2003
{13.71 bill ly} (6128.1 y)

Hello,

My name is John Sanders. I have been working on a comprehensive cosmological model (for over five years now) that seems to evidence the visible universe to have existed for nearly 6134 years time using a poly-tensor equation derived from the General and Special Theory of Relativity.

It is my suspicion that such a model would be of great value to Dr Baugh's work. I will endeavor to lightly explain some of the possible proofs for this First Flash model.

Ignoring all untestable theories while metricizing together laws physically evidenced, FF becomes evident. FF in one perspective, is an inverse square law of time-space itself. This model requires only 8 dimensions to explain all of the physical laws, linear and curved time-space. (1 dimension of linear time, 1 dimension of curved time, 3 dimensions of linear space, and 3 dimensions of curved space.) A careful study of GR and SR reveals this.

This model can potentially unify Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity. I have already expanded Einstein's energy equation to include gravitation, electromagnetic radiation, and weak nuclear force evidenced in the decay rate of atomic mass. This expanded equation is not as in depth in mathematical nature as it still needs to be. It is more or less, a simplified rough draft for a unified field equation.

FF makes predictions of the visible universe that have been consistantly discovered to be evident as unexplained phenomina to the scientific community. It predicts that light observed on Earth, from an object that has traveled one light day's distance away, will start to blue shift. This is observed as the Pioneer anomoly. FF predicts that the temporal rate of distant objects will appear to slow down. Astronomers have confirmed this in the study of supernova explosions with no solid explanations for it. FF also predicts microwave background radiation to equalize at points 60 degrees separated. This observed problem is sometimes refered to as the universe being "out of tune".

FF successfully solves the "distant starlight problem" without alteration of light's constant speed and even reveals that the Big Bang theory works just the opposite (making the constant speed of light a form of fiction). In regard to the expanding universe, BB claims that the universe first started expanding at 1,728x10^38 times the speed of light, later on hitting the breaks for billions of years, and then start accelerating again due to the pressence of mysterious dark matter. In my FF model, the universe first started expanding at the speed of light and has been relatively accelerating at an exponential rate over a period of approximately 6134 years time.

I discovered this model by first bainstorming for an explanation for the distant starlight problem utilizing General Relativity. I speculated on a slide rule effect between time and space. I searched for scripture hoping to find what the proper ratio would be and finally found it in 2 Peter 3:8. This verse contains a rather complex algebraic ratio that when discerned, provides the basis to my model.

Externally, our universe would be observed to obey Kerr Newman geometry. (A singularity with spin and charge also called a "naked singularity" due to its lack of an event horizon.) A singularity of this nature inverses space like dimensions with time. A universe with spin falls in line with an idea purported by Einstein's closest freind, Kurt Godel. This type of universe (under dynamics of expansion defined by FF) would revert itself back to its original time of creation only one time after expanding to a critical distance called the Hubble radius. (Godel's Universe is frequently referenced as a possible method of time travel if we lived in a universe with rotation and had a structure that could withstand tremendous destructive forces) As discribed by the "Big Rip Theory", before reaching this critical radius, the universe would experience terrible convulsions within the very laws that govern its existence. (causing light from the heavens to disappear and a gravitational imbalance between large and small objects.)

The First Flash model predicts such events will occur very soon (due to this model's design of hyper expansion rate). The amazing parallel between these physical predictions and what is recorded scripturally shouldn't be ignored. (I should quickly note that there absolutely no connection between the predicted "shaking of the heavens" and the 2012 nonsense.) If I were to attempt to calculate a critical starting point in a break down in universal physical laws, I would estimate sometime between 2024 and 2037. (When FF predicts the Light Horizon will expand beyond a critical radius.) I would, however, be in error if I were to rely on this data. No one knows the day or hour of Christ's return.

To illustrate how FF works one must first understand that the dimensions of space and time that govern light, as is described by SR, is refered to as linear time-space. The properties of linear time-space govern kinetic energy and has a direct relationship with inertia. Curved time-space is thoroughly explained by GR of which relates to gravitation. This also has a direct association with potential energy.

Einstien errored in failing to recognize these two forms of dimensions effect each other and are not simply one and the same, as similar as they appear to be . Basicly, inertia is the complex conjugate of gravitation. This relationship is also true between kinetic & potential energy as well as linear & curved time-space. In string theory, a twistor is the quanta of linear and angular momentum. FF tweaks with string theory by defining the quanta of Earth's angular momentum as one Earth rotation and the quanta of Earth's linear momentum of light to be one light day's distance.

The constant of the speed of light can not be reduced, but Earth's rotation can be represented in fractions. In measuring resultant distances that light travels (relative to Earth) these two values multiply each other. As a result, the resultant distance light travels will always equal it's speed until light travels more than a light day's distance. At this point, a phase transition occurs and is evident in nature as the Pioneer Anomoly.

To correctly calculate the age of our universe, we first need a correctly measured distance from Earth to the light horizon. In 2008, the distance was calculated to be 13,730,000,000 light years. This distance would need to be divided by the number of Earth rotations per year (for a year calculation) and then square rooted (due to the inverse square property of the First Flash model). This reveals the visible universe's approximate age in 2008 to have been 6131.1248 years. (4124 B.C. just as Martin Anstey claimed) An older less accurate measurement was made in 2003 with the distance of 13,690,000,000 light years. Curiously, this measurement easily fits (within WMAPs degree of error) what FF would predict as the change in the visible universe's radius comparitively with the 2008 measurement.

Using FF, I was also able to determine that the light from the stars created closest to Earth (other than our sun, Sol), would have first reached Earth at twilight of the 6th day (beginning of the first Sabbath), and that the light emitted by the stars furthest away wouldn't reach the Earth until twilight of 7th day (the end of the first Sabbath). I can not see how this could possibly be coincidental in any way.

I just became aware of a new measurement of the light horizon's distance of which was made February of this year.

The new measurement calculated a distance of 13.75 billion light years +/- 120 million.

FFs projection for 2010 was 13.74 billion light years. (well within the degree of error magin)

Here is a complete list for FF data attributed to 2003, 2008, & 2010.

----------------------------------------------------------------
2003
- 13.57 bill ly (6095.3 y)
[13.69 bill ly] (6122.2 y)
{13.71 bill ly} (6126.1 y)
+ 13.81 bill ly (6149 y)

2008
- 13.61 bill ly (6104.3 y)
{[13.73 bill ly]} (6131.1 y)
+ 13.85 bill ly (6157.9 y)

2010
- 13.63 bill ly (6108.8 y)
{13.74 bill ly} (6133.1 y)
[13.75 bill ly] (6135.6 y)
+ 13.87 bill ly (6162.3 y)
----------------------------------------------------------------
- is lowest value & + is the highest possible value
{} is FFs predicted value
[] is WMAP's measured value
the numbers to the right are FF's calculated universe ages using The distances listed on the same line.

If all of the +,-, and [] ages are adjusted for 2010 and averaged, 6132.611111 years is the result. Considering the fact that FF's predicted value is 6133.1, it's very close indeed. (less than half a years difference)

Because the WMAP measurements were made at different times of the year, a difference of + or -1 year is in fact expected.


Please email me back if you have any further interest or questions involving this model.

Sincerely,
John C. Sanders