Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,211
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (TheophilusOne, dedication, daylily, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,694
guests, and 6
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Rosangela]
#127607
09/17/10 04:44 PM
09/17/10 04:44 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
C:Uh, wait!...We are not born carnalR:I completely disagree.
R:The Word of God defines what the carnal mind is:
"Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be" (Rom. 8:7).
"The duty of intelligent souls is to hold to the truth, to practice virtue. We are born with a disinclination to both. It is sad to find in one's own constitution an opposition to virtues that are commendable in the sight of God, as submission, charity, sweetness of spirit, and patience that will not be provoked." {TDG 34.3}
"The nature of man is in opposition to the divine will, depraved, deformed, and wholly unlike the character of God expressed in his law." {ST, June 9, 1890 par. 12}
We are born with a disinclination to, an opposition to, the law of God.
We are born with a natural enmity against God. Tom may say we are not born loving anyone, but this is not true at all. We are born loving ourselves, loving ourselves above anything else, and this is evident in any baby's experience. I made my statement in regards to fetuses and newborns. You're saying that it's evident from any new born that the newborn is born loving itself? (1) : strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties <maternal love for a child> (2) : attraction based on sexual desire : affection and tenderness felt by lovers (3) : affection based on admiration, benevolence, or common interests <love for his old schoolmates> This is the primary definition for "love" from Webster's. I said that fetuses and newborns don't love anybody because they don't love. They haven't developed that capability. You say that fetuses and newborns love themselves, and that this is evident. How so? They have a "strong affection" for themselves? This would mean that fetuses and babies are capable of experiencing "strong affection." On what do you base the assertion that fetuses and newborns are capable of such experiences? On what do you base the assertion that it is "evident" that newborns have this experience in relation to themselves?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Rosangela]
#127608
09/17/10 04:45 PM
09/17/10 04:45 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
R: We are born with a carnal mind, Christ was born with the divine mind - this makes all the difference in the world. What tempts us to sin is our carnal mind, not our body. This carnal mind is the same as the carnal nature. It's this carnal nature which tempts us.
"Every Christian will be assailed by the allurements of the world, the clamors of the carnal nature, and the direct temptations of Satan [the three sources of temptation: the world, the flesh and the devil]. No one is safe. No matter what our experience has been, no matter how high our station, we need to watch and pray continually. We must be daily controlled by the Spirit of God or we are controlled by Satan." {5T 102.1}
T: Christ was tempted in all points as we are [the three sources of temptation: the world, the flesh, and the devil]. He didn't have a carnal mind though; He had sinful flesh.
R:Precisely. In His case, "flesh" was different from carnal mind. But, in our case, the two are one and the same thing. They're not the same thing. The flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God, but the carnal mind can.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Rosangela]
#127609
09/17/10 04:49 PM
09/17/10 04:49 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
C:The sinful human mind becomes carnal by use; it is not carnal by mere existence.
R:You start to use it as soon as you are born, and this can be seen in any newborn. Why would you limit this to being born? That is, this wouldn't start happening at birth, right? It would be difficult to observe what a fetus is doing inside the womb, but it's not qualitatively acting any differently inside than outside, right? So it's not accurate to say "you start to use it as soon as you are born" is it? On what basis do you assert a fetus (or newborn) is using a carnal mind? Because it cries when its hungry? How is it acting any differently than say a cat? Would we say a cat has a carnal mind because it meows when its hungry?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Tom]
#127610
09/17/10 07:15 PM
09/17/10 07:15 PM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
C:The sinful human mind becomes carnal by use; it is not carnal by mere existence.
R:You start to use it as soon as you are born, and this can be seen in any newborn. That's fine: the point is..., that it's by choice and not by nature alone. We make our sinful minds carnal by choice, not by existing. The mystery of Christ's infancy & childhood righteousness by faithful choices compared to typical children, etc, isn't a salvivic necessity to solve: we learn of righteousness later in life, anyway. What you were separating from us was Christ coming all the way down to where we are fallen to, by nature - a connection by him necessary for salvation itself: his righteousness qualifies him to be Saviour.... ...Yes, the church's modern position is not the original, as it publicly admitted, and doesn't work for the remnant movement preparing for Christ's return by developing Christlikeness with him, now.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Tom]
#127611
09/17/10 09:33 PM
09/17/10 09:33 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
(1) : strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties <maternal love for a child> (2) : attraction based on sexual desire : affection and tenderness felt by lovers (3) : affection based on admiration, benevolence, or common interests <love for his old schoolmates>
This is the primary definition for "love" from Webster's. And this is the primary definition for “love” from Ellen White: Supreme love for God and unselfish love for one another--this is the best gift that our heavenly Father can bestow. This love is not an impulse but a divine principle, a permanent power. The unconsecrated heart cannot originate or produce it. Only in the heart where Jesus reigns is it found. --AA 551 In the heart renewed by divine grace, love is the ruling principle of action. It modifies the character, governs the impulses, controls the passions, and ennobles the affections. This love, cherished in the soul, sweetens the life, and sheds a refining influence on all around. {AG 237.5} A divine principle found in the heart of those in whom Christ reigns, which rules the character, governs the impulses, controls the passions and ennoble the affections. Where is this definition in Webster’s? A holy being is born with this principle implanted in the heart.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Tom]
#127612
09/17/10 09:34 PM
09/17/10 09:34 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Why would you limit this to being born? That is, this wouldn't start happening at birth, right? It would be difficult to observe what a fetus is doing inside the womb, but it's not qualitatively acting any differently inside than outside, right? So it's not accurate to say "you start to use it as soon as you are born" is it? Tom, selfishness is "inwrought in our very being," as Ellen White says, before we are born - in fact, from the moment we are conceived - but brain activity begins in fetuses from the sixth month onward, if memory serves me well. However, as you said, we don't know what happens before birth, so, for all practical purposes, we begin to show selfishness from the moment we are born. On what basis do you assert a fetus (or newborn) is using a carnal mind? Because it cries when its hungry? How is it acting any differently than say a cat? Would we say a cat has a carnal mind because it meows when its hungry? I'd say the principle of selfishness extended to animals, too, when man sinned. Have you ever seen an animal steal food from another animal? Have you ever seen animals fight for food, or territory, or whatever? In humans the manifestation of this principle is the carnal mind – me first.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Colin]
#127613
09/17/10 09:46 PM
09/17/10 09:46 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
That's fine: the point is..., that it's by choice and not by nature alone. It's the nature which produces the choices. As I use to say, there is no way a thornbush doesn't produce thorns. The physical nature of Jesus was weak like ours; He was a real man. The difference was in His moral nature - i.e., in His mind. Christ was born with a divine mind - a mind none of us is born with. But He overcame because of His divine mind - and this is our hope.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Rosangela]
#127614
09/17/10 10:25 PM
09/17/10 10:25 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
T:(1) : strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties <maternal love for a child> (2) : attraction based on sexual desire : affection and tenderness felt by lovers (3) : affection based on admiration, benevolence, or common interests <love for his old schoolmates>
This is the primary definition for "love" from Webster's.
R:And this is the primary definition for “love” from Ellen White:
Supreme love for God and unselfish love for one another--this is the best gift that our heavenly Father can bestow. This love is not an impulse but a divine principle, a permanent power. The unconsecrated heart cannot originate or produce it. Only in the heart where Jesus reigns is it found. --AA 551 OK, we can use this definition for "love" if you prefer. This seems rather out of place in the context your assertion that newborns do love. How is it you see this love appearing in fetuses and newborns? And how does this apply in terms of your assertion that newborns love self? How would this work? In the heart renewed by divine grace, love is the ruling principle of action. It modifies the character, governs the impulses, controls the passions, and ennobles the affections. This love, cherished in the soul, sweetens the life, and sheds a refining influence on all around. {AG 237.5} Or this? How is this the love for self that you say newborns have? A divine principle found in the heart of those in whom Christ reigns, which rules the character, governs the impulses, controls the passions and ennoble the affections. Where is this definition in Webster’s? A holy being is born with this principle implanted in the heart. What I said is that newborns, and fetuses, do not love at all. You disputed this by saying that newborns do love, that they love themselves. It seemed logical to define "love" since this is something you are asserting newborns do, which I denied. So I did so using Webster's. You, apparently, took issue to this definition and are using Ellen White to suggest a different one I guess. Really, I'm not sure what you're doing. But you are the one who says that I was wrong in saying that newborns and fetuses don't love at all, so please explain what you mean by this.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Tom]
#127615
09/17/10 10:30 PM
09/17/10 10:30 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
T:Why would you limit this to being born? That is, this wouldn't start happening at birth, right? It would be difficult to observe what a fetus is doing inside the womb, but it's not qualitatively acting any differently inside than outside, right? So it's not accurate to say "you start to use it as soon as you are born" is it?
R:Tom, selfishness is "inwrought in our very being," as Ellen White says, before we are born - in fact, from the moment we are conceived - but brain activity begins in fetuses from the sixth month onward, if memory serves me well. So would you assert that fetuses starting at age 6 months are capable of love? And they love themselves? (in a sinful way, I suppose). However, as you said, we don't know what happens before birth, so, for all practical purposes, we begin to show selfishness from the moment we are born. No, I didn't say we don't know what happens before birth. I said it's more difficult to observe the behavior of the fetus than the newborn. T:On what basis do you assert a fetus (or newborn) is using a carnal mind? Because it cries when its hungry? How is it acting any differently than say a cat? Would we say a cat has a carnal mind because it meows when its hungry?
R:I'd say the principle of selfishness extended to animals, too, when man sinned. Ok, so animals have a carnal mind as well. Have you ever seen an animal steal food from another animal? Have you ever seen animals fight for food, or territory, or whatever? In humans the manifestation of this principle is the carnal mind – me first. It's your belief that an animal is acting selfishly when it seeks to feed itself? And this is the carnal mind at work?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #9 - Freedom in CHRIST
[Re: Tom]
#127616
09/17/10 10:34 PM
09/17/10 10:34 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
C:That's fine: the point is..., that it's by choice and not by nature alone.
R:It's the nature which produces the choices. It's the mind that produces choices, not the flesh. The flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God. As I use to say, there is no way a thornbush doesn't produce thorns. The physical nature of Jesus was weak like ours; He was a real man. What you're calling the "physical nature" of Jesus is "sinful flesh," which involves far more than physical weakness. To mention just one thing, our sinful flesh tempts us, and this was true of Jesus Christ as well. The difference was in His moral nature - i.e., in His mind. Yes, indeed! That *was* the difference! Not that Christ assumed a human nature different than ours. Christ was born with a divine mind - a mind none of us is born with. Not inherently born with. Does one have to be a certain age to be born again? If so, what age would that be? But He overcame because of His divine mind - and this is our hope. Only if He overcame what we have to face.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|