|
Forums118
Topics9,223
Posts196,070
Members1,325
| |
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: Historic SDA?
#75209
07/25/06 07:45 PM
07/25/06 07:45 PM
|
SDA
Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,607
California, USA
|
|
Quote:
Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour. (Isaiah 43:10-11)
Bro David,
I want to add a couple more questions:
- "before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me" - If the Father existed before the Son, how can this statement be true?
- Who was speaking in Verse 11?
By God's grace,
Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
|
|
Re: Historic SDA?
#75210
08/07/06 09:49 PM
08/07/06 09:49 PM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Going back to your list under this heading Quote:
What is an Historic Seventh day Adventist?
I'm surprised you're happy to be an historic SDA, given your username on this forum...: I personally am neither an HSDA nor an LGT SDA - I'm an 1888 SDA.
You, Tom and Mark should join me in that, since we all subscribe to the SOP-endorsed message/writings of Waggoner & Jones. Admittedly there's some discussion still on the Godhead issue about Jesus' eternal Sonship but I'll deal with that later. Larry is correct that HA has given itself a negative image, but the landmark doctrines and their supporting teachings are what gives Adventism its identity and that must include the 1888 message as preserved in the messengers' writings while expressed second handedly by EGW.
The organised church does test one's patience tremendously, but the Australian roots of HA exposed one sort of dilution of the truth, and they still have their part to play in helping the church to recover the clear teachings which are now dimmed and diluted. Sadly, both those HA and the LGT promoters (same message) share with the church at least confusion over if not resistance to the 1888 message - regarding the size and achievements of grace, so recovering the clear, straight testimony of the Laodicean and 3 Angels' message must involve a coming together with the 1888 Message Study Committee before they each and all ride off into the sunset separately.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|
