Forums118
Topics9,228
Posts196,152
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: asygo]
#115682
07/08/09 05:07 PM
07/08/09 05:07 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
tq and kland,
Let's say I was holding an egg in my outstretched hand over the edge of the roof of the Empire State Building, and I let go of it so that it is crushed when it hits the ground. How is that ethically different from simply crushing it in my hand?
Swap the egg with a baby and run the same scenario, ask the same question.
Swap the baby with a normal adult and run the same scenario, ask the same question.
That's the crux of the argument between God sending the serpents vs allowing them, sending the plagues vs allowing them, etc.
What seems to have been overlooked is the fact that these "bad" things may be bad indeed, but the alternative may be worse. When my children disobey me, I spank them so that they can have an immediate and tangible connection between disobedience and suffering. Did I want them to suffer? No. But did I cause pain in their behind? You better believe it! Why? Because the alternative is that they plant and cultivate the idea that they can disobey without any harmful effects upon themselves. That is worse. i understand the point you are trying to make, i believe, but we arent eggs that God is holding in His hand. the serpents were in the desert all along. God was holding them back. think about that picture a minute, please. how many people were there in that desert? about a million? they went out looking for firewood and we dont know what else. but how come noone ever picked up a serpent in those firewood expeditions, as paul did one time? or encounter one when out for whatever reason? why didnt they slither into the camp on occasion? we are told that desert was full of those serpents. on another note, what i am going to say is not about spanking vs not-spanking. i am a grandmother and thankfully my oldest granddaughter has not made me a great grandmother and i hope she never does wish to bring children into this world. but that gives me quite a bit of experience and time to look back, not just at the results of spanking-in reality beatings-on me, but my mental state when spanking my own, as well as the times i have spanked my grandchildren. i will state that i found i spanked considerably less with my grandchildren while having much more co-operation from them, but it was at the expense of a lot of prayer on how to get through to them. it was very painful, still is.
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: Mountain Man]
#115683
07/08/09 06:15 PM
07/08/09 06:15 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
M: I've reread the thread and the only thing that seems clear to me is that neither one of you (Tom and Teresaq) believe God or holy angels will cause the plagues to happen. What is painfully unclear is exactly what you two do think will cause them to happen. The description in the SOP (GC) describes them in such a way as to leave no doubt they are caused by holy angels. Listen: K: I had come across this in CD pg. 75 (MS 23) regarding the health message The Lord has given instruction that the gospel is to be carried forward; and the gospel includes health reform in all its phases. Our work is to enlighten the world; for it is blind to the movements which are taking place, preparing the way for the plagues which God will permit to come upon the world. What do you think she means by permit? I think it means permit the four angels to release the four winds and permit the seven angels to pour out the seven plagues. They are ready and awaiting His command. What do you think it means? are the seven angels begging to pour out the vials? im trying to understand what you mean by permit the seven angels....
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: Mountain Man]
#115684
07/08/09 06:18 PM
07/08/09 06:18 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
M: The quotes posted above include ones that speak of holy angels causing death and destruction. Yes, she also wrote about evil angels causing death and destruction too. Which is why I believe both will be involved during the out pouring of the seven last plagues.
T: But this doesn't really makes sense, does it? On the face of it, something must be wrong with an interpretation that has holy angels and evil angels doing the same thing. I didn't mean to imply they will be doing the same things. There is more happening than the holy angels merely pouring out the plagues. Evil angels are influencing evil men to do all manner of evil. M: I've been asking you to cite examples of Jesus withdrawing His protection, while He was here, and permitting evil men or evil angels to punish and kill unrepentant sinners. So far you've only cited the cross which I do not view as an example unless of course you are looking at Jesus as an example of an unrepentant sinner.
T: You've asked this question several dozen times, and I've answered several dozen times, sometimes with lists with many examples, sometimes with just one item. Have you forgotten? It's very odd that you would say, "So far you've only cited the cross." But since the cross has come up, let's discuss it. How do you see that the cross enables us to understand the plagues? None of the examples of gave fit the bill, Tom. You have yet to cite an example of Jesus doing what I've asked. T: Also, I should add, that Teresa's point is well taken in that Jesus had laid aside prerogatives of His divinity, so that it was not His role to withdraw His protection, permitting evil men to punish and kill unrepentant sinners, etc. I agree. I've made this point several times. T: His role was to reveal the Father. So a more accurate question would be, where was God's character in respect to His withdrawing His protection revealed, and I can think of no better example of the cross, and resulting problems viz a viz Jerusalem and the nation as a whole. But I am asking for an example of Jesus doing it while here in the flesh. You seem to be agreeing with me that He didn't. allowing evil men inspired by demons to kill Him doesnt qualify?Mat 26:53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: Mountain Man]
#115685
07/08/09 06:34 PM
07/08/09 06:34 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
is this an example of God withdrawing His protection? it just "fell into my lap", folks. i didnt go looking for it. didnt have a clue it was out there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_tide Red tide is a naturally recurring thing. Yes, God can prevent it, but He regularly does not. I'm not sure it as an example of the "withdraw and permit principle" of permitting death and destruction. "withdraw and permit", i dont think is accurate. God never "withdraws", not even when He allows whatever to happen. but the word we are given is "restrain", and "no longer restrains". i can understand the idea meant by these words. i dont understand the intent of your phrase. Some red tides are associated with the production of natural toxins, depletion of dissolved oxygen or other harmful effects, and are generally described as harmful algal blooms. The most conspicuous effects of red tides are the associated wildlife mortalities among marine and coastal species of fish, birds, marine mammals and other organisms. In the case of Florida red tides, these mortalities are caused by exposure to a potent neurotoxin called brevetoxin which is produced naturally by the marine algae Karenia brevis. The term "Red Tide" is also commonly used to describe harmful algal blooms on the northern east coast of the United States, particularly in the Gulf of Maine. This type of bloom is caused by another species of dinoflagellate known as Alexandrium fundyense. These blooms of organisms cause severe disruptions in fisheries of these waters as the toxins in these organism cause filter-feeding shellfish in affected waters to become poisonous for human consumption due to saxitoxin. Their occurrence in some locations appear to be entirely natural, while in others they appear to be a result of human activities The frequency and severity of algal blooms in some parts of the world have been linked to increased nutrient loading from human activities.
In other areas, algal blooms are a seasonal occurrence resulting from coastal upwelling, a natural result of the movement of certain ocean currents.
The growth of marine phytoplankton is generally limited by the availability of nitrates and phosphates, which can be abundant in agricultural run-off as well as coastal upwelling zones. Coastal water pollution produced by humans and systematic increase in sea water temperature have also been implicated as contributing factors in red tides.
Other factors such as iron-rich dust influx from large desert areas such as the Saharan desert are thought to play a major role in causing red tides.
Some algal blooms on the Pacific coast have also been linked to occurrences of large-scale climatic oscillations such as El Niño events. No deaths of humans have been attributed to Florida red tide, but people may experience respiratory irritation (coughing, sneezing, and tearing) when the red tide organism (Karenia brevis) is present along a coast and winds blow its toxic aerosol onshore. Swimming is usually safe, but skin irritation and burning is possible in areas of high concentration of red tide. ( http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/topics/redtide/) Red tide is a global phenomenon. However, since the 1980s harmful red tide events have become more frequent and widespread. Detection of a spread is thought to be influenced by higher awareness of red tide, better equipment for detecting and analyzing red tide, and nutrient loading from farming and industrial runoff. Countries affected by red tide events include: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, England, France, Guatemala, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Romania, Russia, Scotland, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, the United States, and Venezuela. The disasters of the past year in America have caused hearts to tremble, and similar disasters have fallen upon other countries. Already sprinklings from the vials of God's wrath have been let fall upon land and sea, affecting the elements of the air. The causes of these unusual conditions are being searched for, but in vain. {3MR 312.2} Famines will increase. Pestilences will sweep away thousands. Dangers are all around us from the powers without and satanic workings within, but the restraining power of God is now being exercised.--19MR 382 (1897). {LDE 27.2} I have been shown that the Spirit of the Lord is being withdrawn from the earth. God's keeping power will soon be refused to all who continue to disregard His commandments. The reports of fraudulent transactions, murders, and crimes of every kind are coming to us daily. Iniquity is becoming so common a thing that it no longer shocks the senses as it once did.--Letter 258, 1907. {LDE 27.3}
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: teresaq]
#115692
07/09/09 12:31 AM
07/09/09 12:31 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
That doesn't seem like a very significant issue to me. More important is this: When God removes His protection and bad things happen, did He want those bad things to happen? This is easy. Of course not. God wants good things to happen. Even for His enemies, God desires nothing but good things. If He did not want those bad things, then why permit them? The following speaks to this question: It was God's purpose to place things on an eternal basis of security, and in the councils of heaven it was decided that time must be given for Satan to develop the principles which were the foundation of his system of government. He had claimed that these were superior to God's principles. Time was given for the working of Satan's principles, that they might be seen by the heavenly universe. (DA 759) If He wanted those bad things, then that's the crucial point. Of course God didn't want bad things to happen. Satan did.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: teresaq]
#115693
07/09/09 12:43 AM
07/09/09 12:43 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
(MM)I think it means permit the four angels to release the four winds and permit the seven angels to pour out the seven plagues. They are ready and awaiting His command. What do you think it means? God permits the holy angels to pour the plagues?! You mean like that holy angels are going, "Can we pour out plagues? Can we, huh? Please, please, please!" like little children raise their hands in class, hoping to be called on by their teacher? What of the following? Coming to Christ, they reported to Him the words of the people, telling Him that they had even refused to give Him a night's lodging. They thought that a grievous wrong had been done Him, and seeing Mount Carmel in the distance, where Elijah had slain the false prophets, they said, "Wilt Thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?" They were surprised to see that Jesus was pained by their words, and still more surprised as His rebuke fell upon their ears, "Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them." And He went to another village.(DA 487) The holy angels have seen Christ and learned of the cross. Of what spirit are they?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: teresaq]
#115696
07/09/09 03:11 AM
07/09/09 03:11 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Let's say I was holding an egg in my outstretched hand over the edge of the roof of the Empire State Building, and I let go of it so that it is crushed when it hits the ground. How is that ethically different from simply crushing it in my hand? I don't understand why you think this is in any way analogous to the situation we are discussing. These are simply two arbitrary ways of destroying an object. Swap the egg with a baby and run the same scenario, ask the same question.
Swap the baby with a normal adult and run the same scenario, ask the same question.
That's the crux of the argument between God sending the serpents vs allowing them, sending the plagues vs allowing them, etc. No it's not. It's not even close. In the one case you have a being with power choosing between two different ways of destroying an object with no power. In the other case you have a being with power protecting other beings who also have power, and choosing to withdraw the protection when the latter rebelled against the former. What seems to have been overlooked is the fact that these "bad" things may be bad indeed, but the alternative may be worse. This isn't being overlooked at all. This is the question at hand. Does the end justify the means? Is it OK to do an evil deed depending on the circumstances? Is God constrained to do bad things, to act contrary to the principles of His government, to avoid "worse things"? When my children disobey me, I spank them so that they can have an immediate and tangible connection between disobedience and suffering. Did I want them to suffer? No. But did I cause pain in their behind? You better believe it! Why? Because the alternative is that they plant and cultivate the idea that they can disobey without any harmful effects upon themselves. That is worse. Is God constrained to use violence in order to teach lessons to His children? (please bear in mind, I'm making no comment whatsoever in regards to spanking children; I'm not suggesting this is violence; I'm only asking about God).
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: Tom]
#115705
07/09/09 12:06 PM
07/09/09 12:06 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,501
Midland
|
|
Let's say I was holding an egg in my outstretched hand over the edge of the roof of the Empire State Building, The difference being you intentionally took the egg against its choice (without it even being able to have a choice) to the top of the Empire State Building and then dropped it, versus leaving it alone. If He did not want those bad things, then why permit them? Have you considered the question, if God didn't want bad things to happen, why did He permit Satan to go bad? Why did He create a being which could go bad? God never "withdraws", not even when He allows whatever to happen. Speaking of the cross, Mountain Man, T:How do you see that the cross enables us to understand the plagues?
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: teresaq]
#115707
07/09/09 01:49 PM
07/09/09 01:49 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
I have been shown that the Spirit of the Lord is being withdrawn from the earth. God's keeping power will soon be refused to all who continue to disregard His commandments. The reports of fraudulent transactions, murders, and crimes of every kind are coming to us daily. Iniquity is becoming so common a thing that it no longer shocks the senses as it once did.--Letter 258, 1907. {LDE 27.3} God's Purpose in Calamities
What mean the awful calamities by sea--vessels hurled into eternity without a moment's warning? What mean the accidents by land--fire consuming the riches that men have hoarded, much of which has been accumulated by oppression of the poor? The Lord will not interfere to protect the property of those who transgress His law, break His covenant, and trample upon His Sabbath, accepting in its place a spurious rest day. {LDE 27.4} The plagues of God are already falling upon the earth, sweeping away the most costly structures as if by a breath of fire from heaven. Will not these judgments bring professing Christians to their senses? God permits them to come that the world may take heed, that sinners may be afraid and tremble before Him.--3MR 311 (1902). {LDE 28.1} God has a purpose in permitting these calamities to occur. They are one of His means of calling men and women to their senses. By unusual workings through nature God will express to doubting human agencies that which He clearly reveals in His Word.--19MR 279 (1902). {LDE 28.2} How frequently we hear of earthquakes and tornadoes, of destruction by fire and flood, with great loss of life and property! Apparently these calamities are capricious outbreaks of disorganized, unregulated forces of nature, wholly beyond the control of man, but in them all God's purpose may be read. They are among the agencies by which He seeks to arouse men and women to a sense of their danger.--PK 277 (c. 1914). {LDE 28.3} Yes, God permits death and destruction to arouse people to a sense of their need and danger. Do evil angels cooperate with God in His endeaver? Or, are they ignorant of what they are doing? Also, it should be noted that for every quote like this one there are corresponding quotes that say God causes death and destruction either Himself or through holy angels. In other words, He does not always withdraw His protection and allow evil angels to wreak havoc.
|
|
|
Re: plagues
[Re: Mountain Man]
#115708
07/09/09 02:10 PM
07/09/09 02:10 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Teresaq, yes, the holy angels are portrayed as awaiting God's command to loose the four winds and to pour out the seven last plagues. No, not like eager little demons who love to kill and torture but in obedience to the will and desire of God to punish unrepentant sinners. Read Rev 16 and you'll see how the holy angels think and feel about it.
I hope you don't think I'm one of those people who have been disregarding the "restrain" quotes you've ben quoting or the "withdraw" quotes Tom has been posting. I have been acknowledging this point all along. It's just that neither am I disregarding the quotes that advocate the rest of the story. Nor do I interpret them to agree with the "restrain" or "withdraw" quotes.
And, yes, the Father allowing Jesus to be crucified is not an example of Jesus withdrawing His protection or choosing not to restrain evil men and evil angels or the forces of nature and permiting death and destruction to happen. Where does it say God or Jesus ceased restraining anyone and permitted Jesus to be crucified?
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|