That is an interesting turn of events regarding the covid-19 issue.

I wonder if anything similar is happening in Canada?

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has taken a turn at spinning the top.
COVID-19 Vaccination Linked to Fewer Cardiac Events

Some interesting things to note is, why did they choose to do a negative probability? That is, why not show the probability of having a cardiac event after being vaccinated instead of the probability of being free from the event? Yes, it works, but backwards. And especially with all the publicity of vaccines causing heart problems, why do this reverse play of hand?

Another thing to note is, why at the beginning is it considered 100% probability of freedom from a cardiac event? Seems the assumption is COVID causes heart problems. Has that been proved?

"particularly among those with comorbidities, such as previous MACE, type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, liver disease, and obesity, there is an association with a lower risk of complications. While we cannot attribute causality, it is supportive evidence that vaccination may have beneficial effects on a variety of post-COVID-19 complications,"

There's that comorbidity thing again. Hmmm....
Cannot show it prevents heart problems, but it "may" have beneficial effects.
But expect all the media to quote the article as "proving" vaccines prevent heart problems!

And yet,
Largest Covid Vaccine Study Yet Finds Links to Health Conditions

Covid Vaccines Linked To Small Incr...ds?But Risk From Infection Is Far Higher

Rare cases of myocarditis?inflammation of the heart?were identified in the first, second and third doses of Pfizer-BioNTech?s and Moderna?s mRNA vaccines: The highest rate was seen after the second Moderna dose (6.1 times the expected rate of cases), according to the study published in the journal Vaccine.

But they still spin it.

However, vaccine makers ensured their shots provided some protection.
Would you expect them to say it didn't?! "Some"? Kind of ambiguous.

The main publicized thing in Canada concerning the whole C o v i d episode is over the court cases concerning the imprisonment of the main organizers of the truckers for Freedom Convoy protest; the legality of the federal government?s invocation of the Emergencies Act and the legality of freezing the bank accounts of people all over Canada who donated monies to the freedom convoy protest (even if it was only $50),

Jan.23,2024--The court determined the protest, two years earlier, was in no way the threat to country or people that the media was trying to make it sound like, and the Prime Minister had over reached in his responses.
There were other more logical and reasonable ways the Prime Minister SHOULD have responded to the protest.



But don't think the government is quietly going to admit any mismanagement on their part.
Hours after Justice Mosley?'ruling was issued, Deputy Prime Minister Chrysta Freeland said the Liberal government intends to fight the ruling.


The truth of course, is that the Freedom Convoy protested against the government's freedom destroying agenda, and in Canada there is a movement that would like to make protesting against government mandates as a criminal offense. Thanks to truckers for throwing a monkey wrench into this mad agenda and pushing to retain "freedoms for Canada".




What was the protest about;

Is the government fighting the ruling?

Like: Don't protest against the red army or they will kill you.