Year (years after creation) (distance from light horizon in LY)
2020 6143.1248...............13,783,798,040
2021 6144.1248...............13,788,285,960
2022 6145.1248...............13,792,774,600
2023 6146.1248...............13,797,263,980
2024 6147.1248...............13,801,754,090
2025 6148.1248...............13,806,244,930

here are four other years of interest:
2035 6158.1248...............13,851,193,510
2037 6160.1248...............13,860,191,990
2877 7000.1248...............17,897,888,170
3037 7160.1248...............18,725,413,160

I've been pounding away at my newly refined "Inverse Square Law of Relative Time" and am excited to reveal a rather simplified equation derived from it.

In inverse square laws, there is a source point for the field, the value of which disperses as the field sphericaly expands away from the source.

In this new law, the "radius" represents the value for the passage of linear time. The "source" is E/M (total energy divided by total mass). The surface area projecting away is resultant space calculated by multipling linear space by curved space.

There are in fact two radial axis radiating away from the source, 90 degrees separated. The second axial dimension of time is curved time. When linear time-space is multiplied by curved time-space, the result is C^2 (which of course equals E/M.)

The focus of inverse square laws is the intensity value "I". For this equation, I represents the relative temporal rate for resultant space.

Here is the equation calculating this value:

L= linear space
G= curved space
T= linear time
S= curved time
P= pi
I= relative temporal rate

I=[(L x G)/4P]/T x S

This equation is so clear and obvious I have trouble understanding why this wasn't established within the scientific community fifty years ago. When this field equation is proven, the Big Bang Theory will die.

How can Evolution hope to survive in a 6134 year old universe?

Here is a link to a pic illustrating how this inverse square law of relative time works. (on my Facebook group called G.A.U.)

http://www.facebook.com/photo_search.php?oid=113712938640104&view=user#!/photo.php?pid=75561&op=1&o=user&view=user&subj=113712938640104&aid=-1&oid=113712938640104&id=100000966480453

I've changed the pic. Here is the updated link.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=113712938640104&ref=search&sid=100000966480453.3998276578..1#!/photo.php?pid=75940&o=all&op=1&view=all&subj=113712938640104&aid=-1&id=100000966480453

The last step in reducing my inverse square equation isn't correct.

Original equation:

[([(L/T)*(G/S)]/[4P*(T*S)])/(T*S)]

correct reduction:

(G*L)/[(4P)*(S^3)*(T^3)]

I recently discovered a wonderful book called "THE GREATEST STANDING ERRORS IN PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS" by Miles Mathis.

http://milesmathis.com/

I strongly recomend this site. I actually found evidence supporting my First Flash model and my new inverse square law in his book.

This is a link to a newly updated pic I've added to the G.A.U. group.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=79...100000966480453

I've started on a new page in developing a unified field theory.

In FF, c^2 involves the speed of light "c" as a description for velocity and a second component equal to it in the form of angular velocity "w".

Quanta of light (or electromagnetic radiation) is known as photons "Y". Photons are emitted when electron orbitals are disturbed.

Looking for the parallel particle to photons, I noticed an interesting effect observed in weak nuclear interactions. When a neutron is effected by a W boson, one of the down quarks changes to an up, turning the neutron into a proton, electron, and a neutrino.

There is a parallel between electrons and neutrinos. Following FFs concept of particle parallelism between velocity and angular velocity, there should be some form of long distance boson involving angular velocity (or spin) that is emitted when neutrinos are disturbed.

There are five types of bosons; the photon (em radiation), Z boson (elecroweak), W boson (weak nuclear), gluons (strong nuclear), and the theoretical Higgs boson (gravitation).

In the weak interaction, all of these particles are accounted for except for three; photons, Z bosons, and the Higgs. I am looking for the parallel particle to the photon, so that leaves the Z boson and the Higgs. This particle of force would effect long distances (just as light does) but with a curved geometry as per the fact that it involves angular velocity.

The Z boson mediates weak reactions with a range of only 10^-18 meter. Wrong force and wrong range of force. The theoretical Higgs particle transmits the force of gravitation (of which is time-space curvature) and has a range effecting the entire visible universe. This is definitely the one.

Regrouping on this quantum physical model, photons are the linear parallel to the angular Higgs bosons, and electrons are parallel to neutrinos. If this is all true then when a neutrino's path is disturbed, Higgs particles are resultantly emitted.

I just found this document that was put together last year as an attempt to explain the Pioneer anomaly.

http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.3244v1.pdf

I've been preaching the idea that Earth's rotation has a hand in the retarded temporal rate of light observed on Earth from outside objects for years. Now NASA confirms it.

How long will it be before my entire model is independently confirmed by someone else?

I'm still researching on this neutrino / higgs boson idea. (extremely complicated stuff)

Thus far I've been taking allot of notes on stuff like Cooper pairs, BEC, phonons, Higg's condensate, gluon collisions, beta decay, and double decay.

I will likely adjust my model, as far as the mechanism between neutrinos and the Higgs.

There seems to be a complex chain of events between the appearance of a neutrino and the Higgs imbuing mass to other particles.

One key point is degrees of freedom. Bosons with mass has 3 degrees of freedom, unlike massless photons of which are limited to only two. A second key point is that a short ranged force also indicates a presence of mass.

Back to the complex chain, a neutrino / antineutrino collision creates Z bosons that quickly decay into one of three things depending on energy: back to a neutrino pair, charged leptons, or a quark pair.

Part of my conjecture is that protons and neutrons are constantly beta + or beta - decaying, meaning protons change into neutrons and back again (each time releasing either an electron and a neutrino or their antiparticles.) B- is from a W boson, B+ is from energy.

When a neutron beta- decays from a W boson, it becomes a proton, electron, and a neutrino. When a proton beta+ decays from energy, it becomes a neutron, positron, and an antineutrino.

So, what we've got so far is quark trios constantly beaming neutrinos and antineutrinos that collide creating Z bosons that can decay back into a neutrino pair again. Obviously these collisions would occur in greater frequency when matter is closer together than apart.

The interesting thing with Z bosons is that they have a very large mass, 91 Gev. There is also what's called the MSW effect that matter has on neutrinos when they pass near electrons.

I suspect that there is an exchange of curved time-space quanta with linear time-space quanta when neutrinos interact with electrons.