I must say, it does lend support to your idea that the whole universe was created at creation, but I am not convinced yet.

Okay, we have our linear time measurement in days. Now, let's look at my interpreted equation from 2 Peter 3:8.

(# of days times 365,250) times (# of days/365,250)="resultant time"= (# of days)^2

[and]

Thus [(number of light days in years since creation* 365,250) * (number of light days in years since creation/365,250)] * 365.25 = resultant distance to the light horizon in light years.

[and]

(linear space * curved space)/(linear time * curved time)= resultant time-space

But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 2Peter 3:8

How old is the universe?

Before jumping to conclusions, let's consider a few facts. Light's speed is derived by (distance/time) =speed, and this speed is a constant. Because of this, the speed of light is used in Special Relativity as a yardstick for space-time. In General Relativity, mass creates space-time curvature also known as gravitation. Gravitational acceleration is basically (distance/time) x time. The energy equation reveals how total energy, total rest mass, and the speed of light fit together as E=mc^2.The quantity of mass (source of space-time curvature) is multiplied by c^2 (the speed of light squared), equaling the total energy. C^2 is (distance/time) x (distance/time). But why is c squared in the energy equation? Look back at the equation for gravitational acceleration. It defines acceleration of speed from curvature, therefore it's actually (distance/time) x curved time. According to Relativity Theory, space and time are not separate. If there is curved time, curved space must also be present. This changes the equation to (distance/time) x (curved distance/curved time)= (resultant distance/resultant time). From this point on, we will refer to this as "The Equation". When the speed of light is combined with the effects of curvature caused from mass, c^2 is the result. This means that the effects of curvature must also equal c. C^2=(distance/time) x (curved distance/curved time).

What do we use to measure the speed of this curved space-time relative to Earth and what about the constant speed of light itself? Earth's daily rotation is our local source for measuring the speed of space-time curvature. To understand the "speed of light", consider the Archimedean spiral (also called a arithmetic spiral) in which equal linear and curved motions are combined. The resulting spiral has a constant value between each cycle. This constant is where the measured "speed of light comes from. We calculate light's speed by dividing the distance between two points with the time light travels between them. But light actually travels in a spiral path as it cycles from an electric to magnetic field. Therefore this method of measuring light's actual speed through space fails.

To measure long distances, the red shift equation is used. This equation in simplified form is c x [(observed wavelength-rest wavelength)/(Hubble's constant x rest wavelength)]= distance. Comparing this to "The Equation", (observed wavelength-rest wavelength)/(Hubble's constant x rest wavelength) =(curved distance/curved time). Notice that the red shift equation as shown, really is a variation of "The Equation." Considering this, the distance is actually a resultant distance divided by resultant time. When calculating the age of the universe, WMAP uses the red shift equation meaning that their results are resultant time, instead of normal linear time. The WMAP measurements for the age of the visible universe are as follows:

2003 | 13,690,000,000 years plus or minus 120,000,000 years
2008 | 13,730,000,000 years plus or minus 120,000,000 years
2010 | 13,750,000,000 years plus or minus 120,000,000 years

The method to convert resultant years to normal linear years works like this:

resultant years x 365.25= resultant days, the square root of resultant days = linear days, linear days/365.25= linear years

Using "The Equation", WMAP's measurements convert to the following calculated year of the universe's creation:

2003 | (using 13,710,000,000 resultant years) = 4124 BC
2008 | (using 13,730,000,000 resultant years) = 4124 BC
2010 | (using 13,740,000,000 resultant years) = 4124 BC

However, "The Equation" also predicts that light, observed on Earth from an object (originating from Earth) that has traveled the distance of a light day, will blue shift. This prediction conflicts with science's present day understanding of how blue shift occurs. None the less, this phenomenon is actually observed by astronomers and has been coined as the "Pioneer Anomaly." On October 8, 2005, the space probe Pioneer 10 exceeded a light day's distance from Earth.

In an attempt to prove or disprove "The Equation," a test should be performed on it's prediction that time's rate is observed to slow down with distance. The timed properties of nova could be used to gage this effect on time. The average distance of nearby nova in super clusters like Hydra, Pavo-Indus, Perseus-Pisces, Coma, and Hercules is 360,000,000 light years. The most distant nova observed, occur 1,000,000,000 light years away in super clusters like Horologium and Corona Borealis. Comparing nova from these two distances, a 60% temporal dilation rate would occur according to "The Equation's" calculations. Cosmological studies confirm this dilation rate to be true but is regarded as another strange "anomaly of nature."

Based on the facts, it would seem obvious that the visible universe was indeed created in the year 4124 BC.

Time on a rotating platform

Abstract Traditional clock synchronisation on a rotating platform is shown to be incompatible with the experimentally established transformation of time. The latter transformation leads directly to solve this problem through noninvariant one-way speed of light. The conventionality of some features of relativity theory allows full compatibility with existing experimental evidence.