I AM means an eternal presence; the past, present, and future are alike to God. He sees the most remote events of past history and the far distant future with as clear a vision as we do those things that are transpiring daily. We know not what is before us, and if we did, it would not contribute to our eternal welfare. God gives us an opportunity to exercise faith and trust in the great I am. {14MR 21.3}

T: God knows the character of people when they die.

R: This is obvious. What He doesn't know, according to your view, is if the character of that person will change in the future or not. How many criminals do you know that were converted?

T: I don't know why you would assert that God doesn't know, according to my view, that the character of the person will not change after the resurrection.

MM, I'm sorry, but I can't respond to your post. It's too fragmented. I'd have to go back, and get the context of what I originally wrote, and piece it back together, and that would just take too long. If you want to include what you originally posted, my comment to that, and then your question or comment, that would give me enough context to respond.

What I see happening is you make some statement, and I provide a response to your statement, and then you quote my response without your original statement, and make some comment or assertion about it completely devoid of the context of what I was originally responding to.

After the great disappointment in 1844, Satan and his angels were busily engaged in laying snares to unsettle the faith of the body. He affected the minds of persons who had had an experience in the messages, and who had an appearance of humility. Some pointed to the future for the fulfillment of the first and second messages, while others pointed far back into the past, declaring that they had been there fulfilled. These were gaining an influence over the minds of the inexperienced and unsettling their faith. Some were searching the Bible to build up a faith of their own, independent of the body. Satan exulted in all this; for he knew that those who broke loose from the anchor he could affect by different errors and drive about with divers winds of doctrine. Many who had led in the first and second messages now denied them, and there was division and confusion throughout the body. {EW 256.3}

My attention was then called to William Miller. He looked perplexed and was bowed with anxiety and distress for his people. The company who had been united and loving in 1844 were losing their love, opposing one another, and falling into a cold, backslidden state. As he beheld this, grief wasted his strength. I saw leading men watching him, and fearing lest he should receive the third angel's message and the commandments of God. And as he would lean toward the light from heaven, these men would lay some plan to draw his mind away. A human influence was exerted to keep him in darkness and to retain his influence among those who opposed the truth. At length William Miller raised his voice against the light from heaven. He failed in not receiving the message which would have fully explained his disappointment and cast a light and glory on the past, which would have revived his exhausted energies, brightened his hope, and led him to glorify God. He leaned to human wisdom instead of divine, but being broken with arduous labor in his Master's cause and by age, he was not as accountable as those who kept him from the truth. They are responsible; the sin rests upon them. {EW 257.1}

If William Miller could have seen the light of the third message, many things which looked dark and mysterious to him would have been explained. But his brethren professed so deep love and interest for him, that he thought he could not tear away from them. His heart would incline toward the truth, and then he looked at his brethren; they opposed it. Could he tear away from those who had stood side by side with him in proclaiming the coming of Jesus? He thought they surely would not lead him astray. {EW 258.1}

God suffered him to fall under the power of Satan, the dominion of death, and hid him in the grave from those who were constantly drawing him from the truth. Moses erred as he was about to enter the Promised Land. So also, I saw that William Miller erred as he was soon to enter the heavenly Canaan, in suffering his influence to go against the truth. Others led him to this; others must account for it. But angels watch the precious dust of this servant of God, and he will come forth at the sound of the last trump. {EW 258.2}

Anyway, even assuming it's true, God's knowledge of what one will do in the future is based upon His knowledge of that person's character. It needn't be based upon His foreknowledge. In fact, I'm not aware of a single statement from the Spirit of Prophecy where she makes any argument whatsoever that God makes these sorts of judgments based on His foreknowledge (i.e., that God looks to the future, and bases His judgment on what He sees that a person would or would not have done). Instead, what I see, is that God makes judgments based on His knowledge of a person's character, and this judgment will be born out by what happens in the future.

Where we may disagree is that I understand that when God looks to the future, He sees all the possible inputs that occur, not just one.