Forums118
Topics9,228
Posts196,149
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: Tom]
#85894
03/01/07 05:24 AM
03/01/07 05:24 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
California, USA
|
|
That's true. But you know, there is a non-zero probability of the sun suddenly turning into a bowl of petunias. Even though we're pretty sure it won't happen tomorrow, given eternity, it eventually will. Eventually the sun will turn into a bowl of petunias? First of all, it's not possible for the sun to turn into a bowl of petunias. A zero probability, even given eternity, remains a 0 probability. One more quickie. There is a non-zero probability of the sun suddenly turning into a bowl of petunias. Just like there is a non-zero probability that an electron will tunnel through an energy barrier greater than the electron's energy. And that happens countless times whenever you turn on your computer. Given eternity, a non-zero probability is a certainty. But of course, the sun's natural lifetime is only on the order billions of years, much too short for its petunia trick to come to pass.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: asygo]
#85901
03/01/07 02:20 PM
03/01/07 02:20 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Arnold, the probability of the sun's turning into a bowl of petunias is 0. Eternity has nothing to do with this. It's still 0. Just like the probability of the sun turning into Casper the friendly ghost is zero, or turning into Arnold.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: Tom]
#85926
03/02/07 02:50 AM
03/02/07 02:50 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
California, USA
|
|
Actually, there are various ways that it could theoretically happen. Neutrons can turn into protons, and vice versa. Looking at the QM wave function of the electron shows that there is a non-zero probability that it could pop up somewhere far from the sun. A fortuitous flow of extra energy away from the system is also possible. Sure, a lot of things have to go just right, but the probability is not zero.
You know, there is even a non-zero probability, though much smaller than the sun's petunia trick, that the whole universe just popped up, as is, last Thursday, complete with all our memories, etc. Very unlikely, but not impossible.
QM is a strange beast. If God's creation is truly probabilistic, then we have to be open to possibilities that are almost impossible to imagine. But it seems that, like me, you can't quite swallow everything that a fully probabilistic universe entails.
One more thing. The greatest miracle is the redemption of the soul. It is easier to turn the sun into a petunia than it is to turn a sinner into a saint.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: asygo]
#85928
03/02/07 04:26 AM
03/02/07 04:26 AM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I agree with the essence of what you are saying, but the electrons of the son are not independent of one another, which you example seems not to account for. That was a point I was getting at earlier, that while individual elements (as in "things") may act unpredictably, that doesn't mean the sum of the parts will act in an unpredictable way. However, even here, if you take God's words at face value, groups of humans have acted in ways that God did not expect. For example: What more was there to do for My vineyard that I have not done in it? Why, when I expected it to produce good grapes did it produce worthless ones? (Isa. 5:4)
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: Tom]
#85929
03/02/07 05:49 AM
03/02/07 05:49 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
California, USA
|
|
The fact that the electrons interact with each other is what makes the petunia probability incredibly small. Under different circumstances, electrons do "impossible" things much more often (e.g. tunneling). But though the probability is infinitesimally small, it is not zero. I agree that unpredictability in individual particles does not always translate to unpredictability in the aggregate. In fact, QM is one of the best examples of that; it says nothing about individual particles, but gives extremely accurate predictions about the macro world. if you take God's words at face value, groups of humans have acted in ways that God did not expect. I think we'll have to investigate that more closely, to see if God can indeed be surprised. I suppose that's one of the topics of this thread. Anyway, what do you think about the distinction between conditional and probabilistic?
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: asygo]
#85935
03/02/07 02:01 PM
03/02/07 02:01 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Anyway, what do you think about the distinction between conditional and probabilistic? I don't know what you're asking here. There's a verse in Scripture somewhere which God says, "It never crossed my mind ..." The idiom in Hebrew is a bit different, so different translations render it differently. Those who hold the traditional position take the position that these things are anthropomorphic. However, that position has several problems, including being circular in reasoning. (when Scripture says something you disagree with, you disregard what God says as being anthropomorphic; in this case, how could God possibly communicate the thing with which you disagree.) An example of this is when God is speaking to Moses, and Moses asks how can he know that what he says will be accepted, and God says that he'll do a sign, and Moses what if that's not accepted, and God says, they may believe when the next sign is performed. Why would God say they "may" believe, if He knew for certain they would believe? Those who hold to the traditional position say this is just a figure of speech, for Moses' benefit, because Moses didn't know what would happen. But suppose it really was possible for the people to believe the signs at different points. How would God communicate that? Then God said, "Put your hand back into your bosom." So he put his hand back into his bosom; and when he took it out, behold, it was restored like the rest of his flesh. "If they will not believe you," God said, "or heed the first sign, they may believe the latter sign. If they will not believe even these two signs or heed your voice, you shall take some water from the Nile and pour it upon the dry ground; and the water which you shall take from the Nile will become blood upon the dry ground."(Ex. 4:7-9) Here's an interesting Spanish translation of verse 8: Y acontecerá que si no te creen, ni obedecen el testimonio de la primera señal, quizá crean el testimonio de la segunda señal. "quizá" means "perhaps"; this is, perhaps the people would believe the second sign. If not, Moses could proceed to the third. God was laying out the future in a contingent fashion.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: Tom]
#85941
03/02/07 04:49 PM
03/02/07 04:49 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
California, USA
|
|
Anyway, what do you think about the distinction between conditional and probabilistic? I don't know what you're asking here. Conditional = If you eat the fruit, you will die. Probabilistic = If you eat the fruit, you might die, but you might not. I'm not sure what will happen in your specific case.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: asygo]
#85945
03/02/07 06:11 PM
03/02/07 06:11 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I know what conditional is and what probabilistic is, but I don't know what you're asking. You're asking what I think about the distinction. What sort of answer are you looking for? There must be some context to your question that I'm missing.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: Tom]
#85948
03/02/07 08:22 PM
03/02/07 08:22 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
California, USA
|
|
I know what conditional is and what probabilistic is, but I don't know what you're asking. I want to know, first of all, if we agree on the distinction between the two. Second, I want to dig a bit deeper to see how each one applies to God's foreknowledge. I have no problem with conditional. But I'm not so sure about probabilistic. I have thought of the universe as deterministic, though conditional based on our choices. I don't know if that's fundamentalist or Calvinist or whatever. I have to think about it some more.
By God's grace, Arnold
1 John 5:11-13 And this is the testimony, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life. I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life.
|
|
|
Re: The Contradiction
[Re: asygo]
#85953
03/02/07 10:49 PM
03/02/07 10:49 PM
|
OP
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I think it's a combination. That is, something things are deterministic, and some probabilistic (or conditional, depending upon the context). How this applies to the future is that the future is comprised of a combination events which are known ahead of time and events which are yet to be determined.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|