Forums118
Topics9,217
Posts195,985
Members1,324
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: asygo]
#104153
11/02/08 09:49 PM
11/02/08 09:49 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I mentioned QM as something you would be familiar with. It shows unpredictability even on the smallest scale.
You appear to have the idea that if we just had enough data, we could know everything that would happen. I don't believe this is the case. The concept of free will, in an incompatibilistic (Armenian) sense contradicts the idea of determinism. Calvinism is the logical consequence of determinism.
Even if QM weren't true, it would still be the case that people act in unpredictable ways. Having free will, they might do this, or they might do that. They might respond to the Holy Spirit's wooing; they might not. No matter how much data one had, one still could not predict with certainty what a person would do.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Tom]
#104158
11/03/08 05:36 AM
11/03/08 05:36 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,607
California, USA
|
|
I mentioned QM as something you would be familiar with. It shows unpredictability even on the smallest scale. Clarification is needed here. QM shows unpredictability ONLY on the smallest scale. You appear to have the idea that if we just had enough data, we could know everything that would happen. I don't believe this is the case. OK. At least we're understanding each other so far. The concept of free will, in an incompatibilistic (Armenian) sense contradicts the idea of determinism. I don't know what "incompatibilistic" means. Calvinism is the logical consequence of determinism. If you mean predestination, I have thought of that. But I got around it. Even if QM weren't true, it would still be the case that people act in unpredictable ways. Having free will, they might do this, or they might do that. They might respond to the Holy Spirit's wooing; they might not. No matter how much data one had, one still could not predict with certainty what a person would do. Did Jesus know for sure that Judas would betray Him? What about Peter? Did Jesus know his history before it happened? My answer to both is Yes. There is evidence that God knew these things before they happened.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: asygo]
#104170
11/03/08 06:35 PM
11/03/08 06:35 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
T:The concept of free will, in an incompatibilistic (Armenian) sense contradicts the idea of determinism.
R:I don't know what "incompatibilistic" means. Compatibilistic means compatible with determinism. Incompatibilistic means not compatible with determinism. The compatibilistic definition of free will is that a person is free to do what he wants to do, not that there is more than one option available that he could actually do. God knows what the person will do, the person does that thing, which is he what he wants to do anyway, so that's that. It's not necessary that there be more than one option actually available. The incompatibilistic definition of free will is that it is actually possible to do either of more than one option, not simply that you are able to do that which you choose to do. T:Calvinism is the logical consequence of determinism.
A:If you mean predestination, I have thought of that. But I got around it. In Calvinism God's foreknowledge is conditioned upon His will. Nothing happens that God does not foreordain. Everything that happens happens for the very reason that this is what God ordained should happen. In Armenianism God's sees what will happen, and then predestines on the basis of what He foresaw. You might be interested in looked at Jonathon Edwards work, "Freedom of the Will." ( http://www.ccel.org/ccel/edwards/will.i.html) T:Even if QM weren't true, it would still be the case that people act in unpredictable ways. Having free will, they might do this, or they might do that. They might respond to the Holy Spirit's wooing; they might not. No matter how much data one had, one still could not predict with certainty what a person would do.
A:Did Jesus know for sure that Judas would betray Him?
What about Peter? Did Jesus know his history before it happened?
My answer to both is Yes. There is evidence that God knew these things before they happened. Even we can know things like this before they happen. I'm not saying people *must* act unpredictably, but that they can.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Tom]
#104191
11/04/08 04:50 PM
11/04/08 04:50 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: The fact something can happen doesn't mean it will or must or might happen.
T: Yes it does. Not the "must" but the "might." That is, the fact that something can happen means that it might happen. That's exactly what it means. To say something can happen means it might happen. To say something might happen means it can happen. Let me rephrase the point: When talking about God's omniscience, the fact something is capable of happening does not mean it will or must or might happen. God knows whether or not something will happen. But knowing does not mean the capability of something else happening does not exist. M: Knowing what will happen doesn't mean something else could have happened.
T: The tenses here don't combine. Knowing what will happen means knowing what won't happen. For example, knowing Christ will be successful means knowing He is not at risk to fail. Or, to use a conditional form, knowing that Christ would succeed means knowing there was no risk of His failing. Knowing what will happen doesn't mean something else is incapable of happening. Just because God knows what will happen does not mean something else is incapable of happening. That is, His foreknowledge does not render something else incapable of happening. The risk Jesus took was real. It doesn't matter that He knew in advance He would succeed on the cross. M: Jesus risked failing but it doesn't mean God couldn't know for sure He would succeed.
T: If Jesus risked failing, that means there was a possibility that He would not succeed. If God was 100% certain that Christ would succeed, there was no possibility of His failing. Again, God's foreknowledge does not render something else incapable of happening. Just because He knew it wouldn't happen doesn't mean it was incapable of happening or that the risk wasn't real. M: The two are not incompatible.
T: Yes they are. If God is 100% certain that something will happen, there is no risk that the thing He is certain will happen will not happen. I agree that things are 100% certain to play out the way God knows. However, this does not mean something else is incapable of happening, that it cannot happen as if God's foreknowledge renders it incapable of happening.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Mountain Man]
#104203
11/04/08 08:54 PM
11/04/08 08:54 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
M: The fact something can happen doesn't mean it will or must or might happen.
T: Yes it does. Not the "must" but the "might." That is, the fact that something can happen means that it might happen. That's exactly what it means. To say something can happen means it might happen. To say something might happen means it can happen.
M:Let me rephrase the point: When talking about God's omniscience, the fact something is capable of happening does not mean it will or must or might happen. God knows whether or not something will happen. But knowing does not mean the capability of something else happening does not exist. Sure it does! If God knows something, say A, will happen, it's 100% certain it will happen. If A and B are mutually exclusive, then there is a 0% chance that B will happen. Iow, B cannot happen; there is not chance B might happen. Otherwise you'd have the absurdity of God's knowing with certainty something will happen and the thing not happening. Knowing what will happen doesn't mean something else is incapable of happening. Just because God knows what will happen does not mean something else is incapable of happening. Of course it does! Otherwise you'd have God knowing with certainty that something will happen and the thing not happening. That is, His foreknowledge does not render something else incapable of happening. The risk Jesus took was real. It doesn't matter that He knew in advance He would succeed on the cross. Sure it does! If you know something will happen, then you are not taking a risk that it won't happen. Risk means uncertainty. It looks like the rest is just repeating the same thing.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Tom]
#104223
11/05/08 05:04 PM
11/05/08 05:04 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: The fact something can happen doesn't mean it will or must or might happen.
T: Yes it does. Not the "must" but the "might." That is, the fact that something can happen means that it might happen. That's exactly what it means. To say something can happen means it might happen. To say something might happen means it can happen.
M:Let me rephrase the point: When talking about God's omniscience, the fact something is capable of happening does not mean it will or must or might happen. God knows whether or not something will happen. But knowing does not mean the capability of something else happening does not exist.
T: Sure it does! If God knows something, say A, will happen, it's 100% certain it will happen. If A and B are mutually exclusive, then there is a 0% chance that B will happen. Iow, B cannot happen; there is not chance B might happen.
Otherwise you'd have the absurdity of God's knowing with certainty something will happen and the thing not happening. True, it will not happen, but it is not because of lack of ability or potential. The fact it will not happen is not because God's foreknowledge rendered it incapable. It will not happen simply because God knows it will not happen. M: That is, His foreknowledge does not render something else incapable of happening. The risk Jesus took was real. It doesn't matter that He knew in advance He would succeed on the cross.
T: Sure it does! If you know something will happen, then you are not taking a risk that it won't happen. Risk means uncertainty. The thing that made risk a real potential still existed even though Jesus knew He would succeed on the cross. The potential for failure was a reality. It didn’t go away just because Jesus knew He would succeed. The pressures, the trials, the temptations, etc. were very real. Knowing He would succeed did not in least diminish their effect on Him. The same thing is true of us. We know we will not sin and die after probation closes, but knowing will not in the least diminish the intensity of the test and trial.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Mountain Man]
#104235
11/05/08 08:13 PM
11/05/08 08:13 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
True, it will not happen, but it is not because of lack of ability or potential. The fact it will not happen is not because God's foreknowledge rendered it incapable. It will not happen simply because God knows it will not happen. Regardless of *why* it will not happen, it will not happen, which is the salient point. Given that B will not happen, it is not the case than an FMA might choose B. T: Sure it does! If you know something will happen, then you are not taking a risk that it won't happen. Risk means uncertainty.
M:The thing that made risk a real potential still existed even though Jesus knew He would succeed on the cross. No, because the the "thing" that made risk a real potential was precisely not knowing He would succeed. That's what "risk" means: not knowing. The potential for failure was a reality. It didn’t go away just because Jesus knew He would succeed. Same comment. There's no risk without uncertainty. The pressures, the trials, the temptations, etc. were very real. Knowing He would succeed did not in least diminish their effect on Him. The same thing is true of us. ??? We don't know we'll succeed, so the same thing can't be true of us. We know we will not sin and die after probation closes, but knowing will not in the least diminish the intensity of the test and trial. When probation has closed is not known.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #4 - Atonement and the Divine Initiative
[Re: Mountain Man]
#104294
11/07/08 04:45 AM
11/07/08 04:45 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
MM, you're free to believe this, but you should recognize the following:
a.If God is certain something will happen (say A), then it is certain it will happen. b.If A is certain to happen, and A and B are mutually exclusive, then the chance of B happening is nil (or, to say it another way, the risk that B will happen is nil).
This means that if God knew with certainty that Christ would succeed, then there was no risk He would fail. This is simple logic.
So if you wish to assert that God knew with certainty that Jesus would succeed, OK, but don't assert that Christ was at risk to fail, since, given your assumption, He wasn't.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|