1261 would indicate a different time period, but it would be only logical to infer that both time periods (1261 and 1260) were related, since they are mentioned in the same chapter, and that there is some overlapping between them, that is, that they begin or end together. In fact, this is the logic used to interpret the 1290 and 1335 days.
No they weren't used in the same chapter. It would be chapter 7 vs chapter 12.
Kland,
I think you are on the right track. Because the 1260, 42-months, and time times and dividing of time are all mathematically the same duration, it appears obvious that they refer to the same period. So if the numbers were not mathematical equivalents they would not be linked as readily.
When numbers are used in the book of Daniel, there is allot of subjectivity. Sometimes the very same numbers are translated from the original language into different numbers in English.
From Strong's allow me to give you two instances:
Unto two thousand <0505> (Daniel 8:14)
the thousand <0505> (Daniel 12:12)
0505 ףלא ‘eleph eh’- lef is translated as thousand 500 times and a variant 1 time (2000)
The same number was translated as 1000 and 2000 depending on the context. That being said, the translators got it right that time. Point being the context can affect how the number is intended to be understood.
The translators understood the history relating to Daniel 8:14 as 2300 literal days from the ascension of Artaxerxes to the cleansing of the Temple in Jerusalem by Ezra because Artaxerxes was the third and final Persian king to issue a decree to restore the Temple. And obviously Ezra arrived in Jerusalem in 457 BC near the end of a 2300-day period.
And there went up some of the children of Israel, and of the priests, and the Levites, and the singers, and the porters, and the Nethinims, unto Jerusalem, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king.
8 And he came to Jerusalem in the fifth month, which was in the seventh year of the king.
9 For upon the first day of the first month began he to go up from Babylon, and on the first day of the fifth month came he to Jerusalem, according to the good hand of his God upon him.
2300[days]/360 [prophetic days in a year] {2300/360}=
6-years (2160-days)[6 years were fulfilled and the 7th began)
4-months (120-days)
1-day (first day of the 5th month)
(2281-days)
Ezra arrived at Jerusalem 19-days before Yom Kippur 457 BC
From Yom Kippur 457 BC 2300-years extend to Yom Kippur 1844
Thus when the Bible translators encountered 0505 which is translated as 1000 [500 times] in the Bible
they knew that it had to be translated as 2000 in Daniel 8:14
Thus you also have an instance where Daniel 8:14 is literal time in the first (local) application and a day for a year in a secondary application.
But this won't help you current discussion much or any such talk with most SDA's since they are not familiar with the 4 applications of Daniel 8:14. These two [a literal and a figurative meaning] will cause many to try to explain away the evidence because it does not fit the historisist model. I should hope that seekers for truth would prefer truth than a pet model that does not fit all the criteria in the prophecy as knowledge is increased. But it can be stressful to exit one's comfort zone.
All things considered, I have been an SDA for almost 50-years. And when God called me to study Daniel almost 20-years ago, I put an earnest effort into answering that call.
Despise not prophesyings.
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
The only Private interpretation of Scriptures that matters is God's