Forums118
Topics9,224
Posts196,112
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (daylily, dedication, Karen Y, 2 invisible),
2,818
guests, and 9
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #2 - Nothing New Under the Sun
[Re: Johann]
#83688
01/08/07 01:00 PM
01/08/07 01:00 PM
|
|
Ecc. 1:1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.
Why does the word Preacher begin with a capital letter? Is it simply to denote a name or title? Sunday's section says, "The word commonly translated "preacher" here, kohelet, is from the Hebrew root kahal, which means "to assemble," "to gather." In Greek, kohelet is translated into a word similar to the Greek word for "church," ekklesia; from this, of course, we get the name Ecclesiastes. The Jews just called the author, and the book, Kohelet." I would therefore say that the name of the book is based upon the Greek word rather than on the Hebrew word, which I find interesting, seeing that it was orginally written in Hebrew.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #2 - Nothing New Under the Sun
[Re: Daryl]
#83710
01/08/07 11:07 PM
01/08/07 11:07 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,619
California, USA
|
|
Strong's defines the Hebrew word hebel (Strong's 01892, used 5 times in Ecc 1:2) as: 1) vapour, breath a) breath, vapour b) vanity (fig.) http://www.blueletterbible.org/cgi-bin/strongs.pl?strongs=01892&page=1From the lexicon: Commonly used of any thing transitory, evanescent, frail. It looks to me like hebel is used for things which are not lasting. Surely we can find many things, then and now, that fit the bill. The solution is to focus on that which is lasting. What's the only thing that we can take from this world into the next one?
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #2 - Nothing New Under the Sun
[Re: Johann]
#83737
01/09/07 05:49 PM
01/09/07 05:49 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,619
California, USA
|
|
Pastor Johann,
I didn't quite understand what you were saying about the falls. What "power" are you talking about? Power generators in the falls?
I think Ecc 1:2-11 is a lament about the lack of purpose or meaning in the various events around us. The water cycle has been that way for a long time, and it will continue that way for a long time. But in and of itself, it has no meaning; it is hebel.
For anything to have real meaning, we have to get past the temporal, and see how they impact the eternal. Consider the sun's rising and setting. I enjoy studying physics and how it keeps the solar system running smoothly. But if I just studied gravity and momentum and how they make the planets move, it would be pretty meaningless. Only as they point me to God do they have true meaning.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #2 - Nothing New Under the Sun
[Re: asygo]
#83741
01/09/07 07:03 PM
01/09/07 07:03 PM
|
|
Tuesday's section asked an interesting question in relation to what is being posted here. Read Ecclesiastes 1:4-11. What point was Solomon making? How accurate were his conclusions?
1 - What point was Solomon making? My answer is that the verses basically says that the living come and go as a vapour, but all else is repetitious, the sun, the wind, the rivers, the water falls, etc. 2 - How accurate were his conclusions? My answer is that what I do not agree with is that the living are not forgotten by God. They may be forgotten by future generations, but they are not forgotten by God. A day is coming when the dead will live again. Those in Christ will live forever. Those not in Christ will die again, but it will be the second death from which there will be no return. There is, therefore, something new under the sun, when all the redeemed will live again for all eternity.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|