Forums118
Topics9,232
Posts196,198
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Kevin H, 2 invisible),
2,759
guests, and 7
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99476
05/18/08 08:39 PM
05/18/08 08:39 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
MM: Tom, you still haven't cited evidence that Jesus revealed all we need to know about God while He was here in the flesh. Citing what He said about the future destruction of Jerusalem does not cut it. Besides, His description of that event was minimal, neither did it include an explanation of how God punishes and destroys impenitent sinners. You are relying on Sister White to fill in the details. No where in the Bible, or in the words of Jesus, are these details described.
Originally you asked me to prove from Jesus' own actions what I've been sharing about the wrath of God. But Jesus did not come here to explain or demonstrate everything there is to know about God. So, not even you can prove your theory based solely on what Jesus did, or even on what He said about it. We are both indebted to the rest of the Bible and the SOP to understand, as much as it is possible, how and why God punishes and destroys sinners.
TE: I've never met anyone more dependent upon the SOP than you. When I ask you to cite somewhere in Scripture to support some viewpoint that you have, more times than not you site the SOP. When I point out that this is not Scripture, you complain. You say, "You don't believe that what Sister White wrote is in harmony with Scripture?"
You're completely using a double standard here. One for yourself, and another for others. If you wish to have a discussion based only on Scripture, you can open a thread for that, and we can do so. But to be as highly dependent upon the SOP as you are, and then complain when someone cites her to you, is completely unreasonable. Again, you're free to believe what you wish. There's no way I can prove to you something is true that you do not wish to believe. We are told that "All that man needs to know or can know of God has been revealed in the life and character of His Son." I believe this is true. I believe her also when she writes that the "whole purpose" of Christ's mission was "the revelation of God." Tom, instead of chastising me for asking you to do what you have asked me to do, namely, to prove solely from the life Jesus lived the truth about the wrath and vengeance of God, why not just cite a legitimate example? In fact, you can even quote from the SOP. Again, here’s the question - Where in the Bible or the SOP does it say Jesus, while here in the flesh, withdrew His protection and allowed evil angels to punish and destroy impenitent sinners? By the way, I have no problem believing what Sister White wrote in 8T. Here it is again, in its original context: 8T 285, 286 Man cannot by searching find out God. Let none seek with presumptuous hand to lift the veil that conceals His glory. "Unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out!" Romans 11:33. It is a proof of His mercy that there is the hiding of His power; for to lift the veil that conceals the divine presence is death. No mortal mind can penetrate the secrecy in which the Mighty One dwells and works. Only that which He sees fit to reveal can we comprehend of Him. Reason must acknowledge an authority superior to itself. Heart and intellect must bow to the great I AM. {8T 285.2}
All that man needs to know or can know of God has been revealed in the life and character of His Son. {8T 286.1}
"No man hath seen God at any time; the only-begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him." John 1:18. {8T 286.2}
Taking humanity upon Him, Christ came to be one with humanity and at the same time to reveal our heavenly Father to sinful human beings. He was in all things made like unto His brethren. He became flesh, even as we are. He was hungry and thirsty and weary. He was sustained by food and refreshed by sleep. He shared the lot of men, and yet He was the blameless Son of God. He was a stranger and sojourner on the earth--in the world, but not of the world; tempted and tried as men and women today are tempted and tried, yet living a life free from sin. {8T 286.3} Let’s break it down: 1. “Man cannot by searching find out God.” This is clear, right? We cannot find out everything there is to know about God by searching. Here is what she wrote about it elsewhere: ED 169 No finite mind can fully comprehend the character or the works of the Infinite One. We cannot by searching find out God. To minds the strongest and most highly cultured, as well as to the weakest and most ignorant, that holy Being must remain clothed in mystery. But though "clouds and darkness are round about Him: righteousness and judgment are the foundation of His throne." Psalm 97:2, R.V. We can so far comprehend His dealing with us as to discern boundless mercy united to infinite power. We can understand as much of His purposes as we are capable of comprehending; beyond this we may still trust the hand that is omnipotent, the heart that is full of love. {Ed 169.1}
GC 527 Yet the finite minds of men are inadequate fully to comprehend the plans and purposes of the Infinite One. We can never by searching find out God. We must not attempt to lift with presumptuous hand the curtain behind which He veils His majesty. The apostle exclaims: "How unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out!" Romans 11:33. We can so far comprehend His dealings with us, and the motives by which He is actuated, that we may discern boundless love and mercy united to infinite power. Our Father in heaven orders everything in wisdom and righteousness, and we are not to be dissatisfied and distrustful, but to bow in reverent submission. He will reveal to us as much of His purposes as it is for our good to know, and beyond that we must trust the Hand that is omnipotent, the Heart that is full of love. {GC 527.1}
MM 95 Human talents and human conjecture have tried by searching to find out God. Many have trodden this pathway. The highest intellect may tax itself until it is wearied out, in conjectures regarding God, but the effort will be fruitless, and the fact will remain that man by searching cannot find out God. This problem has not been given us to solve. All that man needs to know and can know of God has been revealed in the life and character of His Son, the Great Teacher. As we learn more and more of what man is, of what we ourselves are, in God's sight, we shall fear and tremble before Him. {MM 95.2} 2. “Let none seek with presumptuous hand to lift the veil that conceals His glory.” According to you the expression, the glory of God, always and only refers to His character. Thus, contrary to what you’ve been saying, here she is saying it would be presumptuous to think we can understand His glory, His character. And yet, it is essential to our salvation to reproduce the character of Christ. The GC depends on God perfecting and translating His people. Perhaps there is more to the expression, the glory of God, than you have been insisting? 3. "Unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out!" Romans 11:33. It is a proof of His mercy that there is the hiding of His power; for to lift the veil that conceals the divine presence is death.” Here she is saying God in mercy hides His power. His divine presence kills. Obviously Jesus didn’t reveal this aspect of God while here in the flesh, right? If not, please cite an example of Jesus, while here in the flesh, causing someone to die by revealing the divine presence. 4. “No mortal mind can penetrate the secrecy in which the Mighty One dwells and works. Only that which He sees fit to reveal can we comprehend of Him. Reason must acknowledge an authority superior to itself. Heart and intellect must bow to the great I AM.” Again, here she is saying we can only comprehend what God has revealed. We must admit that we lack the intellectual powers to understand everything there is to know about Him.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99477
05/18/08 09:31 PM
05/18/08 09:31 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Regarding the fire that went out from the Lord, God is often attributed as doing that which He permits. So, are you attributing the judgment of God to Satan, that God permitted Satan to punish and destroy Nadab and Abihu with fire? If not, to whom or what do you attribute the fire that killed Aaron’s sons? Leviticus 10:1 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not. 10:2 And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD. 1.I've already commented on Korah. Who said anything about Korah? 2.Regarding holy and Satanic angels: “The above two quotes demonstrate that both evil angels and holy angels will be at work during the outpouring of the 7LPs.”
Yes, they are both at work, but not doing the same thing! They are not going along together hand in hand wreaking destruction upon the wicked. I agree. They are not doing the same work. Holy angels will pour out the 7LPs; whereas, evil angels will have control over the fierce winds of human passion. “[1] In the mad strife of their own fierce passions, and by [2] the awful outpouring of God's unmingled wrath, fall the wicked inhabitants of the earth … {GC 656.3} 3.Regarding the following: “Tom, your view assumes Satan cooperates with God to do things that are calculated to lead people to “tremble before His power and to confess His just sovereignty.” Why would Satan do such a thing?”
Satan doesn't do what he does for this purpose, but this is the purpose it has, because God is able to work the things which Satan does for His purposes. Satan's purpose is to destroy, and then blame God for it, as explained here: “Their sufferings are often represented as a punishment visited upon them by the direct decree of God. It is thus that the great deceiver seeks to conceal his own work.(GC 36)
But God works Satan's destructive acts to His purpose, which is to demonstrate the righteousness of His law. What? Are you suggesting God is dependant upon Satan acting like a demon, when He gives him permission to destroy sinners, in order to demonstrate the righteousness of the law? What if Satan doesn’t do what God expects him to do? Besides, what does God expect him to do? If God expects Satan to destroy sinners, when He withdraws His protection, how is God less culpable than the Devil? Would it totally mess up God's plan if Satan didn't punish and destroy them? 4.Regarding the volcano that destroyed the cities on the plain, she wrote, "Suddenly and unexpectedly as would be a thunder peal from an unclouded sky, the tempest broke." This simply says what happened was unexpected. She's not saying that God worked magic to make fire and brimstone appear from nothing to destroy these cities. Then where was this fire before it rained down upon them? If you answer, In a nearby volcano or some other terrestrial source, then please post inspired quotes to support such a theory. Thank you. 5.Regarding why Satan would wreak havoc upon the Egyptians, it's for the same reason described in GC 36. He wants people to fear God rather than love Him. So when God withdraws His Spirit, Satan takes action and seeks to conceal his own actions by blaming what he does upon God. This still happens today. When things like Katrina happen, people blame God. Basically Satan wants to make God look bad. What? Are you suggesting God gave Satan permission to manipulate the forces of nature to cause the 10 plagues of Egypt so that Satan could blame it on God? That doesn’t make sense to me. If God did indeed give Satan permission, he wouldn’t be lying for giving God the credit, right? Besides, why would Satan try to make it look like, by imitating the first three plagues, that the false gods are just as capable of making plagues happen as the true God? If it was his purpose to make God look bad, why did he try so hard make it look like Moses was relying on magic rather than on God? And, what about the fact that both the Bible and the SOP make it clear that God intended to flex His power and might, that He intended to put the fear of God in their hearts? Are all those statements just another obscure and distorted way of saying – The Devil did it? Why does Inspiration work so hard to say, "And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it."
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99483
05/18/08 10:34 PM
05/18/08 10:34 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I'll try to explain in terms of general principles what I believe.
God's active work is required in order to keep us in good health. God operates in terms of keeping our bodies functioning properly, heavenly bodies functioning properly, and our earth functioning properly. Nature is not self-acting. If God withdraws from His supervisory activity, then chaos results.
Imagine you were to force the pilot of a 747 to jump from the plane, and you were the only one left on the plane. What would happen? If you don't know how to fly, the plane would crash. We need God to fly the plane. But it is possible for us to force God from our lives, and if we do so, chaos will result.
In addition to God's active supervisory role over nature, God also protects us from the activities of evil angels. If He withdraws from this protection of evil angels, bad things can happen as well.
Whenever something bad happens, it must be the case that God has withdrawn in some way. We see this principle in the case of Jesus Christ, when He had to withdraw in order for Lazarus to die.
Now this doesn't mean anytime something bad happens, this is because some person has done something bad to deserve it. That's what the book of Job was about, to show this isn't necessarily the case. We live in a world of sin, and injustice abounds. Wicked people prosper and the righteous suffer.
One other principle to mention is that inspiration often attributes to God that which He permits. So, for example, God is said to have sent fiery serpents upon the Israelites, when what really happened is the serpents were there all along, but God withdrew His protection from them.
We are told that force is not a part of God's government, and that God does not use compelling power to force the conscience. But your understanding of the Egyptian plagues would be exactly this; God's applying more and more force until He finally got His way. It would be the poster child for this idea. One could not imagine a more perfect example of using compelling power to get one's way that this.
If we wish to understand what God is really like, we have but to look to Jesus Christ. How God thinks of sin, and how God treats sinners, is perfectly revealed in Christ. When Christ was urged to destroy those who had rejected Him, what did He do? Did He accede to the request to have fire come down from heaven to destroy them? No; He simply departed and went to another village.
There are thousands of dangers that God continually protects us from, of which we don't know. It is only because of God's grace and loving protection that this world is not in a worse mess than it already is in. When God withdraws His spirit at the end of time, then all hell will break loose on earth, and the result of choosing Satan as one's master will be fully revealed. Until then, it's only partially revealed.
Well, this is a summary of the principles I see involved in understanding the questions you have asked.
I understand you see things differently. You believe that something Satan destroys and sometimes God destroys. We can't know whether it is God acting or Satan acting unless God tells us.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Tom]
#99509
05/21/08 02:50 PM
05/21/08 02:50 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Tom, as you have already mentioned, I totally agree God works to prevent certain things from happening. He prevents nature from imploding on itself and killing us in the process. He prevents evil angels from killing us by holding them in check. He prevents us from killing ourselves by keeping us in check. Where we differ, though, is I see God using divine force and power to prevent these things from happening.
God must exercise His divine force and power to keep chaos in check; otherwise, things will come unglued and people would die. In a court of law, He would be found guilty of murder if He chose not prevent these things from happening. If it is within someones power to prevent something from happening, and people die as a result of that person not working to prevent it, then they are an accomplice to murder, they are guilty of negligence because they had a duty to act to prevent it.
It really doesn't matter then, you see, if God causes things to happen that result in people dying or if He simply stops preventing it from happening. Either way He is culpable. It is within His power to prevent it, therefore, He has a duty to act. He if choses not to act to prevent it, then He is guilty of being an accomplice to murder. For example, if a doctor arrives at a accident scene and choses not to use his life saving skills to prevent someone from dying, then he is guilty of murder if they end up dying.
Another example is, if a dam is about to break and it is within the dam operators power to prevent it, he is guilt of murder if the towns folk die in the flood that result because he chose not to prevent it. This is similar to the Flood that killed the antediluvians, right?
Another example is, if an off duty cop is aware of a plot to kill the mayor, and he does nothing to prevent it, he is guilty of murder if they succeed in killing the mayor. This is similar to the Roman slaughter of Jews at Jerusalem in 70 AD, right?
Another example is, if a man warns an unarmed house thief by telling him, Sir, I mean thee no harm, but I am about to shoot where thou standest, and then he pulls the trigger and the thief dies, he is guilty of killing him. This is similar to earth opening up and killing Korah and his band, right?
But this doesn't answer or address every situation in the Bible where God was involved in the death of sinners. In particular, the fire that came from God out of the tabernacle and killed Nadab and Abihu. This fire cannot be explained in terms of natural law. That is, it didn't exist naturally in the immediate environment. Sure there were candles burning in the tabernacle, but no one would believe they generated enough heat for God to channel like a flame thrower to kill the two boys of Aaron.
Tell me, Tom, do you attribute this act of judgment to Satan?
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99510
05/21/08 02:53 PM
05/21/08 02:53 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
PS - Tom, you didn't answer the questions I asked in #99477 (a few posts above). Please take the time, when you get a chance, to address the specific points I raised. Thank you.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99518
05/21/08 08:41 PM
05/21/08 08:41 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
It really doesn't matter then, you see, if God causes things to happen that result in people dying or if He simply stops preventing it from happening. It makes all the difference in the world. Either way He is culpable. This is not correct. One way He is, the other way He isn't. This is why Satan is so anxious we don't think of things in terms of the way wherein God is not culpable. It is within His power to prevent it, therefore, He has a duty to act. Not if acting requires Him to act contrary to our free will. This gets into the whole Catch 22 Satan was trying to put God into. Satan created a whole new way of looking at things, a new paradigm. In Satan's new way, self is king. Force is a principle of this new way, and the ends justifies the means is another underlying principle. A problem that God faces is that Satan attempts to paint all of God's actions in a negative way, as if there were a selfish motivation to it, or an element of force or violence, or the ends justifying the means. Satan is very clever with this, so the only way that God could make clear who was telling the truth and who wasn't was to allow Satan's kingdom to fully develop its principles. Acting as you are suggesting God should act would not have allowed this to take place, and the universe would be no nearer to overcoming the sin problem. Another example is, if a dam is about to break and it is within the dam operators power to prevent it, he is guilt of murder if the towns folk die in the flood that result because he chose not to prevent it. This is similar to the Flood that killed the antediluvians, right? It would be more similar if in the example of the dam, the towns folk did everything in their power to make the dam operators leave, and finally forced them out, thus bringing destruction upon themselves. Tell me, Tom, do you attribute this act of judgment to Satan? Indirectly all death is attributed to Satan. Satan is the author of sin and all its results, including death. Directly I would attribute it to the two who were killed. I'm not going to get involved in dealing with a possible explanation to every act of violence the Bible attributes to God. From the principles I enunciated, one can easily come up with possible scenarios. I'll discuss the principles involved with you, however.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Tom]
#99526
05/22/08 03:11 PM
05/22/08 03:11 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
Tom, you believe God commissions holy angels to keep in check the fierce winds of human passions so as not to cause the great time of trouble prematurely, right? If so, then you believe God uses compelling force to prevent things from happening.
PP 401 Jesus, the Angel who went before the Hebrews, sought to save them from destruction. Forgiveness was lingering for them. The judgment of God had come very near, and appealed to them to repent. A special, irresistible interference from heaven had arrested their rebellion. Now, if they would respond to the interposition of God's providence, they might be saved. But while they fled from the judgments, through fear of destruction, their rebellion was not cured. They returned to their tents that night terrified, but not repentant. {PP 401.3}
God sometimes uses compelling force when it suits His purposes. Lot was first forcibly dragged into the house, and then later on he was forcibly dragged out of Sodom by the hand.
Genesis 19:10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door. 19:11 And they smote the men that [were] at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door. 19:15 And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, Arise, take thy wife, and thy two daughters, which are here; lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city. 19:16 And while he lingered, the men laid hold upon his hand, and upon the hand of his wife, and upon the hand of his two daughters; the LORD being merciful unto him: and they brought him forth, and set him without the city.
AA 357 In the upbuilding of His work the Lord does not always make everything plain before His servants. He sometimes tries the confidence of His people by bringing about circumstances which compel them to move forward in faith. {AA 357.2}
9T 115 The compassionate Redeemer bids His servants give to rich and poor the call to the supper. Go out into the highways and the hedges, and by your persevering, determined efforts, compel them to come in. Let ministers of the gospel take hold of these worldly moneyed men and bring them to the banquet of truth that Christ has prepared for them. He who gave His precious life for them says: "Bring them in, and seat them at My table, and I will serve them." {9T 115.1}
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99530
05/22/08 04:00 PM
05/22/08 04:00 PM
|
OP
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
MM: Another example is, if a dam is about to break and it is within the dam operators power to prevent it, he is guilt of murder if the towns folk die in the flood that result because he chose not to prevent it. This is similar to the Flood that killed the antediluvians, right?
TE: It would be more similar if in the example of the dam, the towns folk did everything in their power to make the dam operators leave, and finally forced them out, thus bringing destruction upon themselves. But your modification of my example destroys the point I am trying to make, namely, the flood occurred because the dam operator chose not to prevent it. This is what you've been saying about God. You believe God is unnaturally preventing nature from imploding upon itself and killing us in the process. This is in opposition to the idea that God employs the forces of nature to cause the devastation that punishes and destroys sinners. Leviticus 10:1 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not. 10:2 And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.
MM: Tell me, Tom, do you attribute this act of judgment to Satan?
TE: Indirectly all death is attributed to Satan. Satan is the author of sin and all its results, including death. Directly I would attribute it to the two who were killed. I'm not going to get involved in dealing with a possible explanation to every act of violence the Bible attributes to God. From the principles I enunciated, one can easily come up with possible scenarios. I'll discuss the principles involved with you, however. So, yes, you do attribute the judgment by fire that befell Nadab and Abihu to Satan. In other words, do you believe Satan somehow caused the fire that killed them? Or, do you believe circumstances forced God to stop preventing the fire from killing them, that He withdrew His protection and allowed nature to run its natural course? Please bear in mind the fact that on another occasion God was forced to destroy 14,000 Jews because they attributed His fiery judgments to Satan. It is described in the following passages: Leviticus 16:31 And it came to pass, as he had made an end of speaking all these words, that the ground clave asunder that [was] under them: 16:32 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that [appertained] unto Korah, and all [their] goods. 16:33 They, and all that [appertained] to them, went down alive into the pit, and the earth closed upon them: and they perished from among the congregation. 16:34 And all Israel that [were] round about them fled at the cry of them: for they said, Lest the earth swallow us up [also]. 16:35 And there came out a fire from the LORD, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that offered incense. 16:44 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 16:45 Get you up from among this congregation, that I may consume them as in a moment. And they fell upon their faces. 16:46 And Moses said unto Aaron, Take a censer, and put fire therein from off the altar, and put on incense, and go quickly unto the congregation, and make an atonement for them: for there is wrath gone out from the LORD; the plague is begun. 16:47 And Aaron took as Moses commanded, and ran into the midst of the congregation; and, behold, the plague was begun among the people: and he put on incense, and made an atonement for the people. 16:48 And he stood between the dead and the living; and the plague was stayed. 16:49 Now they that died in the plague were fourteen thousand and seven hundred, beside them that died about the matter of Korah. 16:50 And Aaron returned unto Moses unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation: and the plague was stayed.
PP 400 & 404 In the name of the God of Israel, Moses now declared, in the hearing of the congregation: "Hereby ye shall know that the Lord hath sent me to do all these works; for I have not done them of mine own mind. If these men die the common death of all men, or if they be visited after the visitation of all men, then the Lord hath not sent me. But if the Lord make a new thing, and the earth open her mouth, and swallow them up, with all that appertain unto them, and they go down quick into the pit, then ye shall understand that these men have provoked the Lord." {PP 400.4}
The eyes of all Israel were fixed upon Moses as they stood, in terror and expectation, awaiting the event. As he ceased speaking, the solid earth parted, and the rebels went down alive into the pit, with all that pertained to them, and "they perished from among the congregation." The people fled, self-condemned as partakers in the sin. {PP 400.5}
But the judgments were not ended. Fire flashing from the cloud consumed the two hundred and fifty princes who had offered incense. These men, not being the first in rebellion, were not destroyed with the chief conspirators. They were permitted to see their end, and to have an opportunity for repentance; but their sympathies were with the rebels, and they shared their fate. {PP 401.1}
Korah would not have taken the course he did had he known that all the directions and reproofs communicated to Israel were from God. But he might have known this. God had given overwhelming evidence that He was leading Israel. But Korah and his companions rejected light until they became so blinded that the most striking manifestations of His power were not sufficient to convince them; they attributed them all to human or satanic agency. The same thing was done by the people, who the day after the destruction of Korah and his company came to Moses and Aaron, saying, "Ye have killed the people of the Lord." Notwithstanding they had had the most convincing evidence of God's displeasure at their course, in the destruction of the men who had deceived them, they dared to attribute His judgments to Satan, declaring that through the power of the evil one, Moses and Aaron had caused the death of good and holy men. It was this act that sealed their doom. They had committed the sin against the Holy Spirit, a sin by which man's heart is effectually hardened against the influence of divine grace. "Whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man," said Christ, "it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him." Matthew 12:32. These words were spoken by our Saviour when the gracious works which He had performed through the power of God were attributed by the Jews to Beelzebub. It is through the agency of the Holy Spirit that God communicates with man; and those who deliberately reject this agency as satanic, have cut off the channel of communication between the soul and Heaven. {PP 404.4} PP 402 A manifestation of the divine glory was seen in the cloud above the tabernacle, and a voice from the cloud spoke to Moses and Aaron, "Get you up from among this congregation, that I may consume them as in a moment." {PP 402.3} The fire that killed the 250 priests came from divine glory within the cloud above the tabernacle. " Fire flashing from the cloud consumed the two hundred and fifty princes who had offered incense." This is the origin or source of the fire that killed the 250 priests. In other words, the fire came from the divine glory within the cloud above the tabernacle. With this in mind, please consider the following insight: "Notwithstanding they had had the most convincing evidence of God's displeasure at their course, in the destruction of the men who had deceived them, they dared to attribute His judgments to Satan, declaring that through the power of the evil one, Moses and Aaron had caused the death of good and holy men. It was this act that sealed their doom." In other words, God punished and destroyed 14,000 Jews because they "dared to attribute" to Satan the judgments of God that befell 1) Korah and his conspirators, and 2) the 250 priests who were consumed by fire.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Mountain Man]
#99541
05/22/08 09:32 PM
05/22/08 09:32 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
But your modification of my example destroys the point I am trying to make, namely, the flood occurred because the dam operator chose not to prevent it. This is what you've been saying about God. You believe God is unnaturally preventing nature from imploding upon itself and killing us in the process. "Unnaturally"? I'm not sure why you put in this word. "Imploding upon itself" I suppose is possible. These aren't words I've used. I would put it this way. God oversees nature and nature is not self-acting. Should God withdraw from His supervisory capacity, chaos results. This is in opposition to the idea that God employs the forces of nature to cause the devastation that punishes and destroys sinners. It would depend on what was meant. For example, Scripture says that "God killed Saul." It says that God sent fiery serpents upon the Israelites. There are many examples like this where God is said to have done what He permits. So if by the words "God employs the forces of nature to punish" what Scripture says when it says that "God killed Saul" or "God sent fiery serpents upon the Israelites," this it is not in opposition to this. I'm trying to clarify this because both Scripture and the SOP use language similar to what you are asking about. If you're talking about conceptually what happens, in language that we normally use (as opposed to language we find in Scripture, where God is presented as doing that which He permits), then I agree. God destroys and punishes as described in GC chapter 1 and 14 MR 3. For example: God does not stand toward the sinner as an executioner of the sentence against transgression; but He leaves the rejectors of His mercy to themselves, to reap that which they have sown. Every ray of light rejected, every warning despised or unheeded, every passion indulged, every transgression of the law of God, is a seed sown which yields its unfailing harvest. The Spirit of God, persistently resisted, is at last withdrawn from the sinner, and then there is left no power to control the evil passions of the soul, and no protection from the malice and enmity of Satan. (GC 36) This is a general principle. It's not that sometimes God destroys this way, sometimes He destroys that way, He doesn't care, as long as the sinner is destroyed. The general principle is that God warns us to walk along a certain path, that to deviate from that path is dangerous. There are many reasons why deviating from the path could be dangerous. It could be because it opens one up to devastation from Satan and his confederates, it could be because of devastation from fellow human beings, it could be from animals or from natural disasters, or disease; there are all sorts of disasters that can come upon us. God warns us to walk along the path of life, which is the path of love, and to stay away from the path of death, which is the path of self.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: What does it mean - The wrath and vengeance of "an offfended God"?
[Re: Tom]
#99542
05/22/08 09:39 PM
05/22/08 09:39 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Notwithstanding they had had the most convincing evidence of God's displeasure at their course, in the destruction of the men who had deceived them, they dared to attribute His judgments to Satan, declaring that through the power of the evil one, Moses and Aaron had caused the death of good and holy men. It was this act that sealed their doom. The idea that Moses killed these men by using the powers of Satan is certainly a wicked thought. Tom, you believe God commissions holy angels to keep in check the fierce winds of human passions so as not to cause the great time of trouble prematurely, right? If so, then you believe God uses compelling force to prevent things from happening. "Compelling force" has to do with using force to get your own way. God uses "preventative force" to prevent things from happening. If a house is on fire, and one goes and grabs a person to save the person from the fire, that's not an example of compelling force. If someone holds a gun to your head, and commands you to do something, that's an example of compelling force. Compelling force can be tricky, because Satan is so good at misrepresenting God, both in terms of actions and motives. This is a large part of the reason that God was "compelled" to allow evil to continue, so that it's true purposes could be made clear.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|