Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (TheophilusOne, dedication, daylily, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,639
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195638
04/09/23 09:33 AM
04/09/23 09:33 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,705
Canada
|
|
THE FIRST BEAST IN REVELATION 13 This beast continues from Daniel's beasts in Daniel 7 --
1. Mouth of a Lion -- Babylon talk 2. Feet of a Bear -- Persia's infallible laws 3. Body of a leopard -- philosophies and gnostic thinking of Greece 4. It's a beast -- Rome (which has absorbed into itself the former kingdoms)
It has seven heads The pioneers identified these as the seven political phases of the Roman Empire. Kings, Consuls, Decemvirs, Dictators, Triumvirs, Emperors, and Popes,
They felt the heads had to relate to the beast to which these heads were attached. This beast that had already absorbed Ancient Babylon, Persia, Greece, into itself is ROME. Thus the heads must be governments of Rome.
Though it seems to me the seven divisions mentioned as governments of Rome are rather arbitrary. Yes, at first it was a kingdom in which there was a succession of seven kings from 753-509 BC. But in 509 BC Rome entered into a Republic which had consuls, Senates, two parties, etc., the dictators were only temporary when there was an emergency with six month limit. But the government at that time (509 - 27 BC) was considered to be a Republic. As Rome conquered more territory rivalry for power emerged and so they did have a triumvir, three who fought with each other to take control. For a brief moment it seemed Julius Caesar won, but he was assassinated. This all led to Rome becoming an Empire, Caesar Augustus being the first emperor in 27BC. Yet even after it was an empire it was often divided into two, three or even four sections. Constantine is an example, as he conquered his co-rulers in different sections of the empire to become sole emperor. Later it was again divided into east and west. So not sure those seven phases the pioneers ascribed to the heads are that clear.
The interpretation that the seven heads are connected to Rome, Roman heads, however makes sense. But do we go all the way back to 753 BC to identify these heads?
Yet, the prevailing interpretation today goes all the way back 605BC for it's heads., some even throw in Assyria and/or Egypt which goes back even further -- like 2000 years before Christ!!! I'm not convinced Revelation is moving that far back, it's dealing with issues from John's time to the end.
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195639
04/09/23 12:13 PM
04/09/23 12:13 PM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,705
Canada
|
|
I remember reading an article suggesting the seven heads represented seven phases in papal history, which I thought quite interesting. They adapted their idea from the seven divisions Richard McBrien makes in his book "Lives of the Popes".
1) 100AD -312 AD Early church bishops of Rome seeking power over the other bishops. As early as 190 AD we see Victor, bishop of Rome, assuming to dictate to the other bishops concerning when they must observe Jesus death and resurrection. His forceful and harsh action evoked a storm of protest, but the incident shows the growing belief that the bishop of the Roman church enjoyed some kind of primatial status in the church.
The first phase above was not yet "Roman" though, as the Apostle Paul mentioned iniquity was already working but being held in check, it isn't till the Roman Empire joined with the church that the Roman papal power was "let grow". (2 Thes. 2:7)
1st 312 -508 AD The bishops of Rome (popes) under the protection of the Roman Emperor. With this support the bishops of Rome were set above all the other bishops. We have popes like Sylvester I, who supported Constantine's Sunday law, Pope Leo the Great, a strong advocate of papal authority. During this time the papacy was groomed for its role. In 495 Pope Gelasiu I assumed the title Vicar of Christ, and advanced the theory of "two swords" (referring to the authority of the pope in both the sacred and temporal spheres.
2nd 508 -800 AD Popes beginning their overseeing control of the west, with the aid of kings of the Franks. Western Rome having fallen to the barbarian tribes, the papacy starts to fill in the vacancy, and gradually withdraw from dependence upon the Eastern Emperor.
3rd 800 - 1000 AD The Caroline Empire, Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, the for runner of the Holy Roman Empire. . Stephen IV anointed a succeeding emperor (Louis the Pious) continuing the precedent of Pope Leo III that papal approval was necessary for an emperor to rule. There was a common understanding that no kingly power could judge the pope, and moral standards within the papacy weren't that good during these years.
4th 1000-1450 AD Papal Highest Time, Gregorian Reforms, Crusades, Persecuting power.
5th 1450 - 1798 The threat to their power from rise of Protestantism, Counter Reformation, to losing political power
6th 1798 - Present Modern Papacy (without the political power)
7th Restored Papacy (political and religious power)
Last edited by dedication; 04/09/23 03:58 PM. Reason: changed numbering
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: dedication]
#195646
04/11/23 09:32 AM
04/11/23 09:32 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,245
Florida, USA
|
|
THE FIRST BEAST IN REVELATION 13 This beast continues from Daniel's beasts in Daniel 7 --
1. Mouth of a Lion -- Babylon talk 2. Feet of a Bear -- Persia's infallible laws 3. Body of a leopard -- philosophies and gnostic thinking of Greece 4. It's a beast -- Rome (which has absorbed into itself the former kingdoms)
It has seven heads The pioneers identified these as the seven political phases of the Roman Empire. Kings, Consuls, Decemvirs, Dictators, Triumvirs, Emperors, and Popes,
They felt the heads had to relate to the beast to which these heads were attached. This beast that had already absorbed Ancient Babylon, Persia, Greece, into itself is ROME. Thus the heads must be governments of Rome.
Though it seems to me the seven divisions mentioned as governments of Rome are rather arbitrary. Yes, at first it was a kingdom in which there was a succession of seven kings from 753-509 BC. But in 509 BC Rome entered into a Republic which had consuls, Senates, two parties, etc., the dictators were only temporary when there was an emergency with six month limit. But the government at that time (509 - 27 BC) was considered to be a Republic. As Rome conquered more territory rivalry for power emerged and so they did have a triumvir, three who fought with each other to take control. For a brief moment it seemed Julius Caesar won, but he was assassinated. This all led to Rome becoming an Empire, Caesar Augustus being the first emperor in 27BC. Yet even after it was an empire it was often divided into two, three or even four sections. Constantine is an example, as he conquered his co-rulers in different sections of the empire to become sole emperor. Later it was again divided into east and west. So not sure those seven phases the pioneers ascribed to the heads are that clear.
The interpretation that the seven heads are connected to Rome, Roman heads, however makes sense. But do we go all the way back to 753 BC to identify these heads?
Yet, the prevailing interpretation today goes all the way back 605BC for it's heads., some even throw in Assyria and/or Egypt which goes back even further -- like 2000 years before Christ!!! I'm not convinced Revelation is moving that far back, it's dealing with issues from John's time to the end.
This causes the problem in the reading of Revelation 17, as many Adventist try to shoehorn in Babylon as the first kingdom, but immediately are lost when they get to the "five have fallen".
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: dedication]
#195647
04/11/23 09:35 AM
04/11/23 09:35 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,245
Florida, USA
|
|
I remember reading an article suggesting the seven heads represented seven phases in papal history, which I thought quite interesting. They adapted their idea from the seven divisions Richard McBrien makes in his book "Lives of the Popes".
1) 100AD -312 AD Early church bishops of Rome seeking power over the other bishops. As early as 190 AD we see Victor, bishop of Rome, assuming to dictate to the other bishops concerning when they must observe Jesus death and resurrection. His forceful and harsh action evoked a storm of protest, but the incident shows the growing belief that the bishop of the Roman church enjoyed some kind of primatial status in the church.
The first phase above was not yet "Roman" though, as the Apostle Paul mentioned iniquity was already working but being held in check, it isn't till the Roman Empire joined with the church that the Roman papal power was "let grow". (2 Thes. 2:7)
1st 312 -508 AD The bishops of Rome (popes) under the protection of the Roman Emperor. With this support the bishops of Rome were set above all the other bishops. We have popes like Sylvester I, who supported Constantine's Sunday law, Pope Leo the Great, a strong advocate of papal authority. During this time the papacy was groomed for its role. In 495 Pope Gelasiu I assumed the title Vicar of Christ, and advanced the theory of "two swords" (referring to the authority of the pope in both the sacred and temporal spheres.
2nd 508 -800 AD Popes beginning their overseeing control of the west, with the aid of kings of the Franks. Western Rome having fallen to the barbarian tribes, the papacy starts to fill in the vacancy, and gradually withdraw from dependence upon the Eastern Emperor.
3rd 800 - 1000 AD The Caroline Empire, Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, the for runner of the Holy Roman Empire. . Stephen IV anointed a succeeding emperor (Louis the Pious) continuing the precedent of Pope Leo III that papal approval was necessary for an emperor to rule. There was a common understanding that no kingly power could judge the pope, and moral standards within the papacy weren't that good during these years.
4th 1000-1450 AD Papal Highest Time, Gregorian Reforms, Crusades, Persecuting power.
5th 1450 - 1798 The threat to their power from rise of Protestantism, Counter Reformation, to losing political power
6th 1798 - Present Modern Papacy (without the political power)
7th Restored Papacy (political and religious power) Many have tried that route but it only muddies the waters even more and has basically been rejected by most Bible scholars and Adventist for the most part.
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195648
04/11/23 09:37 AM
04/11/23 09:37 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,245
Florida, USA
|
|
I am left with the only one that makes sense prophetically and historically.. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/2013/12/the-seven-heads-of-the-beast-in-revelation-17"THE SEVEN HEADS AS SUCCESSIVE EMPIRES Based on biblical evidence, the interpretation that makes the most sense is that the seven mountains, upon which the prostitute Babylon sits, stand for the seven successive empires that dominated the world throughout history and through which Satan worked to oppose God.3 These empires possessed common traits of religious-political governance and coercion, which they used to cause harm and persecute God?s people. As the angel further explains to John from his time?s perspective, five of these kingdoms have fallen, one is, and the seventh one would appear sometime in the future. As previously explained, this cryptic text has generated numerous speculative interpretations, primarily due to the interpreters? failure to note that the meaning of these successive kingdoms was explained to John in the context of his own time?not ours. Nowhere in the text does it indicate that John was transported to another time; the angel simply explains to him what he had already seen previously in the vision. Therefore, the key to decoding the meaning of these seven heads lies in the sixth kingdom, which is described as ?is.? This ?is? refers to John?s time. John lived in the time of the sixth head?the Roman Empire. The five that had fallen were thus the empires that ruled the world and caused harm to God?s people prior to the time of John: (1) Egypt was the world power that enslaved and oppressed Israel, seeking to destroy her; (2) Assyria destroyed and scattered the ten tribes of Israel; (3) Babylon destroyed Jerusalem and exiled Judah; (4) Persia almost annihilated the Jews at the time of Esther; (5) Greece oppressed and tried to destroy the Jews through Antiochus Epiphanes. The seventh kingdom that ?has not yet come? refers to the medieval papacy that, from John?s time perspective, would be manifested in the future from John?s time?after the fall of the Roman Empire. The angel further explained that the scarlet beast itself is a part of the phase of the eighth head, the world power that is to come at the time of the end. Yet, it is one of the previously noted seven heads. Although this eighth head is one of the previous seven, it is considered a new power. Which of the seven? Most likely the seventh head, which previously experienced the deadly wound but comes back to life after its wound has healed. This seventh power will reappear as the eighth head at the end of time and will exercise the same authority as it did during the Middle Ages. During the time of the eighth head, the scarlet beast carries the prostitute Babylon. We now live in the era of the seventh head, for the eighth head has not yet gained its power. However, it will appear on the world scene at the time of the end and will impose its rule on the inhabitants of the earth."
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195657
04/11/23 09:14 PM
04/11/23 09:14 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 635
New York
|
|
Rich H, I agree that what makes the most sense to me as well are the successive empires. While often the 7 mountains have been understood as the 7 hills of Rome, while this may be on one level, on a greater level is that empires had sacred mountains. In the Bible the true sacred mountain is Mt. Zion. The first counterfeit mountain was the tower of Babel. In college these 7 empires were presented as those ruling over God's people in place of a son of David, or from a son of David until THE son of David.
Both George McCready Price in his timeless book "The Time of the End" and my professors from AUC gave a suggestion that has imy pressed me. And when I was at Andrews we had a guest professor from Europe Peri Windandi (spelling?) who pointed out that the image of Daniel 2 can be broken up into 7 parts, and this has also been suggested by Stephen Haskell that Daniel 2 breaks into 7 parts. I see their 7 parts as at least compatible with the views on Revelation 13.
These would be
1. Babylon
2. Medio Persia
3. Greece
4. Rome
5. The Holy Roman Empire/Papal Supremisy -- The feet of iron and clay. In the Bible clay is what God molds. But here instead of being molded by God the clay is being molded by the iron, the state. Thus this is the world united in a church-state that was ruling in place of the son of David over God's people.
6. The Deadly Wound--the TOES of iron and clay: The beast is but the head is not. The crowns are on the horns, not on the head. The world is divided into independent states, some offering more freedom others more restrictive. This grows from the American and French Revolution (With the American Revolution offering freedom through good laws and liberty of conscience. The French Revolution seeing freedom as absence of law, and that the common people can't handle freedom, only the ?lite can, others sadly need to be controlled). While our art work divides the horns over the beast, they are basically on the 6th head (the deadly wound) but shares power with the 7th head, the deadly wound being healed and sharing power with the horns.
7. The Deadly Wound being healed-the attempt for the toes to join together, but which will not last long but end up in total chaos. As we read the details later in Revelation we find that the woman (the church) is riding the beast. We find the first to cry at the fall of Babylon are the merchants of the earth (the corporations) and we find a very long shopping list in the Bible, of expensive items from all over the world. This indicates a short period of the nations uniting, not by politics and military conquest, but by the independent nations uniting in economic cooperation submitting themselves to the merchants of the earth. Thus it is also an 8th head because it is so different from the military and political powers in the past. A time of relative peace and prosperity, but with a carefully balanced system that everyone needs to cooperate with so that it does not collapse. No room for even a small group who won't harm anything to go their own way. Everyone will either/and have to give up something in their conscience, or use external control psychology to pressure others to comply with the system. Religious people will no longer be able to ignore points in the Bible that does not fit their traditions over what they think inspiration should be; and thus Satan causes his last great deception to make of no effect the spirit of prophecy. The reasons why many Seventh-day Adventists give up Mrs. White's work will be the same reasons why the Christian church in general will give up the Bible. And why turn to this untrustworthy book or other writings, such as Ellen White's when we have "Jesus" right here among us as well as the Bible "writers" and people like "Mrs. White" as well as my dear sweet "grandma" all resurrected and living among us and telling us what to do.
Once again, Daniel teaches us that the 7th empire will only last a short time before collapsing into total chaos, and of course the blame will be placed on those who wanted to cling to the Bible and their conscience, and as we are going through the time of Jacob's trouble while the world is in a religious high, and where feelings rule people, those they blame will look like miserable people so let's put them out of their misery. And as we saw people willing to be active on January 6 and others on September 11, so this same idea will unite people for the universal death decree.
But then there will be the cloud, about half the size of a man's hand, a rock carved out without hands that will smash the image in the feet, and God's people will again be ruled by our true King, the "He" who was suposed to rule over us since Genesis 3:16 (we often apply the "He" to the Husband, but in his commentary on Genesis Jacques Doukhan points out that the poetry just continues from Genesis 3:15 and that the "He" is the promised "He" of Genesis 3:15. The true son of David. Our Lord Jesus!!!
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195658
04/11/23 09:52 PM
04/11/23 09:52 PM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,705
Canada
|
|
In the end, I don't think it matters significantly whether people believe the seven heads are --As the pioneers believed -- seven phases of Roman government --As a few Adventists believe -- seven phases of the Roman papacy --As some Adventists believe -- seven Empires in the world. beginning with Egypt --As many other Adventists believe -- seven Empires beginning with Babylon. Each of those four interpretations zero in on basically the same endpoint scenario of the Roman papacy's political power being fatally wounded, and reviving for a last display of power. But which one brings the conflict for the church into the best focus? A FOUNDATIONAL QUESTION IS WHERE IS THE POINT IN TIME REFERENCE from which John views this vision?
Two of those interpretations place the point in time reference in John's day. Thus they already have five heads of the Roman/papal beast in the past before this beast even emerges from the sea, with the sixth head (pagan Roman) in operation in John's day, with seventh that is yet come; and continues a short space as the medieval papacy. But let's look at these verses: How do we interpret these verses 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, which had seven heads and ten horns 17:8 The beast that you saw was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. Questions arising from the above verses: Was John carried into another time? To the time when the woman Babylon, is sitting on the scarlet beast? To the time when the beast "is not" ( for it had received a fatal wound)? That's why there is such astonishment in the dwellers of earth to see him ascending, coming back to life? At what point "IS THE BEAST NOT"? A lot of us take this as the reference point in time to which John was carried in the spirit. The time when the beast was wounded (is not, yet is) when one of it's heads had a fatal wound.
With this reference point for time-- those who say the heads are empires stick with Daniel's empires. Five fallen -- Babylon, Media Persia, Greece, imperial Rome, papal Rome. The papal head is mortally wounded, the beast is dead, (is not), yet is about to come out of the grave. Sixth head -- (some say America) Seventh head -- Roman power restored. Beast is alive again. Also with this reference point when "the beast is not" -- those who say the heads are seven papal phases throughout the Christian era Five fallen -- the political papal phases have all fallen, This takes them up to sixth head when the beast (political part of the papacy) "is not", the beast is dead, but the woman survived, she "is". And to the astonishment of the people, the beast is coming out of the grave. Seventh head -- restored papal political power.
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Kevin H]
#195679
04/15/23 06:16 PM
04/15/23 06:16 PM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,245
Florida, USA
|
|
Rich H, I agree that what makes the most sense to me as well are the successive empires. While often the 7 mountains have been understood as the 7 hills of Rome, while this may be on one level, on a greater level is that empires had sacred mountains. In the Bible the true sacred mountain is Mt. Zion. The first counterfeit mountain was the tower of Babel. In college these 7 empires were presented as those ruling over God's people in place of a son of David, or from a son of David until THE son of David.
Both George McCready Price in his timeless book "The Time of the End" and my professors from AUC gave a suggestion that has imy pressed me. And when I was at Andrews we had a guest professor from Europe Peri Windandi (spelling?) who pointed out that the image of Daniel 2 can be broken up into 7 parts, and this has also been suggested by Stephen Haskell that Daniel 2 breaks into 7 parts. I see their 7 parts as at least compatible with the views on Revelation 13.
These would be
1. Babylon
2. Medio Persia
3. Greece
4. Rome
5. The Holy Roman Empire/Papal Supremisy -- The feet of iron and clay. In the Bible clay is what God molds. But here instead of being molded by God the clay is being molded by the iron, the state. Thus this is the world united in a church-state that was ruling in place of the son of David over God's people.
6. The Deadly Wound--the TOES of iron and clay: The beast is but the head is not. The crowns are on the horns, not on the head. The world is divided into independent states, some offering more freedom others more restrictive. This grows from the American and French Revolution (With the American Revolution offering freedom through good laws and liberty of conscience. The French Revolution seeing freedom as absence of law, and that the common people can't handle freedom, only the ?lite can, others sadly need to be controlled). While our art work divides the horns over the beast, they are basically on the 6th head (the deadly wound) but shares power with the 7th head, the deadly wound being healed and sharing power with the horns.
7. The Deadly Wound being healed-the attempt for the toes to join together, but which will not last long but end up in total chaos. As we read the details later in Revelation we find that the woman (the church) is riding the beast. We find the first to cry at the fall of Babylon are the merchants of the earth (the corporations) and we find a very long shopping list in the Bible, of expensive items from all over the world. This indicates a short period of the nations uniting, not by politics and military conquest, but by the independent nations uniting in economic cooperation submitting themselves to the merchants of the earth. Thus it is also an 8th head because it is so different from the military and political powers in the past. A time of relative peace and prosperity, but with a carefully balanced system that everyone needs to cooperate with so that it does not collapse. No room for even a small group who won't harm anything to go their own way. Everyone will either/and have to give up something in their conscience, or use external control psychology to pressure others to comply with the system. Religious people will no longer be able to ignore points in the Bible that does not fit their traditions over what they think inspiration should be; and thus Satan causes his last great deception to make of no effect the spirit of prophecy. The reasons why many Seventh-day Adventists give up Mrs. White's work will be the same reasons why the Christian church in general will give up the Bible. And why turn to this untrustworthy book or other writings, such as Ellen White's when we have "Jesus" right here among us as well as the Bible "writers" and people like "Mrs. White" as well as my dear sweet "grandma" all resurrected and living among us and telling us what to do.
Once again, Daniel teaches us that the 7th empire will only last a short time before collapsing into total chaos, and of course the blame will be placed on those who wanted to cling to the Bible and their conscience, and as we are going through the time of Jacob's trouble while the world is in a religious high, and where feelings rule people, those they blame will look like miserable people so let's put them out of their misery. And as we saw people willing to be active on January 6 and others on September 11, so this same idea will unite people for the universal death decree.
But then there will be the cloud, about half the size of a man's hand, a rock carved out without hands that will smash the image in the feet, and God's people will again be ruled by our true King, the "He" who was suposed to rule over us since Genesis 3:16 (we often apply the "He" to the Husband, but in his commentary on Genesis Jacques Doukhan points out that the poetry just continues from Genesis 3:15 and that the "He" is the promised "He" of Genesis 3:15. The true son of David. Our Lord Jesus!!! Yes but just because they looked at prophecy with Babylon first doesn't mean all Bible prophecy must start there. This is what many of the Adventist are trying to do with Revelation 17, and does not work no matter how they try. Very curious to say the least, and I cannot believe it was given to us to cause such a dead end so to speak...
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: dedication]
#195680
04/15/23 06:20 PM
04/15/23 06:20 PM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,245
Florida, USA
|
|
In the end, I don't think it matters significantly whether people believe the seven heads are --As the pioneers believed -- seven phases of Roman government --As a few Adventists believe -- seven phases of the Roman papacy --As some Adventists believe -- seven Empires in the world. beginning with Egypt --As many other Adventists believe -- seven Empires beginning with Babylon. Each of those four interpretations zero in on basically the same endpoint scenario of the Roman papacy's political power being fatally wounded, and reviving for a last display of power. But which one brings the conflict for the church into the best focus? A FOUNDATIONAL QUESTION IS WHERE IS THE POINT IN TIME REFERENCE from which John views this vision?
Two of those interpretations place the point in time reference in John's day. Thus they already have five heads of the Roman/papal beast in the past before this beast even emerges from the sea, with the sixth head (pagan Roman) in operation in John's day, with seventh that is yet come; and continues a short space as the medieval papacy. But let's look at these verses: How do we interpret these verses 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, which had seven heads and ten horns 17:8 The beast that you saw was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. Questions arising from the above verses: Was John carried into another time? To the time when the woman Babylon, is sitting on the scarlet beast? To the time when the beast "is not" ( for it had received a fatal wound)? That's why there is such astonishment in the dwellers of earth to see him ascending, coming back to life? At what point "IS THE BEAST NOT"? A lot of us take this as the reference point in time to which John was carried in the spirit. The time when the beast was wounded (is not, yet is) when one of it's heads had a fatal wound.
With this reference point for time-- those who say the heads are empires stick with Daniel's empires. Five fallen -- Babylon, Media Persia, Greece, imperial Rome, papal Rome. The papal head is mortally wounded, the beast is dead, (is not), yet is about to come out of the grave. Sixth head -- (some say America) Seventh head -- Roman power restored. Beast is alive again. Also with this reference point when "the beast is not" -- those who say the heads are seven papal phases throughout the Christian era Five fallen -- the political papal phases have all fallen, This takes them up to sixth head when the beast (political part of the papacy) "is not", the beast is dead, but the woman survived, she "is". And to the astonishment of the people, the beast is coming out of the grave. Seventh head -- restored papal political power. But why give it to us, if it is useless for prophecy basically a waste of the inspired words, I just won't believe God would do that. It has to be unveiled with clarity, or why give it to us...
Last edited by Rick H; 04/15/23 06:23 PM.
|
|
|
Re: What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
[Re: Rick H]
#195683
04/16/23 02:54 AM
04/16/23 02:54 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,705
Canada
|
|
Oh no, Revelation 17 is NOT useless prophecy. No, it is one of the most revealing prophecies on end time events, depicting the coalition of powers. The identity of the seven kings that are past, is not the core of the message, Though I do see a problem when we want to label all the kings as past identities that have already come and gone so far back it places the prophecy in the dusty hills of antiquity. Both the "Egypt" start point, and the ancient Roman government interpretations, really don't leave much of ANYTHING for us in the present time. That explanation Rick gave ended in 1798 when the last, seventh "king" received it's fatal wound. That, my friend is what I see as an interpretation creating a dead end prophecy. If we use the empires that both Daniel and Revelation talk about -- then Kevin's take on it makes far more sense than bringing in other empires from antiquity and having them all end in 1798. Revelation is far more concerned with the two beasts in chapter 13, and another one in Rev. 11, not with ancient Egypt and Assyria. Again let's look closer at the passage itself to find the clues How do we interpret these verses 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, which had seven heads and ten horns 17:8 The beast that you saw was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.Let's put ALL the information into the time frame when John sees this vision. 1. An angel with the seven last plagues asks John to "come" (end time clue) 2. John is taken into the wilderness. That's where the pure woman was last seen (Rev.12) but he doesn't see a pure woman there, she is somewhere else. (John sees a time that is after 1798) 3. He sees her on many waters merged with the mother of harlots, with Babylon. Since this message follows the warning of the judgment, it must be given in the last days; therefore it cannot refer to the Roman Church alone, for that church has been in a fallen condition for many centuries. Furthermore, in the eighteenth chapter of the Revelation the people of God are called upon to come out of Babylon. According to this scripture, many of God's people must still be in Babylon. And in what religious bodies are the greater part of the followers of Christ now to be found? Without doubt, in the various churches professing the Protestant faith. (This is hinting that John sees the vision portraying time after 1844) 4.. He sees a woman sitting on the beast. Note-- the beast at this point "is not" . He was, but "is not" (again the clue points to time after 1798) 5. The beast is re-emerging from the abyss (grave) The wound showing signs of healing 6. The sixth head of the beast is. The previous five have fallen. What was coming up in Europe around 1798? 7. The ten European horns don't have crowns yet, (their crowns were removed around 1798) they will receive crowns for a short time. The time is being identified, and it's not John's time! It is depicting a time when it se the beast is not. ( it was, it is not, but is coming alive again} The deceptive part -- the Papal power does not look like a threat at this point The 10 horns don't have crowns John sees the "setting" of this vision sometime between 1844 and the end. Thus the 6th "King that is" and the "beast is not" phase, crownless horns are during this time.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|