Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (dedication, daylily, TheophilusOne, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,493
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: ProdigalOne]
#182350
01/19/17 06:02 PM
01/19/17 06:02 PM
|
NON-SDA Active Member 2019
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
|
|
So, Mr. Peterson, you believe that God's instructions for healthy eating in the Old Testament are suddenly defunct in the New Testament?
Well, if the Pope, or whatever cultish figurehead you obtain your doctrine from (it certainly isn't God or His holy Word) tells you that consuming feces eating bottom feeders and trichinosis infected parasite hosts is the "spiritually enlightened" thing to do, then I guess you had better dig in!
Here are a some facts for you to chew on while you are chowing down on your bacon wrapped lobster. There is a certain group that follows the original diet given to Adam and Eve in Eden (the same diet that the saved will enjoy in heaven by the way). Among this group cancer is almost nonexistent and centenarians are plentiful.
Can you guess what group I am referring to? I'll give you a hint, it isn't Catholics or Evangelicals...
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
John 10:10 God's instructions in the Old Testmanent for eating was part of the objective of keeping the Hebrews to himself, separate from the idolatrous world around them (Deut. 14:21). In Christianity however, God's people do not keep to themselves but live, work and play with everyone: remaining morally pure (John 20:21 & Rom. 14). This means that you may share a MacDonald's hamburger with a Roman Catholic best friend, but insist on paying at least part of the bill. One may enjoy bacon and eggs for breakfast with a good Mormon neighbour, but resist the temptation to go after his attractive wife. (1 Cor. 10:25,26 then 8:7) "Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, ' If you continue in my word, then are you my disciples indeed; And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.'" -- John 8:32 ///
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: Charity]
#182351
01/19/17 06:18 PM
01/19/17 06:18 PM
|
NON-SDA Active Member 2019
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
|
|
///
The subject of this thread is "Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold". Indeed Ellen White did write words to those effect, erroneously (perhaps even blasphemously) elevating her books to the "Testimony of Jesus Christ".
@ProdigalOne, what do you say?
///
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: James Peterson]
#182354
01/20/17 09:21 AM
01/20/17 09:21 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,205
Alberta, Canada
|
|
So, Mr. Peterson, you believe that God's instructions for healthy eating in the Old Testament are suddenly defunct in the New Testament?
Well, if the Pope, or whatever cultish figurehead you obtain your doctrine from (it certainly isn't God or His holy Word) tells you that consuming feces eating bottom feeders and trichinosis infected parasite hosts is the "spiritually enlightened" thing to do, then I guess you had better dig in!
Here are a some facts for you to chew on while you are chowing down on your bacon wrapped lobster. There is a certain group that follows the original diet given to Adam and Eve in Eden (the same diet that the saved will enjoy in heaven by the way). Among this group cancer is almost nonexistent and centenarians are plentiful.
Can you guess what group I am referring to? I'll give you a hint, it isn't Catholics or Evangelicals...
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
John 10:10 God's instructions in the Old Testmanent for eating was part of the objective of keeping the Hebrews to himself, separate from the idolatrous world around them (Deut. 14:21). In Christianity however, God's people do not keep to themselves but live, work and play with everyone: remaining morally pure (John 20:21 & Rom. 14). This means that you may share a MacDonald's hamburger with a Roman Catholic best friend, but insist on paying at least part of the bill. One may enjoy bacon and eggs for breakfast with a good Mormon neighbour, but resist the temptation to go after his attractive wife. (1 Cor. 10:25,26 then 8:7) "Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, ' If you continue in my word, then are you my disciples indeed; And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.'" -- John 8:32 /// Hmmm, I'm not sure how eating bacon equates to spiritual liberty, as long as I don't seduce a Mormon's wife? I have had many relatives, neighbours, and friends who's beliefs ranged from Athiest, Baptist, Pentecostal, Sikh, Hudderite, Mennonite, Morman, Wiccan, Native Medicine Man, Muslim, and even (gasp!) Catholic. I have shared meals, socialized, and discussed spirituality with more than I can recall; however, I don't ever remember finding it necessary to eat unclean, unhealthy, life shortening food in order to love my neighbour... Was the Lord's list of unclean foods merely a way of making Israel "peculiar"? Is His wisdom so limited that there is no lesson for today? "The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: James Peterson]
#182355
01/20/17 09:53 AM
01/20/17 09:53 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,205
Alberta, Canada
|
|
///
The subject of this thread is "Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold". Indeed Ellen White did write words to those effect, erroneously (perhaps even blasphemously) elevating her books to the "Testimony of Jesus Christ".
@ProdigalOne, what do you say?
/// Sister White connected the health message closely to the third angel's message. Rejecting her counsel on the topic of health is a huge "rejection of the testimonies". In fact, you are fulfilling her prophesy right now Mr Peterson. Thank-you for helping her to pass the prophet's test of Deuteronomy 18! Incidentally, you have done your best to deride Ellen White at every opportunity: I wonder, have you read any of her books? I don't mean hasty searches on the white lie website, I mean an entire book? If not then your attitude seems rather disingenuous. Reading The Great Controversy or The Desire of Ages cover to cover would be a good, honest, approach to debunking her claims of Devine inspiration.
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: His child]
#182359
01/20/17 03:10 PM
01/20/17 03:10 PM
|
|
Looks like Donald Trump is going to become the next President of the United States, that will show that it was a false prophecy regarding Obama having a 3rd term as President of the United States, becoming a dictator, or whatever.
Something seemed to have changed between 11/19/16 and 11/28/16.
Would you call this "backpedaling"? If not, what could possibly be called backpedaling in regard to your prediction here?
Yes, you claim you talked to MM about this. How long ago was that? Did you forget that when you make an absolute statement such as: President Obama is: 1) America's last President
(By the way, if saying, "Then Christ will come before April 1, 2017" is not date setting, I'm not sure what would be)
kland, I am more convinced that Obama will be President until Christ comes and that Trump will never be inaugurated, but I cannot be dogmatic about a prophecy that has not been fulfilled. How did God lead His people in the past? They knew without a doubt that Jesus would come in 1843. Oops the year zero through off their calculation by one year. They knew without a doubt that Jesus would come in 1844. Oops the wrong Sanctuary. We have nothing to fear except we forget how God has led His people in the past. How was that? With infallibility? no! He allowed them to be almost right and then learn from their errors when the time past and they compared the event to the Scriptures. And you might look up that no message on time quote again and keep it in context. It does not say what you think it says.
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: Charity]
#182375
01/23/17 02:32 PM
01/23/17 02:32 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,512
Midland
|
|
But then there's the spring equinox. Or is it somewhere around near there. Wait for a new date sometime this fall.
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: kland]
#182389
01/24/17 05:18 AM
01/24/17 05:18 AM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,705
Canada
|
|
But then there's the spring equinox. Or is it somewhere around near there. Wait for a new date sometime this fall. That's quite likely. We know HC has set a date for Christ's second coming this spring. (By putting in an artificial extension to Obama's term) If Trump should become President on 1/20/2017 Then Christ will come before April 1, 2017 as I indicated many time in conversations posted on this forum with Mountain Man.
The Babylonian reckoning of a kings reign is from their New Years Day (29 March on our Gregorian Calendar) So from that perspective if Obama leaves office prior to 29 March 2017 then every day from 20 January 2017 up until 29 March 2017 is counted as his last year in office.
But as I continue to study, I understand more of the prophecies and they point to Obama remaining in office until Christ Comes. I won't be surprised if we next hear of another extension -- another date in the fall -- It's the way it always happens with those who like to map out last day events with the calendar. Dozens of failed dates, followed by extension after extension, but seeing the world ripe for those last days to fully develop gives them hope that their next date will actually turn out to be right. We are sitting on the edge of time -- but setting dates only confuses the issue and actually destroys the true preparing for eternity necessary which comes, not in panic preparation to meet a certain date, but from a daily walk with Christ. We are to watch and pray for we don't know when the great tribulation will begin or when Christ will come --
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: Charity]
#182396
01/27/17 02:15 PM
01/27/17 02:15 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,512
Midland
|
|
Instead of looking at and bring attention to Trump adding yet more mechanisms in place as past presidents have done, that our freedoms to lead others to Christ are getting shorter and shorter, he mandates a time restriction for God to fulfill.
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: James Peterson]
#182401
01/28/17 03:51 AM
01/28/17 03:51 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2018
Regular Member
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 63
Colorado, USA
|
|
So, Mr. Peterson, you believe that God's instructions for healthy eating in the Old Testament are suddenly defunct in the New Testament?
Well, if the Pope, or whatever cultish figurehead you obtain your doctrine from (it certainly isn't God or His holy Word) tells you that consuming feces eating bottom feeders and trichinosis infected parasite hosts is the "spiritually enlightened" thing to do, then I guess you had better dig in!
Here are a some facts for you to chew on while you are chowing down on your bacon wrapped lobster. There is a certain group that follows the original diet given to Adam and Eve in Eden (the same diet that the saved will enjoy in heaven by the way). Among this group cancer is almost nonexistent and centenarians are plentiful.
Can you guess what group I am referring to? I'll give you a hint, it isn't Catholics or Evangelicals...
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
John 10:10 God's instructions in the Old Testmanent for eating was part of the objective of keeping the Hebrews to himself, separate from the idolatrous world around them (Deut. 14:21). In Christianity however, God's people do not keep to themselves but live, work and play with everyone: remaining morally pure (John 20:21 & Rom. 14). This means that you may share a MacDonald's hamburger with a Roman Catholic best friend, but insist on paying at least part of the bill. One may enjoy bacon and eggs for breakfast with a good Mormon neighbour, but resist the temptation to go after his attractive wife. (1 Cor. 10:25,26 then 8:7) "Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, ' If you continue in my word, then are you my disciples indeed; And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.'" -- John 8:32 /// I thought I'd mention that the first distinction mentioned between clean and unclean animals was shortly before the flood (Gen 7:2) when describing how many animals would enter the ark. Further, because it's so matter of factly stated without explanation, it can be presumed that Noah already knew about this distinction and that it predated the time of the flood. Even if it was something new at that time, when Noah and his family left the ark there was no one for them to be kept separate from. "In Christianity however, God's people do not keep to themselves but live, work and play with everyone: remaining morally pure" Yet by beholding we become. This is not to say I'm promoting an extreme of isolationism, shunning all contact with others, but that the influences that others have on us should not be taken lightly. The more attached we are to someone, the more willing we are to trust their judgement and do as they do. When you say "play", do you mean actively engage in the same entertainment? What about gambling? Does a Christian enter a casino, gamble their way into a frenzy of worldly excitement and lust for money, and remain pure? I don't actually think you would include that as acceptable for a Christian, but then there must be at the very least some distinction between what the world does and what we do. We believe that this distinction does not end at obvious sins that even the rest of the world warns against, such as drunkennness or the adultery that you mentioned. Our bodies, being temples, should be kept in good repair. 2Co 6:14-18 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be My sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. As he says in Rom. 14:17, "the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit." It is this moving away from freedom in the gospel towards austere doctrines tied on the backs of people that Paul warns Timothy against. But in the Kingdom of God we do still eat and drink, so it's not a non-issue. What he was saying is that the outward following of rules is not of itself what true godliness and righteousness consists of. The religion of the Pharisees was often all about their rules. It was their own rules that they were effectively worshiping.
|
|
|
Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 1
[Re: Charity]
#182402
01/28/17 03:20 PM
01/28/17 03:20 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2018
Regular Member
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 63
Colorado, USA
|
|
Also, regarding Jesus's statement "If ye continue in My word, then are ye My disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Free from what? Jesus then explained "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin."
So if by committing sin freedom is lost and servitude is gained, then the freedom here must be freedom from continuing to follow sin through the dictates of the lusts of the flesh and through the deceitfully wicked unrenewed heart. This does not mean we are free to commit sin again, as if sin was no longer sinful for us as some Christians throughout the ages have claimed. If by committing sin we were made servants of sin then continuing to sin would only keep us in bondage. The freedom offered by Jesus is the true reconciliation of man to God by receiving the love of God and a restoration to the image of God in us.
At no point in this is a command to abolish the restriction against what was once sinful. Sinners are not reconciled to God through the abolishing of the law. Even in the Garden of Eden, when Adam and Eve were without fault and in perfect harmony with the will of God, there was a restriction against eating a certain food. There was also no mention of an allowance to eat meat when what would be their diet was spelled out to them.
When Adam and Eve chose to obey the suggestion of the serpent and distrust God they effectively gave their obedience to Satan. Yet, in the first promise of the Messiah, God said "I will put enmity between thee and the woman". In other words, our obedience to Satan would be replaced with enmity, and our enmity to God would be replaced by a restoration to the genuine love for God that we once had. The Truth, Jesus, is what makes us free.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|