Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,195
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Kevin H, 2 invisible),
2,522
guests, and 8
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Does Ephesians 1:13 Implode SDA "Seal of God" Interpretation?
[Re: Rosangela]
#125698
06/02/10 03:01 PM
06/02/10 03:01 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
Rosangela,
The core issue here is, of course, if Pauls sentence in Romans give you free leave to read "seal" where Moses writes "sign". Both words occur in Romans in the same sentence, but is the sentence constructed in such a way that Paul is in effect saying to us "seal and sign are always interchangeable in the bible, irrespective of who wrote the particular book or when it was written". Would you or Azenilto at least try to prove that this is in fact what Paul is saying here?
Extrapolating a grammatical point from one sentence to make the foundation for one of the SDA unique points of doctrine, can you at least admit that you understand why I find this a very weak foundation, even a sandy beach?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: Does Ephesians 1:13 Implode SDA "Seal of God" Interpretation?
[Re: vastergotland]
#125701
06/02/10 05:09 PM
06/02/10 05:09 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Vaster,
No, seal and sign are not always interchangeable in the Bible. Not even the same word has always the same meaning in the Bible. "Seal" in Rev. 7:2 represents one thing, in Rev. 8:1 another thing, and in Rev. 20:3, still another thing. So the key is looking at the context. The word "sign," either in Hebrew or in Greek, is "a distinguishing mark." The Sabbath was a distinguishing mark of the children of God, showing that they belonged to the Lord. The same was true of the circumcision. The same was true of the blood on the doorposts on the occasion of the Exodus. The New Testament also speaks of a distinguishing mark of the children of God in connection with the Holy Spirit. And in Revelation it is also clear that the seal is a distinguishing mark of the children of God in the last great crisis. It is also clear that it is opposed to the mark of the beast, which will be the distinguishing mark of the enemies of God at that time. What is very questionable, which Azenilto correctly points out, is the argument that, since the New Testament says that the seal of God is the Holy Spirit, the seal mentioned in Revelation can be nothing else. To begin with, the New Testament doesn't say that the Holy Spirit is the seal, but that the believers were sealed with the Spirit, or in the Spírit. Maybe the Spirit is not the seal itself, but a sealing agent; or maybe both the manifestations of the Spirit are a seal and He is a sealing agent. Going back to the seal of God in Revelation. I think the clue for us to understand what the seal of God is in Revelation is the message of the third angel:
"Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, 'If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.' Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus."
The ones who are mentioned in contrast with them that receive the mark of the beast are "those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus." It's on this basis that we can conclude that the mark of the beast is related to the keeping of the commandments of God. And, since we know that almost the totality of Christendom keeps Sunday, it's probable this will be the point of truth especially controverted. And when we add the fact that God calls the Sabbath a sign between Him and His people, things begin to fall into place.
|
|
|
Re: Does Ephesians 1:13 Implode SDA "Seal of God" Interpretation?
[Re: Rosangela]
#125709
06/02/10 08:39 PM
06/02/10 08:39 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
Vaster,
No, seal and sign are not always interchangeable in the Bible. Not even the same word has always the same meaning in the Bible. "Seal" in Rev. 7:2 represents one thing, in Rev. 8:1 another thing, and in Rev. 20:3, still another thing. So the key is looking at the context.
Agreed The word "sign," either in Hebrew or in Greek, is "a distinguishing mark." The Sabbath was a distinguishing mark of the children of God, showing that they belonged to the Lord. The same was true of the circumcision. The same was true of the blood on the doorposts on the occasion of the Exodus. The New Testament also speaks of a distinguishing mark of the children of God in connection with the Holy Spirit. And in Revelation it is also clear that the seal is a distinguishing mark of the children of God in the last great crisis. It is also clear that it is opposed to the mark of the beast, which will be the distinguishing mark of the enemies of God at that time.
Even though a sign and a seal both have a distinguishing purpose, it seems they are thus in quite different ways. As the following example shows, the sabbath is a sign which is maintained by both parties taking part in it together. Exodus 31:16 Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. 17 It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever; A seal on the other hand, while being a distinguishing mark, is so through the authority of the one who does the sealing. Eph 1:13 In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who[a] is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory. Both thus distinguish the people of God but in fundamentally different ways. The sign through the partaking of the covenant and its promises and stipulations, while the seal is entirely founded on the authority and power on the part who bestows it. This is further support for the sabbath being a sign of the people of God while the Holy Spirit being the seal of the people of God. Incidentally exactly what the bible teaches. Unfortunately removing the base of interpretation for one verse of apocalyptic prophecy. What is very questionable, which Azenilto correctly points out, is the argument that, since the New Testament says that the seal of God is the Holy Spirit, the seal mentioned in Revelation can be nothing else. To begin with, the New Testament doesn't say that the Holy Spirit is the seal, but that the believers were sealed with the Spirit, or in the Spírit. Maybe the Spirit is not the seal itself, but a sealing agent; or maybe both the manifestations of the Spirit are a seal and He is a sealing agent.
I agree that there may be several different seals, the revelation itself uses the imagery of the seven seals to one document. So the question arises, which seals does the bible speak about. Having established that sign does not mean seal, there is no biblical foundation (at least any that has been presented here, which I am convinced it would have been had it existed) for identifying the sabbath as a seal. The Holy Spirit is mentioned as a seal of the righteous. Ephesians 1:13 has been mentioned, but Ephesians 4:30 is even more clear and to the point. 2 Timothy chapter 2 suggests that the gospel may be a seal when it says: 14Keep reminding them of these things. Warn them before God against quarreling about words; it is of no value, and only ruins those who listen. 15Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. 16Avoid godless chatter, because those who indulge in it will become more and more ungodly. 17Their teaching will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, 18who have wandered away from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some. 19Nevertheless, God's solid foundation stands firm, sealed with this inscription: "The Lord knows those who are his,"[a] and, "Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness."Setting the solid foundation firm against false doctrine, and identifying as its seal two phrases from the law and the prophets, ie the bible as Paul knew it. The two seals thus seem to be the Holy Spirit and His collected teaching throughout the ages. Going back to the seal of God in Revelation. I think the clue for us to understand what the seal of God is in Revelation is the message of the third angel:
"Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, 'If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.' Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus."
The ones who are mentioned in contrast with them that receive the mark of the beast are "those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus." It's on this basis that we can conclude that the mark of the beast is related to the keeping of the commandments of God. And, since we know that almost the totality of Christendom keeps Sunday, it's probable this will be the point of truth especially controverted. And when we add the fact that God calls the Sabbath a sign between Him and His people, things begin to fall into place.
First we may want to widen the definitions a little. In Johns first letter, we can read a clear definition of what he meant by Gods commands: 1 john 3:21Dear friends, if our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God 22and receive from him anything we ask, because we obey his commands and do what pleases him. 23And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us. 24Those who obey his commands live in him, and he in them. And this is how we know that he lives in us: We know it by the Spirit he gave us. and 1 john 5: 1Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves the father loves his child as well. 2This is how we know that we love the children of God: by loving God and carrying out his commands. 3This is love for God: to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome, 4for everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. 5Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God. We thus see that identifying "commandments" with the verses of exodus chapter 20 is in fact limiting the verses in revelation. Or to hear it in Jesus own words, in Matthew chapters 5-7. Lastly, and digressing from my own point made above, concerning the widespread view that sunday is the christian sabbath, I would ask, which of the 10 commandments is widely kept in our world today? No Gods before the Lord? Was worship given to things or beings other than God ever as widespread as it is today? Even those who claim to have no god worship at some altar, of commerce or communism or something else. Such worship of course takes its form from idols. Misusing the name of God? All who claim to be christian but show no fruit of the Spirit are daily misusing Gods name, dragging it in the dirt. The sabbath commandment.. Giving honor to ones parents; maybe this is the best kept of the 10, though rapidly decreasing where family structures disappear I image. Murder, is part of daily life in all to large parts of our world while adultery barely seem regarded as immoral any longer. Stealing and gossiping lies about others are huge problems in society, now recognized to be measurable on GDP scale. Finally the last of the ten, coveting what we do not have. Capitalism would cease to work tomorrow if all or even a qualified majority of the world population began to honor this command.
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: Does Ephesians 1:13 Implode SDA "Seal of God" Interpretation?
[Re: vastergotland]
#125710
06/03/10 11:58 AM
06/03/10 11:58 AM
|
Active Member 2019 Died February 12, 2019
2500+ Member
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
|
|
Good point Vaster. I don't have much time to elaborate, but through my studies of the sanctuary, the epods that the high priest wore on his shoulders where made of Onyx(H7718) which means "to blanch".
Anyway, what was interesting was that the names of the 12 tribes of the COI was engraved on the two ephods. Ex 28:11; 39:6,14 And it was to be a "SIGNET"(H2368) meaning "a signature ring" like a kings wears and seal up any laws or important papers with it.
H2368(Signet 9x, Seal 5x) comes from the root word H2856 "SEAL"(18x) which means "to close up, esp. to seal".
From these, my understanding is that we are the Fathers "SIGNET" that Jesus Christ wears on both shoulders. Or we are the Kings ring that seals up all things on earth and in heaven.
Blessings
|
|
|
The Competing "Mark of the Beast"
[Re: Rosangela]
#125712
06/03/10 12:31 PM
06/03/10 12:31 PM
|
|
The “Mark of the Beast”, End Time Sign Competing With the “Seal of God”
Since in my last article we demonstrated clearly that Ephesians 1:13 does not “implode” SDA interpretation concerning God’s seal (the Sabbath), let’s analyze the “mark of the beast” feature of these end time prophecies.
If there is a “seal of God”, which has to do with genuine worship of God, we all know how the devil along the centuries and millenia of human history especialized in devising counterfeits for everything God establishes. Thus, we can see how his agenda is being fulfilled. It is not an agenda of any particular Church or religious organization, rather the Enemy uses them as he pleases, always intending to deviate God’s people from genuine worship.
That has been his modus operandi. How many times in Israel’s history the people, even their kings, were distanced from God through idolatry! Who was behind all that, but Satan? He even created a “queen of heaven” to whom the people burnt frankincense (Jer. 44:18). And don’t we have in recent times a revised “queen of heaven”, with even campaigns to make her a “co-Redeemer”?!
Would the devil be less active today? Wouldn’t he exert even greater power to distance people from the genuine worship and, if possible, even diminish the glory of the Savior, as he always attempted to accomplish? Didn’t he resort to appealing to be worshipped, in place of God, by Christ Himself, in order to have the Savior worshipping him in the temptation desert? (see Matt. 4).
Before discussing the competing “mark of the beast”, it is important to know that thus far nobody is a bearer of it. Nowhere in the world people are impeded to buy or sell for not having such sign, or mark. But it is predicted that there will be this economic boycott against those who are not willing to participate in a global plan that will involve a decision as to being a bearer of either one of these mentioned signs (see Rev. 13:16, 17).
Characteristics of God’s Seal and the Identification of the “Mark of the Beast”
An imperial seal had three things: the name of the legislator, his function, and the territory of his jurisdiction. For example, Julius Caesar [name], Emperor [position he occupies] of Rome [territory on which he rules]. In the Sabbath commandment we find these three characteristics: the name of the Legislator—God, His position—Creator, and the territory on which He exerts dominion—the heavens, the Earth, the sea and the springs of waters:
“. . . For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it” (Exo. 20:10 e 11).
Once it is clear what the “seal of God” is—the Sabbath commandment—it becomes easy to understand what would be the “mark of the beast”. It is certainly the false Sabbath, that institution that the Roman Catholic Church says clearly to have altered by its authority, changing the day of observance from the seventh to the first day of the week and that the Protestants render a homage to her as they dedicate that day to their main worship activities, or sanctify it (which has been rarer lately, since the majority has adhered to the more “user friendly” nodayism/anydayism/everydayism. . .)
That the Roman Catholic Church claims to have been the responsible for that alteration, can be exemplified by some official statements of that Church, such as:
“The Catholic Church . . . by virtue of her divine mission, changed the day from Saturday to Sunday” – The Catholic Mirror, official organ of Cardinal Gibbons, Sept. 23, 1893.
“You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify”.—James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 ed.), pp. 72, 73. Another Catholic document confirms it:
“Ques. How prove you that the Church hath power to command feasts and holydays?
“Ans. By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of; and therefore they fondly contradict themselves, by keeping Sunday strictly, and breaking most other feasts commanded by the same Church”. – Henry Tuberville, An Abridgment of the Christian Doctrine (same in the Manual of Christian Doctrine, ed. By Daniel Ferris [1916 ed.], p. 67.
Five End Time Scenarios
As we study carefully the prophecies of Revelation 13, 14, 17 and 18 one thing is made clear: the final clashes between good and evil will have to do with genuine versus false worship.
Some time ago I composed an article analyzing five end time scenarios--that of Humanists, Spiritists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Dispensationalists and the last and the one that most clearly is being fulfilled, even after over one and a half centuries of being exposed--that of Seventh-day Adventists.
Even though the data presented is somehow outdated, the gist of what is exposed in said articles, written a few years ago, still demonstrates their total validity. Let’s see:
1st. – Humanistic Scenario. This scenario refers to a pinkish and prosperous future for all, thanks mainly to human developments in the field of science and technology. One can remember the amazing promises of the 60s and 70s for the year 2,000, when it was envisaged that everybody would work less hours, many would remain at their homes working with their computers, going to their workplace only once in a while for socializing, people would retire much sooner, home robots would do most tasks for housewives, the more adventurous ones could have a holiday on the Moon, or perhaps undertake excursions to Mars . . .
However, today the scientists seem the most dismayed people regarding the future of humanity. Despite their scientific and technological achievements having brought so many benefits to the world, they also created terrible conditions in which the very future of the planet is threatened. Just think about New Orleans’ Katrina, caused by climate change due to human activity in confrontation with nature. A story on the CBS TV network, USA, a time ago highlighted how Alaskan villages by the sea must move to higher ground, at a cost of billions of dollars, because of unexpected defrosting of the Poles. As the “greenhouse effect” warms ocean waters. the sea is invading the areas where they had their homes.
Human selfishness is the same and does not change on the face of scientific and technological development. Hence, man himself threatens the survival of the human race. And that to not mention the old threat of nuclear war globally destructive, seen today as reduced with the end of the cold war. But the former threats are being revived by other emerging nuclear powers. . .
In certain scientific panel of around 600 scientists from around the world surveys were publicized on the conditions of our planet, at the request of the UN, concluding that if urgent and comprehensive measures are not taken, we will be marching towards a global catastrophe. The ecological imbalance is an increasingly acute problem everywhere. Several bacteria not existing in certain territories are now advancing to vast areas due to changes in climate and temperature, which affects men, animals and plants. The July 2006 issue of the National Geographic magazine showed widespread contamination of the US coast, and another recent edition of Time magazine presented a scary scenario of mercury pollution affecting wild animals and fish in alarming proportions, not only in North America as also in other continents. But if we leave the land to check what happens at sea, the situation does not look like more encouraging.
These data above are not updated, but does the present conditions show improvement of the crises pointed out? Anyone can tell that the answer is NO!
2nd. – Spiritist’s Scenario. The Spiritists’ worldview shows many similarities with the Humanists’ in their also pinkish scenario of the future of mankind. There is, however, a significant difference--it views the development and progress of mankind thanks to the endless “law” of reincarnation. But, as we cannot see this supposed moral, ethical and spiritual progress among men, and the scientific-technological progress is a double-edged sword, as stressed above, the pinkish future vision that Spiritism promotes is not confirmed at any rate.
Not to mention how, biblically, the notion of reincarnation is not substantiated by facts, and is even a terrible error of these last days, preparatory to other larger predicted errors when there will be those bringing down fire from heaven before men. Moreover, the biblical picture of the future, as presented by Jesus, Paul and other Apostles, is that people in general would go “from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived” (2 Tim. 3: 13).
Christ stated that in the last days immorality and departure from good would make society very similar to that of Sodom and Gomorrah, and stressed that “because of the increase of wickedness the love of many will grow cold” (Matt. 24:12). Such words are far from representing a positive and optimistic scenario for men in the future (or would that be in the present?!). 3rd. - Scenario of “Jehovah’s Witnesses”. These religious people preached that Armageddon would occur due to the shock between the forces of the Communist world vs. the Capitalist one. The Watchtower Society organization’s book Thy Will Be Done on Earth (1958), had a scenario of the end time highlighting the struggle between “the King of the North” and “the King of the South”, according to Daniel chapter 11. The modern “King of the South” was seen as a combination of Great Britain/United States (p. 263), and the “King of the North” was, as the book teaches, “the Soviet Union, the Communist power that since seized power in Russia in 1917 has maintained as its goal until now the dominion of the entire world” (p. 278).
The book continues predicting: “Until the time of the end, during the Armageddon, there will be competitive coexistence between the two kings” (p. 297). And declares on pg. 300: “the Angel of Jehovah predicted additional attacks by the Communist King of the North before its end IN THE ARMAGEDDON” (emphasis in uppercase added).
In the well-known “witnesses’” publication Watchtower, dated April 1, 1984, p. 20, it is highlighted that the Soviet Union is an Atheist, materialistic nation. However, if this would lead to Armageddon it seems that this direction was permanently lost. Actually, today the “cold war” not only ended, but that former Communist and Atheist regime no longer exists.
On the other hand, religion is in full ascension in the lands of the former USSR and other ex-Communist associate republics. Such “prophetic anticipations” proved a failure for the Watchtower folks. The tremendous strength of Communism, led by USSR, dissolved itself almost overnight, without the firing of a single shot! The toppling of the Berlin wall symbolized this historical and surprising turnaround, and we know that everything came to occur thanks to the close collaboration between the CIA and the Vatican. No doubt, that was a “test” of other future collaborations between the beast that climbs from the land and the one that rises from the sea . . .
4th. – Dispensationalist’s Scenario. Arising at the end of the 19th century, these Bible interpreters preached a future in which a Jewish Antichrist would persecute the Jews, Russia would invade Israel, and that nation would expand its territories until reaching the proportions of the area under Solomon’ rule. But nothing has been confirmed in that direction. Although there was a significant return of large contingents of Jews to Palestine, with the formation of the State of Israel, other predictions have failed entirely. Israel is not expanding its territories and, on the contrary, has been returning land stretches to the Palestinians, as is the case with the Gaza Strip.
There is minimal possibility that Russia would invade Israel, and the failure of this Israel-centered eschatology was demonstrated for good with the prediction that 40 years after the establishment of the State of Israel, i.e. in 1988, the “Rapture” of the Church would occur. Books were published and sold by the millions around the world with such predictions, as The Great Late Planet Earth, by the dispensationalist author Hal Lindsey. And all that led to nothing.
The big interpretation problem of these scholars of biblical prophecy is that they can’t realize the conditional nature of divine promises and threats, both for Israel and for any other peoples (see Deu. cap. 28 and Jer. 18:7-11). The promise to Abraham (Gen. 12: 1-3) is not “unconditional”, as interpreted sometimes, since he had to effectively leave his land and relatives so that the divine plan were fulfilled from his action (he had total freedom not to obey the divine order).
[To be concluded in the next thread]
A. G. Brito Sola Scriptura Ministry
|
|
|
Re: The Competing "Mark of the Beast"
[Re: Azenilto]
#125714
06/03/10 12:58 PM
06/03/10 12:58 PM
|
|
[Conclusion of previous thread]
5th. Seventh-day Adventist Scenario, the Most Clearly Being Fulfilled
For over one and a half century, Seventh-day Adventists claim that the final conflict will have to do with the Sabbath/Sunday question. The Adventist expectation for a global “Sunday Law”, beginning through initiatives from the US, is well known. Although this notion has been often the target of mockery by opponents, signs pointing in that direction can be seen as never before in different ways, both in the US and other parts of the world.
Nowadays we witness a very significant emphasis on Sunday sanctification, most significantly highlighted in the Pastoral Letter Domini Dies, proclaimed by late Pope John Paul II, but clearly composed by the present pope, Benedict XVI. In his apostolic trip to Austria, he recalled in a mass on the 9th of September (2007) that Sunday is “the weekly celebration of creation: celebration of gratitude and joy for God’s creation” (see: http://zenit.org/article-20574?l=english).
Among other things said to exalt the Sunday institution, the Pope repeated the words of a Catholic leader of the past, pleading: “Give the soul its Sunday, give Sunday its soul”. Establishing a connection between Sunday sanctification and nature’s preservation, unheard of before, Benedict XVI highlighted the threat that hovers upon the environment and Creation in general, stressing the necessity to pay greater attention to the “ecological dimension of Sunday”, the day when the Church thanks God for the Creation. He said: “At a time when creation seems to be endangered in so many ways through human activity, we should consciously advert to this dimension of Sunday too”.
This “ecological dimension” of Sunday is a new language by which the Pope tries to show the Vatican’s leadership in a global campaign to “save the planet” (see http://zenit.org/article-20450?l=english). Wouldn’t that be what some are calling “ECOmenism”?
But in a theological perspective, we see in the papal discourse a clear distortion of the real meaning of the Sabbath institution: he points to Sunday as a day to celebrate creation, which doesn’t match the biblical teaching, for that role is assigned to the seventh-day Sabbath as being the “memorial of creation”.
According to the Genesis creation record, on the first day God was acting in His work, as Creator, and only on the seventh-day He rested, blessed and sanctified the day (Gen. 2:2, 3). So, this twisting of meanings is certainly a subtle change of the Bible’s teaching and symbolism on the subject of what constitutes the institution to remember the Creator and His creation.
In the USA, on the other hand, campaigns stressing greater respect for Sunday and the 10 Commandments are under way. A “10 Commandments Commission” was formed to promote a “10 Commandments Day” (which is being set for the 1st Sunday of May) under the command of influential Evangelical leaders, such as James Dobson, Benny Hynn, Charles Colson, Pat Robertson, Don Wildmon and a good number of others (see: http://www.tencommandmentsday.com/).
The promoters of these significant campaigns understand that the moral and spiritual decline of the great North-American nation (and all over the world) is due to the failure of society to consider seriously these divine principles, which seems a good thing, but that implies serious dangers for religious freedom. Such initiatives could lead to having religio-political systems influencing the government to dictate norms according to the expectations and interpretations of these leaders. History teaches us a sober lesson that when there is a mix of religion and politics, minorities are always hurt. . .
In an interview on May 18, 2005 to the program “Fresh Air”, of the NPR network (National Public Radio), that covers practically the entire country, Dr. James D. Kennedy, influential minister and evangelist who had an intense radio and TV activity before passing away in September, 2007, said openly that the principle of separation of Church and State in the USA is an error that goes against the ideals of the Christian founders of the nation, and should be simply discarded. This is a very worrisome notion. His interview can be heard through the following link: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4656600).
As aforementioned, the final events will have much to do with the Sabbath/Sunday question. It will be the definition of who will bear the seal of God, and who will receive the “mark of the beast”. And that the obligatory character of total suspension of activities on Sundays is not a new idea we can see just recalling the “rehearsal” of that during a very serious crisis in recent decades—the oil embargo of the 70’s. What day in the week was affected by those politico-economical developments of the time? The older ones remember the gas stations closing on Sundays in many countries throughout the world.
The Increasing Ecological Link
In an entire last page article, journalist Nancy Gibbs writes to Time magazine (Aug 2, 2004 edition) suggesting that it would be a good idea to bring back the old “blue laws” of rigorous closing of shops, stores and other establishments on Sundays in the USA. The article had as title “And in the Seventh Day We Rested?”, and as subtitle, “Maybe those old blue laws weren’t so crazy after all”.
Voices have been raised in different places, asking that all commercial, industrial and recreational activities are suspended one day a week to save energy and to reduce the emission of pollutant gases, which seems to make good sense in the perspective of an ecological catastrophe scientists have been warning humankind about lately. Wouldn’t the Pope’s recent homilies linking respect for Sunday with respect for nature suit perfectly this type of vision?!
A significant article in British newspaper The Guardian stresses the idea of halting activities on Sunday to undo the global warming effect. The article has as title ”Slow Sunday: The simple solution to global warming”. It refers a certain movement supported by the publication, that proposes “a wonderful way to empower ordinary people to participate in the great movement of mitigating global warming.”
The article goes on: “We cannot wait until governments are enlightened enough to legislate and cap the carbon emissions. Matters are urgent. We have to act now, without any delay. The power of public opinion and citizen action will have a strong impact on the climate conference taking place in Copenhagen.
“One thing we can easily do to achieve this goal: we can declare Sunday to be a fossil fuel-free day or a low-carbon day or at least an energy-saving day. We can start this week, this month or in 2010. We can start individually and collectively. The long journey to cut carbon dioxide emissions can start in the here and now.
“Not long ago Sunday used to be a day of rest, a day of spiritual renewal, a day for families to come together, but we have changed Sunday from a day of rest to a day of shopping, flying and driving. However, in the context of excessive carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, which are bringing catastrophic upheavals, we can and should restore Sunday to a day for Gaia, a day for the Earth.
“There will be no great hardship in cutting down all non-essential and non-urgent use of fossil fuels for one day a week. We can easily close supermarkets, department stores and petrol stations. . . . At a stroke, we can reduce 10% of our carbon emissions into the atmosphere by making Sunday a low-carbon day and at the same time make ourselves healthier and happier. So, let us make Sunday a day of rest and renewal rather than a day of travel and toil.
“Global warming or climate change is only a symptom of our deep-seated desire to consume, consume and consume. The external problem of carbon emissions is connected with the internal problem of desire. If we stay in the rat-race 24 hours, seven days a week, we are bound to pollute our inner space as well as the outer space. Speed is the curse of modern civilisation. The solution to global warming is simple: slow down. Slow is beautiful. Even if we cannot slow down every day, at least slow down on Sunday.” -- The Guardian, 17-09-09. [see original text in: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2009/sep/17/low-carbon-sunday]
Once more, Sunday would, undoubtedly, be the day chosen, in a global campaign to “save the planet”, and if emergency situations arise—since nobody has any idea of how all this immense quantity of pollutants thrown into the air all over the world would effect nature—how much obligatory this measure couldn’t come to be?
If in a boat there are five passengers, each belonging to a different religious or philosophical orientation, all debating enthusiastically their ideas, individually defending their views, and one of them spots a hole in the bottom of the boat, which begins to fill with water, won’t they all forget their differences and see a way to fix the common and threatening problem? In the face of emergencies, the tendency is everybody to unite to look for immediate measures that help achieve a common route of escape.
To Unite is Necessary, But. . .
The union of humankind has been attempted through divers campaigns, but none seems more efficacious for that end than “ecumenism”—the global religious union. And the “supernatural factor” could be part of this final scenario. “Mary’s” message, when of her “apparitions” before millions of Christians and Muslims in Egypt some years ago, was—”Unite”, “Unite”, “Unite”! As we witness such a tremendous political, ethnical, social, economic and religious divisions among the inhabitants of this planet, doesn’t it make much sense to look for such union? Of course to unite is necessary, but the crucial question is—to unite under what leadership?!
Only those who are very well prepared will discern the truth from the error in these final stages of human history. We are pleased that, in several Christian forums we have participated of, the discussions involving the Sabbath/Sunday and the law of God’s validity questions are the ones that hit records of visitors and participation. This shows the great interest that exists in understanding the Sabbath/Sunday/nodayism-everydayism-anydayism and the validity of the Ten Commandments as God’s moral law issues once and for all.
This interest in defining clearly the question of the polemical 4th precept of the Decalogue is very timely, for in the near future we will actually have more and more debates on these themes. And such debates will prove foundational to define who will be on God’s side in the final crisis, and who will accept the imposition of an evil agenda by those who want to deviate God’s people from the genuine worship. In the crisis that soon all inhabitant of the Earth will face everyone will have to choose what side he/she will take.
As the three faithful Hebrews of old, who had to decide between the genuine worship to God and the worship to the false god of Babylon (Dan. 3), those who remain faithful to God are described as the ones who “keep the commandments of God and have the faith of Jesus” (Rev. 14:12). This is additional evidence that the final conflict will have to do with obedience to some aspect of God’s law.
In the past these deviations from God’s Word meant the most abject idolatry, which still occurs in the present, but in more subtle ways, notwithstanding no less deceitful. That involves the despising of one of God’s commandments, the Sabbath, and the valuation of its poor imitation—the false Sabbath enforced upon society, even the so-called Christian world, by religious powers that long ago departed from the correct view of the divine law.
On the other hand, in an evident revival to the genuine worship to God, more and more congregations and pastors all over the world have been accepting the Sabbath truth, becoming “repairers of breaches and restorers of paths” (see Isa. 58:12). This is said in the context of a divine appeal for a faithful observance of the Sabbath day (vs. 13, 14).
Recently in Brazil a traditional conservative Pentecostal denomination had o a charismatic leader adopting the seventh-day Sabbath keeping, which caused his defrocking, but he was supported by many of the members who studied the subject and concluded that they also wanted to be “restorers of paths”. They had to leave that church, but started a new one stressing the same “seventh day” feature that characterizes those at the end time who “keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus” (Rev. 14:12). That is the origin of the newly formed Congregação Cristã do Sétimo Dia (Seventh-day Christian Congregation), that little by little is growing across Brazil.
A. G. Brito Sola Scriptura Ministry
|
|
|
Re: Does Ephesians 1:13 Implode SDA "Seal of God" Interpretation?
[Re: Elle]
#125720
06/03/10 05:43 PM
06/03/10 05:43 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
From these, my understanding is that we are the Fathers "SIGNET" that Jesus Christ wears on both shoulders. Or we are the Kings ring that seals up all things on earth and in heaven.
Like in these cases? Matt 16: 17Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. 18And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. 19I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." 20Then he warned his disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Christ. Matt 18 15"If your brother sins against you,[b] go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. 16But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that 'every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.' 17If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector. 18"I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. John 20:21Again Jesus said, "Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you." 22And with that he breathed on them and said, "Receive the Holy Spirit. 23If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven."
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: The Competing "Mark of the Beast"
[Re: Azenilto]
#125721
06/03/10 05:46 PM
06/03/10 05:46 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
The “Mark of the Beast”, End Time Sign Competing With the “Seal of God”
Since in my last article we demonstrated clearly that Ephesians 1:13 does not “implode” SDA interpretation concerning God’s seal (the Sabbath), let’s analyze the “mark of the beast” feature of these end time prophecies.
Azenilto, I take it that you dont bother reading what anyone else writes in the threads you start?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: The Competing "Mark of the Beast"
[Re: vastergotland]
#125722
06/03/10 06:31 PM
06/03/10 06:31 PM
|
|
Oh, I do read. . . But I don't think anybody gainsaid the points I made. By the way, there is another forum, similar to this, and there are also good comments in it. I think it would be worthwhile to reproduce here what a brother said: The seal of God "on the Law of God" is found in the Sabbath. The seal of God on the believer is found in Ephesian 1. If you think you are going to retain the Eph 1 seal of God at the time of the Loud Cry by telling the Holy Spirit to not talk to you about God's Commandments - then guess again. Matt 16 shows us that there never was such a thing as a time when it was "ok" to tell the Holy Spirit of truth "not to talk to you about sin" or not to "convict the World of Sin".
Thus all the non-Sabbath keeping saints today who truly are SEALED by the holy Spirit - will one day be "Keeping the Commandments of God" (as Rev 12 and 14 point out) when NSL issues surface and they are called out - in the Loud Cry.
For as Paul says in 1Cor 7:19 "But what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God"
Christ said "my sheep hear My voice" -- if they really are sealed by the Holy Spirit - then at the time God calls them "with a loud cry" -- they will answer.
in Christ,
BobMy reaction: Hi Bob Very good points. I would say that the Sabbath is the external "sign of God", while the Holy Spirit is the "internal sign of God". The promise of the New Convenant is that God would write His laws on the hearts and minds of those who accept the Gospel (Heb. 8:6-10 and 10:16). Nowhere in these texts, which are the most important to deal with the transfer of the Old to the New Covenant, it is minimally hinted that in the process of God writing His laws on these hearts and minds, He a) leaves the Sabbath commandment out of the picture; b) maintains the Sabbath commandment, but transfering the sanctity of the 7th to the 1st day of the week; OR, c) leaves this question of the day of rest as a vague, voluntary or variable religious practice, which can be adjusted to the believer's convenience or necessities (or that of his/her employer). Best regards Now, what was said above, 2 Timothy chapter 2 suggests that the gospel may be a seal when it says:
14Keep reminding them of these things. Warn them before God against quarreling about words; it is of no value, and only ruins those who listen. 15Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. 16Avoid godless chatter, because those who indulge in it will become more and more ungodly. 17Their teaching will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, 18who have wandered away from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some. 19Nevertheless, God's solid foundation stands firm, sealed with this inscription: "The Lord knows those who are his,"[a] and, "Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness."
Setting the solid foundation firm against false doctrine, and identifying as its seal two phrases from the law and the prophets, ie the bible as Paul knew it. The two seals thus seem to be the Holy Spirit and His collected teaching throughout the ages.Yes, this confirms what I said: all is part of the same experience—the gospel motivating a Christian to keep God’s commands, which ARE NOT LIMITED to believing in Christ, but also to keep his commandments. Jesus Himself said: "If you love Me, keep My commandments" which include, not exclude, those belonging to the law that God writes on the minds and hearts of those who accept the Gospel, as is the promise of the New Covenant (Heb. 8:6-10). I think John Calvin presented a wonderful view of how that works as he comments Heb. 8:10: In vain then does God proclaim his Law by the voice of man, unless he writes it by his Spirit on our hearts, that is, unless he forms and prepares us for obedience. . . . . Thus it comes that the Law is ruinous and fatal to us as long as it remains written only on tables of stone, as Paul also teaches us. (2 Corinthians 3:3.) In short, we then only obediently embrace what God commands, when by his Spirit he changes and corrects the natural pravity of our hearts; otherwise he finds nothing in us but corrupt affections and a heart wholly given up to evil. The declaration indeed is clear, that a new covenant is made according to which God engraves his laws on our hearts, for otherwise it would be in vain and of no effect. Source: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom44.xiv.ii.html
A. G. Brito Sola Scriptura Ministry
|
|
|
Re: The Competing "Mark of the Beast"
[Re: Azenilto]
#125723
06/03/10 08:25 PM
06/03/10 08:25 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
Regarding your second article, does the sabbath command require you to work on the sunday? If it does, many adventists may be breaking it even now in this way. And if it does not, then what is the problem if the economy shuts down one day of the week?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|