HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
Ike, Andrew, Trainor, ekoorb1030, jibb555
1326 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,214
Members1,326
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
asygo 29
Rick H 24
kland 16
November
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Member Spotlight
asygo
asygo
California, USA
Posts: 5,636
Joined: February 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
8 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Daryl, daylily, TheophilusOne, 3 invisible), 2,489 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 6 of 25 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 24 25
Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Tom] #92979
11/21/07 03:45 PM
11/21/07 03:45 PM
Rosangela  Offline
5500+ Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
 Quote:
T: So depending on the circumstances, how an individual may respond to God's influence could be known with certainty.

R: If I already exist and God knows me. ...

T: God would certainly know of your possible existence.

Even if God knows of the possible existence of every future person in the world (in fact this does not make sense), He has no way of knowing how each person will respond to His influence. He can only have an idea about this if the person is alive and He knows the person, but He can have no idea about how a person who still doesn't exist will respond to His influence. After all, if He had any idea about this He wouldn't have created Lucifer nor Adam and Eve, would He?

Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: vastergotland] #92980
11/21/07 04:20 PM
11/21/07 04:20 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
 Originally Posted By: västergötland
TV: Maybe you did not see the presented idea that in adition to Gods trustworthiness, the worthlessness of the alternative is what the GC is exploring. Gods trustworthiness could be known before. The true character of the alternative can only be known after.

MM: Therefore, the GC was necessasry, right? Without it, God cannot guarantee FMAs will never rebel again, right?

TV:Thats the general idea, is it not?

MM: I do not believe the GC was "necessary" in order for God to be able to guarantee FMAs will never rebel again. Instead, I believe GC was inevitable because God chose to create FMAs in spite of knowing some of them were going to rebel.

Even if we agree with Tom Ewall, that is, if we believe God chose to create FMAs knowing they might rebel but hoping they wouldn't, we are forced to conclude God thought the risk was worth it, that even if FMAs chose to rebel He would deal with it. He would implement the plan of salvation, eventually win the GC, and in the end the remaining FMAs will live happily ever after.

But to say the GC was "necessary" is drawing conclusions that misrepresent the character of God. Why FMAs chose to rebel is unexplainable. It is mysterious. God foresaw it (my perspective) or He foresaw it as a possibility (Tom's perspective), either way God chose to create FMAs and ended up having to deal with the GC. But the GC was not "necessary" in order to safeguard the future.

Do you agree?

 Quote:
GC 492, 493
It is impossible to explain the origin of sin so as to give a reason for its existence. Yet enough may be understood concerning both the origin and the final disposition of sin to make fully manifest the justice and benevolence of God in all His dealings with evil. Nothing is more plainly taught in Scripture than that God was in no wise responsible for the entrance of sin; that there was no arbitrary withdrawal of divine grace, no deficiency in the divine government, that gave occasion for the uprising of rebellion.

Sin is an intruder, for whose presence no reason can be given. It is mysterious, unaccountable; to excuse it is to defend it. Could excuse for it be found, or cause be shown for its existence, it would cease to be sin. Our only definition of sin is that given in the word of God; it is "the transgression of the law;" it is the outworking of a principle at war with the great law of love which is the foundation of the divine government. {GC 492.2}

Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Mountain Man] #92981
11/21/07 04:26 PM
11/21/07 04:26 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
R: After all, if He had any idea about this [how a person who still doesn't exist will respond to His influence] He wouldn't have created Lucifer nor Adam and Eve, would He?

MM: Good question, Rosangela.

Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Mountain Man] #92984
11/21/07 04:39 PM
11/21/07 04:39 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Even if God knows of the possible existence of every future person in the world (in fact this does not make sense),

Sure it makes sense. If you have married someone else, and had children with that other person, God would know what those children would have been like. Why not?

He has no way of knowing how each person will respond to His influence. He can only have an idea about this if the person is alive and He knows the person, but He can have no idea about how a person who still doesn't exist will respond to His influence.

This doesn't make any sense. Of course God can know how a person will respond to His influence without the person existing.

Look at the resurrection for example. There's a whole group of people that do not yet exist, yet God knows how they will respond.

Why should a person have to exist in order for God to know something about that person? God knows all contingencies as well as if they were a reality. He sees any possible thing that can happen just as clearly as what is actually happening or has already happened.


After all, if He had any idea about this He wouldn't have created Lucifer nor Adam and Eve, would He?

First of all, there's no reason to assume that God had "no idea" how a creature He was going to create would respond to His influence. Just because God does not know exactly, specifically what a person will do in each and every decision that a person will ever make does not mean that God has "no idea" what a person will do in a specific circumstance. This is terrible logic.

Secondly, actually I guess there is no secondly. Your whole argument here falls apart because the hypothesis that God has "no idea" what the response to His influence will be has no foundation.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Tom] #92985
11/21/07 04:47 PM
11/21/07 04:47 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
 Quote:
But the GC was not "necessary" in order to safeguard the future.

Do you agree?


Butting in here, I agree from my perspective, but not from yours. From my perspective, it is possible (even likely) that FMAs could not sin. If FMAs had not sinned, I believe God could have safeguarded the universe in some other way than the Great Controversy (since there wouldn't have been any controversy).

However, from your perspective, sin was inevitable, and since the Great Controversy is the only way to resolve the sin problem, it was inevitable too, and therefore the only way to safeguard the future.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Tom] #92988
11/21/07 05:36 PM
11/21/07 05:36 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
But the GC was not "necessary" in order to safeguard the future.

Do you agree?


Butting in here, I agree from my perspective, but not from yours. From my perspective, it is possible (even likely) that FMAs could not sin. If FMAs had not sinned, I believe God could have safeguarded the universe in some other way than the Great Controversy (since there wouldn't have been any controversy).

However, from your perspective, sin was inevitable, and since the Great Controversy is the only way to resolve the sin problem, it was inevitable too, and therefore the only way to safeguard the future.

MM: Tom, you are assuming God was forced to implement the plan of salvation, as if there were no other options. In truth, though, He could have chosen, from your perspective, to allow A&E to suffer the immediate consequences of sinning - instant and eternal death. Thus, the GC was not necessary. He would have disproven Satan's accusations in some other way.

Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Mountain Man] #92989
11/21/07 05:54 PM
11/21/07 05:54 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
 Quote:
R: After all, if He had any idea about this [how a person who still doesn't exist will respond to His influence] He wouldn't have created Lucifer nor Adam and Eve, would He?

TE: First of all, there's no reason to assume that God had "no idea" how a creature He was going to create would respond to His influence. Just because God does not know exactly, specifically what a person will do in each and every decision that a person will ever make does not mean that God has "no idea" what a person will do in a specific circumstance. This is terrible logic.

Secondly, actually I guess there is no secondly. Your whole argument here falls apart because the hypothesis that God has "no idea" what the response to His influence will be has no foundation.

MM: Tom, if God can know precisely how certain beings will, hundreds of years before they exist, respond to His influence under certain circumstances, why can't He know it under all circumstances? What is the thing that prevents Him from knowing everything about everyone?

And, since, from your perspective, He knew there was a chance Lucifer and A&E would sin, why did He choose to create them? Why didn't He just leave them uncreated?

DA 22
From the beginning, God and Christ knew of the apostasy of Satan, and of the fall of man through the deceptive power of the apostate. God did not ordain that sin should exist, but He foresaw its existence, and made provision to meet the terrible emergency. {DA 22.2}

Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Rosangela] #92995
11/21/07 09:14 PM
11/21/07 09:14 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline OP
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
 Originally Posted By: Rosangela
 Quote:
If Judas would have choosen not to betray Jesus, someone else would have done it instead. Jesus had no lack of enemies nor of "friends" with ulterior motives.

It had to be someone from Christ's inner circle of friends, for the prophecy says: "Even my own familiar friend in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me" (Ps 41:9).
How would God make the future to play out in the way He had said it would? By influencing the person to betray Christ, or in what other way?

I dont know what way. However, considering that the option is that Judas would have been damned from his mothers womb (simmilar to Jeremiah being chosen as Gods prophet from his mothers womb), that simply does not fit with the God I see in the bible. God do not wish for anyones destruction. Judas always had a choise not to betray Jesus. A real choise which means that until the moment when he kissed Jesus in the garden, he could have ended his life not having betrayed Jesus. Maybe as did ten of the other diciples, through a persecution against the apostles or something.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Rosangela] #92996
11/21/07 09:19 PM
11/21/07 09:19 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline OP
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
 Originally Posted By: Rosangela
 Quote:
T: So depending on the circumstances, how an individual may respond to God's influence could be known with certainty.

R: If I already exist and God knows me. ...

T: God would certainly know of your possible existence.

Even if God knows of the possible existence of every future person in the world (in fact this does not make sense), He has no way of knowing how each person will respond to His influence. He can only have an idea about this if the person is alive and He knows the person, but He can have no idea about how a person who still doesn't exist will respond to His influence. After all, if He had any idea about this He wouldn't have created Lucifer nor Adam and Eve, would He?
It makes no less sence than having God sitting outside of time looking at it all in one eternal now. Like a frozen air bubble in a pice of ice.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Review: God of the possible [Re: Mountain Man] #92997
11/21/07 09:32 PM
11/21/07 09:32 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline OP
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
 Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
 Originally Posted By: västergötland
TV: Maybe you did not see the presented idea that in adition to Gods trustworthiness, the worthlessness of the alternative is what the GC is exploring. Gods trustworthiness could be known before. The true character of the alternative can only be known after.

MM: Therefore, the GC was necessasry, right? Without it, God cannot guarantee FMAs will never rebel again, right?

TV:Thats the general idea, is it not?

MM: I do not believe the GC was "necessary" in order for God to be able to guarantee FMAs will never rebel again. Instead, I believe GC was inevitable because God chose to create FMAs in spite of knowing some of them were going to rebel.

Even if we agree with Tom Ewall, that is, if we believe God chose to create FMAs knowing they might rebel but hoping they wouldn't, we are forced to conclude God thought the risk was worth it, that even if FMAs chose to rebel He would deal with it. He would implement the plan of salvation, eventually win the GC, and in the end the remaining FMAs will live happily ever after.

But to say the GC was "necessary" is drawing conclusions that misrepresent the character of God. Why FMAs chose to rebel is unexplainable. It is mysterious. God foresaw it (my perspective) or He foresaw it as a possibility (Tom's perspective), either way God chose to create FMAs and ended up having to deal with the GC. But the GC was not "necessary" in order to safeguard the future.
There is a context to my sentence that you have missed here. What I agreed the GC was necessary for was the prevention of the reappearance of sin. Not until we had started exploring the alternative to Gods leadership were we forced to complete the investigation. If sin had never raised its ugly head, then of course no GC would ever have been needed. But now sin did happen and we are daily suffering for it. We are daily learning the futility of the ways opposed to Gods ways. We will remember for eternity.
 Quote:

Do you agree?

 Quote:
GC 492, 493
It is impossible to explain the origin of sin so as to give a reason for its existence. Yet enough may be understood concerning both the origin and the final disposition of sin to make fully manifest the justice and benevolence of God in all His dealings with evil. Nothing is more plainly taught in Scripture than that God was in no wise responsible for the entrance of sin; that there was no arbitrary withdrawal of divine grace, no deficiency in the divine government, that gave occasion for the uprising of rebellion.

Sin is an intruder, for whose presence no reason can be given. It is mysterious, unaccountable; to excuse it is to defend it. Could excuse for it be found, or cause be shown for its existence, it would cease to be sin. Our only definition of sin is that given in the word of God; it is "the transgression of the law;" it is the outworking of a principle at war with the great law of love which is the foundation of the divine government. {GC 492.2}
Yes, words to remember.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Page 6 of 25 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 24 25

Moderator  Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
What are the seven kings of Rev. 17:10?
by Rick H. 11/23/24 07:31 AM
No mail in Canada?
by Rick H. 11/22/24 06:45 PM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 11/21/24 11:03 AM
Fourth quarter, 2024, The Gospel of John
by asygo. 11/20/24 02:31 AM
The 2024 Election, the Hegelian Dialectic
by ProdigalOne. 11/15/24 08:26 PM
"The Lord's Day" and Ignatius
by dedication. 11/15/24 02:19 AM
The Doctrine of the Nicolaitans
by dedication. 11/14/24 04:00 PM
Will Trump be able to lead..
by dedication. 11/13/24 07:13 PM
Is Lying Ever Permitted?
by kland. 11/13/24 05:04 PM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 11/13/24 04:06 PM
Profiles Of Jesus In Zecharia
by dedication. 11/13/24 02:23 AM
Good and Evil of Higher Critical Bible Study
by dedication. 11/12/24 07:31 PM
The Great White Throne
by dedication. 11/12/24 06:39 PM
A god whom his fathers knew not..
by TruthinTypes. 11/05/24 12:19 AM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by dedication. 11/24/24 04:13 AM
Dr Ben Carson: Church and State
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:12 PM
Will Trump Pass The Sunday Law?
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:51 PM
Understanding the 1,260-year Prophecy
by dedication. 11/22/24 12:35 PM
Private Schools
by Rick H. 11/22/24 07:54 AM
The Church is Suing the State of Maryland
by Rick H. 11/16/24 04:43 PM
Has the Catholic Church Changed?
by TheophilusOne. 11/16/24 08:53 AM
Dr Conrad Vine Banned
by Rick H. 11/15/24 06:11 AM
Understanding the 1290 & 1335 of Daniel 12?
by dedication. 11/05/24 03:16 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1