Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,195
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Kevin H, 2 invisible),
2,522
guests, and 8
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33773
08/01/00 10:27 PM
08/01/00 10:27 PM
|
Anonymous
OP
Unregistered
|
|
|
I'll just sing my usual way down lower than the accompanist goes and sing "with my back to the rising sun" and happily go right on along. Here's for # 373 "Seeking the Lost" Fits my voice just fine, the congregation sings too high that's all. ------------------ Edward F. Sutton
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33774
08/02/00 12:51 AM
08/02/00 12:51 AM
|
|
My all time favorite is Beulah Land, but there were several that came to mind. I grew up listening to groups like the Paines and the Lewis family and The Chuckwagon Gang. Unfortunately, it has been to long and I don't remember the titles. I was only 12 or 13 the last time I attended there. Shall we gather at the river At The Rugged Cross I Stand Roll Jordan Roll Fishers of Men ( not to sure that is the proper title) Just a little walk ( with my saviour) There was one that I only remember the chorus to: He's more than just a swear word, Not just an idle care word, He's the precious Son of God. ------------------ Is what you're living for worth Christ dying for? Gerry B.
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33775
08/03/00 06:20 PM
08/03/00 06:20 PM
|
|
It's interesting where the theology of "O Canada" will end up. Daryl from Campmeeting
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33776
08/09/00 06:38 PM
08/09/00 06:38 PM
|
|
Not to be rude Mr. Layman, but your post on the "new music" reminded me of something I see in my father and fear in myself. I wonder at what age we subconciously decide that all we knew up till then was good and proper and right and any new innovations from then on are from the devil. I love some of the old hymns and some of the new. One thing I know for sure. It is frustration to sit in a song service and not be able to sing any of the songs because you don't know them. I believe that is the biggest reason why music is such a contentious issue. We fear what we do not know and are suspicious of all things different. On the other hand, if it is familiar, it must be OK. I struggle to remain open minded in all areas and these discussions are a real help!
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33777
08/10/00 01:52 AM
08/10/00 01:52 AM
|
|
Not having had the 'honor' of growing up in a christian home, I don't think all I have known is right and proper. I recognize the power behind most of the music that many are trying desperatly to introduce into worship services. I am not against contemporary music per se, but do have a problem with the 2 or 3 chord 'chants' that try to pass themselves off as 'christian'. Same stuff I listened to in spiritist srvices 20 years ago. As to 'christian rock', I've made my thoughts known on that several times, and have been called old fashioned in my thinking and have been told I am close minded. I am. I know where rock came from, where it still is and where it still belongs. In a christian service it doesn't. The repetitive chants ( choruses) remind me of the mantras many of my new age friends use to 'get in touch with their inner selves'. You are right, old isn't necessarily better. The old druid chants and the new age mantras are all the same thing, just under a different name. I watch so many of our young people struggle with this stuff, and watch them get blind sided by the very people that are supposed to guide them past this obstacle. I used to think there was a time and a place for everything, but, I was wrong. There is never a time for the things of the devil in our worship service, and not in our minds and hearts, either. What is popular is not often right. What is right is not often popular. Gerry B.
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33778
08/10/00 04:34 AM
08/10/00 04:34 AM
|
Anonymous
OP
Unregistered
|
|
|
Sometimes people come to church services to have their faith affirmed. I guess that is why some of the "let's try something new" stuff is sniffed at. Familiar hymns have much meaning to people. In my years of ministry, I can remember people (some of whom have passed away) simply by knowing that "Sitting at the Feet of Jesus" or "Whiter Than Snow" were hymns they always requested to be sung. I find "newer" choruses like "Pass it On" or "The Hash Chorus" get worn out quite quickly (even young people groan when those are selected), but "What a Friend We Have in Jesus" or "The Old Rugged Cross" can never go out of style. Now why is that? Were Bernard, Schriven, Sankey et al. better writers? ------------------ "He Restoreth My Soul" Pastor Andrew
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33779
08/10/00 11:19 AM
08/10/00 11:19 AM
|
|
So much that is written today, appears to be nothing but fluff. It doesn't speak to the heart the way a really good song does. I've said it before, not all CCM is bad, I have heard some really good ones, but, most of it wears thin after just a few plays. It has no message and doesn't uplift God or bring us into His presence. It's like eating popcorn, filling, but not satisfying. An hour later, you're hungry again. ------------------ What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular. Gerry B.
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33780
08/11/00 10:24 AM
08/11/00 10:24 AM
|
Anonymous
OP
Unregistered
|
|
|
It would seem that the writers and arangers of timeless hymns, are not entertainers. To write what has convicted you and propels the listner/singer into the themes of Scripture. The effect would be that of bringing them closer into the messages of Scripture, being arranged with the humble dignity and content that arouses not sentamintilism and empty emotions; but rather shame for sin - gratitude for Calvery and the Saviour Who died & rose again - hope for His return - and a place for them to work beside HIM - and moves them to consider their place in that story. Any forms of music used with such hymns that by it's delivery or style detracted from the lyrics and message would rightly seem out of place and inappropriate. Will more timeless hymns be written in our day, I sure hope so. Martin Luther commented that a religion that depended on force to spread or maintain it's self was a bad one. My comment is that any hymn that relies upon Entertainment Industry style arranging and sentimental lyrics is trendy today and forgotten tommorow, for it does not satisfy the heart needs of the hearer or the singer. It does not bring them into the themes of Scripture, it tickles the ear, moves the feet, claps the hands, misses the Heart and saddens the Lord. It could not direct away from it's self to God to - convict / comfort / motivate /convert. ------------------ Edward F. Sutton [This message has been edited by Edward F. Sutton (edited August 11, 2000).]
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33781
08/11/00 10:48 AM
08/11/00 10:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Theology of "O Canada"
#33782
08/11/00 11:26 PM
08/11/00 11:26 PM
|
|
I transferred this thread from The Fellowship Room for continued discussion here in the Music forum. ------------------ In His Love, Mercy & Grace Daryl Fawcett :)
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|