Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (dedication, daylily, TheophilusOne, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,493
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#129443
12/07/10 06:20 PM
12/07/10 06:20 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Since fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth, it stands to reason, then, that they can only cultivate a sinful character. Why do you think fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129444
12/07/10 06:35 PM
12/07/10 06:35 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
Since fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth, it stands to reason, then, that they can only cultivate a sinful character. Why do you think fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth? Come on Tom, surely you can see that it is impossible to be re-born until you are first born? You cannot repeat something you did not do a first time. The real question is, how can the unborn cultivate character, let alone a sinful one?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: vastergotland]
#129445
12/07/10 06:39 PM
12/07/10 06:39 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
MM:Since fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth, it stands to reason, then, that they can only cultivate a sinful character.
T:Why do you think fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth?
Th:Come on Tom, surely you can see that it is impossible to be re-born until you are first born? You cannot repeat something you did not do a first time. This is implying that "rebirth" is literal, but it isn't, so this logic doesn't apply here. I have a specific reason for asking MM this question. It will probably come up in a bit. The real question is, how can the unborn cultivate character, let alone a sinful one? Yes, this is a good question.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129456
12/08/10 03:02 PM
12/08/10 03:02 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Since fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth, it stands to reason, then, that they can only cultivate a sinful character. Why do you think fetuses and infants are incapable of experiencing rebirth? Rebirth requires conviction, confession, repentance, pardon, thorough Bible study and prayer, commitment, public testimony, and baptism. Fetuses and infants have not reached the age of accountability and are, therefore, incapable of experiencing rebirth. What do you have in mind?
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129457
12/08/10 03:06 PM
12/08/10 03:06 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
But I also agree with what EGW said, as she said it. We receive from Adam guilt and death. She didn't say we receive the possibility to earn guilt and death. She didn't say we receive the inclination toward guilt and death. She said we receive them. Did you look at the context? The context of the entire article from which this is taken, and especially the immediate context, is dealing with issues of choice. From a corporate standpoint, one could make the argument that in Adam we receive guilt, since we were all "in Adam", as we were all "in Christ." So, as Levi paid tithes in Abraham, so we sinned "in Adam" and were redeemed "in Christ." This was a much elaborated theme by Prescott. Jones and Waggoner also discussed this. Ellen White made statements dealing with this as well, for example, by Christ's life the entire race of men was restored to favor with God (1SM 343 or 1SM 353, from memory). However, this wasn't the context of this particular article. Seems logical to conclude, then, that being redeemed "in Christ" trumps, cancels being condemned "in Adam".
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#129467
12/08/10 07:24 PM
12/08/10 07:24 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Rebirth requires conviction, confession, repentance, pardon, thorough Bible study and prayer, commitment, public testimony, and baptism. Fetuses and infants have not reached the age of accountability and are, therefore, incapable of experiencing rebirth.
What do you have in mind? You're saying you don't think a person can be converted until they reach the age of accountability? Is this correct? If so, when do you think the age of accountability is? (I realize this differs from person to person; a general idea would be fine). Also you speak of public testimony and baptism. Are you saying you don't think a person can experience rebirth until they are baptized?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129468
12/08/10 08:01 PM
12/08/10 08:01 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Regarding what I have in mind, there are a couple of things. One I'll wait to discuss until your response, which has to do with the age of conversion, and so forth.
The other has to do with whether God can work through a fetus or infant. We know from the case of John the Baptist that the Holy Spirit can work with even a fetus. There's no reason to assume that the Holy Spirit couldn't work with a newborn either.
So the fact that a newborn has sinful flesh doesn't prevent it from being used by the Holy Spirit. Similarly Christ could have taken our flesh, and been used by the Holy Spirit.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129482
12/09/10 03:10 PM
12/09/10 03:10 PM
|
|
I am new to the board.
So hello.
I apologise that I have not had time to read the whole thread, but would like to offer this thought, if it hasn't already been offered:
Jesus was born "born again".
If we understand what that is, we will understand something of Christ's nature I sense.
Mark :-)
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: Tom]
#129483
12/09/10 03:17 PM
12/09/10 03:17 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: Rebirth requires conviction, confession, repentance, pardon, thorough Bible study and prayer, commitment, public testimony, and baptism. Fetuses and infants have not reached the age of accountability and are, therefore, incapable of experiencing rebirth. What do you have in mind?
T: You're saying you don't think a person can be converted until they reach the age of accountability? Is this correct? If so, when do you think the age of accountability is? (I realize this differs from person to person; a general idea would be fine).
Also you speak of public testimony and baptism. Are you saying you don't think a person can experience rebirth until they are baptized?
Regarding what I have in mind, there are a couple of things. One I'll wait to discuss until your response, which has to do with the age of conversion, and so forth.
The other has to do with whether God can work through a fetus or infant. We know from the case of John the Baptist that the Holy Spirit can work with even a fetus. There's no reason to assume that the Holy Spirit couldn't work with a newborn either.
So the fact that a newborn has sinful flesh doesn't prevent it from being used by the Holy Spirit. Similarly Christ could have taken our flesh, and been used by the Holy Spirit. People reach the age of accountability at different times for specific aspects of life and living. As it relates to obeying mom and not stealing cookies it happens around 2 years old. Regarding premarital sex it happens around 12. I see a difference between experiencing rebirth and experiencing conversion. Rebirth can happen, and usually does, before conversion. Rebirth involves conviction, confession, and repentance as it pertains to bad habits and practices commonly condemned by society (lying, cheating, stealing, adultery, murder, etc). Baptism and public testimony follow rebirth and are required for salvation. Whereas, conversion involves discovering everything else Jesus commanded us to obey and observe and then consenting to live in harmony with it (Sabbath keeping, diet, doctrine, etc). Concerning rebirth Jesus said, "Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." We are born and conceived "in sin". "All have sinned." "There is none righteous, no, not one." We begin life, as it were, dead in sin. None of this, however, prevents the Holy Spirit from exerting an influence on us from the moment of conception. John Baptist is an example of someone who particularly benefited from the influence of the Holy Spirit in his mother's womb. Does this mean he, unlike others, experienced rebirth and conversion before he was born, that the biblical descriptions cited above did not apply to him ("All have sinned." "There is none righteous, no, not one.")? That Jesus did not sin before He reached the age of accountability is a mystery that God has not seen fit to explain to us yet. "He was tempted in all points like as man is tempted, yet He is called "that holy thing." It is a mystery that is left unexplained to mortals that Christ could be tempted in all points like as we are, and yet be without sin. {5BC 1128.6}
|
|
|
Re: Is there a relation between Christ's assumed human nature and rightesousness by faith?
[Re: mtimber]
#129484
12/09/10 03:28 PM
12/09/10 03:28 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
I am new to the board.
So hello.
I apologise that I have not had time to read the whole thread, but would like to offer this thought, if it hasn't already been offered:
Jesus was born "born again".
If we understand what that is, we will understand something of Christ's nature I sense.
Mark :-) Hi, Mark. Welcome to the forum. My name is Mike. I agree with the idea that Jesus was born, as it were, born again. In fact, to be technical about it, it is even more accurate to say He was conceived in a born again state. By "born again state" I mean the sinful flesh nature He took at conception was under the control of a sanctified mind and spirit. Of course, precisely how He managed to control it before He reached the age of accountability is a mystery God has not yet explained to us. Do you see what I mean?
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|