HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
Andrew, Trainor, ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield
1325 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,193
Members1,325
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
asygo 28
Rick H 15
kland 15
November
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Member Spotlight
Rick H
Rick H
Florida, USA
Posts: 3,234
Joined: January 2008
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
5 registered members (dedication, Kevin H, Karen Y, 2 invisible), 2,092 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study #195953
06/25/23 07:38 PM
06/25/23 07:38 PM
dedication  Online Content OP
Global Moderator
Supporting Member 2022

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
What is higher Critical Bible Study?

It is a method of studying the Bible that seeks to understand the text in its historical and cultural context by analyzing the language, history, and culture of the people at the time it was written.

Sounds pretty good at this point, but....

This approach assumes a secular perspective and rather than seeing the Bible as authoritative, uses the then present culture and history to be the authority above accepting the inspiration of Scripture. That means it's conclusions must be in harmony with a secular, non-supernatural worldview.

According to R.A.Torrey in "History of Higher Criticism"
Quote
The term Higher Criticism, then, means nothing more than the study of the literary structure of the various books of the Bible, and more especially of the Old Testament. Now this in itself is most laudable.... to find out all he can with regard to the portion of the Bible he is studying; the author, the date, the circumstances, and purpose of its writing.

How is it, then, that the Higher Criticism has become identified in the popular mind with attacks upon the Bible and the supernatural character of the Holy Scriptures?....

the work of the Higher Critic has not always been pursued in a reverent spirit nor in the spirit of scientific and Christian scholarship....who have based their theories largely upon their own subjective conclusions. ..
Higher criticism, again also known as the historical-critical method, treats the ancient texts of the Bible from an entirely secular perspective. The presupposition of secular necessity to the exclusion of supernatural possibility


A secular approach to interpreting a document that is "spiritually discerned" will not come to the right conclusions.
They will find answers in their higher criticism to downplay and explain away the wonder of God's wonderous works by making it all agree with natural conditions and circumstance.
Christians who hold to God?s existence will have no problems acknowledging the miraculous authorship of the Bible, or the workings of God's miraculous intervention, as truly supernatural glimpses of God's great power and love. The Christians are not limited by this strenuous requirement of secularism that is an unfounded filter put upon the Bible.

Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #195955
06/25/23 08:09 PM
06/25/23 08:09 PM
Kevin H  Online Content
SDA
Active Member 2024

Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 635
New York
Higher and lower criticism started out in something like the 1700s in unison. One was looking at the different writing styles and the other was looking at the completed product. However, in the mid 1800s as evolution became popular, people began looking for evolution in everything. The evolutionists interpreted the different writing styles to reflect evolution. They developed a theory that instead of the names associated with the Bible playing some kind of role in the development of the book, they came up with alternative writers/authors that they set in a certain order which they saw as corresponding to human Darwinian evolution. They set the books in time periods years after the time that the Bible claims them to be.

In a reaction to what was being done, those who wanted to believe the Bible came up with a theory of inspiration that did away with the idea of any editing. They started to say that the Bible was as perfect as God is perfect, and thus the Bible Books came out perfect and totally complete the first time. (Except for some reason the book of Daniel still gets set in the later context).

Now, there was one pastor who was worried about both extremes, and he offered a third solution that had room for editing and mistakes, yet still seeing a real God, and real people who the Bible mentioned and connected to the time that the Bible sets. His one short fall was that he ended up putting more emphases on the subjective experience of the Bible writers than the objective experience. Sadly, his view became hated by both sides, and he lost his ministry when a woman claimed that she and this pastor were having an affair. Eventually she admitted that she was lying, that there was no affair, but it was a needed lie to protect the Bible from his horrible ideas.

Our ideas of historism shows it's Biblical foundation in the two very different writing styles found in the book of Amos. And our typical Ellen White studies use the original 1700s style as the pre Darwinian higher critics. But our leadership is discouraging any of this in our Bible studies, that we should use the style of lower criticism alone. In a book by Gerhard Hassel on how to study the Bible, he says that while the Bible gives indication of editing, that we need to pretend that they are not there and just study the text as if it's final form was it's original form.

Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #195957
06/25/23 09:15 PM
06/25/23 09:15 PM
dedication  Online Content OP
Global Moderator
Supporting Member 2022

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
What does EGW say about "higher Biblical Criticism"?


According to P. Gerard Damsteegt
Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 4/2 (1993):115-136.


"Popular theology is characterized by false interpretations of Scripture. The origin of many of these errors may be traced to the "ages of papal darkness, that is the Dark Ages." (See Testimonies, 5:710,711.)

"The nature of this theology is speculative. It exalts human theories based on philosophy and theology above the Word of God and stands in sharp contrast to the eternal truths taught by the Bible writers.17 Its presence is widespread. "To a large degree," Ellen White writes, "theology, as studied and taught, is but a record of human speculation." (See Counsels to Teachers, p. 380.)

"She strongly warns against the methods of higher criticism, also called historical criticism. It is the use of the historical-critical method for the study of the Bible. This approach she characterizes as "dissecting, conjecturing, reconstructing" the Scriptures. The result is the destruction of faith in Scripture as the Word of God. (Education, p. 227) She considered it to be one of Satan's tools of deception. Through its "pleasing sentiments," she says, "the enemy of righteousness is seeking to lead souls into forbidden paths." (Acts of the Apostles, p. 474). His other tools are "evolution, spiritualism, theosophy, and pantheism, ibid )

"The reason for her strong opposition to higher criticism is that it "is destroying faith in the Bible as a divine revelation; it is robbing God's word of power to control, uplift, and inspire human lives." (Education, p. 227) She compares its influence to the destructive effect of tradition and rabbinical teaching in Christ's days. (Ministry of Healing, p. 142.)

"In a sermon she ironically contrasts the higher critics, whom she identifies as "poor, finite man on probation," with the true Higher Critic, "the Lord God of the universe who has spread the canopy of the heavens above us, and has made the stars and called them forth in their order." (MS 43a, 1894)

From Ellen White Information Network:

"The vast majority of scholars today would disagree with (Ellen White's) position (to take the Bible as it reads, not finite man's opinions) . "Higher criticism" is the norm, which, according to Wikipedia, "is a branch of literary analysis that attempts to investigate the origins of a text, especially the text of the Bible. Higher criticism in particular focuses on the sources of a document and tries to determine the authorship, date, and place of composition of the text." Other definitions out there say that the higher critic is also trying to determine the meaning of the text.

"That all may sound benign, but it should be understood that higher criticism is based on the assumption that the Bible is inaccurate. Thus, when a higher critic is trying to determine the authorship and date of Genesis and Exodus, he may conclude that these books, contrary to Jesus' claim in the New Testament, were not written by Moses at the time of the Exodus. Moreover, he may also conclude that the Creation account of Genesis 1 is just an allegory, and that there really wasn't an exodus from Egypt after all.

Quote
Bible study, as too often conducted in the schools, is robbing the world of the priceless treasure of the word of God. The work of "higher criticism," in dissecting, conjecturing, reconstructing, is destroying faith in the Bible as a divine revelation; it is robbing God's word of power to control, uplift, and inspire human lives.?Education, p. 227.

Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #195959
06/25/23 10:05 PM
06/25/23 10:05 PM
dedication  Online Content OP
Global Moderator
Supporting Member 2022

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
Originally Posted by Kevin
(In thread on time going backwards)
The plagues on Egypt were routine events, but God increased their intensity, and specificity from what usually appears random and general. Where Israel crossed the Jordan river, it was a place where the rocks falling from an upstream earthquake would dam up the river. Likewise, a suggestion for the location of the crossing of the Red Sea, is a place that use to part there every once in a while, whenever the east wind blew all night, until they built the Suez Canal. Nearly an entire village was wiped out the last time it parted and the villagers were slow to return. Same with the crossing of the Jordan. Sodom, Gomorrah, and Jericho are on a major earthquake fault.


The above are all interpretations based on the opinions of the Higher Critical Bible scholars.
You see -- according to that method everything needs to be interpreted by natural means.

Miracles are denied.
God is restricted to what mankind sees as natural events. He is not allowed to act as the God of the Universe, but only as a god of nature.
Everything supernatural, the wonderous works of God, the poor finite higher critic will pull down and explain as a natural event, -- oh yes, they may say God can use it, but it's not a miracle as such.

The RED SEA CROSSING.

The higher critics place the Red Sea Crossing almost next door to Goshen where the Israelites lived in Egypt. Totally a wrong site, but they chose it even though it wasn't even the Red Sea proper, just a reed sea because it could be crossed naturally --
The Bible does not support the idea that the Israelites travelled only a few steps, staying nearly next door to their homes for several days, and weren't running across the desert to get away from Egypt.

No -- they left with haste!
They ate their last supper in Egypt standing up ready to run as soon as Pharaoh said "go", and in that 'self same day" they left. (Ex 12:33) and could not tarry, neither had they prepared for themselves any victual.( 39). They travelled to a place where there were mountains on either side.

The place of crossing can be found and it shows significant evidence that it is the right place -- and it was not where the higher critics maintain it was.

https://www.holylandsite.com/exodus-redsea-sinai






Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #196034
07/19/23 11:55 AM
07/19/23 11:55 AM
G
Garywk  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 982
Colville, Wa
I tried to reply to dedication's op but for some reason could not.

This is a very important topic as it explains much of what is going on in Christianity for the last 150-200 years or so. A Dutch Reformed minister, N. N. Whiting, who was also a Bible translator, joined the Millerite movement and although he never became an Adventist wrote a book on what he called neology that grew out of the French Revolution. Another name for it is rationalism. It denies inspiration as well as all supernatural events. His book can be found in the APL and downloaded from any site that makes those books available or read on line on the Ellen White site.

Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #196065
07/20/23 02:09 PM
07/20/23 02:09 PM
G
Garywk  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 982
Colville, Wa
I just found this. I had read it several years ago but forgotten it. The quote is from F. C. Gilbert who was a Jew who had been converted to become an Adventist. He wrote several books published by the Review and Herald publishing assn.

This comment of his is on the Sadducees.

Quote
26. This class is frequently mentioned in the New Testament, and they often came in contact with the Savior and with the Apostles. They were a large and powerful faction, though they did not have the following of the masses. They were very wealthy and quite influential, but were strongly inclined toward infidelity. They held a similar relation to the Pharisees of the time as do the so-called "higher critics" to the orthodoxy of the present, who not only discard many of the popular theological errors, but also seek to undermine faith in the word of God.

Last edited by Garywk; 07/20/23 02:10 PM.
Re: Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study [Re: dedication] #198168
11/12/24 07:31 PM
11/12/24 07:31 PM
dedication  Online Content OP
Global Moderator
Supporting Member 2022

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,701
Canada
Historical-critical methods, are generally anti-supernatural interpretations of things we read in Biblical historical narratives. This became popular in the post-Enlightenment era, with the assumption that history follows reasonable patterns with no supernatural interference. History, then is in need to be explained by remaining evidence. Traditional meaning or understanding is not really its goal,

Historical Criticism tends to be a great way for the more liberal scholars to make the biblical text fit more to modern thinking . But how does looking at the historical culture lead to more modern thinking?
Could it be by linking to our emotional response to situations?
Could the nature of historical criticism be a psychological operation that is conducted on the mind to change our thinking and/or behavior?

A central concept of any psychological operation is to use accepted terms or words that we tend to understand to mean certain things, but to change their meaning to one that is decidedly different . This confusion of the meaning of words can infiltrate the mind with conflicting concepts and change how people think and understand the message.

British writer George Orwell warned of the manipulation of words and their meanings as an important key influencing how people think about things. Words are changed from their original meaning to create new ways of thinking. Double talk is another term.

I remember trying to talk to someone who believed everyone is eventually saved. The whole conversation was built on this principle of changing word meanings. Death didn't mean death, perish didn't mean perish, even the references of heaven didn't mean heaven. The home in heaven wasn't a "home" but was a new body. Every bible verse used, was explained away as not saying what it was saying.
And considering the on going debates on "There are three living persons" the word "persons" receives volumes of attempts to prove it doesn't mean "persons". By changing the meaning of words, one can adjust anything to match what they wish to promote.

One writer explained it thus:
"At its heart, historical criticism is neither "historical" or "critical" in the traditional sense of the term. It does not genuinely believe Biblical revelation contains history in the sense of what actually happened in a time-space continuum. Instead, historical criticism is post-modernistic that asserts all history is by nature a subjective interpretation of surviving traces of events."

This isn't just concerning Biblical history. The trend is turned on all history. In our modern times, rewriting history to fit modern movements has reached new heights.


Moderator  dedication, Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
No mail in Canada?
by dedication. 11/20/24 05:53 PM
Fourth quarter, 2024, The Gospel of John
by asygo. 11/20/24 02:31 AM
The 2024 Election, the Hegelian Dialectic
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 08:26 PM
"The Lord's Day" and Ignatius
by dedication. 11/15/24 02:19 AM
The Doctrine of the Nicolaitans
by dedication. 11/14/24 04:00 PM
Will Trump be able to lead..
by dedication. 11/13/24 07:13 PM
Is Lying Ever Permitted?
by kland. 11/13/24 05:04 PM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 11/13/24 04:06 PM
Profiles Of Jesus In Zecharia
by dedication. 11/13/24 02:23 AM
Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study
by dedication. 11/12/24 07:31 PM
The Great White Throne
by dedication. 11/12/24 06:39 PM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 11/08/24 04:32 PM
A god whom his fathers knew not..
by TruthinTypes. 11/05/24 12:19 AM
Understanding the Battle of Armageddon
by Rick H. 10/25/24 07:25 PM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by dedication. 11/20/24 02:28 PM
The Church is Suing the State of Maryland
by Rick H. 11/16/24 04:43 PM
Has the Catholic Church Changed?
by TheophilusOne. 11/16/24 08:53 AM
Understanding the 1,260-year Prophecy
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 11:10 PM
Dr Ben Carson: Church and State
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 10:43 PM
Dr Conrad Vine Banned
by Rick H. 11/15/24 06:11 AM
Understanding the 1290 & 1335 of Daniel 12?
by dedication. 11/05/24 03:16 PM
Private Schools
by dedication. 11/04/24 01:39 PM
The 1260 Year Prophecy & The Roman Catholic Church
by dedication. 10/22/24 01:32 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1