Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,215
Members1,326
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
7 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Daryl, daylily, TheophilusOne, 2 invisible),
2,482
guests, and 13
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: teresaq]
#113750
05/29/09 04:44 AM
05/29/09 04:44 AM
|
OP
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,707
Canada
|
|
Do you think looking to the cross and seeing Christ taking our sins upon Himself and dying in our place so "justice and mercy" both remain as part of God's character, is "missing" Jesus?
Is accepting Christ's death and merits in our behalf, and seeing it as HIM opening the door to us for salvation, releasing us from the condemnation of the law which our transgressions incurred, as "missing Jesus"?
Is looking to Christ as our heavenly High Priest Who is interceding for us, "missing Jesus"?
Is spending time at the cross and knowing there Christ has freed us from the bondage of sin, and that we can now consider ourselves dead to sin, because He took our sins and died, and realizing we are alive in Him raised with Him to newness of life, "missing Jesus"?
Is the new live of walking daily in humble obedience and submission to His will, relying upon Him each hour of each day, "missing Jesus"?
Are you agreeing with Tom, who denies that the blood Christ shed was not necessary for God to grant FORGIVENESS of sin?
Are you agreeing with Tom who disagrees that we account ourselves dead to sin and alive in Christ, because Christ died our death, and rose again to give us that new life.
What does it mean to "look to Jesus our Savior" if all there is at the cross is a "demonstration" of love, IF it really wasn't needed to forgive sin?
I believe it was necessary. Think of the millions before the cross -- they didn't have that demonstration, yet there were many who still had faith in God and knew God in a way that we would do well to emulate!
Last edited by dedication; 05/29/09 05:06 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: dedication]
#113753
05/29/09 05:47 AM
05/29/09 05:47 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
Do you think looking to the cross and seeing Christ taking our sins upon Himself and dying in our place so "justice and mercy" both remain as part of God's character, is "missing" Jesus?
Is accepting Christ's death and merits in our behalf, and seeing it as HIM opening the door to us for salvation, releasing us from the condemnation of the law which our transgressions incurred, as "missing Jesus"?
Is looking to Christ as our heavenly High Priest Who is interceding for us, "missing Jesus"?
Is spending time at the cross and knowing there Christ has freed us from the bondage of sin, and that we can now consider ourselves dead to sin, because He took our sins and died, and realizing we are alive in Him raised with Him to newness of life, "missing Jesus"?
Is the new live of walking daily in humble obedience and submission to His will, relying upon Him each hour of each day, "missing Jesus"?
Are you agreeing with Tom, who denies that the blood Christ shed was not necessary for God to grant FORGIVENESS of sin?
Are you agreeing with Tom who disagrees that we account ourselves dead to sin and alive in Christ, because Christ died our death, and rose again to give us that new life.
What does it mean to "look to Jesus our Savior" if all there is at the cross is a "demonstration" of love, IF it really wasn't needed to forgive sin?
I believe it was necessary. Think of the millions before the cross -- they didn't have that demonstration, yet there were many who still had faith in God and knew God in a way that we would do well to emulate! originally by teresa: yes! yes! yes! that is what was missing!! ive been reading various articles by egw tonight and they are so full of Jesus. it is studying all that Christ has done for us, from coming down from heaven to the cross that saves us if we surrender/submit to Him.
cold, dry presentations of symbols and theories do not, can not touch the heart. they dont show us anything better than ourselves. they dont show us how far superior God is to us and how far, so very far, we miss the mark!! i dont know how you read this to warrant your response.
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: Tom]
#113760
05/29/09 08:14 AM
05/29/09 08:14 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
[quote=dedication]We don't just die to sin by "appreciation". It takes more than that. We need to accept the fact that Christ credits His death to our sin as our death to sin, or we will never experience "living in newness of life" with Him.[quote]
The last sentence is what I was demonstrating cannot be true. There are many who are saved who do not have the idea that "Christ credits His death to our sin as our death to sin," many who would have no clue as to what this even meant. No way is it necessary to accept this fact to experience living in newness of life. There are no inspired statements that suggest this. Don't be silly, Tom: we know of those who'll be saved without ever hearing of a Bible, let alone Jesus, because God himself knows their conscience and gives them adequate light which they accept and believe. But even they cannot be saved without Jesus being their Saviour, in God's eyes, since God views Jesus as their substitute. How do you propose, otherwise - since you are either completely cancelling Dedication's last sentence you quoted or possibly limiting it to people who've studied a Bible, etc, that we die daily to sin & self as we follow Jesus? You said her statement "cannot be true", so how are we to die daily????...Does her statement even apply to Bible students - ie. any normally-informed believer? You know appreciating God's love in Christ isn't dying daily - it's just knowing the truth of God: the Devil does that, too, but it does save him!
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: teresaq]
#113761
05/29/09 08:28 AM
05/29/09 08:28 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Do you think looking to the cross and seeing Christ taking our sins upon Himself and dying in our place so "justice and mercy" both remain as part of God's character, is "missing" Jesus?
Is accepting Christ's death and merits in our behalf, and seeing it as HIM opening the door to us for salvation, releasing us from the condemnation of the law which our transgressions incurred, as "missing Jesus"?
Is looking to Christ as our heavenly High Priest Who is interceding for us, "missing Jesus"?
Is spending time at the cross and knowing there Christ has freed us from the bondage of sin, and that we can now consider ourselves dead to sin, because He took our sins and died, and realizing we are alive in Him raised with Him to newness of life, "missing Jesus"?
Is the new live of walking daily in humble obedience and submission to His will, relying upon Him each hour of each day, "missing Jesus"?
Are you agreeing with Tom, who denies that the blood Christ shed was not necessary for God to grant FORGIVENESS of sin?
Are you agreeing with Tom who disagrees that we account ourselves dead to sin and alive in Christ, because Christ died our death, and rose again to give us that new life.
What does it mean to "look to Jesus our Savior" if all there is at the cross is a "demonstration" of love, IF it really wasn't needed to forgive sin?
I believe it was necessary. Think of the millions before the cross -- they didn't have that demonstration, yet there were many who still had faith in God and knew God in a way that we would do well to emulate! originally by teresa: yes! yes! yes! that is what was missing!! ive been reading various articles by egw tonight and they are so full of Jesus. it is studying all that Christ has done for us, from coming down from heaven to the cross that saves us if we surrender/submit to Him.
cold, dry presentations of symbols and theories do not, can not touch the heart. they dont show us anything better than ourselves. they dont show us how far superior God is to us and how far, so very far, we miss the mark!! i dont know how you read this to warrant your response. Teresa, dear Sister, you applauded one small, true piece of the discussion, here, while the dispute by Tom is over how surrendering to Jesus is related, if it is at all, to our daily death to self & sin. Tom's arguing for one atonement theory over all the others - and allowing bits of each theory, too, to be fair - while Dedication and I are pointing to Scripture itself and saying that eg. Rom 6:4, with eg. 2 Cor 5:14b, teaches surrendering to Jesus is dying to sin by his death on the cross, experienced by us - heart of stone for heart of flesh - by grace through faith. Tom objects, it appears, pretty firmly too. What of this spiritual, leaving sin, angle to justification and newness of life? Do we, can we actually link to Jesus by faith without dying to sin and self by his cross?
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: Colin]
#113763
05/29/09 12:02 PM
05/29/09 12:02 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Tom's arguing for one atonement theory over all the others - and allowing bits of each theory, too, to be fair - while Dedication and I are pointing to Scripture itself and saying that eg. Rom 6:4, with eg. 2 Cor 5:14b, teaches surrendering to Jesus is dying to sin by his death on the cross, experienced by us - heart of stone for heart of flesh - by grace through faith. Tom objects, it appears, pretty firmly too. On the contrary, Colin. I've affirmed several times that I've been agreement with what your ideas on justification by faith, except for the legal points, right? I asked about the phrase about dying to sin not being something we do, but that's the only thing I commented on regarding this that I recall. Also, regarding the atonement theories, I wrote to MM that I thought all the atonement theories had elements of truth to them, although I disagree with Anselm's ideas. I think the Christus Victor theory, which I posted separately on another thread, provides a framework into which all these other truths can be fit. If you read the post, you'll see that the Christus Victor framework is basically simply what we, as Adventists, would call "The Great Controversy." What of this spiritual, leaving sin, angle to justification and newness of life? Do we, can we actually link to Jesus by faith without dying to sin and self by his cross? My opinion is of course not, and the quotes I provided address this.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: Tom]
#113765
05/29/09 02:41 PM
05/29/09 02:41 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Don't be silly, Tom: we know of those who'll be saved without ever hearing of a Bible, let alone Jesus, because God himself knows their conscience and gives them adequate light which they accept and believe. This being the case, what D affirmed cannot be true (I'll repost it a bit later). But even they cannot be saved without Jesus being their Saviour, in God's eyes, since God views Jesus as their substitute. Of course they cannot be saved without Jesus ("the Savior of all men") being their Savior. Why are you making this point? D didn't say anything about this. Also, why do you add "in God's eyes, since God views Jesus as their substitute."? (it seems to me simply saying "they cannot be saved without Jesus being their Savior" would be sufficient.) How do you propose, otherwise - since you are either completely cancelling Dedication's last sentence you quoted or possibly limiting it to people who've studied a Bible, etc, that we die daily to sin & self as we follow Jesus? You said her statement "cannot be true", so how are we to die daily????...Does her statement even apply to Bible students - ie. any normally-informed believer? She also seems to have misunderstood what she said that I was taking issue with, so I responded as follows: D:We don't just die to sin by "appreciation". It takes more than that. We need to accept the fact that Christ credits His death to our sin as our death to sin, or we will never experience "living in newness of life" with Him.
T:The last sentence is what I was demonstrating cannot be true. There are many who are saved who do not have the idea that "Christ credits His death to our sin as our death to sin," many who would have no clue as to what this even meant. No way is it necessary to accept this fact to experience living in newness of life. There are no inspired statements that suggest this. We don't need to adhere to some specific theory of the atonement in order to experience living in newness of life in Him. You know appreciating God's love in Christ isn't dying daily - it's just knowing the truth of God: the Devil does that, too, but it does save him! I defined what I meant by knowing the truth of God. Leaving out what I said and casting it to mean something I did not intend is not fair. I'll requote the statements from "The Desire of Ages." The points I've been making are right there. How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ. The heart, the mind, are created anew in the image of Him who works in us to subdue all things to Himself. Then the law of God is written in the mind and heart, and we can say with Christ, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God." Ps. 40:8. (DA 171, 172) (M)an was deceived; his mind was darkened by Satan's sophistry. The height and depth of the love of God he did not know. For him there was hope in a knowledge of God's love. By beholding His character he might be drawn back to God. (DA 762) Anyone who reacts as described above in these quotes will die to sin. The catalyst to the whole thing is the revelation of the love and character of God. This leads a person to repentance. If a person does not resist the drawing of the Spirit, everything else follows from there: God writes the law in the heart, the person is brought into harmony with God, etc.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: teresaq]
#113767
05/29/09 03:33 PM
05/29/09 03:33 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
He can take the penalty for their transgression. Which is what? Is it death, or something else? If it's death, this is exactly what I see happening. Sin resulted in death in the person of Christ (in His humanity), thus demonstrating the truth that God had been saying all alone, the one who sins will die. We also see what that death looks like in Christ's experience; not a fire-ball from heaven burning Him up, but His heart melting like wax. "By pledging His own life Christ has made Himself responsible for every man and woman on the earth. He stands in the presence of God, saying, "Father, I take upon Myself the guilt of that soul. It means death to him if he is left to bear it. If he repents he shall be forgiven. My blood shall cleanse him from all sin. I gave My life for the sins of the world." {HP 42.5} Why would it mean death if one had to bear one's own sin? The heaviest burden that we bear is the burden of sin. If we were left to bear this burden, it would crush us.(MH 71) It would crush us. Christ, during this life, bears the sin of every human being, so that they are not crushed, but have the opportunity to make a decision for or against Christ. In the second resurrection, those who have chosen to reject Christ will be left to bear their own sin (God's strange act, the outpouring of His wrath, His execution of justice), and they will be crushed. As DA 764 puts it: By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire. The glory of Him who is love will destroy them. (DA 764) THAT IS THE ISSUE -- CHRIST TOOK OUR PENALTY so we could partake of His righteousness. I agree with this. The penalty for sin is death. Christ died, as the result of taking our sin upon Him. It's DEFINITELY NOT against our need to accept Christ in our lives in order to be saved -- of course WE NEED TO ACCEPT CHRIST, we need to accept HIM and HIS MERITS, and HIS death in our place, and His resurrection. "There is no other name by which we must be saved." Accepting Christ is enough. When we accept Christ, His merits, His death in our place, His resurrection, and many other things, come with that. Now Christ is in the heavenly sanctuary, which He entered WITH HIS OWN BLOOD to minister as High Priest.
Which means what? It doesn't mean He's taking His literal blood in a pot or something, right? The blood is symbolic. So the question we need to ask is what the blood is symbolic of. It seems clear from Scripture that the blood of Christ represents His life.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: teresaq]
#113768
05/29/09 03:45 PM
05/29/09 03:45 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
T:The significance of the blood is that it represents that life. Christ gave Himself for us. He died for our sins. That's what the blood represents.
So how does Christ's giving His life for us save us? It does so by drawing us to God.
R:You still ignore the part that Christ took upon HIMSELF our sins, and died in our place. No I don't. I've affirmed this. For example, I've quoted the following several times: Christ was treated as we deserve, that we might be treated as He deserves. He was condemned for our sins, in which He had no share, that we might be justified by His righteousness, in which we had no share. He suffered the death which was ours, that we might receive the life which was His. "With His stripes we are healed." (DA 25) His death makes forgiveness possible. His resurrection brings justification. Your concepts are only HALF of the picture. I've gone into a great deal of detail regarding how Christ's death makes forgiveness possible, so you're asserting I'm ignoring this is hardly fair or accurate. I haven't commented on Christ's resurrection, but I'll by way as a brief statement that I think it's a big mistake to separate Christ's death from His life and resurrection, as if it could be considered separately. Christ's death only has meaning when connected to His life, and similarly with His resurrection. They all go together, and were all necessary for our forgiveness and justification. The whole purpose of Christ's earthly ministry was the revelation of God, which sets men right with Him. I don't know if you had a chance to look at the post regarding "Christus Victor," but it does a really nice job of tying things altogether, demonstrating how Christ obtained the victory over the powers of darkness by his "outrageous love," as the author puts it.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Justifiction, sanctification and the Grace of God
[Re: Tom]
#113769
05/29/09 03:48 PM
05/29/09 03:48 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Are you agreeing with Tom who disagrees that we account ourselves dead to sin and alive in Christ, because Christ died our death, and rose again to give us that new life. Whoa! I call "foul"! I didn't claim this! Not at all! Please be more careful in your reading of things. I've noticed quite a number of cases now where you're misstating what I've said. It's safer if you cite direct quotes. It's not nice to make false claims about what people have said.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|