Forums118
Topics9,234
Posts196,239
Members1,327
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126251
07/07/10 12:39 PM
07/07/10 12:39 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
Found the complete article, and here it is: http://www.anti-relativity.com/Selleri_Sagnac_Paradox.pdfThere is an excellent book too: http://books.google.com/books?id=_PGrlCLkkIgC&pg=PA132&lpg=PA132&dq=%22time+on+a+rotating+platform%22&source=bl&ots=TLLcyRrC5l&sig=d81msXvWyqYjStCS5B7hZiLP92g&hl=en&ei=14I0TIT4E8T8nAf4gc3WAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22time%20on%20a%20rotating%20platform%22&f=false
Last edited by JCS; 07/07/10 12:45 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126253
07/07/10 12:42 PM
07/07/10 12:42 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
So, did your original assessment of it stand to the whole context?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: vastergotland]
#126254
07/07/10 12:50 PM
07/07/10 12:50 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
Yes, I believe so.
Also, there is a group called the 4th Day Alliance that is now working to assist me in publishing a formal physics paper on my First Flash cosmological model.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126307
07/10/10 08:00 PM
07/10/10 08:00 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
I've been studying the mathematics to the Archimedean spiral and discovered a method for calculating the spiral's length called the "Clackson scroll formula." According to this formula, the following equation will determine the cross sectional area.
A=pi * s^2n^2 or r^2 * pi=A
s=the spacing between turns n=the number of turns A=the cross sectional area s*n=r radius
Relating this to my own First Flash equation, "A" would be the value for resultant time and "n" is obviously the number of days. What "s" represents in my model is of yet unknown. So I proceeded to compare the two equations and noticed that conversion value for days per year has a similarity with diameter and pi, but I needed to convert this to the value of pi.
To do this, I first multiplied 365.25 by pi = 1147.466717, thus 1147.466717/365.25=pi. This number is my rate of conversion for linear days^2. My original equation is:
(linear days)^2 x 365.25=resultant years
I have now changed it to:
[(linear days)^2/1147.466717] x pi = resultant years
But this is incomplete, since the Clackson's formula is: n^2 * s^2 * pi = A
To convert 1147.466717 into the value for "s", I first square rooted it and then inverted the value so that the squared number times linear days squared equals the original.
sqrt 1147.466717=33.8742781
33.8742781 inverted is 1/33.8742781 or .02952092431
So the result equation becomes:
linear days^2 * 0.02952092431 light days^2 * pi = resultant years
Which matches up with:
n^2 * s^2 * pi = A
In order to test this, I'll try the 2008 WMAP measurement. 13,730,000,000 resultant years/pi=4,370,394,737 4,370,394,737/(0.02952092431 light days)^2=5,014,882,502,000 sqrt 5,014,882,502,000=2,239,393.333 2,239,393.333/365.25=6131.1248 linear years
So that seems to work. Now I just need to find if there is any scientific evidence supporting this 0.02952092431 light day spacing and what this spacing actually is. Whatever it is, it contains the value for pi and the ratio for the number of days per year.
Last edited by JCS; 07/10/10 10:45 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126325
07/11/10 05:46 PM
07/11/10 05:46 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
I just recently put several of the different forms of my equation into Wolfram Alpha (for comparison). I was startled to discover that resultant time=mass and resultant space=energy.
I should correct that, mass is proportional to resultant time and energy is proportional to resultant space. Such a simple concept could possibly explain the dark matter problem.
I never saw it before. Amazing
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=A%3Dl*s%3Dc^2%3Dr^2*pi%3D%28s*n%29^2*pi%3DE%2Fm%3D%28d*o%29%2F%28t*n%29
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=l*s%3Dc^2%3Dr^2*pi%3D%28s*n%29^2*pi%3DE%2Fm%3D%28d*o%29%2F%28t*n%29%3D%28d*b-w%29%2F%28t*h*w%29
Last edited by JCS; 07/11/10 06:22 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126332
07/12/10 12:18 PM
07/12/10 12:18 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
Just found this website, apparently I'm not the only one who knows that c^2 = space^2/time^2. http://www.structureofexistence.com/Chapter03.htmlQuantitative relationships use objective equations, and qualitative relationships use subjective relations. They can both be represented by a proportional array that separates each element of interest from the others. This array is the division of the unity into four parts, seen along and across two dimensions. Each new overlay of concrete existence adds new information for further parallel correlations of subjective existence. The better understood each model is, and the greater the number of parallel correlations made between models, the clearer an actual indirect perspective of the whole of all things becomes. By aligning several contrasting patterns out of the vast array of existent models, a lateral higher perspective may be perceived.
Einstein’s famous equation relates the four components of the physical universe; mass, energy, space, and time. Einstein’s said that in cases where the atoms emitting and absorbing photons are at rest relative to each other, E=mc ² . E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. All motions (including that of light) are expressed in a rate of distance per time. Distance is the one-dimensional expression of space. (Area would be the two-dimensional expression of space.)
The equation E=mc ², in this form, does not show the proportional array it naturally contains. Simple algebra will suffice to restate the equation as the parts of a proportional array.
Divide both sides of the equation by m and the result is E/m=c². The c representing the speed of light (which is squared) can be rewritten as (s/t) ², which is equivalent to s²/t², so the equation now reads E/m=s²/t².
The proportional array is now evident. Energy is to mass as space squared is to time squared. It is also evident from this array that energy is to space squared as mass is to time squared.
E=mc²
E/m=c²
E/m=s²/t²
The relationship between the four components of the physical universe can be seen to parallel the relationship between the four components of formal linear logic; the A, E, I, and O propositions.
These four propositions are assertions about a relationship between things and there is a relationship between the four different logical assertions and the possibility of each to exist in the case of the others.
The A proposition is ‘All A is B’
The E proposition is ‘No A is B’
The I proposition is ‘Some A is B’
The O proposition is ‘Some A is not B’
These propositions can be visualized topologically.
The relationship between the possible truth of one formal proposition in relationship to the possible truth of another formal proposition parallels the possible case of one kind of physical existence for an entity in the presence of another kind of physical existence for that same entity. The array of formal propositions in logic parallels the array of physical components of objective reality.
Each term of reality is defined by the others, and is a term used to define the others. This array is a definitive study on the relationships between the physical entities of existence; matter, energy, space, and time, and also the relationship between conditions of existence. If this truth is evident through the use of basic algebra in accordance to genuine logic, why does nearly every physicist I speak with fight tooth and nail to disprove it?
Last edited by JCS; 07/12/10 12:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126337
07/12/10 11:19 PM
07/12/10 11:19 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
Ha! Check this out. Secret to the rest of the world, in cutting edge science it is already common knowledge that light has a combination of linear and angular momentum and that light can in fact be manipulated into "orbital angular momentum" or OAM. Meaning that photons can be made to orbit matter in a plasma state. http://iopscience.iop.org/0295-5075/90/4/45001/fulltextAll of this works in agreement with the First Flash model and yet every physicist that has evaluated my work, attacks the concept of c^2 representing a composite angular and linear time-space. I wonder what else remains hidden from the general population? Ah yes, here is another site: Abraham-Minkowski controversy Electromagnetic momentum in matter: Wrong formula: E = mc^2 ; Correct formula: E = mcw The value "w" means angular velocity. Here is the site: http://www.wbabin.net/saraiva/saraiva223.pdf
Last edited by JCS; 07/12/10 11:51 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126362
07/16/10 01:38 AM
07/16/10 01:38 AM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
Just found this link that expands on "OAM", and goes on to describe the very strange properties of a unique form of light called Bessel photons. Bessel photons travel in a parabolic-cylindrical path. Sounds impossible, but this stuff is very real. http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0903/0903.0819v3.pdfNotice this quote: An overall factor "h" was introduced so that the dynamical variable "U"(quantum realm associated with generator A) for a photon has units of linear momentum times angular momentum as expected for the quantum variable associated to pylz. I imagine allot this sounds like Greek but try to focus on the point where these special photons exhibit a motion of linear momentum times angular momentum. This paper was composed May 20th, 2009. Science is starting to catch up with my theoretical work.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126377
07/17/10 01:39 PM
07/17/10 01:39 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
I've been looking at an older book, "Superstrings and the Theory of Everything" in addition to a much newer book called "The Road to Reality" and am coming to the realization that Roger Penrose's Twistor theory represents my First Flash model at the quantum scale. With only two "modifications" does Twistor Theory morph into my own model. #1) Penrose explains that the net effect of a group of spinors would represent a spinor field. The combined effect of a group of twistors (at the scale of the entire Earth) and Twistor Theory is now represented at the same macro scale as FF. #2) Twistors represent the combined quanta of "null rays" and spinors at equal footing. Null rays represent the linear momentum of light's speed as explained in Special Relativity, spinors are quanta of angular momentum of which governs processes existing in quantum mechanics. The interesting point here is that Special Relativity dictates that the speed of light works as the foundational yardstick for relativistic time-space. In order for spinors to be on equal footing with light, there must exist a form of curved time-space as well. When linear and angular momentum are combined on equal footing, a Archimedean spiral results. (consider the fact that light actually expands away in a sphere) There really is no mystery here due to the fact that the General theory of Relativity has already confirmed the existence of curved time-space. I can see at this point, someone wanting to debate that curved time-space is simply distorted time-space that can not be combined with linear time-space because it is one and the same. On this point I would strongly urge you to consider the information on Bessel photons (a form of light that moves in a parabolic path due to linear momentum times angular momentum) as is explained on the following site: http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/PS_ca ... 0819v3.pdf
Last edited by JCS; 07/17/10 01:40 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A New Creationist Cosmological Model "The First Flash"
[Re: JCS]
#126380
07/17/10 05:55 PM
07/17/10 05:55 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
Senior Member
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 470
Colorado, USA
|
|
I would like to edit my second point as:
"#1) Penrose explains that the net effect of a group of spinors would represent a spinor field. The combined effect of a group of twistors (at the scale of the entire Earth) would represent Twistor Theory at the same macro scale as FF."
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|