If Benjamin had but two watches on his wrist, both of which differed from the other, would he have any way of knowing which of the two were more accurate? Of course not. But suppose Benjamin had three watches on his person, two of which agreed while the third differed...which time would he trust? Would he not trust the two which showed the same time?

Now, in the case that there are 20 clocks, and only one is different while 19 all show the identical same time--which time would a wise person trust?

That is exactly the situation with the Bible manuscripts. The "Majority Text" is a subset of all known copies of the Bible manuscripts comprising about 95% of them. Only 1 in 20 manuscripts differs, and is part of the Alexandrian text, or "Neutral Text" as it was christened by Westcott and Hort--after they had edited and revised the original copies.

Are we calling scriptures or their manuscripts "opinion?"

I agree in terms of human interpretations that the majority is usually wrong. However, we are not talking here about interpretations. We are talking about manuscripts.

Mrs. White affirmed the lineage of the Waldensian Bible. We have inspiration to go on, not mere opinion or majority vote.