Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,214
Members1,326
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Daryl, daylily, TheophilusOne, 4 invisible),
2,521
guests, and 9
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Rosangela]
#148860
01/09/13 07:30 PM
01/09/13 07:30 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Did He have sin in His body? What do the scriptures say? 1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bore our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live to righteousness: by whose stripes you were healed.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Rosangela]
#148861
01/09/13 07:47 PM
01/09/13 07:47 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2014 Retired Pastor
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,014
Iceland
|
|
John 14:30-31 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world comes, and has nothing in me. [nothing that would respond to the devil] Did He have sin in His body? Are you thinking in the terms of Gnosticism? Or how?
"Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Johann]
#148865
01/09/13 08:12 PM
01/09/13 08:12 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
[quote=Rosangela]Sin was not an element in his body which would have led him to death. Or is it your contention that God prevented this element to act in Satan and his angels but not in humans? The difference between angels and humans is that, differently from humans, the life of angels is directly maintained by God. They could never die unless God ceased to sustain their life. [/quotge]Sin was not an element in his body which would have led him to death - - Really? You are 100% sure? So, sin is not the cause of death. Did Jesus carry our sin in His body on the tree? Yes or no? If yes, HOW? If no, then you do you not believe the scriptures?
"If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." While it is a disgrace to sin, it is no disgrace to confess sin, and to forsake it, as the hateful thing it is,--that which caused the death of the only begotten Son of God. {RH, December 9, 1890 par. 4}
What caused the death of the Son of God? SIN.
Or is it your contention that God prevented this element to act in Satan and his angels but not in humans? - - God did not allow the natural consequences of sin to take full effect. In humans, read Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; it shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel. What happens when God removed the enmity, let sin go to its natural conclusion? We see this on the cross. And it killed Christ. .
The difference between angels and humans is that, differently from humans, the life of angels is directly maintained by God. - I don't know how you know that. You will need to supply some evidence on this. Is not ALL life from God? Are you saying that humans can live independantly of God?
By transgression man had separated himself from Him who alone is light and love. The sinner was "alienated from the life of God," "dead in trespasses and sins." The only hope for the fallen race was found in their becoming reconciled to God. Satan had so misrepresented God that man had no true conception of the divine character. But in carrying out the plan of salvation, Christ revealed that "God is love." "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." The Father loves us, not because of the great propitiation; but he provided the propitiation because he loves us. Christ was the medium through which he could pour out his infinite love upon a fallen world. "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself." The Father suffered with the Son. In the agony of Gethsemane, the death of Calvary, the heart of infinite love paid the price of our redemption. {BEcho, August 1, 1892 par. 2}
Is this quotation saying that since man had sinned, then he was in need of execution? No. Sin causes death. If we do not believe on the Son, will we then need execution? No. Sin causes death.
Christians misrepresent their heavenly Father when they go mourning and groaning, as though they were burdened with an enormous load, when their countenances are expressive of gloom and despondency, and the shadow encompasses their souls. But let them not think they are serving God in so doing; they are doing Satan's work in misrepresenting God and his service. They should go before the Father, and plead with him for a view of his goodness. They have lost sight of Jesus and his love. Let them go to Christ and study his character, for he came to represent the Father. Shall we receive Satan's misrepresentations of our God, and go on in discouragement, lacking peace and joy in the Holy Ghost? Shall we go on mistrusting our heavenly Father's love and doubting his goodness? What greater injury could we do to our children and our friends than to give them such false impressions of Christian life? It was at an infinite cost to the Father that man's salvation was purchased. The Father suffered with the Son to bring salvation within our reach. It is not his will that one soul should perish, but that all should come to repentance and receive eternal life. He has done all that it is possible to do to save fallen man. There was no other way by which man could be brought into harmony with his unchangeable law, save by the death of Christ. Christ became our surety, our sacrifice, Saviour, and example, and when all Heaven has been poured out to us in this gift of God, how shall he not with him freely give us all things? {ST, September 2, 1889 par. 7}
What injury do we do our children when we say, if you are naughty, God will execute you? NO. Sin pays its wage, it causes death. Christ came to save us from our sins, not to save us from God!!!
Christ was the Son of God, equal with the Father; and yet he was abused, ridiculed, scourged, and crucified. There are many who have thought that the Father had no part in the sufferings of the Son; but this is a mistake. The Father suffered with the Son. When the Son of God hung upon Calvary, the darkness gathered like the pall of death about the cross. All nature sympathized with its dying Author. There were thunderings and lightnings, and a mighty earthquake, but the hearts of men were so hardened that they could quarrel at the foot of the cross upon which hung the world's Redeemer, about the dividing of his vesture. Their hearts seemed to be wholly under the control of the powers of darkness. Angels looked upon the scene with sorrow and amazement. As man's substitute and surety, the iniquity of men was laid upon Christ; he was counted a transgressor that he might redeem them from the curse of the law. The guilt of every descendant of Adam was pressing upon his heart; and the wrath of God, and the terrible manifestation of his displeasure because of iniquity, filled the soul of his Son with consternation. The withdrawal of the divine countenance from the Saviour, in this hour of supreme anguish, pierced his heart with a sorrow that can never be fully understood by man. Sin, so hateful to his sight, was heaped upon him till he groaned beneath its weight. The despairing agony of the Son of God was so much greater than his physical pain, that the latter was hardly felt by him. The hosts of Heaven veiled their faces from the fearful sight. They heard his despairing cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" they saw the divine Sufferer die beneath the sins of the world. {ST, November 25, 1889 par. 6}
Satan charged God with an unforgiving spirit, because he would not receive on terms of favor those who disobeyed his law and therefore misrepresented his character. But forgiveness of sins would be of no avail unless the course of transgression was abandoned, and the grace of Christ imparted to the sinner to renovate, purify, and ennoble him who had fallen by iniquity. This was the only way by which the sinner could be restored to divine favor, and trusted to come into copartnership with Jesus Christ. But in Christ we behold the character of the Father, and see the pitying tenderness which God exercised for fallen man, giving his only begotten Son as a ransom for the transgressors of the law. It is in beholding the love of God that repentance is awakened in the sinner's heart, and an earnest desire is created to become reconciled to God. When the transgressor becomes acquainted with God, and experiences his love, it produces in his heart a hatred for sin and a love for holiness. {RH, March 9, 1897 par. 4}
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: APL]
#148867
01/09/13 08:25 PM
01/09/13 08:25 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2014 Retired Pastor
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,014
Iceland
|
|
What is the element of enmity as used in Gen 3:15?
"Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Johann]
#148872
01/09/13 09:09 PM
01/09/13 09:09 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
What is the element of enmity as used in Gen 3:15? The enmity was the means that God put in place in order to interrupt Satans efforts to corrupt human nature.God declares: "I will put enmity." This enmity is not naturally entertained. When man transgressed the divine law, his nature became evil, and he was in harmony, and not at variance, with Satan. There exists naturally no enmity between sinful man and the originator of sin. Both became evil through apostasy. The apostate is never at rest, except as he obtains sympathy and support by inducing others to follow his example. For this reason fallen angels and wicked men unite in desperate companionship. Had not God specially interposed, Satan and man would have entered into an alliance against Heaven; and instead of cherishing enmity against Satan, the whole human family would have been united in opposition to God. {GC 505.2} ... Satan tempted man to sin, as he had caused angels to rebel, that he might thus secure co-operation in his warfare against Heaven . There was no dissension between himself and the fallen angels as regards their hatred of Christ; while on all other points there was discord, they were firmly united in opposing the authority of the Ruler of the universe. But when Satan heard the declaration that enmity should exist between himself and the woman, and between his seed and her seed, he knew that his efforts to deprave human nature would be interrupted; that by some means man was to be enabled to resist his power. {GC 505.3}
What a sight was this for heaven to look upon. Christ, who knew not the least moral taint or defilement of sin, took our nature in its deteriorated condition. {16MR 115.3} There was not a drop of bitter woe which He did not taste, not a part of the curse which He did not endure, that He might bring many sons and daughters to God. {16MR 116.1} By taking upon Himself man's nature in its fallen condition, Christ did not in the least participate in its sin. He was subject to the infirmities and weaknesses of the flesh with which humanity is encompassed, "that it might be fulfilled that was spoken by the prophet Esaias, Himself took our infirmities and bare our sicknesses." He was touched with the feeling of our infirmities, and was in all points tempted like as we are. And yet He was without a spot. {16MR 116.3} The enmity referred to in the prophecy in Eden was not to be confined merely to Satan and the Prince of life. It was to be universal. Satan and his angels were to feel the enmity of all mankind. {16MR 117.3} The enmity put between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman was supernatural. With Christ the enmity was in one sense natural; in another sense it was supernatural, as humanity and divinity were combined. And never was the enmity developed to such a marked degree as when Christ became a resident of this earth. Never before had there been a being upon the earth who hated sin with so perfect a hatred as did Christ. He had seen its deceiving, infatuating power upon the holy angels, causing them to revolt, and all His powers were enlisted against Satan. In the purity and holiness of His life, Christ flashed the light of truth amid the moral darkness with which Satan had enshrouded the world. Christ exposed his falsehoods and deceiving character, and spoiled his corrupting influence. {16MR 118.1} But Christ was unmoved; and He used only the weapons justifiable for human beings to use--the word of Him who is mighty in counsel, "It is written." {16MR 119.2} With what intense interest was this controversy watched by the heavenly angels and the unfallen worlds as the honor of the law was being vindicated. Not merely for this world, but for the universe of heaven and the worlds that God had created, was the controversy to be forever settled. The confederacy of darkness were watching for the semblance of a chance to rise and triumph over the divine and human Substitute and Surety of the human race, that the apostate might shout Victory, and the world and its inhabitants forever become his kingdom. But Satan reached only the heel; he could not touch the head. {16MR 119.4} After His resurrection, Christ opened the understanding of His followers, that they might understand the Scriptures. Everything had been transformed by the working of the arts of Satan. Truth was covered up by the rubbish of error, and hidden from finite sight. … {16MR 122.3}
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: APL]
#148875
01/10/13 02:17 AM
01/10/13 02:17 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2014 Retired Pastor
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,014
Iceland
|
|
Wonders of wonders. That great theme, The Great Controversy, is a TRUTH that has been given to God's people that they may discern how to be a part of the Victory made possible by the miraculous enmity.
Thank you, APL, we need to study messages like that. It refreshes the soul, even in the midst of the battle against the powers of darkness.
Within the realm of our discussion I'd still like to have an expanded definition of that miraculous enmity. Does that help us to understand the depravity of sin?
"Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Johann]
#148876
01/10/13 04:07 AM
01/10/13 04:07 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Wonders of wonders. That great theme, The Great Controversy, is a TRUTH that has been given to God's people that they may discern how to be a part of the Victory made possible by the miraculous enmity.
Thank you, APL, we need to study messages like that. It refreshes the soul, even in the midst of the battle against the powers of darkness.
Within the realm of our discussion I'd still like to have an expanded definition of that miraculous enmity. Does that help us to understand the depravity of sin? What is sin? Does sin cause disease? How? Does sin cause death? How? So far, if you take Green, Rosangela and MM, it is not the sin causes death, but that God will execute sinners if they do not flip to His side. Is that really the truth? MM even claimed that God inflicts disease. Is that really true? I don't think so. A clear understanding of sin is needed, and understanding of what went wrong in the first place, then exactly what the enmity is can be defined Note what Rosangela said above, "...sin can't be the physical agent of death. The angels who sinned would never die if Christ, by His death, hadn't brought them under the dominion of death. For Christ, by dying, secured the right to destroy them (FLB 179.5)." It is interesting if you read where she was quoting from, you find the following in the same paragraph: "Death entered the world because of transgression." {FLB 179.5}. Death entered the world because of transgression. Are we to believe that because of transgression, God is now required to violate His law and kill? Is that why death entered with sin? No. Sin is the cause of all sickness and death. That is why sin is so horrendous. Now the book FLB is a compilation devotional book. If you read the original source for these quotes which is in Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers, you find one paragraph back, "Adam and Eve and their posterity lost their right to the tree of life because of their disobedience." {TM 133.3} Adam and Eve's posterity lost the right to the tree of life. Why their posterity? What did they do to be barred from the tree? What sin did they commit? Are they "legally" barred from the tree? Is sin a legal problem that needs a legal solution?Ezekiel 18:20-23 The soul that sins, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be on him. 21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he has committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. 22 All his transgressions that he has committed, they shall not be mentioned to him: in his righteousness that he has done he shall live. 23 Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? said the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live? Continuing: Ezekiel 18:30-32 Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, said the Lord GOD. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin. 31 Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby you have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will you die, O house of Israel? 32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dies, said the Lord GOD: why turn yourselves, and live you. This case is placed on record for our benefit. Just what took place in Pharaoh's heart will take place in every soul that neglects to cherish the light and walk promptly in its rays. God destroys no one. The sinner destroys himself by his own impenitence. When a person once neglects to heed the invitations, reproofs, and warnings of the Spirit of God, his conscience becomes seared, and the next time he is admonished, it will be more difficult to yield obedience than before. And thus with every repetition. Conscience is the voice of God, heard amid the conflict of human passions; when it is resisted, the Spirit of God is grieved. {5T 120.1}We want all to understand how the soul is destroyed. It is not that God sends out a decree that man shall not be saved. He does not throw a darkness before the eyes which cannot be penetrated. But man at first resists a motion of the Spirit of God, and, having once resisted, it is less difficult to do so the second time, less the third, and far less the fourth. Then comes the harvest to be reaped from the seed of unbelief and resistance. Oh what a harvest of sinful indulgences is preparing for the sickle! {5T 120.2} How does the enmity get placed? It is by the Spirit. Jesus when talking to Nicodemus, said we needed to be "born again". John 3:5-8 Jesus answered, Truly, truly, I say to you, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said to you, You must be born again. 8 The wind blows where it wants, and you hear the sound thereof, but can not tell from where it comes, and where it goes: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. Satan can claim that God had messed up his experiment by interjecting the enmity. At the cross, God removed the enmity between "his [Satan's] seed and the woman". Sin went to completion. And it killed the Son of God.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: APL]
#148881
01/10/13 06:16 AM
01/10/13 06:16 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2021
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
|
|
[quote=Rosangela]Sin was not an element in his body which would have led him to death. Or is it your contention that God prevented this element to act in Satan and his angels but not in humans? The difference between angels and humans is that, differently from humans, the life of angels is directly maintained by God. They could never die unless God ceased to sustain their life. [/quotge]Sin was not an element in his body which would have led him to death - - Really? You are 100% sure? So, sin is not the cause of death. Did Jesus carry our sin in His body on the tree? Yes or no? If yes, HOW? If no, then you do you not believe the scriptures?
"If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." While it is a disgrace to sin, it is no disgrace to confess sin, and to forsake it, as the hateful thing it is,--that which caused the death of the only begotten Son of God. {RH, December 9, 1890 par. 4}
What caused the death of the Son of God? SIN.
Or is it your contention that God prevented this element to act in Satan and his angels but not in humans? - - God did not allow the natural consequences of sin to take full effect. In humans, read Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; it shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel. What happens when God removed the enmity, let sin go to its natural conclusion? We see this on the cross. And it killed Christ. .
The difference between angels and humans is that, differently from humans, the life of angels is directly maintained by God. - I don't know how you know that. You will need to supply some evidence on this. Is not ALL life from God? Are you saying that humans can live independantly of God?
By transgression man had separated himself from Him who alone is light and love. The sinner was "alienated from the life of God," "dead in trespasses and sins." The only hope for the fallen race was found in their becoming reconciled to God. Satan had so misrepresented God that man had no true conception of the divine character. But in carrying out the plan of salvation, Christ revealed that "God is love." "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." The Father loves us, not because of the great propitiation; but he provided the propitiation because he loves us. Christ was the medium through which he could pour out his infinite love upon a fallen world. "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself." The Father suffered with the Son. In the agony of Gethsemane, the death of Calvary, the heart of infinite love paid the price of our redemption. {BEcho, August 1, 1892 par. 2}
Is this quotation saying that since man had sinned, then he was in need of execution? No. Sin causes death. If we do not believe on the Son, will we then need execution? No. Sin causes death.
Christians misrepresent their heavenly Father when they go mourning and groaning, as though they were burdened with an enormous load, when their countenances are expressive of gloom and despondency, and the shadow encompasses their souls. But let them not think they are serving God in so doing; they are doing Satan's work in misrepresenting God and his service. They should go before the Father, and plead with him for a view of his goodness. They have lost sight of Jesus and his love. Let them go to Christ and study his character, for he came to represent the Father. Shall we receive Satan's misrepresentations of our God, and go on in discouragement, lacking peace and joy in the Holy Ghost? Shall we go on mistrusting our heavenly Father's love and doubting his goodness? What greater injury could we do to our children and our friends than to give them such false impressions of Christian life? It was at an infinite cost to the Father that man's salvation was purchased. The Father suffered with the Son to bring salvation within our reach. It is not his will that one soul should perish, but that all should come to repentance and receive eternal life. He has done all that it is possible to do to save fallen man. There was no other way by which man could be brought into harmony with his unchangeable law, save by the death of Christ. Christ became our surety, our sacrifice, Saviour, and example, and when all Heaven has been poured out to us in this gift of God, how shall he not with him freely give us all things? {ST, September 2, 1889 par. 7}
What injury do we do our children when we say, if you are naughty, God will execute you? NO. Sin pays its wage, it causes death. Christ came to save us from our sins, not to save us from God!!!
Christ was the Son of God, equal with the Father; and yet he was abused, ridiculed, scourged, and crucified. There are many who have thought that the Father had no part in the sufferings of the Son; but this is a mistake. The Father suffered with the Son. When the Son of God hung upon Calvary, the darkness gathered like the pall of death about the cross. All nature sympathized with its dying Author. There were thunderings and lightnings, and a mighty earthquake, but the hearts of men were so hardened that they could quarrel at the foot of the cross upon which hung the world's Redeemer, about the dividing of his vesture. Their hearts seemed to be wholly under the control of the powers of darkness. Angels looked upon the scene with sorrow and amazement. As man's substitute and surety, the iniquity of men was laid upon Christ; he was counted a transgressor that he might redeem them from the curse of the law. The guilt of every descendant of Adam was pressing upon his heart; and the wrath of God, and the terrible manifestation of his displeasure because of iniquity, filled the soul of his Son with consternation. The withdrawal of the divine countenance from the Saviour, in this hour of supreme anguish, pierced his heart with a sorrow that can never be fully understood by man. Sin, so hateful to his sight, was heaped upon him till he groaned beneath its weight. The despairing agony of the Son of God was so much greater than his physical pain, that the latter was hardly felt by him. The hosts of Heaven veiled their faces from the fearful sight. They heard his despairing cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" they saw the divine Sufferer die beneath the sins of the world. {ST, November 25, 1889 par. 6}
Satan charged God with an unforgiving spirit, because he would not receive on terms of favor those who disobeyed his law and therefore misrepresented his character. But forgiveness of sins would be of no avail unless the course of transgression was abandoned, and the grace of Christ imparted to the sinner to renovate, purify, and ennoble him who had fallen by iniquity. This was the only way by which the sinner could be restored to divine favor, and trusted to come into copartnership with Jesus Christ. But in Christ we behold the character of the Father, and see the pitying tenderness which God exercised for fallen man, giving his only begotten Son as a ransom for the transgressors of the law. It is in beholding the love of God that repentance is awakened in the sinner's heart, and an earnest desire is created to become reconciled to God. When the transgressor becomes acquainted with God, and experiences his love, it produces in his heart a hatred for sin and a love for holiness. {RH, March 9, 1897 par. 4} Jesus was the Sacrifice to end all sacrifices. He was the Lamb of all lambs, the One in whom type met anti-type. I'm sure you recognize this, APL. But who or what had killed all those innocent lambs before? Their own sins? Did they self-destruct on account of the poison of the sins placed upon their heads? Did the conferrance of those sins kill them? Or was it the knife of another being that brought them to an early demise? And how was it with Jesus? Was it His own sins that destroyed Him? Did He self-destruct on account of the sins placed upon His head? Did those sins kill Him? Or was it at the hand of another that He died? Contemplate these themes. Blessings, Green Cochoa.
We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#148882
01/10/13 06:28 AM
01/10/13 06:28 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2021
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
|
|
Are we to believe that because of transgression, God is now required to violate His law and kill? It is not against God's law to kill. If it is against the law to kill, it should be against the law to command someone to kill. If it is against the law to command someone to kill, it should be against the law to approve of killing. If it is against the law to approve of killing, it should be against the law to bless one who kills for having done so. In all these cases, God would have gone against His own law already. So, it can only be that it is not against the law to kill. What is against the law? Murder. Murder does not equal kill. The Bible outlines the distinctions for those who have an ear to hear. Blessings, Green Cochoa.
We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
|
|
|
Re: Moral Influence Theory versus Penal Substitution.
[Re: APL]
#148884
01/10/13 10:25 AM
01/10/13 10:25 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Did He have sin in His body? What do the scriptures say? 1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bore our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live to righteousness: by whose stripes you were healed. And how do you reconcile this with John 14:30, which you had quoted: “For the prince of this world comes, and he has nothing in me”? If He had sin in His body, how is it that He had nothing from Satan in Him?
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|