Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,214
Members1,326
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
8 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Daryl, daylily, TheophilusOne, 3 invisible),
2,514
guests, and 9
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Tom]
#121259
11/04/09 02:47 PM
11/04/09 02:47 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: Tom, I agree with Dedication.
T: That's no surprise. I stated it for the benefit of those who might not know it. M: God knows the end from the beginning.
T: I agree with this; God knows the end of the road chosen from the beginning. Do you agree we do not agree on what this statement means? M: Not only what can be - but also what will be.
T: That's only possible if the future is fixed, or determined, before it happens. Why do you limit God? M: Do you agree the GC will play precisely the way it is described in the Bible? Or, do you suspect some details might play out differently or not at all? For example, do you think it is possible the USA will not legislate and enforce the MOB, that instead she will continue to defend liberty of conscience?
T: I think things will play out as they've been described. Why? M: GC, I believe the future for God is like watching a rerun. The reason no one can alter what God has shared with us through the prophets is for the simple reason He is explaining what has already happened from His eternal perspective.
T: If things play out like a re-run, then there can be no risk. That should be easy to see. But the SOP has a number of statements which describe risk, such as that God allowed His Son to come at the risk of failure and eternal loss, and that heaven itself was imperiled for our redemption. Neither of these statements makes sense if God is looking at things like a re-run. Where in the Bible did God say, "I'm not certain Jesus will succeed?" I've asked this before but don't recall the passages you cited.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Mountain Man]
#121260
11/04/09 02:54 PM
11/04/09 02:54 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
"The fall of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent. Redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam, but an eternal purpose, suffered to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world, but for the good of all the worlds that God had created. . . . {TMK 18.2}
"The plan for our redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam. It was a revelation of "the mystery which hath been kept in silence through times eternal." Rom. 16:25, R. V. It was an unfolding of the principles that from eternal ages have been the foundation of God's throne. From the beginning, God and Christ knew of the apostasy of Satan, and of the fall of man through the deceptive power of the apostate. God did not ordain that sin should exist, but He foresaw its existence, and made provision to meet the terrible emergency. So great was His love for the world, that He covenanted to give His only-begotten Son, "that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16. {DA 22.2}
"The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity. Before the foundation of the world it was according to the determinate counsel of God that man should be created, endowed with power to do the divine will. But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness. God knows the end from the beginning. . . . Therefore redemption was not an afterthought . . . but an eternal purpose to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world but for the good of all the worlds which God has created. {AG 129.2}
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Mountain Man]
#121261
11/04/09 02:56 PM
11/04/09 02:56 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
"But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness."
Why did God create FMAs in spite of knowing they would sin and die and require redemption at the expense of Jesus' life and death? Why? - "For the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness."
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: dedication]
#121266
11/04/09 03:46 PM
11/04/09 03:46 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Tom: "This seems to be implying that God's plan was that there would be sin, and if Lucifer thwarted this plan of God's, then God would have accomplished it by some other FMA."
D: No, no -- it was not God's plan that there would be sin. This whole sin experiment is terribly painful for God. But God in His foreknowledge KNEW that by creating FMA that there WOULD be sin.
You are right that there is no logical reason WHY perfect beings should sin. Sin has no excuse! To give a reason why perfect beings would sin, would be to excuse sin. There is no reason except that freedom to chose will eventual result in making a wrong choice -- not knowing what sin actually is, some FM being would try it.
God knew that if He created Free moral agents there would be sin. He knew if he didn't create Lucifer, another would try it.
God's choices were: 1)Create Free Moral Beings -- and go through the sin/redemption plan.
2)Create pre-programed beings that could not sin, but also could not worship and love from free choice.
3) not create at all.
You're not mentioning the simplest and obvious alternative, which is simply to create free moral agents (FMAs) who wouldn't sin. You appear to suggesting the idea that creating an FMA means that the FMA must sin. But this is obviously false, since not even 1 in a million of them do (if you consider all created beings; the millions of worlds God created, of which, only one fell, humans and fallen angels are a mere drop in the bucket). So God could simply have chosen not to create those 1 in a million FMA's that would sin. That wouldn't be infringing upon their free will, since a being who does not exist has no free will, and it wouldn't be infringing upon the free will of any of the other FMA's that wouldn't choose to sin. You're saying that if God saw that one FMA wouldn't sin, say Lucifer, and God didn't create him, some other one would. But God, with the future being fixed and His perfect foreknowledge, would see that, and simply not create that one either. So unless you wish to assert that *any* FMA would sin, given an eternity in which to do so, your assertion here is easily seen to be false. This is why I asked you the question regarding Gabriel. If God had only created one being in the universe, Gabriel, would it be inevitable that he would have sinned? This is the logical conclusion of your idea; any FMA would sin. Are you familiar with proof by induction? This is essentially what I laid out in my previous post, if you are. Regarding 1SM 250, that's one quote to consider, but there are others, namely DA 49, DA 131, COL 196, and EW 125-127 which make it clear that the no risk idea of the future isn't correct. That is, if the future is fixed, given God's perfect foreknowledge, there can be no risk for God. Risk means uncertainty. Fixed future = no uncertainty. These are mutually exclusive concepts. Regarding Rev. 13:8, 1 Pet. 1:19-20, these aren't implying the future is fixed either, but are simply referring to God's Plan of Salvation, which would be put into effect IF necessary. It wasn't inevitable, because Lucifer could have chosen to repent, and Adam/Eve could have chosen not to sin as well. I should make clear that where we differ is not in regards to whether or not God has perfect foreknowledge, but as to the nature of what He foresees. I also believe that God perfectly sees the future. I just don't believe the future consists of events that must occur (i.e., at any given time in the future, only one thing will happen) but consists of the union of all possible events. Since this is what the future consists of, this is what God foresees. Tom: Otherwise it's hard to follow the example here of Jacob and Esau, and the point that God would have accomplished what He had promised by some other means.
D; God had declared that Jacob should receive the birthright, and His word would have been fulfilled in His own time had they waited in faith for Him to work for them. However, God also foreknew they won't wait, and He had to work to bring Jacob through his self inflicted detour to get him back on track. I don't see what this has to do with sin coming into existence.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Tom]
#121270
11/04/09 04:10 PM
11/04/09 04:10 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
M: God knows the end from the beginning.
T: I agree with this; God knows the end of the road chosen from the beginning.
M:Do you agree we do not agree on what this statement means? Yes. You understand this to mean that God sees the future like a re-run, implying it is fixed, or determined, or single-threaded, or like a movie, to use your analogy. M: Not only what can be - but also what will be.
T: That's only possible if the future is fixed, or determined, before it happens.
M:Why do you limit God?
Why do *you* limit God? My view of God requires far more intelligence than yours. Under yours, God has nothing to manage. Things simply occur as God has always known they will. Under the Open View, God must manage events as possibilities become realities. We can see exactly this occurring in EW 126-127: Sorrow filled heaven as it was realized that man was lost and that the world which God had created was to be filled with mortals doomed to misery, sickness, and death, and that there was no way of escape for the offender. The whole family of Adam must die. I then saw the lovely Jesus and beheld an expression of sympathy and sorrow upon His countenance. Soon I saw Him approach the exceeding bright light which enshrouded the Father. Said my accompanying angel, "He is in close converse with His Father." The anxiety of the angels seemed to be intense while Jesus was communing with His Father. Three times He was shut in by the glorious light about the Father, and the third time He came from the Father we could see His person. His countenance was calm, free from all perplexity and trouble, and shone with a loveliness which words cannot describe. He then made known to the angelic choir that a way of escape had been made for lost man; that He had been pleading with His Father, and had obtained permission to give His own life as a ransom for the race, to bear their sins, and take the sentence of death upon Himself, thus opening a way whereby they might, through the merits of His blood, find pardon for past transgressions, and by obedience be brought back to the garden from which they were driven. Then they could again have access to the glorious, immortal fruit of the tree of life to which they had now forfeited all right.
Then joy, inexpressible joy, filled heaven, and the heavenly choir sang a song of praise and adoration. They touched their harps and sang a note higher than they had done before, because of the great mercy and condescension of God in yielding up His dearly Beloved to die for a race of rebels. Then praise and adoration was poured forth for the self-denial and sacrifice of Jesus, in consenting to leave the bosom of His Father, and choosing a life of suffering and anguish, and an ignominious death, that He might give life to others.
Said the angel, "Think ye that the Father yielded up His dearly beloved Son without a struggle? No, no." It was even a struggle with the God of heaven, whether to let guilty man perish, or to give His darling Son to die for them. This description doesn't make sense from the standpoint you are suggesting. It depicts God's reacting to a crisis. You can see that in the three meetings Christ had with the Father. Under the scenario you are suggesting, this doesn't make sense. There would have been no crisis to manage, but simply the unfolding of an unfortunate event that God was certain was about to happen. If things were as you are suggesting, it would make sense for God to have responded, "Don't worry. I was certain this would happen, and here's what we're going to do about it." There certainly wouldn't be any need for meetings with Christ to discuss what to do. Nor would it make any sense to depict what God was going through as a "struggle." Your viewpoint doesn't allow for this. God was struggling whether to do this or that. You can't have this in a re-run world. In a re-run world God simply does what He has foreseen He will do. You've never come to terms with this logical inconsistency. M: Do you agree the GC will play precisely the way it is described in the Bible? Or, do you suspect some details might play out differently or not at all? For example, do you think it is possible the USA will not legislate and enforce the MOB, that instead she will continue to defend liberty of conscience?
T: I think things will play out as they've been described.
M:Why?
God knows the characters of the beings/institutions involved. It makes perfect sense to me that God can describe what would happen. God is (however I state this will be understated) incredibly intelligent, so there's no reason to think He would be unable to do so. M: GC, I believe the future for God is like watching a rerun. The reason no one can alter what God has shared with us through the prophets is for the simple reason He is explaining what has already happened from His eternal perspective.
T: If things play out like a re-run, then there can be no risk. That should be easy to see. But the SOP has a number of statements which describe risk, such as that God allowed His Son to come at the risk of failure and eternal loss, and that heaven itself was imperiled for our redemption. Neither of these statements makes sense if God is looking at things like a re-run.
M:Where in the Bible did God say, "I'm not certain Jesus will succeed?" I've asked this before but don't recall the passages you cited.
There are many things in inspiration which depict risk. That's all that needs to be established to make the re-run view logically impossible. For example, all heaven was imperiled for our redemption (COL 196). This makes no sense in a re-run world. Neither does EW 126-127. Nor DA 49, nor DA 131.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Tom]
#121271
11/04/09 04:17 PM
11/04/09 04:17 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
"But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness."
Why did God create FMAs in spite of knowing they would sin and die and require redemption at the expense of Jesus' life and death? Why? - "For the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness." You're misreading her statement. She wrote: and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness. This means that, in spite of the fact that sin should occur, this would not deter the Lord from establishing His throne in righteousness. It does not mean, as you appear to be suggesting, that God created FMA's He was certain would sin for the purpose of establishing His throne in righteousness. The Plan of Redemption is like the following: God's healing power runs all through nature. If a tree is cut, if a human being is wounded or breaks a bone, nature begins at once to repair the injury. Even before the need exists, the healing agencies are in readiness; and as soon as a part is wounded, every energy is bent to the work of restoration. So it is in the spiritual realm. Before sin created the need, God had provided the remedy. Every soul that yields to temptation is wounded, bruised, by the adversary; but whenever there is sin, there is the Saviour. It is Christ's work "to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, . . . to set at liberty them that are bruised." Luke 4:18. (Ed 113) As our bodies are ready to go to work healing if we are injured, so God was read to deal with sin, should it occur. But it was not part of God's plan that it should occur, nor was it inevitable, or certain, that it should occur. It was the will of God that Adam and Eve should not know evil. (Ed 23) It was not God's will that sin should occur. Sin occurred contrary to His will. You're suggesting something was certain to happen which was contrary to God's will. Again, EW 126-127 demonstrate that the sin of man was not an inevitability.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Mountain Man]
#121284
11/05/09 01:58 AM
11/05/09 01:58 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,706
Canada
|
|
"The fall of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent. Redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam, but an eternal purpose, suffered to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world, but for the good of all the worlds that God had created. . . . {TMK 18.2}
"The plan for our redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam. It was a revelation of "the mystery which hath been kept in silence through times eternal." Rom. 16:25, R. V. It was an unfolding of the principles that from eternal ages have been the foundation of God's throne. From the beginning, God and Christ knew of the apostasy of Satan, and of the fall of man through the deceptive power of the apostate. God did not ordain that sin should exist, but He foresaw its existence, and made provision to meet the terrible emergency. So great was His love for the world, that He covenanted to give His only-begotten Son, "that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16. {DA 22.2}
"The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity. Before the foundation of the world it was according to the determinate counsel of God that man should be created, endowed with power to do the divine will. But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness. God knows the end from the beginning. . . . Therefore redemption was not an afterthought . . . but an eternal purpose to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world but for the good of all the worlds which God has created. {AG 129.2} Good quotes above! ""God and Christ knew from the beginning, of the apostasy of Satan and of the fall of Adam through the deceptive power of the apostate. The plan of salvation was designed to redeem the fallen race, to give them another trial. Christ was appointed to the office of Mediator from the creation of God, set up from everlasting to be our substitute and surety."{1SM 250.1}
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: dedication]
#121285
11/05/09 02:20 AM
11/05/09 02:20 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
These are good quotes too! Satan in heaven had hated Christ for His position in the courts of God. He hated Him the more when he himself was dethroned. He hated Him who pledged Himself to redeem a race of sinners. Yet into the world where Satan claimed dominion God permitted His Son to come, a helpless babe, subject to the weakness of humanity. He permitted Him to meet life's peril in common with every human soul, to fight the battle as every child of humanity must fight it, at the risk of failure and eternal loss.
The heart of the human father yearns over his son. He looks into the face of his little child, and trembles at the thought of life's peril. He longs to shield his dear one from Satan's power, to hold him back from temptation and conflict. To meet a bitterer conflict and a more fearful risk, God gave His only-begotten Son, that the path of life might be made sure for our little ones. "Herein is love." Wonder, O heavens! and be astonished, O earth! (DA 49) Never can the cost of our redemption be realized until the redeemed shall stand with the Redeemer before the throne of God. Then as the glories of the eternal home burst upon our enraptured senses we shall remember that Jesus left all this for us, that He not only became an exile from the heavenly courts, but for us took the risk of failure and eternal loss. Then we shall cast our crowns at His feet, and raise the song, "Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honor, and glory, and blessing." Rev. 5:12. (DA 131) Remember that Christ risked all. For our redemption, heaven itself was imperiled. At the foot of the cross, remembering that for one sinner Christ would have laid down His life, you may estimate the value of a soul.(COL 196) Sorrow filled heaven as it was realized that man was lost and that the world which God had created was to be filled with mortals doomed to misery, sickness, and death, and that there was no way of escape for the offender. The whole family of Adam must die. I then saw the lovely Jesus and beheld an expression of sympathy and sorrow upon His countenance. Soon I saw Him approach the exceeding bright light which enshrouded the Father. Said my accompanying angel, "He is in close converse with His Father." The anxiety of the angels seemed to be intense while Jesus was communing with His Father. Three times He was shut in by the glorious light about the Father, and the third time He came from the Father we could see His person. His countenance was calm, free from all perplexity and trouble, and shone with a loveliness which words cannot describe. He then made known to the angelic choir that a way of escape had been made for lost man; that He had been pleading with His Father, and had obtained permission to give His own life as a ransom for the race, to bear their sins, and take the sentence of death upon Himself, thus opening a way whereby they might, through the merits of His blood, find pardon for past transgressions, and by obedience be brought back to the garden from which they were driven. Then they could again have access to the glorious, immortal fruit of the tree of life to which they had now forfeited all right.
Then joy, inexpressible joy, filled heaven, and the heavenly choir sang a song of praise and adoration. They touched their harps and sang a note higher than they had done before, because of the great mercy and condescension of God in yielding up His dearly Beloved to die for a race of rebels. Then praise and adoration was poured forth for the self-denial and sacrifice of Jesus, in consenting to leave the bosom of His Father, and choosing a life of suffering and anguish, and an ignominious death, that He might give life to others. Said the angel, "Think ye that the Father yielded up His dearly beloved Son without a struggle? No, no." It was even a struggle with the God of heaven, whether to let guilty man perish, or to give His darling Son to die for them. (EW 126, 127) Why was giving Christ for man a struggle? Because of the risk involved.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: Tom]
#121286
11/05/09 02:44 AM
11/05/09 02:44 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,706
Canada
|
|
quote=Tom You're not mentioning the simplest and obvious alternative, which is simply to create free moral agents (FMAs) who wouldn't sin.
D: If God created them so they could not sin they would not be Free Moral Agents.
quote=Tom You appear to suggesting the idea that creating an FMA means that the FMA must sin. But this is obviously false,since not even 1 in a million of them do
D: That is pushing this too far. No, a free moral agent does NOT have to sin. Of course they don't. And true multitudes didn't. But all it takes is one. And sooner or later one would, and did.
quote=Tom You're saying that if God saw that one FMA wouldn't sin, say Lucifer, and God didn't create him, some other one would. But God, with the future being fixed and His perfect foreknowledge, would see that, and simply not create that one either. So unless you wish to assert that *any* FMA would sin, given an eternity in which to do so, your assertion here is easily seen to be false.
This is where I disagree with your premise. The future of a free moral agent IS NOT FIXED -- to be a free moral agent means the CHOICE is yours! This is where it seems there is a block in communication between us. Yes, ANY Free moral agent COULD have sinned, this doesn't mean he had to sin, or even that he would sin, but any free moral agent COULD sin.
quote=Tom This is why I asked you the question regarding Gabriel. If God had only created one being in the universe, Gabriel, would it be inevitable that he would have sinned? This is the logical conclusion of your idea; any FMA would sin.
D: correction -- any FMA COULD sin, not "would sin".
Quite possible if God had created only one, sin would not have raised its ugly head. But I don't think God wanted to create just one -- he wants to fill the universe with intelligent beings who love and worship Him from free choice.
And yes, -- sooner or later amongst so many free moral agents one of them would want to try something apart from God -- thinking his way was better than God's way.
God's full character and righteous ways were not fully appreciated when the opposite was not known.
quote=Tom Regarding 1SM 250, that's one quote to consider, but there are others, namely DA 49, DA 131, COL 196, and EW 125-127 which make it clear that the no risk idea of the future isn't correct. That is, if the future is fixed, given God's perfect foreknowledge, there can be no risk for God. Risk means uncertainty. Fixed future = no uncertainty. These are mutually exclusive concepts.
Again, you seem to have this fixation of "fixed".
I don't know how to try to explain - many have tried as this debate seems to go on for months on end -- so it's rather pointless to think I could add anything to change the "fixed" concepts held.
Somehow the whole emotional element is missing -- yes, God knew the plan of redemption would be successful. But He still has to experience every bit of the process to reach that end. It's not just a "fast forward" the events, painless leap into the perfect eternity. When Christ was on earth, it was a REAL battle against Satan. He spent hours in prayer for strength to remain in God's will. It was REAL pain, REAL temptations, real opportunities to fail. When Christ was on earth, the "foreknowledge" sometimes grew very dim and He could barely see beyond the immediate conflict with sin. It's this reality of battle to make victory secure that seems to be dismissed in your interpretation of what I mean when we say God knew Christ would be victorious.
[i]quote=Tom It wasn't inevitable, because Lucifer could have chosen to repent, and Adam/Eve could have chosen not to sin as well.[i]
Yes, they could have -- but they didn't. And God foreknew they wouldn't, though He wished they would.
|
|
|
Re: Could Christ have sinned.
[Re: dedication]
#121294
11/05/09 03:57 PM
11/05/09 03:57 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: God knows the end from the beginning.
T: I agree with this; God knows the end of the road chosen from the beginning.
M: Do you agree we do not agree on what this statement means?
T: Yes. You understand this to mean that God sees the future like a re-run, implying it is fixed, or determined, or single-threaded, or like a movie, to use your analogy. Who or what fixes history? It is what it is. The future for God is like history. He knows everything past, present, and future. He knows the end from the beginning, and the beginning to the end. There is nothing single-threaded about it. In the same way knowing history doesn’t alter its reality, so too, knowing the future like history in no way alters its reality. We are, after all, talking about God. It’s not like He can change the outcome by doing something different. Why not? Because history is what it is. All the choices and outcomes have played out. There’s no going back and changing things. M: Not only what can be - but also what will be. T: That's only possible if the future is fixed, or determined, before it happens. M: Why do you limit God? T: Why do *you* limit God? My view of God requires far more intelligence than yours. Under yours, God has nothing to manage. Things simply occur as God has always known they will. Under the Open View, God must manage events as possibilities become realities. We can see exactly this occurring in EW 126-127: Sorrow filled heaven as it was realized that man was lost and that the world which God had created was to be filled with mortals doomed to misery, sickness, and death, and that there was no way of escape for the offender. The whole family of Adam must die. I then saw the lovely Jesus and beheld an expression of sympathy and sorrow upon His countenance. Soon I saw Him approach the exceeding bright light which enshrouded the Father. Said my accompanying angel, "He is in close converse with His Father." The anxiety of the angels seemed to be intense while Jesus was communing with His Father. Three times He was shut in by the glorious light about the Father, and the third time He came from the Father we could see His person. His countenance was calm, free from all perplexity and trouble, and shone with a loveliness which words cannot describe. He then made known to the angelic choir that a way of escape had been made for lost man; that He had been pleading with His Father, and had obtained permission to give His own life as a ransom for the race, to bear their sins, and take the sentence of death upon Himself, thus opening a way whereby they might, through the merits of His blood, find pardon for past transgressions, and by obedience be brought back to the garden from which they were driven. Then they could again have access to the glorious, immortal fruit of the tree of life to which they had now forfeited all right.
Then joy, inexpressible joy, filled heaven, and the heavenly choir sang a song of praise and adoration. They touched their harps and sang a note higher than they had done before, because of the great mercy and condescension of God in yielding up His dearly Beloved to die for a race of rebels. Then praise and adoration was poured forth for the self-denial and sacrifice of Jesus, in consenting to leave the bosom of His Father, and choosing a life of suffering and anguish, and an ignominious death, that He might give life to others.
Said the angel, "Think ye that the Father yielded up His dearly beloved Son without a struggle? No, no." It was even a struggle with the God of heaven, whether to let guilty man perish, or to give His darling Son to die for them. This description doesn't make sense from the standpoint you are suggesting. It depicts God's reacting to a crisis. You can see that in the three meetings Christ had with the Father. Under the scenario you are suggesting, this doesn't make sense. There would have been no crisis to manage, but simply the unfolding of an unfortunate event that God was certain was about to happen. If things were as you are suggesting, it would make sense for God to have responded, "Don't worry. I was certain this would happen, and here's what we're going to do about it." There certainly wouldn't be any need for meetings with Christ to discuss what to do. Nor would it make any sense to depict what God was going through as a "struggle." Your viewpoint doesn't allow for this. God was struggling whether to do this or that. You can't have this in a re-run world. In a re-run world God simply does what He has foreseen He will do. You've never come to terms with this logical inconsistency. Knowing the future like history includes knowing how He managed everything. It includes knowing every single minute detail regarding the zillions of choices and outcomes of billions of people acting simultaneously. I’m surprised you perceive this as requiring less intelligence on the part of God. Even from your point of view God does not find Himself scrambling to deal with unforeseen choices and outcomes. He is not winging it as things unfold. You believe God knows all the possible ways all the choices can play out, which means you believe God knew, in advance, exactly how He was going to act when forced to decide whether or not to implement the plan of salvation. It’s not like He was surprised to find Himself responding the way He was. He foresaw, from eternity past, the whole scenario play out exactly the way it was playing out. So, the only difference between our views, so far as this point is concerned, is I believe God has known for eternity precisely which scenario is going to play out. I’m glad we agree God must work to manage the outcome of the zillions of choices billions of beings make every minute of every day. God does not, of course, prevent them from choosing as they please, but He does, for the good of all, manage the outcome of their choices. We manage the choices, God manages the consequences. Nothing is left to fate or chance. Everything plays out according to God’s master plan. He orchestrates everything perfectly. Which, of course, does not mean God wants us to sin. M: Do you agree the GC will play precisely the way it is described in the Bible? Or, do you suspect some details might play out differently or not at all? For example, do you think it is possible the USA will not legislate and enforce the MOB, that instead she will continue to defend liberty of conscience?
T: I think things will play out as they've been described.
M: Why?
T: God knows the characters of the beings/institutions involved. It makes perfect sense to me that God can describe what would happen. God is (however I state this will be understated) incredibly intelligent, so there's no reason to think He would be unable to do so. How can He know, thousands of years in advance, the exact choices and the precise outcomes before people are born? If, according to you, God does not know in advance precisely which scenario will play out, how can He know with absolute certainty the USA will legislate and enforce the MOB? And, why do you think God can know such things without violating their ability and freedom to choose as they please? M: GC, I believe the future for God is like watching a rerun. The reason no one can alter what God has shared with us through the prophets is for the simple reason He is explaining what has already happened from His eternal perspective.
T: If things play out like a re-run, then there can be no risk. That should be easy to see. But the SOP has a number of statements which describe risk, such as that God allowed His Son to come at the risk of failure and eternal loss, and that heaven itself was imperiled for our redemption. Neither of these statements makes sense if God is looking at things like a re-run.
M: Where in the Bible did God say, "I'm not certain Jesus will succeed?" I've asked this before but don't recall the passages you cited.
T: There are many things in inspiration which depict risk. That's all that needs to be established to make the re-run view logically impossible. For example, all heaven was imperiled for our redemption (COL 196). This makes no sense in a re-run world. Neither does EW 126-127. Nor DA 49, nor DA 131. Tom, you didn’t cite a Bible reference. Where in the Bible did God say, "I'm not certain Jesus will succeed"? "But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness."
M: Why did God create FMAs in spite of knowing they would sin and die and require redemption at the expense of Jesus' life and death? Why? - "For the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness."
T: You're misreading her statement. This means that, in spite of the fact that sin should occur, this would not deter the Lord from establishing His throne in righteousness. It does not mean, as you appear to be suggesting, that God created FMA's He was certain would sin for the purpose of establishing His throne in righteousness. What is His “eternal purpose”? The following passages make it clear that His “eternal purpose” is to redeem sinners and to restore them to righteous and true holiness in Paradise Lost. “The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity.” “Redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam, but an eternal purpose, suffered to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world, but for the good of all the worlds that God had created.” Why? "For the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness." The exaltation of the redeemed will be an eternal testimony to God's mercy. "In the ages to come," He will "show the exceeding riches of His grace in His kindness toward us through Christ Jesus." "To the intent that . . . unto the principalities and the powers in the heavenly places might be made known . . . the manifold wisdom of God, according to the eternal purpose which He purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord." Eph. 2:7; 3:10, 11, R. V. {DA 26.1}
Of special value to God's church on earth today--the keepers of His vineyard--are the messages of counsel and admonition given through the prophets who have made plain His eternal purpose in behalf of mankind. In the teachings of the prophets His love for the lost race and His plan for their salvation are clearly revealed. {ML 40.7}
During the years that were to follow the rending of the kingdom, Elijah and Elisha were to live and labor, and the tender appeals of Hosea and Amos and Obadiah were to be heard in the land. Never was the kingdom of Israel to be left without noble witnesses to the mighty power of God to save from sin. Even in the darkest hours some would remain true to their divine Ruler and in the midst of idolatry would live blameless in the sight of a holy God. These faithful ones were numbered among the goodly remnant through whom the eternal purpose of Jehovah was finally to be fulfilled. {PK 108.1}
The prophet's absolute faith in God's eternal purpose to bring order out of confusion, and to demonstrate to the nations of earth and to the entire universe His attributes of justice and love, now led him to plead confidently in behalf of those who might turn from evil to righteousness. {PK 461.1}
Through Jeremiah in Jerusalem, through Daniel in the court of Babylon, through Ezekiel on the banks of the Chebar, the Lord in mercy made clear His eternal purpose and gave assurance of His willingness to fulfill to His chosen people the promises recorded in the writings of Moses. That which He had said He would do for those who should prove true to Him, He would surely bring to pass. "The word of God . . . liveth and abideth forever." 1 Peter 1:23. {PK 464.1}
If the remnant people of God will walk before Him in humility and faith, He will carry out through them His eternal purpose, enabling them to work harmoniously in giving to the world the truth as it is in Jesus. He will use all --men, women, and children--in making the light shine forth to the world and calling out a people that will be true to His commandments. Through the faith that His people exercise in Him, God will make known to the world that He is the true God, the God of Israel. {9T 274.1}
The fall of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent. Redemption was not an afterthought, a plan formulated after the fall of Adam, but an eternal purpose, suffered to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world, but for the good of all the worlds that God had created. {TMK 18.2}
The purpose and plan of grace existed from all eternity. Before the foundation of the world it was according to the determinate counsel of God that man should be created, endowed with power to do the divine will. But the defection of man, with all its consequences, was not hidden from the Omnipotent, and yet it did not deter Him from carrying out His eternal purpose; for the Lord would establish His throne in righteousness. God knows the end from the beginning. . . . Therefore redemption was not an afterthought . . . but an eternal purpose to be wrought out for the blessing not only of this atom of a world but for the good of all the worlds which God has created. {AG 129.2}
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|