HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
Ike, Andrew, Trainor, ekoorb1030, jibb555
1326 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,218
Members1,326
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
asygo 31
Rick H 23
kland 16
Daryl 1
November
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Member Spotlight
Daryl
Daryl
Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 25,133
Joined: July 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
8 registered members (Daryl, Karen Y, dedication, daylily, TheophilusOne, 3 invisible), 2,463 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 26 of 62 1 2 24 25 26 27 28 61 62
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: APL] #147646
11/28/12 03:49 PM
11/28/12 03:49 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Yes, sin is a real problem. The solution must also be real. People must "cease to do evil; learn to do well." Paul wrote, "According to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost". "Regeneration is the only path by which we can enter the city of God."

Quote:
Man was brought again into favor with God by the washing of regeneration. The washing was the burial with Christ in the water in the likeness of His death, representing that all who repent of the transgression of the law of God receive purification, cleansing, through the work of the Holy Spirit. Baptism represents true conversion by the renewing of the Holy Spirit. {FLB 143.3}

Those who have been buried with Christ in baptism, and been raised in the likeness of His resurrection, have pledged themselves to live in newness of life. "If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth." Colossians 3:1, 2. {FLB 143.4}

"Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." John 3:3. He may conjecture and imagine, but without the eye of faith he cannot see the treasure. Christ gave His life to secure for us this inestimable treasure; but without regeneration through faith in His blood, there is no remission of sins, no treasure for any perishing soul. {COL 112.5}

Nicodemus had come to the Lord thinking to enter into a discussion with Him, but Jesus laid bare the foundation principles of truth. He said to Nicodemus, It is not theoretical knowledge you need so much as spiritual regeneration. You need not to have your curiosity satisfied, but to have a new heart. You must receive a new life from above before you can appreciate heavenly things. Until this change takes place, making all things new, it will result in no saving good for you to discuss with Me My authority or My mission. {DA 171.1}

There was no excuse for the blindness of Israel in regard to the work of regeneration. Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, Isaiah had written, "We are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags." David had prayed, "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me." And through Ezekiel the promise had been given, "A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. And I will put My Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in My statutes." Isaiah 64:6; Psalm 51:10; Ezekiel 36:26, 27. {DA 174.1}

Regeneration is the only path by which we can enter the city of God. It is narrow, and the gate by which we enter is strait; but along it we are to lead men and women and children, teaching them that, in order to be saved, they must have a new heart and a new spirit. The old, hereditary traits of character must be overcome. The natural desires of the soul must be changed. All deception, all falsifying, all evilspeaking, must be put away. The new life, which makes men and women Christlike, is to be lived. 36 {CCh 59.3}

Again, "without regeneration through faith in His blood, there is no remission of sins". In response to, "Did Enoch need Christ's death in order to be regenerated?" you wrote, "Enoch, Moses and Elijah needed Christ's death and life." Please explain.

Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: APL] #147651
11/28/12 05:50 PM
11/28/12 05:50 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
asygo: I asked for yes or no, and you give a long answer that gave neither yes nor no. Don't be surprised if you are misunderstood, since you seem to go out of your way to be opaque.

Let me try again: Did Enoch need Christ's death in order to be regenerated?


APL: Enoch, Moses and Elijah needed Christ's death and life.

asygo: Good. We agree that Enoch needed Christ's death.

But that was not quite my question. Did Enoch need Christ's death in order to be regenerated? IOW, if Jesus lived His perfect life, then while hanging on the cross, just before dying, He decided to just go back to heaven, could Enoch have been regenerated?


APL: What do you mean by "regenerated". You and MM are the ones that have used the term, applying it to me. But looking back through this thread, I do not that I used it.

From post#146984 - 11/14/12 08:55 PM:
Originally Posted By: APL
This required a "RENEWING OF OUR WHOLE NATURE". This is a healing process, not a legal process. The only way we can be saved, is if we are born again, recreated. Then, and only then is the law satisfied. The regeneration can only be done by Christ. It took His death on the cross to achieve this.

Whatever you meant by "regeneration" in that quote, that's what I mean. Did Enoch need Christ's death in order to be regenerated in whatever sense you meant it in that quote?

Originally Posted By: APL
What I have been talking about is salvation. Most here is appears that salvation is a legal issue. I don't. I see salvation as a real issue, sin as a real problem.

That's what I'm trying to figure out about your belief. Did Enoch, 4,000 before Jesus came, lived, and died as a man, experience the salvation you are talking about?


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: Mountain Man] #147652
11/28/12 06:08 PM
11/28/12 06:08 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: asygo
There is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. Even the vilest sinner is not condemned if he is in Christ Jesus. I'll say again what I said last time: Because when a person is in Christ, God looks at Christ's holiness, not the person's depravity. So, no, one abiding in Jesus is not condemned. But it is not because he is holy, but because Jesus is holy. The depravity still brings guilt and condemnation, but Jesus takes it all away. It's still there, but it is rendered powerless by Christ's righteousness. We are not to worry about what God thinks of us, but what He thinks of Christ.

Just to be clear - so, because we have a fallen, depraved nature we are guilty and condemned, even if we do not cherish it or act it out; if we are abiding in Jesus the Father ignores our guilt and condemnation.

Almost. God doesn't ignore them, He disposes of them. God placed them on Jesus our Substitute, and they will be disposed of along with all the other sins in the sanctuary. We simply need to accept His propitiation.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
What effect does our ignored depravity, guilt, and condemnation have on the fruits of the Spirit we experience while abiding in Jesus? Does it stain them with sin and selfishness? Or, do they flow from us pure and holy and undefiled?

Passing through the corrupt channels of humanity, they are so defiled that unless purified by blood, they can never be of value with God. They are fig leaves, filthy rags compared to Christ's robe of righteousness.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Is "righteousness and true holiness" real or forensic, imparted or imputed?

Both. But what God counts in the judgment of those who are in Jesus is not what they have done, or even what He has done in and through them. What counts is what God did in and through Jesus, and accepted by His people as a gift.


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: asygo] #147660
11/29/12 12:44 AM
11/29/12 12:44 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: asygo
A: There is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. Even the vilest sinner is not condemned if he is in Christ Jesus. I'll say again what I said last time: Because when a person is in Christ, God looks at Christ's holiness, not the person's depravity. So, no, one abiding in Jesus is not condemned. But it is not because he is holy, but because Jesus is holy. The depravity still brings guilt and condemnation, but Jesus takes it all away. It's still there, but it is rendered powerless by Christ's righteousness. We are not to worry about what God thinks of us, but what He thinks of Christ.

M: Just to be clear - so, because we have a fallen, depraved nature we are guilty and condemned, even if we do not cherish it or act it out; if we are abiding in Jesus the Father ignores our guilt and condemnation.

A: Almost. God doesn't ignore them, He disposes of them. God placed them on Jesus our Substitute, and they will be disposed of along with all the other sins in the sanctuary. We simply need to accept His propitiation.

What is the difference between 1) "It's still there," and 2) "He disposes of them"?

Quote:
M: What effect does our ignored depravity, guilt, and condemnation have on the fruits of the Spirit we experience while abiding in Jesus? Does it stain them with sin and selfishness? Or, do they flow from us pure and holy and undefiled?

A: Passing through the corrupt channels of humanity, they are so defiled that unless purified by blood, they can never be of value with God. They are fig leaves, filthy rags compared to Christ's robe of righteousness.

So, the fruit of abiding in Jesus is defiled with sin and selfishness and the Father disposes of them? What's left to investigate and examine in judgment?

Quote:
M: Is "righteousness and true holiness" real or forensic, imparted or imputed?

A: Both. But what God counts in the judgment of those who are in Jesus is not what they have done, or even what He has done in and through them. What counts is what God did in and through Jesus, and accepted by His people as a gift.

If defiled and disposed of, in what sense is the fruit of abiding in Jesus "righteousness and true holiness" imparted and real?

Also, since our words and works justify us in judgment (our character determines out eternal destiny) in what sense do you mean they will not count?

Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: Mountain Man] #147676
11/29/12 05:54 AM
11/29/12 05:54 AM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: asygo
A: There is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. Even the vilest sinner is not condemned if he is in Christ Jesus. I'll say again what I said last time: Because when a person is in Christ, God looks at Christ's holiness, not the person's depravity. So, no, one abiding in Jesus is not condemned. But it is not because he is holy, but because Jesus is holy. The depravity still brings guilt and condemnation, but Jesus takes it all away. It's still there, but it is rendered powerless by Christ's righteousness. We are not to worry about what God thinks of us, but what He thinks of Christ.

M: Just to be clear - so, because we have a fallen, depraved nature we are guilty and condemned, even if we do not cherish it or act it out; if we are abiding in Jesus the Father ignores our guilt and condemnation.

A: Almost. God doesn't ignore them, He disposes of them. God placed them on Jesus our Substitute, and they will be disposed of along with all the other sins in the sanctuary. We simply need to accept His propitiation.

What is the difference between 1) "It's still there," and 2) "He disposes of them"?

"It's still there" and "He disposes of them" are independent concepts. It's like asking what's the difference between a manual transmission and a flyswatter.

What you're probably wondering about is what's the difference between "He ignores them" and "He disposes of them." It's the same difference as trash day at your house. You roll out your trash the night before. If you walk out the next morning early enough, it's still there. When you think about how the trash collector relates to your trash, is there a difference between "he ignores it" and "he disposes of it"? That's the difference.


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: asygo] #147679
11/29/12 12:50 PM
11/29/12 12:50 PM
APL  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
Originally Posted By: asygo
We are guilty and condemned, not because our nature is fallen, but because our nature is depraved. That depraved nature cannot be controlled by human power. Only in Christ can we hope to control it.

But when a person is in Christ, does that mean that his nature is no longer depraved? It is very likely to still be depraved. Does that mean that his depraved nature is no longer condemned? God still condemns it. Does that mean a person in Christ is condemned by God? No, it does not. How? Because when a person is in Christ, God looks at Christ's holiness, not the person's depravity.
What is the difference between a "fallen nature" and "depraved nature"?


Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: APL] #147692
11/29/12 03:05 PM
11/29/12 03:05 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
A fallen nature is one that is damaged in some way compared to the original. So, one with damaged DNA is fallen. So is one with malfunctioning neurons.

A depraved nature is a type of fallen nature that suffers from moral damage. For example, a nature that wants to please self at the expense of all others is depraved. So is one that prefers evil over good.


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: asygo] #147702
11/29/12 05:13 PM
11/29/12 05:13 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: asygo
M: What is the difference between 1) "It's still there," and 2) "He disposes of them"?

A: "It's still there" and "He disposes of them" are independent concepts. It's like asking what's the difference between a manual transmission and a flyswatter. What you're probably wondering about is what's the difference between "He ignores them" and "He disposes of them." It's the same difference as trash day at your house. You roll out your trash the night before. If you walk out the next morning early enough, it's still there. When you think about how the trash collector relates to your trash, is there a difference between "he ignores it" and "he disposes of it"? That's the difference.

Two metaphors. Nice job. Let's go with trash. So, the fruit of abiding in Jesus is trash. We toss it curbside and it is hauled to the landfill. Jesus said, "By their fruits ye shall know them." Does the trash collector discern our character based on our trash? Does he shift gears with a flyswatter?

Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: Mountain Man] #147710
11/29/12 06:27 PM
11/29/12 06:27 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: asygo
M: What is the difference between 1) "It's still there," and 2) "He disposes of them"?

A: "It's still there" and "He disposes of them" are independent concepts. It's like asking what's the difference between a manual transmission and a flyswatter. What you're probably wondering about is what's the difference between "He ignores them" and "He disposes of them." It's the same difference as trash day at your house. You roll out your trash the night before. If you walk out the next morning early enough, it's still there. When you think about how the trash collector relates to your trash, is there a difference between "he ignores it" and "he disposes of it"? That's the difference.

Two metaphors. Nice job. Let's go with trash. So, the fruit of abiding in Jesus is trash. We toss it curbside and it is hauled to the landfill. Jesus said, "By their fruits ye shall know them." Does the trash collector discern our character based on our trash? Does he shift gears with a flyswatter?

Here's how that works. Let's say you want to give your trash collector a gift - the best fruits from your garden. So you put it in the nicest basket you can find, then insert carefully in the center of your trash bin so he can get it when he picks it up.

That's your offering to God. The fruit itself maybe be nice, but the packaging is garbage.


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution. [Re: asygo] #147711
11/29/12 06:35 PM
11/29/12 06:35 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,638
California, USA
When we do our best, God accepts that as our best offering. But not because it is good enough. It's good enough only because Jesus makes up for the deficiency. That's what happens when we carefully place our nicest fruit basket in our garbage.

But if you just toss it to the curb, that's not your best. That will definitely not be good enough.


By God's grace,
Arnold

1 John 5:11-13
And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
Page 26 of 62 1 2 24 25 26 27 28 61 62

Moderator  Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
by dedication. 11/24/24 09:57 PM
No mail in Canada?
by Rick H. 11/22/24 06:45 PM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 11/21/24 11:03 AM
Fourth quarter, 2024, The Gospel of John
by asygo. 11/20/24 02:31 AM
The 2024 Election, the Hegelian Dialectic
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 08:26 PM
"The Lord's Day" and Ignatius
by dedication. 11/15/24 02:19 AM
The Doctrine of the Nicolaitans
by dedication. 11/14/24 04:00 PM
Will Trump be able to lead..
by dedication. 11/13/24 07:13 PM
Is Lying Ever Permitted?
by kland. 11/13/24 05:04 PM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 11/13/24 04:06 PM
Profiles Of Jesus In Zecharia
by dedication. 11/13/24 02:23 AM
Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study
by dedication. 11/12/24 07:31 PM
The Great White Throne
by dedication. 11/12/24 06:39 PM
A god whom his fathers knew not..
by TruthinTypes. 11/05/24 12:19 AM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by asygo. 11/25/24 03:16 AM
Dr Ben Carson: Church and State
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:12 PM
Will Trump Pass The Sunday Law?
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:51 PM
Understanding the 1,260-year Prophecy
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:35 PM
Private Schools
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:54 AM
The Church is Suing the State of Maryland
by Rick H. 11/16/24 04:43 PM
Has the Catholic Church Changed?
by TheophilusOne. 11/16/24 08:53 AM
Dr Conrad Vine Banned
by Rick H. 11/15/24 06:11 AM
Understanding the 1290 & 1335 of Daniel 12?
by dedication. 11/05/24 03:16 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1