Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,195
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Kevin H, 2 invisible),
2,522
guests, and 8
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#159325
12/18/13 03:17 AM
12/18/13 03:17 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
APL, There is a distinction between "light bearer" and "Morning Star." I have no problem with the fact that Lucifer was a light bearer. So may we all be. Joseph was a light bearer in Egypt. Not to the people of Egypt alone, but to all the nations connected with that powerful kingdom, God manifested Himself through Joseph. He desired to make him a light bearer to all peoples, and He placed him next the throne of the world's greatest empire, that the heavenly illumination might extend far and near. {CC 78.3} But Joseph is never called the "Morning Star." Consider the spirit of prophecy as represented by the moon. This "lesser light" can only reflect what it has received from the sun, the greater light. Jesus is that sun, that Morning Star, which rises to light our planet every morning. All of God's prophets speak that which they have received of God. They reflect, as the moon, the light of the Morning Star. Lucifer used to reflect that too. But he never originated that light. All truth originates with God. It's a shame that some Bible translators are so careless and indistinct in their utterances as to muddy up the water of life. They have sown tares. An Enemy hath done this. Blessings, Green Cochoa. No body is suggesting that Satan is the source of "light". Go back and read the EGW quote I provided. Satan was next to Christ. As for "morning star", perhaps you should skip the English and only read in the Hebrew and Greek. But you might find then they use the same name for different people it might still confuse you, such as Jesus vs Joshua in Hebrews 4, which I'm not sure you have clarity on there either. Isaiah 14:12 How H349 are you fallen H5307 from heaven, H4480 H8064 O Lucifer, H1966 son H1121 of the morning! H7837 how are you cut down H1438 to the ground, H776 which did weaken H2522 H5921 the nations! H1471
H1966- Original: הילל - Transliteration: heylel - Phonetic: hay-lale' - Definition: Lucifer = light-bearer 1. shining one, morning star, Lucifer a. of the king of Babylon and Satan (fig.) 2. (TWOT) 'Helel' describing the king of Babylon - Origin: from H1984 (in the sense of brightness) - TWOT entry: 499a - Part(s) of speech: Noun Masculine - Strong's: From H1984 (in the sense of brightness); the morning star: - lucifer. Total KJV Occurrences: 1 • Lucifer, 1 Isa_14:12 Did you note the meaning of the word? Light Bearer - Shining One - Morning Star - Lucifer. These are all the same person, the one that eventually authored sin and fell. 'Lucifer, before his fall, was the morning star, the covering cherub, the brightest and highest of all creatures.' {1891 JHW, ATNM 58.2} Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? "Morning STARS" - Pleural. More that Christ and Satan were called morning stars.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: APL]
#159331
12/18/13 04:04 AM
12/18/13 04:04 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2021
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
|
|
APL,
I'm not accepting your concordance definitions. Nor do I accept Waggoner's words. I believe it is a mistranslation to call Lucifer the "morning star." First of all, the text in the NIV doesn't do this. It omits the word "Lucifer" altogether. So one might think it referred only to Christ. But then, this figure is said to be "fallen from heaven." Jesus came down from Heaven, but He never fell. This passage would be confusing and misleading to anyone who was unaware of the full truth. That is just as Satan would have it.
The KJV, on the other hand, preserves the clarity of the passage without confusing terms with that of Jesus' title.
I believe the translators of the KJV, while not perfect, enjoyed the blessing of God in their work. They lived in a time when their very lives were at stake over their work of maintaining the purity of God's Word and placing it in the hands of the people in their own language. The modern translators, by comparison, have set about to change things following their own opinions and doctrines.
Blessings,
Green Cochoa.
We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#159334
12/18/13 05:18 AM
12/18/13 05:18 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Lucifer is and ENGLISH word. There is no confusion in the verse, unless you want to see one. As for the KJV, you are confused on the name JESUS meaning JOSHUA in Hebrews 4. I guess I'm not surprised if you want to be confused by Isaiah 14. As for the translators that put their lives on the line in the reformation, that would include Wycliffe, the "morning star" of the reformation. In the fourteenth century arose in England the "morning star of the Reformation." John Wycliffe was the herald of reform, not for England alone, but for all Christendom. The great protest against Rome which it was permitted him to utter was never to be silenced. That protest opened the struggle which was to result in the emancipation of individuals, of churches, and of nations. {GC 80.1} Are we to hold EGW responsible for confusing Wycliffe with Christ?????
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: APL]
#159335
12/18/13 05:57 AM
12/18/13 05:57 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2021
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
|
|
Ellen White was quoting others in referring to Wycliffe. This is why she put the term in quotations marks, which you appear not to have noticed. She points out in doing so that Wycliffe's role in the reformation movement was one of prominence. She is not giving Wycliffe that title. Of course, feel free to believe what you want. I'm not the one confusing Joshua with Jesus. Again, that is a translation in Hebrews that is questionable. Of course, just like the tactics of those who support naturalistic evolution, errors can still be used to support other errors--and this works to persuade some people. Blessings, Green Cochoa.
We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#159343
12/18/13 02:53 PM
12/18/13 02:53 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,509
Midland
|
|
Green, still having trouble with Joshua, eh? Green, you seem to be having a hard time with thinking through this. What about "another than Joshua" do you not understand?
How is Joshua translated into Greek?
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Rick H]
#159345
12/18/13 03:10 PM
12/18/13 03:10 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,509
Midland
|
|
If you look in the NIV, you will find it has taken out something that clearly changes understanding, as it takes out a key name, Lucifer, for this term for Satan does not appear on its pages.
Rick, why remain shallow rather than going deep?
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#159352
12/18/13 04:51 PM
12/18/13 04:51 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
Ellen White was quoting others in referring to Wycliffe. This is why she put the term in quotations marks, which you appear not to have noticed. She points out in doing so that Wycliffe's role in the reformation movement was one of prominence. She is not giving Wycliffe that title. Of course, feel free to believe what you want. I'm not the one confusing Joshua with Jesus. Again, that is a translation in Hebrews that is questionable. Of course, just like the tactics of those who support naturalistic evolution, errors can still be used to support other errors--and this works to persuade some people. Blessings, Green Cochoa. Actually green, you fell into the trap. You rant about calling other beings "morning star", and EGW does not. In fact, endorses it. The trap was to show how she handled it vs you. Thanks!
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: APL]
#159355
12/18/13 07:00 PM
12/18/13 07:00 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2021
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
|
|
APL, You are still choosing to be small minded about this. That is your right. However, for others' sake, let me clarify this point once and for all. Ellen White never confuses the term "Morning Star," applied to Jesus, with anyone else except Jesus. She refers to the fact that some have called John Wycliffe the morning star of the reformation, indicating so by her use of quotation marks. Examples follow. n the fourteenth century arose in England the “morning-star of the Reformation.” John Wycliffe was the herald of reform, not for England alone, but for all Christendom. The great protest against Rome which it was permitted him to utter, was never to be silenced. That protest opened the struggle which was to result in the emancipation of individuals, of churches, and of nations. {GC88 79.3}
In the fourteenth century arose in England the "morning star of the Reformation." John Wycliffe was the herald of reform, not for England alone, but for all Christendom. The great protest against Rome which it was permitted him to utter was never to be silenced. That protest opened the struggle which was to result in the emancipation of individuals, of churches, and of nations. {GC 80.1}
In the fourteenth century arose in England the "morning star of the Reformation." John Wycliffe was the herald of reform, not for England alone, but for all Christendom. He was the progenitor of the Puritans; his era was an oasis in the desert. {4SP 86.1}
In the fourteenth century arose in England the "morning star of the Reformation." John Wycliffe was the herald of reform, not for England alone, but for all Christendom. He was the progenitor of the Puritans; his era was an oasis in the desert. {SR 336.2} Those statements above comprise the full set of statements regarding the "morning star of the Reformation." All of them put that term in quotation marks. Furthermore, the qualification "of the Reformation" sets this term to a specific context. Notice also the case. Not one of these has "morning star" in title case. On the other hand, Mrs. White would frequently put Jesus' title in title case. See below. The Shekinah had departed from the sanctuary, but in the Child of Bethlehem was veiled the glory before which angels bow. This unconscious babe was the promised seed, to whom the first altar at the gate of Eden pointed. This was Shiloh, the peace giver. It was He who declared Himself to Moses as the I AM. It was He who in the pillar of cloud and of fire had been the guide of Israel. This was He whom seers had long foretold. He was the Desire of all nations, the Root and the Offspring of David, and the Bright and Morning Star. The name of that helpless little babe, inscribed in the roll of Israel, declaring Him our brother, was the hope of fallen humanity. The child for whom the redemption money had been paid was He who was to pay the ransom for the sins of the whole world. He was the true "high priest over the house of God," the head of "an unchangeable priesthood," the intercessor at "the right hand of the Majesty on high." Hebrews 10:21; 7:24; 1:3. {DA 52.3}
"He that overcometh, . . . I will give him the Morning Star," "and I will write upon him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God: . . . and I will write upon him My new name." Verses 26-28; 3:12. {MH 516.3}
There is a great work to be done, and every effort possible must be made to reveal Christ as the sin-pardoning Saviour, Christ as the Sin Bearer, Christ as the bright and morning Star; and the Lord will give us favor before the world until our work is done. {6T 20.3}
Every true believer catches the beams from the Morning Star and transmits the light to those who sit in darkness. Not only do they shine amid the darkness of their own neighborhood, but as a church they shine forth to regions beyond. The Lord expects every man to do his duty. Every one who unites with the church is to be one with Christ to diffuse the beams of the Morning Star, and becoming the light of the world, Christ and His people are to be copartners in the great work of saving the world.-- Manuscript 51, Nov. 14, 1894. {TDG 327.5} Clearly, Mrs. White uses "Morning Star" as a title for Jesus. Now, APL, if you really want to "trap" me, find Mrs. White using the title "Morning Star" for Lucifer. If you find it, I'll admit I've been "trapped." Blessings, Green Cochoa.
We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: Green Cochoa]
#159356
12/18/13 07:13 PM
12/18/13 07:13 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
The Bible has the answer green. 2 Peter 1:19, uses the name day star for Christ. It is the same word in Green that the Hebrew uses in Isaiah 14:12. This was Satan before his fall. Satan was a light bearer. He was perfect. He corrupted himself and is no longer. Job confirms there were more than one "morning star", in the KJV! Who is being narrow minded?
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Bible Doctrines affected by Modern Versions
[Re: APL]
#159396
12/19/13 04:10 PM
12/19/13 04:10 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,509
Midland
|
|
Who? Hmmm. Who has narrowed down the scriptures to one version only!
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|