Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,213
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
9 registered members (dedication, daylily, TheophilusOne, Daryl, Karen Y, 4 invisible),
2,493
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Colin]
#99359
05/15/08 03:01 PM
05/15/08 03:01 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
“If Christ had a special power which it is not the privilege of man to have, Satan would have made capital of this matter.” (3SM 139)
R: Satan wouldn’t have made capital of that, because the same happens to us after we are born again – we are united with the divinity, in the same way that He was. Having a special power would include not having internal foes, right? R: We do have a carnal mind which Christ didn’t have, and which is just crucified, not eliminated, at conversion, and which tries constantly to reassert itself. Besides, passions and inclinations are in the mind, or heart. No, the carnal mind must die; otherwise, we cannot experience the miracle of rebirth. The carnal mind is not subject to God. It must die. We receive the mind of the new man when we are born again. The mind of the old man is crucified and buried. We are not born again double-minded. Here’s how it is described: Sin did not kill the law, but it did kill the carnal mind in Paul. {1SM 213.1}
Their parents are so anxious for them, that they accept anything that appears favorable, and do not labor with them, and teach them that the carnal mind must die. {2SG 261.2}
That which is pleasing to the natural heart and carnal mind is cherished. If the lust of the flesh had been rooted out of their hearts, they would not be so weak. {CH 570.3}
Jesus continued: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." By nature the heart is evil, and "who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one." Job 14:4. No human invention can find a remedy for the sinning soul. "The carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." "Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies." Rom. 8:7; Matt. 15:19. The fountain of the heart must be purified before the streams can become pure. He who is trying to reach heaven by his own works in keeping the law is attempting an impossibility. There is no safety for one who has merely a legal religion, a form of godliness. The Christian's life is not a modification or improvement of the old, but a transformation of nature. There is a death to self and sin, and a new life altogether. This change can be brought about only by the effectual working of the Holy Spirit. {DA 172.1} Our old man mind dies when we're born again with the new man mind. Jesus implants within us a new heart and mind, new tastes, new motives, new desires. Nevertheless, our internal foes remain to war against us. They continue to clamor for sinful expression. They continue to tempt and harass us from within. It should be obvious, therefore, that our internal foes "have their seat in the body and work through it." We become consciously aware of our internally generated temptations in the mind of the new man. The fact we are conscious of being tempted with unholy lusts and affections does not mean our old man mind is still alive. Otherwise, if we conclude the new man mind cannot be tempted from within, we are in essence claiming to have holy flesh.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Colin]
#99360
05/15/08 03:19 PM
05/15/08 03:19 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
With this in mind, you are asking us to consider an interpretation which forces us to conclude - The higher powers are to be subjected to the higher powers. It just doesn't make sense to me. Again, the lusts and affections originate in the body and work through it. Yes, we become aware of them in our conscious new man mind, but they do not originate in the new man mind. Are you saying we are born again with our old man mind in tact, that Jesus dwells upon a throne that is divided?
If flesh mind is dead, how, then, can it continue to tempt us from within? Are we born again with two hearts, with two minds, with both the mind/heart of the old man and the new man? Does Jesus share the throne of our soul temple with Satan? "The love of God must reign supreme; Christ must occupy an undivided throne." So, MM, you want the old man mind in tact and revivable for tempting us, but not alive and sharing space & power with Christ's presence in our lives? After all we are supposed to entertain the old heart's presence until we are changed in the twinkling of an eye: that's the heart of the two covenants' truth... You weren't leaving a hint, were you, of the old heart not hanging around at all? It is agreed that neither should we serve two masters nor do we have both old and new hearts reigning simultaneously in our new, spiritual life. Good questions. Thank you, Colin. Yes, I am saying that our old man mind/heart dies. It does not hang around. What does hang around afterwards, though, is our fallen flesh nature, which has a mind and voice of its own. It generates and communicates unholy thoughts and feelings which we become aware of in our new man mind/heart, and this will continue to happen until the day Jesus returns and replaces our sinful flesh nature with a sinless one. However, there is another thing that happens if we neglect to abide in Jesus - we resurrect our old man mind/heart, and resume sinning. To escape this situation, we must receive the gift of repentance, which in turn empowers us to confess and forsake our sin, and to recrucify and bury our old man mind/heart. Jesus then forgives us and restores us to the mind/heart of the new man, and we resume walking in the Spirit, growing in grace, and maturing in the fruts of the Spirit. Nevertheless, our sinful flesh nature continues to tempt us from within. The following passages speak to these things: The Saviour said, "Except a man be born from above," unless he shall receive a new heart, new desires, purposes, and motives, leading to a new life, "he cannot see the kingdom of God." John 3:3, margin. The idea that it is necessary only to develop the good that exists in man by nature, is a fatal deception. "The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." "Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again." 1 Corinthians 2:14; John 3:7. Of Christ it is written, "In Him was life; and the life was the light of men"--the only "name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." John 1:4; Acts 4:12. {SC 18.2}
It is the work of conversion and sanctification to reconcile men to God by bringing them into accord with the principles of His law. In the beginning, man was created in the image of God. He was in perfect harmony with the nature and the law of God; the principles of righteousness were written upon his heart. But sin alienated him from his Maker. He no longer reflected the divine image. His heart was at war with the principles of God's law. "The carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be" (Rom. 8:7). But "God so loved the world, that He gave His only-begotten Son," that man might be reconciled to God. Through the merits of Christ he can be restored to harmony with his Maker. His heart must be renewed by divine grace; he must have a new life from above. This change is the new birth, without which, says Jesus, "he cannot see the kingdom of God." {NL 11.3}
To be pardoned in the way that Christ pardons is not only to be forgiven, but to be renewed in the spirit of our mind. The Lord says, "A new heart will I give unto thee." The image of Christ is to be stamped upon the very mind, and heart, and soul. The apostle says, "And we have the mind of Christ." Without the transforming process which can come alone through divine power, the original propensities to sin are left in the heart in all their strength, to forge new chains, to impose a slavery that can never be broken by human power. . . . {RC 303.4}
The youth especially stumble over this phrase, "A new heart." They do not know what it means. They look for a special change to take place in their feelings. This they term conversion. Over this error thousands have stumbled to ruin, not understanding the expression, "Ye must be born again." . . . When Jesus speaks of the new heart, He means the mind, the life, the whole being. To have a change of heart is to withdraw the affections from the world, and fasten them upon Christ. To have a new heart is to have a new mind, new purposes, new motives. What is the sign of a new heart?--a changed life. There is a daily, hourly dying to selfishness and pride. {SD 100.2}
Then a spirit of kindness will be manifested, not by fits and starts, but continually. There will be a decided change in attitude, in deportment, in words and actions toward all with whom you are in any way connected. You will not magnify their infirmities, you will not place them in an unfavorable light. You will work in Christ's lines. . . . {SD 100.3}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Colin]
#99379
05/15/08 08:48 PM
05/15/08 08:48 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Babies need and have a Saviour: you're avoiding the need, because you object to eternal damnation being based also on the law regarding human nature - allowing only for sinful choices to be final. Human nature is no fault of ours, but it is our problem which Jesus solved by his death and his life - each meeting demands of the law. I think the crux of the difference we have is that you see things as being primarily a legal problem. I see the problem as having to do with the underlying realities involved. Any legal matter would simply be a recognition of the underlying reality; iow, the law creates no new requirements. No human being would have been saved without Jesus Christ. So all human beings, whether babies or not, have an equal and total need for a Savior. I should clarify that my objection is not necessarily with the idea that human nature is condemned. Waggoner speaks about this in referring Gal. 4:4 to Christ's taking our human nature. My objection to Rosangela's points have been that she has babies being genetically different than Christ. The argument regarding human nature goes like this: a)Babies are condemned because they have a sinful nature. b)Christ was not condemned. c)Therefore Christ did not have a sinful nature. She's also not recognizing Christ's role in restoring the human race to favor with God. You should be on the same page with me on this. Babies would have been condemned (as we all) apart from Christ, but Christ restored the entire race to favor with God, which includes babies.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99383
05/15/08 09:29 PM
05/15/08 09:29 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Rosangela, the problem, as I see it, with substituting words in the way you have suggested is that it doesn't reflect the obvious meaning of the original sentence construction. For example, the word "flesh" refers to the carnal lusts and affections. According to the Bible and the SOP, the lusts and affections that war against the Spirit and mind of the new man do not constitute sinning. Yes, they are sinful, but God does not count us guilty of sinning. Which is why she wrote - "the flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God." Where specifically do the Bible and Ellen White say that carnal lusts and affections do not constitute sinning? I think the way you substitute words does not reflect the obvious meaning of the original sense. You said that “the ‘flesh’ in this context refers to the animal propensities.” So, the phrase would read: “Animal propensities, of themselves, cannot act contrary to the will of God”. Obviously you cannot use the verb “act” in reference to “propensities”. Propensities cannot “act,” while the body can “act.” You also said that “the word ‘flesh’ refers to the carnal lusts and affections.” The same would apply here. Carnal lusts and affections cannot “act.” Besides, the word “lust” already implies participation in sin, which is clear from the quotes below: “Many regard this text as a warning against licentiousness only; but it has a broader meaning. It forbids every injurious gratification of appetite or passion. Every perverted appetite becomes a warring lust. Appetite was given us for a good purpose, not to become the minister of death by being perverted, and thus degenerating into ‘lusts, which war against the soul.’” Peter's admonition is a most direct and forcible warning against the use of all stimulants and narcotics. These indulgences may well be classed among the lusts that exert a pernicious influence upon moral character.” {Mar 81.1} “He names some of the forms of fleshly lusts,--‘idolatry, drunkenness, and such like.’ And after mentioning the fruits of the Spirit, among which is temperance, he adds, ‘And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh, with the affections and lusts.’” {HR, November 1, 1882 par. 13} With this in mind, you are asking us to consider an interpretation which forces us to conclude - The higher powers are to be subjected to the higher powers. Huh? The text just means that the physical powers (the body) are to be subjected to the higher powers (the mind). Are you saying we are born again with our old man mind in tact, that Jesus dwells upon a throne that is divided? If flesh mind is dead, how, then, can it continue to tempt us from within? Are we born again with two hearts, with two minds, with both the mind/heart of the old man and the new man? What? There is no “flesh mind,” there is a “carnal mind,” or “carnal nature,” which is self and its tendencies. It may be said, at conversion, that self is slain, crucified or subdued, but this certainly does not mean it will not try to reassert itself. (Obs. Self, Carnal nature, carnal mind and carnal heart are all synonyms.) The carnal heart must be crucified; for its tendency is to moral corruption, and the end thereof is death. {AG 312.5} But Jesus says, "my grace is sufficient for you." Yes it is sufficient to overcome and subdue the "natural," carnal, heart. {YI, November 1, 1857 par. 7} Many are filled with self-importance, and esteem themselves above their brethren. Such should let self die; let the carnal mind be crucified. {BTS, August 1, 1912 par. 6} They are sold under sin and must die to the carnal mind. Self must be slain. {3T 475.1} But as, when in actual conflict, he contends for the mastery, overcomes his antagonist by repeated and well-directed blows, beats him to the ground, and holds him there till he acknowledges himself conquered, so did the apostle [Paul] fight against the temptations of Satan and the evil propensities of the carnal nature. {LP 167.2} “ Self--the old disobedient nature--must be crucified, and Christ must take up His abode in the heart. Thus the human agent is born again, with a new nature.” {ST, July 26, 1905 par. 6}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Tom]
#99384
05/15/08 09:36 PM
05/15/08 09:36 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
T: I agree with this, except for the "born" part. R: This exactly is the crux of the disagreement. T: True. I believe Christ was genetically like we are. My point is not that you are making Christ like us, but that you trying to make us like Christ. You are trying to say that we were not born as enemies of God and His law, with a carnal mind, partakers of the satanic nature, but you are trying to smooth man's condition in order to put Christ and us on the same level. Before you said passions and appetites are in the flesh, so you must mean that some passions are in the flesh and some in the heart I guess. Sure. There are physical passions (which are not sinful in themselves), and sinful passions.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99385
05/15/08 09:48 PM
05/15/08 09:48 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Having a special power would include not having internal foes, right? When we speak of a special power, we mean a special power to overcome temptation. But I believe you previously agreed that not having tendencies to sin does not represent an advantage in relation to temptation. Or did I misunderstand you? No, the carnal mind must die; otherwise, we cannot experience the miracle of rebirth. Sure. Self must die. Does this mean we will never have problems with self again? The same applies to the carnal mind. Both are synonyms. It should be obvious, therefore, that our internal foes "have their seat in the body and work through it." What Ellen White refers to as having their seat in the body are the lower passions – emotion and appetite (drink, food, sex). Take a look here: http://www.essortment.com/all/platotheory_reym.htm Guys, I’ll be traveling this weekend. The Lord willing, I’ll see you on Monday.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Rosangela]
#99386
05/15/08 10:17 PM
05/15/08 10:17 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
My point is not that you are making Christ like us, but that you trying to make us like Christ. You are trying to say that we were not born as enemies of God and His law, with a carnal mind, partakers of the satanic nature, but you are trying to smooth man's condition in order to put Christ and us on the same level. No, I'm not. I'm simply saying the same thing all SDA's said until recently, which was that Christ took our fallen nature with all its inclinations. Christ was divine, equal with the Father. We will never be on His level. However, Christ humbled Himself and became a man, going to the lowest level of Jacob's ladder, a ladder which could not fail by a single rung without our being lost, to reach us. You interpretation requires you to take a position contrary to what science teaches regarding genetics, and to disregard the testimony of EGW's colleagues. I think these are serious problems.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Tom]
#99387
05/15/08 10:18 PM
05/15/08 10:18 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
(Rosangela)Sure. Self must die. Does this mean we will never have problems with self again? The same applies to the carnal mind. Both are synonyms. You are saying that "self" and the "carnal mind" are synonyms?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Tom]
#99389
05/16/08 12:35 AM
05/16/08 12:35 AM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Tom, what do you think? Are self, flesh, and the carnal mind separate aspects of human nature? The following insights seem to use them interchangeably:
We are commanded to crucify the flesh, with the affections and lusts. {AH 127.2}
We must crucify self with the lusts thereof. We must cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. {1T 440.1}
Have you crucified self, with the affections and lusts? {ML 369.2}
You have not felt the positive necessity of training your mind, nor of crucifying in yourself the old man with the affections and lusts. {3T 240.4}
[They] would see that they are sold under sin and must die to the carnal mind. Self must be slain. {3T 475.1}
You are bound by your baptismal vows to honor your Creator and to resolutely deny self and crucify your affections and lusts, and bring even your thoughts into obedience to the will of Christ. {3T 45.1}
If self has really been crucified, with the affections and lusts, the fruit will appear in good works to the glory of God. {5T 650.2}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #3 - The Reality of His HUMANITY
[Re: Rosangela]
#99390
05/16/08 01:02 AM
05/16/08 01:02 AM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Rosangela, the problem, as I see it, with substituting words in the way you have suggested is that it doesn't reflect the obvious meaning of the original sentence construction. For example, the word "flesh" refers to the carnal lusts and affections. According to the Bible and the SOP, the lusts and affections that war against the Spirit and mind of the new man do not constitute sinning. Yes, they are sinful, but God does not count us guilty of sinning. Which is why she wrote - "the flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God." Where specifically do the Bible and Ellen White say that carnal lusts and affections do not constitute sinning? I think the way you substitute words does not reflect the obvious meaning of the original sense. You said that “the ‘flesh’ in this context refers to the animal propensities.” So, the phrase would read: “Animal propensities, of themselves, cannot act contrary to the will of God”. Obviously you cannot use the verb “act” in reference to “propensities”. Propensities cannot “act,” while the body can “act.” You also said that “the word ‘flesh’ refers to the carnal lusts and affections.” The same would apply here. Carnal lusts and affections cannot “act.” Besides, the word “lust” already implies participation in sin, which is clear from the quotes below: “Many regard this text as a warning against licentiousness only; but it has a broader meaning. It forbids every injurious gratification of appetite or passion. Every perverted appetite becomes a warring lust. Appetite was given us for a good purpose, not to become the minister of death by being perverted, and thus degenerating into ‘lusts, which war against the soul.’” Peter's admonition is a most direct and forcible warning against the use of all stimulants and narcotics. These indulgences may well be classed among the lusts that exert a pernicious influence upon moral character.” {Mar 81.1} “He names some of the forms of fleshly lusts,--‘idolatry, drunkenness, and such like.’ And after mentioning the fruits of the Spirit, among which is temperance, he adds, ‘And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh, with the affections and lusts.’” {HR, November 1, 1882 par. 13} With this in mind, you are asking us to consider an interpretation which forces us to conclude - The higher powers are to be subjected to the higher powers. Huh? The text just means that the physical powers (the body) are to be subjected to the higher powers (the mind). Are you saying we are born again with our old man mind in tact, that Jesus dwells upon a throne that is divided? If flesh mind is dead, how, then, can it continue to tempt us from within? Are we born again with two hearts, with two minds, with both the mind/heart of the old man and the new man? What? There is no “flesh mind,” there is a “carnal mind,” or “carnal nature,” which is self and its tendencies. It may be said, at conversion, that self is slain, crucified or subdued, but this certainly does not mean it will not try to reassert itself. (Obs. Self, Carnal nature, carnal mind and carnal heart are all synonyms.) The carnal heart must be crucified; for its tendency is to moral corruption, and the end thereof is death. {AG 312.5} But Jesus says, "my grace is sufficient for you." Yes it is sufficient to overcome and subdue the "natural," carnal, heart. {YI, November 1, 1857 par. 7} Many are filled with self-importance, and esteem themselves above their brethren. Such should let self die; let the carnal mind be crucified. {BTS, August 1, 1912 par. 6} They are sold under sin and must die to the carnal mind. Self must be slain. {3T 475.1} But as, when in actual conflict, he contends for the mastery, overcomes his antagonist by repeated and well-directed blows, beats him to the ground, and holds him there till he acknowledges himself conquered, so did the apostle [Paul] fight against the temptations of Satan and the evil propensities of the carnal nature. {LP 167.2} “ Self--the old disobedient nature--must be crucified, and Christ must take up His abode in the heart. Thus the human agent is born again, with a new nature.” {ST, July 26, 1905 par. 6} Rosangela, how can we say self is dead with one breath, and with the next breath say self tries to reassert itself? Is self dead or alive? It cannot be both, right? It makes more sense, to me, to say there is an aspect of human nature that dies when we are born again and an aspect that lives on afterwards. "We need not retain one sinful propensity." {FLB 23.4} This applies to propensities that result from cultivating sinful traits of character. This aspect of human nature dies when we are born again. This is self, the mind of the old man. "Evil propensities are to be controlled." {CG 42.1} This applies to inherited propensities. This aspect of human nature lives on after we are born again. They will continue to strive for the mastery until Jesus returns and eliminates them. This is sinful flesh.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|