That's assuming the vaccine prevents shingles. All you need is one case of someone taking the vaccine and still getting shingles to disprove it prevents shingles.
Now someone may argue "most of the time", "half the time", "some of the time" it prevents disease. Can we see the actual experimental evidence? Lots of luck in finding such.

I once found CDC or WHO stating on their website that vaccines do not prevent disease, only lessons the severity. I have failed to find where I saved it or on their sites again. But with the lack of evidence of vaccines preventing disease, how could one possibly prove they lessen the severity? What a joke.

So saying no to taking the vaccine isn't just preventing you from all kinds of toxins and animal diseases from what they incubate it in, but also, it has no effect on preventing it - (someone prove me wrong with experimental study!)

For shingles, I have read you take a bath over all your body for as hot as you can stand it for a period of time or as long as you can stand it. You will need help getting out. Search it out.

Be cautions of such a statement. I've heard those who vaccinated their children make a similar claim in support of injections. Just ask for science. While vaccines are "tested" so they don't harm all the children, you will find very little where they are tested for preventing disease. I found one study where they did a small study in a nursing home and the amount of hospitalizations were less in vaccinated residents. It didn't prevent disease, just reduced hospitalizations. Hmmm. Maybe if the resident wasn't vaccinated, the administration chose to send them to the hospital?

My children are all grown now. That is an interesting point you made and I think there are a lot of other factors that maybe are not considered when giving the statistics around vaccines and their effectiveness. One thing to always keep in mind, which influence can be seen in so many other areas of life, such as alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and junk food production is that "For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." 1 Tim. 6:10 I think that love of money when deciding on the safety of any product often overrules some clear dangers of said product.

Are you saying the vaccine is equal to the mark of the beast?
No. We'll have a choice to take the mark or not. the choice will be clear.

If this is a trial, you aint seen nothing yet!

Who is saying that the vaccine is equal to the mark of the beast and where is it being said??? A link to such a post will be appreciated.

I don't think the "mark of the beast" is the only time God's people have to make a choice?

Surely no one would suggest that it doesn't matter what choices we make now, as long as we don't chose the "mark of the beast" when that is sprung upon us?

No -- I don't think anyone here sees vaccinations as the "mark of the beast".

However, I do believe satan is cultivating the ground so when the "mark of the beast" is being urged it will take easier root.

This whole COVID issue -- if government says close your business and stay home for several months for the "common good" -- will people obediently do it?
It's a "conditioning process" they can get people to practice giving up their freedoms "for the common good" a few times on a variety of issues, then it be easy to legislate Sunday laws "for the common good" and have people (even those who don't have any religious inclinations concerning Sunday) to keep Sunday without protest, "for the common good"?
There's a "conditioning process", you see satan doesn't want any "A.T.Jones changing his plans. If he gets all the people conditioned to doing things "for the common good" he can hugely lessen the message proclaiming that Sunday is wrong.

In the same line -- urging that everyone must take the vaccine "for the common good" -- even though the vaccine is highly questionable, -- getting everyone to obey is good practice, for what he plans to bring in later.

And that vaccine is highly suspect -- (they are working on several possibilities, and cutting testing time down to extremely short time periods, hoping to jab thousands in a matter of months)
Did you know that Gates is most excited about developing an RNA vaccine that alters a person's DNA? That' playing havoc with the marvelous immune system that God created in our bodies. Yes, I know there's a big disclaimer on the dangers of this experimental vaccine. They say after getting into the cells and getting them to produce immunity, the RNA and the cells they invaded will die and everything will be OK.. BUT THEY DON'T KNOW THAT!!!! And their very rebuttal affirms it does alter the DNA.

Dedication, you are spot on.

First, you must be vaccinated to protect yourself.
But too many said the risk was too great.
So now, they say, forget about you, but you need to be vaccinated to protect others.

The flu lockdown is following the same mindset. You don't wear masks to protect yourself, but others. You stay home to protect others. You worry about transmitting viruses to others.

Create this fear. Make you think that everyone else is a carrier. They must have a mask on or they are going to contaminate you. If they aren't vaccinated, they are going to infect you (never mind you are vaccinated).

"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"

And isn't that their whole point in moving this forward?

You may have seen that some scientists are working on getting the vaccine into plants so that in eating the plants we will get the vaccine! Here is the link.
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/c...tist-seeking-edible-vaccine-for-covid-19

Maybe Bud the spud from the bright red mud might soon be coming with a surprise inside every bag.

Just in case anyone needed more motivation to start a garden!

GMO food. It's for your own good.
And we might add some extra items
or fail to prevent extra items.
Too bad. Friendly fire causalities.