Green, when I'm talking about Global Warming Farce, I might should have said, "How global warming promoters have failed in their predictions". I don't mean how whatever your private predictions may be have failed, but how those promoted in the mass media with mass hysteria have not reflected reality.

(bold emphasis mine)

I would agree with that statement.

Europe is now in global cooling!

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world...the-north-pole/

I keep coming across things:
100 reasons why climate change is natural

Whatever the truth is about climate change, the various governments are certainly using it to as way to separate citizens from their money.

In January this year the Alberta government instituted a carbon tax. This has increased the price of gasoline, home heating, etc. Due to the jacked up price of already overtaxed gasoline and diesel, the cost of transporting goods to market has risen along with the price of everything from food to lumber.

The Jesuit strategy of impoverishing the middle class continues unabated!

Amen ProdigalOne.

Almost all the governments of the world are in this "conspiracy" with the Papacy to end the middle class in all countries of the world.

What will it take to wake people up? Unfortunately in some cases, nothing will ever wake them up. So, we must keep our eyes open for those who are at least paying attention to warn them that God has almost had enough Himself.

What do you make of climate change kland? Is it man-made or natural? Is it even real?

As said before, "climate change", (which was "global warming" until people realized they didn't know which way the climate was going), is a jesuit fabrication put in place to hurt the masses: mentally, economically, physically.

As far as the question, is the climate changing, goes, has it ever not changed? How would one go about determining it? I once asked someone promoting such, as to why they only gave a very limited amount of data when others had given more. They responded that that was all that was convenient to them on the Internet. Just goes to show you....

Given the earth is 6,000+ years, can 30 years of weather data all at the end provide any meaningful sample sample size to determine something amiss? We know the earth was much much warmer in the past. We also know the earth was much much colder in the past. Weather happens. Weather changes. It's different than last year. It's different than when I was a kid. But I don't think my momentary fragment of time should be a measuring stick of what world history is. What should be the measuring stick with which we compare today to, and why should that be the targeted temperature?

People imagine it has something to do with carbon dioxide. Questions to ask yourself: What percentage is in the atmosphere? What percentage of that, and what percentage total, is man-made? The answers to that show something other than logic and reasoning is going on here. Whether it's the Titanic, the world trade center towers, whatever, when one is left wondering why or how in the world did that happen, better look towards jesuit involvement.

But really, don't you think with Fukushima continuing to spew tons of radiation into the ocean is a much bigger problem than the weather? Or is it much more convenient to complain that it sure is hot/cold/just right today than to worry about radiation maiming and killing thousands of people, and also much cattle.

“Most catastrophic fisheries collapse in history” expected along West Coast — Official: “This is a nightmare, I have never in my life dreamed that it could get this bad” — Threat of “coast-wide fishing failure”
And not just Fukushima:
“Nuclear Nightmare”: Children with mutations “on almost every street” — Deformed heads, lopsided bodies, “toad skin”, eyelids turned inside out

Given that both stories linked to a website called "enenews", I thought I would just check that site.



Here are some interesting links about "enenews."

https://fauxcapitalist.com/2011/04/03/who-is-behind-enenews-com/comment-page-1/

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/ENENews

Could you also research who is behind the following sites if you are against having a convenient news feed aggregator "that was created in response to the Fukushima I nuclear accident"?
That is, is the Huffington Post dubious?
How about KRCRTV Bonten Media Group?
Or the Oregon Public Broadcasting?
Should you have checked what the news actually said?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/india-uranium-mine-jadugoda_us_566b2d2ce4b0fccee16e8dcd

http://www.krcrtv.com/north-coast-news/y...ecord/414590594

http://theava.com/archives/66899

http://www.recordnet.com/sports/20170321/outdoors-chinook-salmon-season-in-trouble

http://www.opb.org/news/article/ocean-sa...ath-river-fish/