Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,193
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (dedication, Kevin H, Karen Y, 2 invisible),
2,162
guests, and 11
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: APL]
#157037
10/11/13 12:42 AM
10/11/13 12:42 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
|
|
dedication - what kind of body did Christ have? A perfect body or a "sinful" body? Christ's physical body came from the DNA passed down from King David and the line of descendants to Mary. He was fully human, "tempted in all points as we are". But His mind was completely surrendered to the Holy Spirit and to God from the very beginning. He was born of the Spirit from birth, He didn't need to be "born again" of the spirit, like we must. In this sense He was not altogether like us, for we must be born again of the Spirit. As for "A sudden DNA change would require God to recreate Adam and Eve into carnal beings by changing the genetic codes in their bodies", that would mean that God is the author of sin and He is not. I agree -- and I don't think there was a "sudden DNA change" either. Let me ask a question, is a viral infection a "sudden DNA change"? Or is it a "progressive DNA change"? It is not the latter. A viral infection is when a foreign substance attacks our cells, and the body's immune system has to fight it off to restore health. While sin is often compared to a virus, due to its destructive effects on our spirituality, morals, emotions and health, it is not literally a virus. Therefore I really do not see approaching this symbolic representation in an absolute literal way. It's the mind -- our thoughts, motives and focus that is changed when Christ is our Lord, not our DNA. We do not receive new bodies until the second coming.
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: dedication]
#157041
10/11/13 01:40 AM
10/11/13 01:40 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Christ's physical body came from the DNA passed down from King David and the line of descendants to Mary. He was fully human, "tempted in all points as we are".
But His mind was completely surrendered to the Holy Spirit and to God from the very beginning. He was born of the Spirit from birth, He didn't need to be "born again" of the spirit, like we must.
In this sense He was not altogether like us, for we must be born again of the Spirit. Is the mind completely separate from the Body????? The mind can not work without a body. I agree -- and I don't think there was a "sudden DNA change" either. Actually - I completely disagree with you. Not sure how you can agree with me. You appear to claim that DNA can only be changed by God. This is not true. Viruses prove this. Unless you believe that God created viruses, which are the epitome of selfishness. A viral infection is when a foreign substance attacks our cells, and the body's immune system has to fight it off to restore health. While sin is often compared to a virus, due to its destructive effects on both our spirituality and health, it is not literally a virus. Therefore I really do not see approaching this symbolic representation in an absolute literal way. That is YOUR paradigm. Could your paradigm be wrong? Did God create viruses? I don't think so! Just read what you wrote! A virus attachs our cells. Does not the say anything to you??? Chrst being born again. Consider, John 17:19 AKJV And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth. Did Christ undergo a process of sanctification? If so, what does that mean? Christ, who knew not the least moral taint or defilement of sin, took our nature in its deteriorated condition. {16MR 115.3}...
By taking upon Himself man's nature in its fallen condition, Christ did not in the least participate in its sin. He was subject to the infirmities and weaknesses of the flesh with which humanity is encompassed, "that it might be fulfilled that was spoken by the prophet Esaias, Himself took our infirmities and bare our sicknesses." He was touched with the feeling of our infirmities, and was in all points tempted like as we are. And yet He was without a spot. {16MR 116.3} ...
The enmity put between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman was supernatural. {16MR 118.1}...
Everything had been transformed by the working of the arts of Satan. {16MR 122.3} Any other writing speaking about Christ being "born again"? Yes. But note how it works opposite! He was born of the Holy Ghost. In other words, Jesus Christ was born again. He came from heaven, God's first-born, to the earth, and was born again. But all in Christ's work goes by opposites for us: he, the sinless one, was made to be sin, in order that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. He, the living one, the prince and author of life, died that we might live. He whose goings forth have been from the days of eternity, the first-born of God, was born again, in order that we might be born again. {August 1, 1899 ATJ, ARSH 487.2}
If Jesus Christ had never been born again, could you and I have ever been born again?—No. But he was born again, from the world of righteousness into the world of sin; that we might be born again, from the world of sin into the world of righteousness. He was born again, and was made partaker of the human nature, that we might be born again, and so made partakers of the divine nature. He was born again, unto earth, unto sin, and unto man, that we might be born again unto heaven, unto righteousness, and unto God. {August 1, 1899 ATJ, ARSH 487.3} Christ took our sinful nature, he never participated in its sin (quoting EGW), and He sanctified Himself, that we may be sanctified. This should give one pause for thought! The forgiveness of sins is not the sole result of the death of Jesus. He made the infinite sacrifice, not only that sin might be removed, but that human nature might be restored, rebeautified, reconstructed from its ruins, and made fit for the presence of God. {5T 537.1} Sin is real, it is physical, it is not immaterial. Note what EGW talks about speaking of the "holy flesh" movement. If those who speak so freely of perfection in the flesh, could see things in the true light, they would recoil with horror from their presumptuous ideas. {2SM 32.2} What horror do you think she was speaking about? I have my opinion, and it is absolutely horrendous. Continuing... In this work we are to be laborers together with God. Much may be done to restore the moral image of God in man, to improve the physical, mental, and moral capabilities. Great changes can be made in the physical system by obeying the laws of God and bringing into the body nothing that defiles. And while we cannot claim perfection of the flesh, we may have Christian perfection of the soul. Christ had a perfect mine in an sinful body. He offers us HIs character on our sinful body. Continuing... When human beings receive holy flesh, they will not remain on the earth, but will be taken to heaven. While sin is forgiven in this life, its results are not now wholly removed. It is at His coming that Christ is to "change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body" (Philippians 3:21). . . . {2SM 33.3} Hm - sin is not fully removed until the second coming. Any other testimony to this effect? Yes! All come forth from their graves the same in stature as when they entered the tomb. Adam, who stands among the risen throng, is of lofty height and majestic form, in stature but little below the Son of God. He presents a marked contrast to the people of later generations; in this one respect is shown the great degeneracy of the race. But all arise with the freshness and vigor of eternal youth. In the beginning, man was created in the likeness of God, not only in character, but in form and feature. Sin defaced and almost obliterated the divine image; but Christ came to restore that which had been lost. He will change our vile bodies and fashion them like unto His glorious body. The mortal, corruptible form, devoid of comeliness, once polluted with sin, becomes perfect, beautiful, and immortal. All blemishes and deformities are left in the grave. Restored to the tree of life in the long-lost Eden, the redeemed will "grow up" (Malachi 4:2) to the full stature of the race in its primeval glory. The last lingering traces of the curse of sin will be removed, and Christ's faithful ones will appear in "the beauty of the Lord our God," in mind and soul and body reflecting the perfect image of their Lord. Oh, wonderful redemption! long talked of, long hoped for, contemplated with eager anticipation, but never fully understood. {GC 644.3} The curses of Genesis 3 were not placed there by God. They came as a result of SIN. Sin is a curse. The whole plan of redemption is to remove sin and vindicate God!
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: Mountain Man]
#157065
10/11/13 01:59 PM
10/11/13 01:59 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Do believers sin and not sin simultaneously? Are they righteous and unrighteous at the same time? Can they mature in the fruits of the Spirit and cultivate sinful traits of character in the same instant? No. Believers cannot sin and not sin simultaneously. They cannot be righteous and unrighteous at the same time. They cannot mature in the fruits of the Spirit and cultivate sinful traits of character in the same instant. While abiding in Jesus and partaking of the divine nature they do not and cannot knowingly sin. So, the question remains - What constitutes an unknown sin? Which sins can born-again, baptized believers commit without realizing it? In particular, which sins do believers commit unknowingly who have learned how to live in harmony with "all things whatsoever" Jesus commanded?
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: Mountain Man]
#157081
10/11/13 09:23 PM
10/11/13 09:23 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
MM - do you believe that sin is just a behavioral issue?
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: APL]
#157092
10/12/13 12:27 AM
10/12/13 12:27 AM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Sinning can happen in several different ways. Sin is the transgression of the law. We can sin in thoughts, words, and deeds. There is also a record of the sins we have committed in the past.
Why do you ask?
Also, would you mind answering the questions I posted above?
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: Mountain Man]
#157109
10/12/13 01:25 PM
10/12/13 01:25 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Sinning can happen in several different ways. Sin is the transgression of the law. We can sin in thoughts, words, and deeds. There is also a record of the sins we have committed in the past.
Why do you ask?
Also, would you mind answering the questions I posted above? My question on sin being a behavioral issue stems from the question of what really is sin. Is sin a legal problem that needs to be solved, or sin more like a medical problem that needs to be cured? What work did Christ do most while on earth; Legal absolution or healing? Is Salvation a legal solution or a healing solution. Consider a few texts: Jeremiah 17:14; Jeremiah 3:22; Jeremiah 30:17; Jeremiah 33:6; Psalms 6:2; Psalms 30:2; Psalms 103:1-3; Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and you shall call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Sin is the thing to be feared, not God. Sin causes destruction and death, and Satan is its author. In the medical model of sin, the bad behavior are the symptoms, what we call sins. But the disease is Sin. Example, a person might have a cough and a fevor, these are symptoms. You can treat the symptoms, but that will not cure the underlying disease. With sin, there is bad behavior, such as stealing, lying, cheating, coveting, hating your parents, breaking the Sabbath, these are "sins", little "s", which are symptoms of the disease "Sin". The disease needs to be cured, and the bad bahaviors will go away. Read the 51st Psalm. It speaks of healing! Here is part of it: Psalms 51:6-136 Behold, you desire truth in the inward parts: and in the hidden part you shall make me to know wisdom. 7 Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. 8 Make me to hear joy and gladness; that the bones which you have broken may rejoice. 9 Hide your face from my sins, and blot out all my iniquities. 10 Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me. 11 Cast me not away from your presence; and take not your holy spirit from me. 12 Restore to me the joy of your salvation; and uphold me with your free spirit. 13 Then will I teach transgressors your ways; and sinners shall be converted to you. Read Jeremiah 31:30-33. Focusing on behaviors misses the true problem which is the disease Sin.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: APL]
#157111
10/12/13 10:08 PM
10/12/13 10:08 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
I'm not a fan of the "state of being" (Sin) versus "state of doing" (sins) explanation of sin. I like the following definitions: The apostle gives us the true definition of sin. "Sin is the transgression of the law." {Con 75.2}
Now, we want to understand what sin is--that it is the transgression of God's law. This is the only definition given in the Scriptures. {FW 56.1}
The only definition we find in the Bible for sin is that "sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4). {1SM 320.1}
A terrible doom awaits the sinner, and therefore it is necessary that we know what sin is, in order that we may escape from its power. John says, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law; for sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4). Here we have the true definition of sin; it is "the transgression of the law." {FW 117.2}
Sin is an intruder, for whose presence no reason can be given. It is mysterious, unaccountable; to excuse it is to defend it. Could excuse for it be found, or cause be shown for its existence, it would cease to be sin. Our only definition of sin is that given in the word of God; it is "the transgression of the law;" it is the outworking of a principle at war with the great law of love which is the foundation of the divine government. {GC 492.2}
What is to bring the sinner to the knowledge of his sins unless he knows what sin is? The only definition of sin in the Word of God is given us in 1 John 3:4. "Sin is the transgression of the law." The sinner must be made to feel that he is a transgressor. Christ dying upon the cross of Calvary is drawing his attention. Why did Christ die? Because it was the only means for man to be saved. {OHC 141.3}
Then if this great and infinite sacrifice has been made in our behalf, let us ask ourselves, What are we doing? Do we say, "Believe, believe on Christ, and that is all"? If we have not the faith that works by love, and purifies the soul from every stain of sin, then we have a spurious faith. Christ is not the minister of sin. And what is sin? The only definition given in God's word is, "Sin is the transgression of the law;" and the apostle Paul declares, "Where no law is, there is no transgression." The law is the great standard that will measure every man's character. {BEcho, June 11, 1894 par. 7}
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: Mountain Man]
#157112
10/12/13 10:09 PM
10/12/13 10:09 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
So, the question remains - What constitutes an unknown sin? Which sins can born-again, baptized believers commit without realizing it?
In particular, which sins do believers commit unknowingly who have learned how to live in harmony with "all things whatsoever" Jesus commanded?
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: Mountain Man]
#157118
10/13/13 12:58 AM
10/13/13 12:58 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
I'm not a fan of the "state of being" (Sin) versus "state of doing" (sins) explanation of sin. I like the following definitions: Yes, "sin is transgression of the law". And I ask - again - WHAT LAW? And in so answering, include how all creation groans under the weight of sin, transgression of the law. I agree with the definition, that sin is transgression of the law. Now from your paradigm, please explain how cancer develops via transgression of the law since ALL disease and death comes from transgression of the law. And one more thing - HOW was Jesus made to be sin for us? He never was on the "doing" side, so He never could fit your explanation.
Last edited by APL; 10/13/13 01:08 AM.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: From Sinners to Saints, Part 3 - Which Way? (Sermon by Arnold Sy Go)
[Re: APL]
#157142
10/14/13 03:35 AM
10/14/13 03:35 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
|
|
Jesus takes the sin problem deeper than "doing".
Matt. 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:
Sin begins in our minds.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|