Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (daylily, TheophilusOne, dedication, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,491
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: APL]
#158934
12/01/13 06:25 PM
12/01/13 06:25 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,636
California, USA
|
|
We dare not say that sin per se is transmitted in the DNA, or we would have to adopt a version of the Roman Catholic Immaculate Conception. APL, do you agree with this? I thought you have been promoting the idea that sin IS transmitted genetically.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: APL]
#158935
12/01/13 06:44 PM
12/01/13 06:44 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,636
California, USA
|
|
Clarifying Basic Concepts
Sinless nature = a nature completely without sin in any form, such as Adam had when he came from the Creator’s hand, such as the unfallen angels and God Himself possess.
Sinful nature = the corrupted nature, which is influenced and tempted by Satan to do those things which are contrary to God’s will, but it does NOT have to yield to Satan’s attacks (this is an essential element in the Cleansing of the Sanctuary doctrine).
Sinning nature = the nature which continues to indulge in those things which are contrary to God’s will; this is an active, willful behavior from a character which is in rebellion to God. "Sinning nature" - Does anyone else find it strange that in order to "clarify" what EGW meant, Walper used something that EGW never wrote? Furthermore, it implies that it is the "nature" that is sinning, rather than the person. I don't think that concept is in the Bible or SOP. This part of the description of "sinful nature" is noteworthy: "influenced and tempted by Satan to do those things which are contrary to God’s will." Weren't Adam and Eve, in sinless human natures in Eden, "influenced and tempted by Satan to do those things which are contrary to God’s will"? Temptation is not limited to sinful nature. It seems Walper has fallen into the "holy flesh" trap of "sinless nature = cannot be tempted, cannot fall." Or she believes Adam and Eve had sinful natures before they sinned.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: asygo]
#158936
12/01/13 08:13 PM
12/01/13 08:13 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,636
California, USA
|
|
Emphasis mine. There are many people, even Christians, who wonder why it is that in the prayer that Jesus taught his disciples to pray, there is the petition constantly for the forgiveness of sins, when it is taught, and provided and expected, that His disciples shall not sin at all. This petition is in that prayer for this very purpose that we shall not sin, and as the sure defense against our sinning. Sin is in us. Our human nature is a sinful nature—a nature full of sin. Yet though this be ever true, as surely as we recognize, and acknowledge, and confess it, and offer the Offering that is ever acceptable to God, so surely the sin is forgiven and we are made "partakers of the divine nature;" and the sin of our human nature is not manifested, but the righteousness of the divine nature is made manifest instead. {August 12, 1908 ATJ, MEDM 646.3} He is our life. He who would raise fallen man, must come where he is. He is made what we are, in order that we may be made what He is. He comes into us, suffering the death which He did not deserve, in order that we may enjoy the life that we did not deserve. And this He does, not arbitrarily, but because from the very fact of our existence He is one with us. {February 5, 1903 EJW, PTUK 84.4}
If there were a difference between the nature of Christ, and that of man, that which we read in Heb. v. 7, would be but a farce. "In the days of His flesh, He offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto Him that was able to save Him from death." ... Although in the heavens, He is still compassed with infirmity, even with our infirmity. Our great High Priest that is passed into the heavens is still touched with the feeling of our infirmity. This is why we can come with boldness to the throne of grace, assured that we shall find mercy and grace to help in time of need. {February 5, 1903 EJW, PTUK 85.1} Then Christ was made like us. He possessed the same nature that we do as well also as the divine nature; and when he was on the earth, he was subject to all the temptations that we are, and yet without sin; and he emptied himself of self just as much and as really as we are to empty ourselves of self in overcoming and partaking of the divine nature. He laid down his own self. He was divine. We are mere selfishness. Full of sin. He did not lay down any sin; but he took on himself our sinful natures and yet without sin. {February 9, 1893 N/A, GCDB 214.2} The word "likeness" here is not the thought that is in the second chapter of Philippians, where it is shape, the form, or likeness as to form; but here, in the book of Hebrews, it is likeness in nature, likeness to the flesh as it is in itself, God sending his own Son in that which is just like sinful flesh. And in order to be just like sinful flesh, it would have to be sinful flesh; in order to be made flesh at all, as it is in this world, he would have to be just such flesh as it is in this world, - just such as we have, and that is sinful flesh. This is what is said in the words "likeness of sinful flesh." {February 19, 1895 N/A, GCB 232.5} Thus in the flesh of Jesus Christ, - not in himself, but in his flesh, - our flesh which he took in the human nature, - there were just the same tendencies to sin that are in you and me. And when he was tempted, it was the "drawing away of these desires that were in the flesh." These tendencies to sin that were in his flesh, drew upon him, and sought to entice him, to consent to the wrong. But by the love of God and by his trust in God, he received the power, and the strength, and the grace to say, "No," to all of it, and put it all under foot. And thus being in the likeness of sinful flesh, he condemned sin in the flesh. {February 21, 1895 N/A, GCB 266.9}
All the tendencies to sin that are in me were in him, and not one of them was ever allowed to appear in him. All the tendencies to sin that are in you were in him, and not one of them was ever allowed to appear, - every one was put under foot, and kept there. All the tendencies to sin that are in the other man were in him, and not one of them was ever allowed to appear. That is simply saying that all the tendencies to sin that are in human flesh were in his human flesh, and not one of them was ever allowed to appear; he conquered them all. And in him we all have victory over them all. {February 21, 1895 N/A, GCB 267.1} But if he comes no nearer to us than in a sinless nature, that is a long way off; because I need somebody that is nearer to me than that. I need some one to help me who knows something about sinful nature; for that is the nature that I have; and such the Lord did take. He became one of us. {February 24, 1895 N/A, GCB 311.7} Again: "Wherefore in all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren." In how many things? - All things. Then in his human nature there is not a particle of difference between him and you. {February 19, 1895 N/A, GCB 233.3} So, according to Jones, there was no particle of difference between Jesus and us when it comes to the human nature. But there is a difference elsewhere: Now as to Christ's not having "like passions" with us: In the Scriptures all the way through he is like us, and with us according to the flesh. He is the seed of David according to the flesh. He was made in the likeness of sinful flesh. Don't go too far. He was made in the likeness of sinful flesh; not in the likeness of sinful mind. Do not drag his mind into it. His flesh was our flesh; but the mind was "the mind of Christ Jesus." Therefore it is written: "Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus." If he had taken our mind, how, then, could we ever have been exhorted to "let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus?" It would have been so already. But what kind of mind is ours? O, it is corrupted with sin also. Look at ourselves in the second chapter of Ephesians, beginning with the first verse, and reading to the third, but the third verse is the one that has this particular point in it:- {February 25, 1895 N/A, GCB 327.1} If, according to Jones, "I need some one to help me who knows something about sinful nature; for that is the nature that I have," where can he get help for his sinful mind?Our problem goes much deeper than the flesh. When man transgressed the divine law, his nature became evil, and he was in harmony, and not at variance, with Satan. There exists naturally no enmity between sinful man and the originator of sin. {GC 505.2}
The real difficulty arises from the corruption of an unsanctified heart, and an unwillingness to submit to the control of God. {COL 331.2}That's our problem, that's where our difficulty comes from. And for that, the post-lapsarian has no help.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: asygo]
#158937
12/01/13 08:52 PM
12/01/13 08:52 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Yes, Adam did not have a sinful nature. That is where Jesus's job was so much harder. As EGW says, none of the effects of sin were on Adam.
EGW:"The great work of redemption could be carried out by the Redeemer only as He took the place of fallen man. Burdened with the sins of the world, He must pass over the path where Adam fell, and redeem his failure. When Adam was assailed by the tempter, none of the effects of sin were upon him, but he was surrounded by the glories of Eden. But it was not thus with Jesus; for, bearing the infirmities of degenerate humanity, He entered the wilderness to cope with the mighty foe, that He might lift man up from the lowest depths of his degradation. Alone He was to tread the path of temptation and exercise self-control stronger than hunger, ambition, or death."{BEcho, November 15, 1892 par. 1}
Published in the Review, January 7, 1896, EGW writes about the camp meeting recently held in Australia. WW Prescott was one of the speakers and she praised him for his presentation. What was it that Prescott presented? One presentation was "The Word Became Flesh". Published in the Bible Echo, January 6, 1896, you find phrases such as, "Now verily, He helps the seed of Abraham by Himself becoming the seed of Abraham. God, sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh; that the righteousness of the law might be revealed in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." {January 6, 1896 WWP, BEST 4.5}. And, "But since the first Adam took his place, there has been a change, and humanity is sinful humanity. The power of righteousness has been lost. To redeem man from the place unto which he had fallen, Jesus Christ comes, and takes the very flesh now borne by humanity; He comes in sinful flesh {January 6, 1896 WWP, BEST 4.15}
He concludes, "The object in these remarks is not merely to establish a line of thought. It is to bring new life into our soul, and open up our ideas of the word of God and the gift of God, that we may be able to grasp His love for us. We need it. Nothing short of that will meet what we have to meet,-the world, the flesh, and the devil. But He that is for us is mightier than he that is against us. Let us have in our daily lives Jesus Christ, "the Word" that "became flesh." {January 13, 1896 WWP, BEST 13.4}
There is not doubt, that EGW believed, as most of those of her time, that Christ had our sinful human nature.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: APL]
#158941
12/02/13 07:41 AM
12/02/13 07:41 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,636
California, USA
|
|
"When man transgressed the divine law, his nature became evil, and he was in harmony, and not at variance, with Satan." That was the nature of fallen Adam. Are you saying this was the nature Jesus had? He had an evil nature, in harmony with Satan?
We would do well to heed Jones' warning, "Don't go too far. He was made in the likeness of sinful flesh; not in the likeness of sinful mind. Do not drag his mind into it."
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: asygo]
#158943
12/02/13 12:33 PM
12/02/13 12:33 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
"When man transgressed the divine law, his nature became evil, and he was in harmony, and not at variance, with Satan." That was the nature of fallen Adam. Are you saying this was the nature Jesus had? He had an evil nature, in harmony with Satan?
We would do well to heed Jones' warning, "Don't go too far. He was made in the likeness of sinful flesh; not in the likeness of sinful mind. Do not drag his mind into it." You have quoted Jones and Waggoner well. You have quoted the same concept that I have that Rosangela has said is not true. EGW was fully aware of what Jones, Waggoner, Prescott, Haskell and others were teaching. The Baker letter is not a rebuke of their teaching. Never did EGW rebuke this teaching. In fact, it is our only hope. Waggoner: Do not forget, either, that the mystery of God is not God manifest in sinless flesh, but God manifest in sinful flesh. There could never be any mystery about God's manifesting himself in sinless flesh—in one who had no connection whatever with sin. That would be plain enough. But that he can manifest himself in flesh laden with sin and with all the tendencies of sin, such as ours is—that is a mystery. Yea, it is the mystery of God. And it is a glorious fact, thank the Lord! Believe it. And before all the world, and for the joy of every person in the world, in Jesus Christ he has demonstrated that this great mystery is indeed a fact in human experience. For "as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same." "In all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren." And therefore God "made him to be sin for us." "He hath laid on him the iniquity of us all." Thus, in our flesh, having our nature, laden with iniquity, and himself made to be sin, Christ Jesus lived in this world, tempted in all points like as we are; and yet God always caused him to triumph in him, and made manifest the savor of his knowledge by him in every place. Thus God was manifest in the flesh,—in our flesh, in human flesh laden with sin,—and made to be sin in itself, weak and tempted as ours is. And thus the mystery of God was made known to all nations for the obedience of faith. O, believe it! {September 29, 1896 ATJ, ARSH 621.7}
And this is the mystery of God to-day and forever—God manifest in the flesh, in human flesh, in flesh, laden with sin, tempted and tried. In this flesh, God will make manifest the knowledge of himself in every place where the believer is found. Believe it, and praise his holy name! {September 29, 1896 ATJ, ARSH 621.8}
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: APL]
#158944
12/02/13 01:02 PM
12/02/13 01:02 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
EGW also writes, "As the head of humanity, Christ lived on this earth a perfect, consistent life, in conformity with the will of His heavenly Father. When He left the courts of heaven, he announced the mission that He designed to fulfill. "Lo, I come," He declared. "In the volume of the book it is written of Me, I delight to do Thy will, O My God." Always uppermost in His mind and heart was the thought, "Not My human will, but Thy will be done." This was the infallible principle that actuated Him in all His words and works, and that molded His Character. <His work is [to] do the will of His heavenly Father. The majesty of heaven was subjected to the lowliest humiliation>. Letter K-303, 1903 (emphasis in the original)
The letter also contains the following: Throughout His experience, during the thirty-three years He spent on this earth, Christ was beset with all the temptations wherewith the human family are tempted, yet He was without a stain of sin.
Last edited by APL; 12/02/13 01:06 PM. Reason: added further quotation or K-303
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#158947
12/02/13 04:05 PM
12/02/13 04:05 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
GC, I agree Jesus never wanted to sin. He suffered when tempted because the thought of sinning was repulsive to Him. Equally repugnant to Him was the fact He inhabited a human body whose sinful flesh nature craved and clamored for sinful expression, that is, it tempted Him from within to indulge His innocent and legitimate needs (appetites, passions, drink, food, rest, happiness, companionship, etc) in sinful ways. Sinful flesh nature, as you know, cannot actually commit a sin - it can only tempt us to sin. It is not a sin to be tempted.
To say Jesus was never tempted to satisfy His human needs in sinful ways is to say He was not tempted in every way we are tempted. This would give Satan an advantage. "If Christ had a special power which it is not the privilege of man to have, Satan would have made capital of this matter. . . . When we give to His human nature a power that it is not possible for man to have in his conflicts with Satan, we destroy the completeness of His humanity." (3SM 139)
If Jesus' sinful flesh nature never tempted Him from within to satisfy His innocent and legitimate needs in sinful ways (remember, it is not a sin to be tempted) it would have given Him an advantage not available to us. However, Jesus became like us so we can be like Him. He was tempted in every way we are tempted thereby proving born-again believers are safe to save. "Jesus revealed no qualities, and exercised no powers, that men may not have through faith in Him. His perfect humanity is that which all His followers may possess, if they will be in subjection to God as He was." (DA 664)
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#158948
12/02/13 04:10 PM
12/02/13 04:10 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
"It is the privilege of every believer in Christ to possess Christ's nature, a nature far above that which Adam forfeited by transgression. {UL 18.3}
|
|
|
Re: Did Christ have sinful tendencies? How does EGW use the word propensities?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#158950
12/02/13 05:15 PM
12/02/13 05:15 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
The law requires righteousness,--a righteous life, a perfect character; and this man has not to give. He cannot meet the claims of God's holy law. But Christ, coming to the earth as man, lived a holy life, and developed a perfect character. These He offers as a free gift to all who will receive them. His life stands for the life of men. Thus they have remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God. More than this, Christ imbues men with the attributes of God. He builds up the human character after the similitude of the divine character, a goodly fabric of spiritual strength and beauty. Thus the very righteousness of the law is fulfilled in the believer in Christ. God can "be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." Romans 3:26. {DA 762.2}
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|