MM, you didn't respond to my post. For example, I've trying to get an answer from you for about a week now to the first question on my post.

The propositions are assuming that God is as you are suggesting, so your criticism is ill-founded.

MM: What is the difference between truth and reality? In this context, aren't they one and the same?

If there's no difference, why not just answer the question, "yes."

Somehow I come to think of Platons Cave when reading the past pages of this discussion. That reality as it really is is unrelated to anything substantial on earth and what we percieve as reality is merely a broken shadow on a jagged stone wall. Somehow it fits, if we are to define God after Platons definition of deity, it seems fitting to define ourselves by Platons thoughts too.

If we start to give words separate meanings depending on if we apply them to us or to God, discussion becomes pointless. If we talk about God in time but with the condition that time in Gods perspective is not seconds, minutes and hours but some entity that we cannot understand. Then the word time becomes empty when we use it in relation to God, no more than spacefiller.

Agreed Thomas.

It's interesting that in this mode of thought, one feels free to construct "realities" which need not be tied to logic, which also makes conversation challenging.

Okay, Tom, God knows the truth as it really is, He knows reality as it really is. What is your point?

Hey, that only took about two weeks!

My point is that if God knows reality as it is, and what God knows is that everything is happening now, then, in reality, everything is happening now.

Unless it isn't like that for God. He is big enough to know and experience everything now in the same way He can be everywhere at the same time.

Can Christ also be everywhere at the same time?

You were the one who said it was. I was quoting you.



Experiencing everything as happening now doesn't have anything to do with being big. "Big" has nothing to do with "time."