Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,214
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (dedication, daylily, TheophilusOne, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,500
guests, and 6
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: LUIS]
#163962
04/03/14 11:39 PM
04/03/14 11:39 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
I don´t see how that verse is relevant to this discussion since it is referring to "unintentional sins" of the priest and obviously that cannot describe Jesus’ daily work on the sanctuary. Welcome, Luis. Well, first let me make clear that there was no atonement specified in the law for "intentional" sins (that is, willful sins), for which the penalty was death. Only "unintentional" sins could be atoned for. Second, that form of atonement (in which the blood was brought within the sanctuary) was specified for the sins of priests and for the sins of the whole congregation of Israel (Lev. 4:13ff). In the case of the common sinner, the blood wasn't brought within the sanctuary, but the priest ate the flesh of the sacrifice (Lev 6:25, 26; 7:7), symbolically taking the sins of the person upon himself, as if they were his own (Lev 10:17). And, again, in the atonement for his own sins, the blood was taken inside the sanctuary.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: Rosangela]
#163963
04/03/14 11:46 PM
04/03/14 11:46 PM
|
NON-SDA Active Member 2019
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
|
|
Thank you. My second question to you is then ....
"2. Does Christ do EXACTLY the same thing in the "temple in heaven"? Can you provide the scriptural references that say so."
///
No, James. This was symbolic of what happens in heaven. Of course Christ did not sprinkle and is not now sprinkling His literal blood before God. But for the forgiveness of sin to occur, notice that two things were necessary: 1) the slaying of the sacrifice, and 2) the ministration of the blood. Christ offered Himself as a sacrifice on earth, but, as a High Priest, He had to apply, in heaven, the benefits of His sacrifice to the sinner, for his forgiveness. "Nor by the blood of goats and calves, but by His own blood He entered once for all into the Holies, having obtained eternal redemption for us" (Heb 9:12). Thank you. 1. The scripture you quoted (Heb. 9:12) is interesting. It says that Christ needed to do that ONLY ONCE for all time and everyone: "Nor by the blood of goats and calves, but BY HIS OWN BLOOD HE ENTERED ONCE FOR ALL into the Holies, having obtained eternal redemption FOR US." 2. Secondly, it says that His sacrifice on earth was the means of "our eternal redemption". Therefore, when He entered "into the Holies" (i.e. ascended into heaven), He was ALREADY in possession of "our eternal redemption". 3. What then was the purpose of HIS sacrifice? Was it: a. for individual sins (being committed many times throughout the ages, past present and future), OR b. for the sin of the world (i.e. Adam's fall and banishment from Paradise, once in the beginning -- under which all other, and every form of sin falls)? ///
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: Rick H]
#163965
04/04/14 12:16 AM
04/04/14 12:16 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
1. The scripture you quoted (Heb. 9:12) is interesting. It says that Christ needed to do that ONLY ONCE for all time and everyone.
"Nor by the blood of goats and calves, but BY HIS OWN BLOOD HE ENTERED ONCE FOR ALL into the Holies, having obtained eternal redemption FOR US." Paul is contrasting Christ's ministry with the ministry of earthly priests. They had to enter the sanctuary many times, and offer many sacrifices, but Christ offered Himself once for all and entered once for all into the sanctuary. 2. Secondly, it says that His sacrifice on earth was the means of "our eternal redemption". When He entered "into the Holies", He was ALREADY in possession of "our eternal redemption". Through His sacrifice He obtained - or secured - eternal redemption for us. But this redemption must be individually appropriated. 3. What then was the purpose of HIS sacrifice? Was it: a. for individual sins (being committed many times throughout the ages), or b. for the sin of the world (i.e. Adam's fall and banishment from Paradise, once in the beginning)? It seems to me that the purpose of His sacrifice involves both things, for the following verses refer to individual sins. Heb 2:17 Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. Heb 9:28 so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. 1Pe 2:24 He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: Rosangela]
#163969
04/04/14 03:01 AM
04/04/14 03:01 AM
|
NON-SDA Active Member 2019
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
|
|
1. Paul is contrasting Christ's ministry with the ministry of earthly priests. They had to enter the sanctuary many times, and offer many sacrifices, but Christ offered Himself once for all and entered once for all into the sanctuary. Through His sacrifice He obtained - or secured - eternal redemption for us. But this redemption must be individually appropriated.
2. It seems to me that the purpose of His sacrifice involves both things, for the following verses refer to individual sins. 1. Heb. 9:13-14 says, "For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, CLEANSE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS to serve the living God?" Therefore where is the "blood of Christ" sprinkled in the "temple of heaven" for cleansing? And what is this "blood of Christ"? 2. Heb. 9:15 says, "And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance." What does it mean that his death was for "the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant"? ///
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: James Peterson]
#163971
04/04/14 04:01 AM
04/04/14 04:01 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,706
Canada
|
|
1. Heb. 9:13-14 says, "For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, CLEANSE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS to serve the living God?"
Therefore where is the "blood of Christ" sprinkled in the "temple of heaven" for cleansing?
As I pointed out in my last post, the sprinkling of the blood upon the inner veil of the earthly sanctuary symbolized a record of the "covered" sins of the penitent being transferred to the sanctuary. Thus the sins are no longer upon the person, Christ has taken them upon Himself, as the lamb that was sacrificed, He then as the priest takes the record of those covered sins and transfers them to the sanctuary. This reality, that whosoever confesses His sin is forgiven and cleansed (See 1 John 1:9) is what cleanses the conscience of dead works. What are 'dead works' -- it is trying to erase our sins by doing penance, punishing ourselves in hopes of appeasing. But Christ has taken our sins away, and covered them with His blood. And on the day of atonement all covered sins were forever disposed of. But all sins that people still clung to and refused to send into the sanctuary through the blood of the sacrifice, condemned them. 2. Heb. 9:15 says, "And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance."
What does it mean that his death was for "the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant"?
The blood of sheep, goats, or even bulls could not really take away sin. All this was a promise of the REALITY of what Christ would do. The people who followed God's plan in the OT were forgiven, but it was a promissory forgiveness based on the future death and priestly ministry of Christ.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: dedication]
#163974
04/04/14 04:58 AM
04/04/14 04:58 AM
|
NON-SDA Active Member 2019
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
|
|
1. Heb. 9:13-14 says, "For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, CLEANSE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS to serve the living God?"
Therefore where is the "blood of Christ" sprinkled in the "temple of heaven" for cleansing?
As I pointed out in my last post, the sprinkling of the blood upon the inner veil of the earthly sanctuary symbolized a record of the "covered" sins of the penitent being transferred to the sanctuary. Thus the sins are no longer upon the person, Christ has taken them upon Himself, as the lamb that was sacrificed, He then as the priest takes the record of those covered sins and transfers them to the sanctuary. This reality, that whosoever confesses His sin is forgiven and cleansed (See 1 John 1:9) is what cleanses the conscience of dead works. What are 'dead works' -- it is trying to erase our sins by doing penance, punishing ourselves in hopes of appeasing. But Christ has taken our sins away, and covered them with His blood. And on the day of atonement all covered sins were forever disposed of. But all sins that people still clung to and refused to send into the sanctuary through the blood of the sacrifice, condemned them. 2. Heb. 9:15 says, "And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance."
What does it mean that his death was for "the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant"?
The blood of sheep, goats, or even bulls could not really take away sin. All this was a promise of the REALITY of what Christ would do. The people who followed God's plan in the OT were forgiven, but it was a promissory forgiveness based on the future death and priestly ministry of Christ. Look again at the scripture I quoted and at the question I asked. I'm NOT asking about covered sins, transfer or disposal of sins. 1. Heb. 9:13-14 says, "For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, SPRINKLING THE UNCLEAN, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, CLEANSE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS to serve the living God?"
Therefore where is the "blood of Christ" sprinkled in the "temple of heaven" for cleansing? And what is this "blood of Christ"? Secondly, do you know what it really means for Christ to have died "for the redemption of ALL OLD COVENANT transgressions"? What does it mean to die "for the redemption of transgressions"? ///
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: James Peterson]
#163978
04/04/14 11:03 AM
04/04/14 11:03 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
1. Heb. 9:13-14 says, "For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, CLEANSE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS to serve the living God?"
Therefore where is the "blood of Christ" sprinkled in the "temple of heaven" for cleansing? And what is this "blood of Christ"? Paul is referring to symbolisms of the old covenant. If the sprinkling mentioned here, besides that done with the ashes of a heifer, refers also to the sprinkling of blood, Paul probably is referring to the sprinkling of people with blood (see v. 19, 20 of the same chapter). However, even if he was referring to the sprinkling of blood in the sanctuary, it should be remembered that, through the sacrifice and all that it involved, the person was purified because his/her sin was taken away. As I said in my last post, the fact that, in the sanctuary of the old covenant, the blood of the victim was sprinkled before God for the forgiveness of the sinner, means that today Christ presents His blood (sacrifice) before God as a reason why the sinner should be forgiven. I think the symbolism is clear. 2. Heb. 9:15 says, "And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance."
What does it mean that his death was for "the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant"? It means the following: Rom 3:24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, Rom 3:25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. Rom 3:26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. The blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sin, so the sins committed before the death of Christ were not punished. God does not forgive sins without punishing them. Since all sins were punished at the cross, the forgiveness granted before this was in promise, as Dedication pointed out.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: James Peterson]
#163979
04/04/14 03:28 PM
04/04/14 03:28 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: The earthly sanctuary symbolizes the plan of salvation. It depicts the fact Jesus paid our sin debt of death. Jesus lived and died the perfect life and death. However, His life and death is part of a larger plan to save us from sin and death. Jesus must also justify forgiving and saving sinners. He is not at liberty to save everybody. He must also justify punishing unsavable sinners. He is not at liberty to punish everybody. Exactly how the earthly and heavenly sanctuaries demonstrate the plan of salvation is fascinating. However, they come short of reality. For example, the services performed in the outer court symbolize Jesus' perfect death. But the reality is so much more. Also, the holy place symbolizes Jesus' perfect life. But, again, the reality is so much more.
J: It would be helpful if you could provide an answer to the second question I asked Rosangela in the preceding post, namely: "2. Does Christ do EXACTLY the same thing (as the earthly priest) in the "temple in heaven"? And where does it say so in the Bible?" Exactly? I doubt it. Jesus does so much more than is symbolized by priests officiating in the earthly sanctuary. Also, He doesn't literally sprinkle His blood. Nor does He spend one day in the most holy place. The essence is the same. His perfect life and death serves to save us. It also gives Him the legal right to punish unsavable sinners. Hebrews 7-9 explain it quite nicely.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: Rick H]
#163980
04/04/14 03:59 PM
04/04/14 03:59 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
James, the benefits of Jesus' atoning life and death have been available to sinners since the day Adam and Eve sinned. Jesus is "the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." (Rev 13:8). Enoch, Elijah, and Moses were in Heaven before Jesus lived and died the perfect life and death.
|
|
|
Re: Foretelling the rejection of the Investigative Judgement?
[Re: Rick H]
#163981
04/04/14 04:06 PM
04/04/14 04:06 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
The blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sin, so the sins committed before the death of Christ were not punished. God does not forgive sins without punishing them. Since all sins were punished at the cross, the forgiveness granted before this was in promise, as Dedication pointed out. When you say "sins were punished at the cross" do you mean sinners were punished in Christ on the cross?
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|