Forums118
Topics9,217
Posts195,975
Members1,324
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87004
03/27/07 02:54 AM
03/27/07 02:54 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Thomas:If God knows that I will be saved or that I will be lost, that would greatly concern me that if God knows that I will be lost I really cant do or choose anything that would end up in a different end result than in my damnation, or if God knows that I will be saved, I couldnt really do or choose anything that would have a different end result than in my salvation.
Rosangela:God only sees what you will choose, and He died to make this choice possible. It's simple. Choose salvation and you will be saved. Choose it every day and every hour.
But you can't choose to do something which cannot happen! That's Thomas' point! How could Thomas possibly choose to do something different that what God has seen? Thomas may *think* he can choose something different than what God has seen, but he can't, because the logical conclusion is untenable. That is, say God has seen that Thomas will be lost, yet Thomas winds up being saved. Then something God has seen would happen would not have happened, which is not possible. (this whole paragraph is assuming your premise regarding the future, that's it can be seen like a T.V. re-run).
It's as simple as 1, 2, 3.
1)God sees that Thomas will be lost. 2)Everything that God sees will happen, does. 3)Therefore Thomas will be lost.
Thomas may be ignorant regarding his future, ignorantly feeling like he can choose to do either salvation or damnation, but unless you want to open up the possibility of being able to bring into being a reality which is different than what God has foreseen will happen, Thomas cannot do differently than the action that God has foreseen will happen.
Again, I hasten to point out that the problem is not that God has seen what will happen (as if God's seeing what will happen causes it to happen; no one is saying that), but the problem is that there is (supposedly) only one future, and that future is such that if Thomas is lost, then Thomas can do nothing to change that future (just as he can do nothing to change any other future; we can do nothing different than what is known will happen).
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87009
03/27/07 03:44 AM
03/27/07 03:44 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,607
California, USA
|
|
It showed that the problem was not having enough information, but that small changes in one are can respond in large changes in another. The precise description is that small variations in initial conditions result in large variations further along the process. Here's the Wiki: In mathematics and physics, chaos theory describes the behavior of certain nonlinear dynamical systems that under certain conditions exhibit dynamics that are sensitive to initial conditions (popularly referred to as the butterfly effect). As a result of this sensitivity, the behavior of chaotic systems appears to be random, because of an exponential growth of errors in the initial conditions. This happens even though these systems are deterministic in the sense that their future dynamics are well defined by their initial conditions, and there are no random elements involved. This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos. It seems random because variations in initial conditions are propagated through the system exponentially. But if we eliminate the variations, i.e. measurement errors, the system is deterministic and completely predictable. For example, two drops of water can be right next two each other and fall of a waterfall. One drop goes one way, while the other goes another. There are water eddies which exhibit this type of behavior as well. The problem is not one of simply not having enough information. There are only 4 forces that are universally accepted: Gravity, Electromagnetic, Weak, and Strong. Gravity between the water and air molecules is too weak in that scenario to make any difference. The Weak and Strong forces work only at subatomic distances. That leaves us with the Electromagnetic force. Earth's Gravity and Electromagnetic interaction between the water particles and the air particles determine the path of every drop. If we knew the exact positions and momenta of every particle in the system, we could determine where every drop of water will end up. At that scale, there is nothing random about its behavior. It only seems random because we lack information. Again, the chaos is due to ignorance of initial conditions combined with exponential growth of the error, leading to vague predictions. The article you linked to said as much.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87012
03/27/07 06:09 AM
03/27/07 06:09 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,607
California, USA
|
|
there is (supposedly) only one future, and that future is such that if Thomas is lost, then Thomas can do nothing to change that future With a slight change to your words, it expresses what I believe at this time: There is (supposedly) only one future, and that future is such that if Thomas is lost, then Thomas will do nothing to change that future.The key is not Thomas' ability, but his choice. Free will speaks of ability; foreknowledge (in the way I think of it) speaks of choice.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: asygo]
#87013
03/27/07 07:02 AM
03/27/07 07:02 AM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
And in either case, my future would be set as if in stone. One theory would be harder on God than the other but none would offer me free will as in "it is my choise to either accept or reject God." Wether I cant do something or I wont do something has implications for some questions, but neither offer me free choise.
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87018
03/27/07 11:33 AM
03/27/07 11:33 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
My point has nothing to do with God's foreknowledge. It has to do with the simple fact that if the future is single-threaded, in that there is only one possible thing that can happen (which is what will happen), then our free will cannot logically mean that we are capable of doing either of several mutually exclusive alternatives. That should be obvious.
This makes it awfully clear that I couldn't possibly mean "that people are coerced by God's foreknowledge to do things," doesn't it?
Aside from this that I've quoted above, I've also made the point many, many, many times that God's foreknowledge does not cause us to do anything. I've also stated many times that this isn't the issue. Tom, sorry, but I’m not understanding the point you are trying to make. I’m free to obey or disobey God. If God knows that I’m going to disobey Him, what is your contention? That I’ve never really had the alternative to obey Him?
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: vastergotland]
#87019
03/27/07 11:59 AM
03/27/07 11:59 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
And in either case, my future would be set as if in stone. One theory would be harder on God than the other but none would offer me free will as in "it is my choise to either accept or reject God." Wether I cant do something or I wont do something has implications for some questions, but neither offer me free choise. Thomas, Are temptations real or not? Have you ever felt the force of temptation? If God knows that you will be victorious over temptation, does this mean you didn't have the choice to do wrong? If you didn't have the choice to do wrong, how could you feel the force of temptation? How could there be any real struggle?
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Rosangela]
#87022
03/27/07 01:06 PM
03/27/07 01:06 PM
|
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
|
|
And in either case, my future would be set as if in stone. One theory would be harder on God than the other but none would offer me free will as in "it is my choise to either accept or reject God." Wether I cant do something or I wont do something has implications for some questions, but neither offer me free choise. Thomas, Are temptations real or not? Have you ever felt the force of temptation? If God knows that you will be victorious over temptation, does this mean you didn't have the choice to do wrong? If you didn't have the choice to do wrong, how could you feel the force of temptation? How could there be any real struggle? Temptations are real, and yes, sometimes they are very persuasive. You ask: If God knows that you will be victorious over temptation, does this mean you didn't have the choice to do wrong? -In such a situation as this, if I do wrong, Gods knowledge would prove to be a lie. We dont want to go there do we? You ask: If you didn't have the choice to do wrong, how could you feel the force of temptation? -I have heard that a person that is on a drug high can be entierly convinced of things which have no connection to the real world. Pink elephants, having the capacity to fly, fear of being hunted and so on. The Matrix all over again. But if I do have the choise to do either right or wrong, then this is no problem, is it? You ask: How could there be any real struggle? -Indeed, how could there?
Galatians 2 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: vastergotland]
#87027
03/27/07 02:47 PM
03/27/07 02:47 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Tom, sorry, but I’m not understanding the point you are trying to make. I’m free to obey or disobey God. If God knows that I’m going to disobey Him, what is your contention? That I’ve never really had the alternative to obey Him? If the future is such that only one thing can happen (the thing which will happen, the thing which God sees), then you are not free to do anything different than what will happen. You may *feel* like you are free to make a different choice, but you can't actually do anything different than what is known will happen (this is using the one-threaded future model, which can be seen like a T.V. rerun). Your "freedom" is really ignorance. You *think* you can do either of A or B, but if it is known with 100% certainty (the fact that God knows what you will do is immaterial; the important point is that it is known, or knowable) that you will do A, then your thinking you might do B or could do B is just ignorance. The definition you quoted from Webster's was a compabibilistic definition of free will, which basically stated that you are free to do what you choose to do. This definition avoids the logical problem which comes of asserting that free will implies one can actually do either of A or B (not just do the action one wishes to do, but actually do either of several mutually exclusive actions). What I've been pointing out is that the future-is-like-a-TV-rerun model is not logically consistent with the view of free will SDA's have traditionally held that one is free, not simply to do what one wishes, but to do either of more than one mutually exclusive alternatives (the latter being a stronger definition). To put it in less technical terms, you come to a road which forks. You can go either right or left. The definition of free will you quoted says you are free to go right if you choose to go right. The definition of free will I've been using (the traditional SDA one) says that you can actually go either right or left. Now if it is known that you will go left, then you can't go right (not because of a physical constraint, but a logical one). You can't logically do something different than that which is with 100% certainty known will happen.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87028
03/27/07 02:56 PM
03/27/07 02:56 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
With a slight change to your words, it expresses what I believe at this time: There is (supposedly) only one future, and that future is such that if Thomas is lost, then Thomas will do nothing to change that future. This doesn't express the logical problem strongly enough. It is not simply that case that Thomas *won't* do something to change the future, but he *can't*. It's not possible that Thomas could do something different than what God has known for all eternity with 100% certainty will happen, correct? What passes in Thomas' mind as free will is in reality just ignorance.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What is the Truth About The Foreknowledge of God?
[Re: Tom]
#87040
03/27/07 04:49 PM
03/27/07 04:49 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,607
California, USA
|
|
With a slight change to your words, it expresses what I believe at this time: There is (supposedly) only one future, and that future is such that if Thomas is lost, then Thomas will do nothing to change that future. This doesn't express the logical problem strongly enough. It is not simply that case that Thomas *won't* do something to change the future, but he *can't*. I guess that's why I don't see a logical problem. There is none, in my mind. As I see it, the case is *won't*, not *can't*. It's not possible that Thomas could do something different than what God has known for all eternity with 100% certainty will happen, correct? Right. Because the will is the governing power in the nature of man, you cannot do what you will not do. But the inability is not inherent in nature, nor is it dictated by God's foreknowledge; it is determined by Thomas' free will choice.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|