 AM
Understanding the 1290 & 1335 of Daniel 12?
by dedication. 11/05/24 03:16 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1